The Fuel Project “Know Your Enemy” – Republics And “Science Dictatorships”

Republics 

The alternative to monarchies was secular republics where Church and State were completely separated. What kind of Republics were these enlightened individuals after? What would the new system look like in this brave new secular world they were trying to create? The foundation of their ideas can actually be found in the works of the classical Greek philosopher, Plato (428/427 – 348/347 BC). Plato’s beliefs in turn were based on the Kabbalah (Jewish) form of the Mysteries as handed down through the Persians and his predecessor, Pythagoras. Plato’s most famous book is in fact called The Republic and in this and his other works he has much to say on how a society should be run.

Plato believed that society should be divided into a hierarchy of three levels; the ruling elite (philosopher kings or guardians), the Auxiliaries (soldiers, police and civil servants to keep everyone in check) and the Workers (the rest of us; the masses). Plato believed that the average individual was incapable of running his own life and that they should therefore submit unquestioningly to the ruling elite who, because of their superior knowledge, would direct their lives for the greater good. He wrote,

“… And even in the smallest manner … [one] should stand under leadership. For example, he should get up, or move, or wash, or take his meals … only if he has been told to do so. In a word, he should teach his soul, by long habit, never to dream of acting independently … There will be no end to thetroubles of states, or of humanity itself, till philosophers become kings in this world, or till those we now call kings and rulers really and truly become philosophers, and political power and philosophy thus come into the same hands.” (The Republic.)

What Plato was effectively describing was a totalitarian state – a socialistic dictatorship. Plato believed that average men were nothing more than labouring beasts of the field, fit for nothing else but slavery. He believed that not all men were equal and that only a small number of elites at the top of the Hierarchy were fit to rule. Sound familiar? Those elites were those who were ‘philosophers’ i.e. those with the greatest capacity for knowledge. Knowledge is what made one man better than another.

“We must … look for the right kind of rule in one or two or very few men, whenever such right rule occurs. And these men, whether they rule over willing or unwilling subjects, with or without written laws, and whether they are rich or poor, must … exercise their rule in accordance with some art or science…And whether they purge the state for its good by killing or banishing some of the citizens, or make it smaller by sending out colonies somewhere, as bees swarm from the hive, or bring in citizens from elsewhere to make it larger, so long as they act in accordance with science and justice and preserve and benefit it by making it better than it was, so far as is possible, that must at that time and by such characteristics be declared to be the only right form of government.”

Chillingly, Plato believed that those at the top of the hierarchy could manipulate, kill and control human beings as they wished as long as it was for the ‘greater good’. Remember the satanic mantra that ‘the end justifies the means.’ He states that it doesn’t matter whether the masses are willing or unwilling to be ruled and that they may be justly killed or banished in order to control populations. In Plato’s eyes, the individual exists merely for the benefit of the state. In fact, he suggests that a tyrant is in fact necessary to protect people from themselves. Here is a key statement:

“[Philosopher kings must] take the city and the characters of men, as they might a tablet, and first wipe it clean–no easy task. But at any rate you know that this would be the first point of difference from ordinary reformers, that they would refuse to take in hand either individual or state or to legislate before they either received a clean slate or themselves made it clean.”

In other words, in order for this new order of things to be introduced, the former way of things must be first wiped out. They must start with a clean slate. One way of wiping out the old is a kind of brainwashing through propaganda – flow of information. He writes:

“Rhetoric … is a producer of persuasion for belief, not for instruction in the matter of right and wrong. And so the rhetorician’s business is not to instruct a law court or a public meeting in matters of right and wrong, but only to make them believe…”

So the idea is not to tell people what is truly right and wrong but only to make them believe what it is you want them to believe in order that that they might best be manipulated for your own specific end. This is morally acceptable to Plato as long as the end justifies it. This is compounded when he says:

“The profession of those who are greatest in wisdom, who are called orators and lawyers; for they persuade men by the art which they possess, not teaching them, but making them have whatever opinion they like.”

Plato praises those that have such smooth words of persuasion that they can make people conform their opinions to anything they wish. A barrier to wiping the slate clean is parents however who would hold to the old inherited value system. Therefore Plato suggests:

“All inhabitants above the age of ten … they will send out into the fields, and they will take over the children, remove them from the manners and habits of their parents, and bring them up in their own customs and laws which will be such as we have described. This is the speediest and easiest way in which such a city and constitution as we have portrayed could be established and prosper and bring most benefit to the people among whom it arises.”

Plato suggests that the children should be raised by the state who will instruct them in the ways required to bring about change – not the truth about right and wrong – simply the ideas that will manipulate their minds into believing what they want them to believe.

Also like the Jesuits, who were ordered in military style, Plato believed that society should have a similar kind of structure. Notice how closely this passage mirrors the Jesuit philosophy.

“Military organization is the subject of much consultation and of many appropriate laws. The main principle is this–that nobody, male or female, should ever be left without control, nor should anyone, whether at work or in play, grow habituated in mind to acting alone and on his own initiative, but he should live always, both in war and peace, with his eyes fixed constantly on his commander and following his lead; and he should be guided by him even in the smallest detail of his actions–for example, to stand at the word of command, and to march, and to exercise, to wash and eat, to wake up at night for sentry-duty and dispatch-carrying, and in moments of danger to wait for the commander’s signal before either pursuing or retreating before an enemy; and, in a word, he must instruct his soul by habituation to avoid all thought or idea of doing anything at all apart from the rest of his company, so that the life of all shall be lived en masse and in common; for there is not, nor ever will be, any rule superior to this or better and more effective in ensuring safety and victory in war. This task of ruling, and being ruled by, others must be practiced in peace from earliest childhood; but anarchy must be utterly removed from the lives of all mankind.”

The words of that quotation could easily have come from Ignatius Loyola. Notice that the individual is so heavily de-emphasised and that it is all about the collective.

Plato also believed that because all humans were not equal, there should be a breeding program of the finest designed to improve the qualities of the species. Only the best were to procreate. Those humans who it was believed had undesirable traits should not. This is called eugenics.

“You have in your house hunting-dogs and a number of pedigree cocks … do not some prove better than the rest? Do you then breed from all indiscriminately, or are you careful to breed from the best? And, again, do you breed from the youngest or the oldest, or, so far as may be, from those in their prime? And if they are not thus bred, you expect, do you not, that your birds and hounds will greatly degenerate? And what of horses and other animals? Is it otherwise with them? … How imperative, then, is our need of the highest skill in our rulers, if the principle holds also for mankind? … the best men must cohabit with the best women in as many cases as possible and the worst with the worst in the fewest, and that the offspring of the one must be reared and that of the other not, if the flock is to be as perfect as possible. And the way in which all this is brought to pass must be unknown to any but the rulers, if, again, the herd of guardians is to be as free as possible from dissension.”

He went even further, suggesting that the offspring of inferior humans should be disposed of, like a piece of trash.

“The offspring of the inferior, and any of those of the other sort who are born defective, they will properly dispose of in secret, so that no one will know what has become of them. That is the condition of preserving the purity of the guardians’ breed.”

Eugenics is what Adolf Hitler was doing when he tried to establish a master race of blonde haired, blue eyed Aryan humans. This process involved trying to eradicate those who he saw as inferior – specifically the Jews.

Plato elaborates saying, “The bride and bridegroom must set their minds to produce for the State children of the greatest possible goodness and beauty.” They are to procreate for just ten years, at the end of which, they are considered too old to produce any more, and are forcibly divorced. If they couple don’t agree to this, Plato suggests that wardens, “partly by threat and partly by admonition” stop them. If the man refuses in the face of these threats, he is to be disqualified from attending his children’s birthday parties and any weddings. If he does appear at these events, people are entitled to “punish him with blows.” The same was to apply to women.

Plato also believed that marriage and the family unit should be completely abolished saying, “all these women shall be wives in common to all the men, and not one of them shall live privately with any man; the children too should be held in common so that no parent shall know which is his own offspring, and no child shall know his parent.”

Science Dictatorships 

Now these aren’t just ancient, scary, but irrelevant ideas from thousands of years ago. These Kabbalah Mystery ideas about a new society became the prevailing views of the Enlightenment era and the foundation of what these illuminated individuals set out to achieve. The kind of society being described by Plato is the one that elite occultists everywhere are still trying to engineer.

We can see how closely Plato’s ideas match the ideas of the Illuminati when we consider their stated main goals:

1. Abolition of Monarchy and Ordered Government
2. Abolition of Property
3. Abolition of Inheritance
4. Abolition of Patriotism
5. Abolition of Family
6. Abolition of (Christian) Religion

“In the societies of Illuminati …The being of God was denied and ridiculed;…The possession of property was pronounced to be robbery;…Adultery, assassination, poisoning, and other crimes of the like infernal nature, were taught as lawful, and even as virtuous actions. To crown such a system of falsehood and horror all means were declared to be lawful, provided the end was good . . . Of the goodness of the end every man is to judge for himself…The great and good ends proposed by the Illuminati…are the overthrow of religion, government and human society civil and domestic. These they pronounce to be so good, that murder…and war, however extended and dreadful, are declared by them to be completely justifiable, if necessary for these great purposes…” – Dr Timothy Dwight

It is reckoned by some that the man primarily responsible for reviving the ideas of Plato in the Enlightenment era was Niccolo Machiavelli. Machiavelli, who also perpetuated the trademark idea that the end justifies the means, wrote a book that taught how to rule through duplicity and was full of such deceptive wickedness that his very name has become the modern byword for it. Oxford English Dictionary describes Machiavellianism as “cunning and duplicity in statecraft or general conduct.”

We could call these Plato inspired societies Knowledge Dictatorships, or as Freemason Aldous Huxley called them in Brave New World Revisited, Science Dictatorships (the word science comes from the Latin for ‘knowledge’). Just as operative Freemasons knew that having a monopoly on trade secrets gave them power and position when building cathedrals and churches Speculative Freemasons equally understood that having a monopoly on knowledge and science would give them power to rule in these new Republics. Looking at it from the spiritual perspective, Satan will always try and gain control of the flow of information and since people were turning away from the Catholic church to science for understanding now, Satan had to change tack and get control of the science.

In The Architecture of Modern Political Power, Daniel Pouzzner outlines the tactics employed by the Masonic elite. Among them is: ‘Ostensible control over the knowable, by marketing institutionally accredited science as the only path to true understanding’. Thus, the ruling class endeavours to discourage independent reason while exercising illusory power over human knowledge. This tactic of control through knowledge suppression and selective dissemination is reiterated in the anonymously authored document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars:

“… the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping. All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control.”

Knowledge is power. Those at the top are to have that secret serpent knowledge and they are to use it to control the mass of people below who are to be kept in ignorance. The masses were to be fed not the truth, but false information that made them believe they had the truth. By this method they could be effectively manipulated and dominated. This is the foundation of satanic societies and institutions since Babylon. It’s the same old pyramid structure. The kind which the Catholic church employed to keep the masses in darkness during the Dark Ages. Independent thought was to be banished in the Enlightenment and instead institutional science was to be used to control what the muggles knew and what they believed.

Aldous Huxley wrote in Brave New World Revisited that,

“Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.”

The priests and rituals of Roman Catholicism were merely replaced by a new breed of “bookkeepers” or holders of information. Jim Keith writes:

“As the Sun/Moon cult lost some of its popularity, ‘Scientists’ were quick to take up some of the slack. According to their propaganda, the physical laws of the universe were the ultimate causative factors, and naturally, those physical laws were only fathomable by the scientific (i.e. Illuminati) elite.”

Satan had used Catholicism to turn people against God but in doing so, he turned people against his most successful brand of Mystery religion – Catholicism itself. As the disgusted people moved away from religion, science was presented to fill the void and in doing so, the elite simply created a new type of religion called Scientism. This is the idea that Science explains everything and is the answer to everything, even when science itself can’t support that worldview. Much of what we call science today is actually Scientism – a mere philosophy masquerading as scientific truth.

So now the elite had to meet two requirements in order to keep their dominance under the new non-religious system. They firstly had to create a false science specifically designed for their needs. Secondly they had to create an official institution to accredit, control and disseminate it to the masses. That institution was The British Royal Society.

The Royal Society was to be a kind of propaganda machine – a forerunner to the modern day media who would sculpt and shape public opinion through the notions about science that they controlled and disseminated.

Evolution

With the British Royal Society acting as the headquarters of the propaganda machine, they now needed to introduce the ‘science’. That science was Darwinism or Evolution. Given that the founding members of the Royal Society were Freemasons, whatever science they came up with would only stem from their occult doctrine. The theory of evolution is nothing less.

“Virtually all the Royal Society’s founding members were Freemasons. One could reasonably argue that the Royal Society itself, at least in its inception, was a Masonic institution – derived, through Andrea’s Christian Unions, from the ‘invisible Rosicrucian brotherhood’.” (Baigent, et al, 144)

In THE MEANING OF MASONRY, W.L. Wilmhurst reveals the worldview underpinning the new Masonic ‘science’: “This – the evolution [emphasis added] of man into superman – was always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of modern Masonry is not the social and charitable purposes to which so much attention is paid, but the expediting of the spiritual evolution of those who aspire to perfect their own nature and transform it into a more god-like quality. And this is a definite science, a royal art, which it is possible for each of us to put into practice; whilst to join the Craft for any other purpose than to study and pursue this science is to misunderstand its meaning.”

Later in the book, Wilmhurst reiterates this theme:

“Man who has sprung from earth and developed through the lower kingdoms of nature to his present rational state, has yet to complete his evolution [emphasis added] by becoming a god-like being and unifying his consciousness with the Omniscient – to promote which is and always has been the sole aim and purpose of all Initiation.” (Wilmhurst, 94)

The spiritual implications of evolution are something that few people ever stop to consider. If we are constantly evolving onwards and upwards, where is the end goal? The point at which evolution reaches its conclusion is absolute perfection, which is to say, godhood. Evolution is still the exact same lie from the Garden of Eden. Through the idea of evolution, freemasons introduced the occult idea of ‘becoming’ – the belief that man is gradually evolving towards enlightened godhood. Science or knowledge is merely the key to understanding that evolution.

According to MACKEY’S ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY, Erasmus Darwin, grandfather of Charles Darwin, was the first
to propose the concept of evolution:

“Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731 – 1802) was the first man in England to suggest those ideas which later were to be embodied in the Darwinian theory by his grandson, Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882), who wrote in 1859 ORIGIN OF SPECIES.” (quoted in Daniel, 34)

Erasmus Dawin was founder of the Masonic Lunar Society.

The Lunar Society

According to author Ian Taylor, the Lunar Society was active from about 1764 to 1800 and its prominent influence ‘continued long afterwards under the banner of The British Royal Society.’ The group’s name owed itself to the fact that members met monthly at the time of the full moon. The membership of this group boasted such luminaries as John Wilkinson (who made cannons), James Watt (inventor of the steam engine), Matthew Boulton (a manufacturer), Joseph Priestly (a chemist), Josiah Wedgewood (who founded a famous pottery business), and Benjamin Franklin. These men along with other members were given the title, ‘merchants of light.’ It is with the Lunar Society that one begins to identify Erasmus’ ties to Freemasonry. (Taylor, 55)

In 1794, Erasmus Darwin wrote a book called Zoonomia where he expanded upon his theory of evolution. It was based on the occult Masonic concept of ‘becoming’ – the gradual process of attaining godhood.

MACKEY’S ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY confirms the link:

“Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. [Erasmus] Darwin had been made a Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning, No. 2, of Scotland. Sir Francis Darwin, one of the Doctor’s sons, was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807 or 1808. His son Reginald was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge in 1804. The name of Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is very possible that he, like Francis, was a Mason.” (quoted in Daniel, 34)

Before Erasmus had put his ideas on paper however, Freemason John Locke (1632 – 1704) took the Hindu doctrine of reincarnation and formulated a theory of evolution as well (Daniel, 33-34).

The British East India Company had imported the Hindu belief in reincarnation to England where it was adopted by the British Royal Society. A prominent member of the Royal Society, John Locke studied reincarnation extensively and, working with the occult doctrine as an inspiration, developed his own evolutionary ideas. In fact, Locke’s theory of evolution incorporating Eastern forms of the Mysteries received the support of the male members of Darwin’s family (Daniel, 33-34). Two centuries later, this occult concept of ‘becoming’ would be transmitted to Charles Darwin and ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES would be born.

Now remember the reason that we had Deism was at least partly because people couldn’t explain the origins of life without some kind of God. The general population understood that things don’t just pop into existence. Therefore one of the key problems for the evolutionary theory was to get over this hurdle by showing that life could arise from non-living matter. If life could come from chemicals by some kind of natural and undirected reaction the need for God to explain the origin of life was eliminated. This concept is called ‘spontaneous generation’. It was the only way evolution could work.

Louis Pasteur wrote:

“To bring about spontaneous generation would be to create a germ. It would be creating life; it would be to solve the problem of its origin. It would mean to go from matter to life through conditions of environment and of matter [lifeless material]. God as author of life would then no longer be needed. Matter would replace Him. God would need to be invoked only as author of the motions of the universe.” (Dubos, 395)

After scientific testing however, the idea of spontaneous generation was quickly destroyed and proved to be impossible by the Law of Biogenesis. It just couldn’t happen. No mixture of chemicals or non-living matter ever produced life. This disaster should have meant that the theory never got off the ground. However, this didn’t stop ‘men of science’ from defying nature, even to this day. Evolution still has no answer for the origin of life and the whole enterprise continues on blind faith. This is an example of science becoming Scientism – a philosophy. Perhaps it is epitomised by the following quotation from Dr George Wald, a Nobel Prize winning evolutionist in the field of Biology and Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University.

“There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation; that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible. [emphasis added]”

All evidence still pointed towards some kind of mind being behind the world. Charles Darwin himself unconsciously revealed this in statements like: “natural selection picks out with unerring skill the best varieties”. Statements like these suggest that nature has a mind. Only something with a mind can ‘pick out’ or make any kind of decision at all. What statements like these hint at is that nature itself is some kind of sovereign deity acting as the ultimate arbiter of life and death. This idea has evolved itself and is now known as the Gaia Hypothesis. This is the New Age pagan idea that Gaia or ‘Mother Earth’ is a self-creating, self-sustaining and self-regenerating type of goddess. Central to this idea is that both living and non living things are inseparable. We are part of the earth and the earth is part of us. We are part of god and god is part of us.

The idea that lifeless matter spontaneously generates life is taken from a Kabbalah concept called the golem. Isaac Singer writes:

“’the golem ‘ is based on faith ‘ that dead matter is not really dead, but can be brought to life [emphasis added]’ What are the computers and robots of our time if not golems? ‘ The Talmud tells us of an interpreter by the name of Rava who formed a man by this mysterious power’ We are living in an epoch of golem-making right now. The gap between science and magic ‘ is becoming narrower’.” (Hoffman, 115)

The Darwin Project 

In the article ‘Toward a New Science of Life,’ EIR journalist Jonathan Tennenbaum makes the following the statement:

“Now, it is easy to show that Darwinism, one of the pillars of modern biology, is nothing but a kind of cult, a cult religion. I am not exaggerating. It has no scientific validity whatsoever. Darwin’s so-called theory of evolution is based on absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for political-ideological reasons.”

Charles Darwin can be seen as the elite’s apostle or prophet, preaching a new gospel which is in fact the oldest lie of all time. Initially through the Royal Society and increasingly today through the media and education, we are taught that evolution is an undisputed fact. Most people have a blind faith in evolution simply because its what the crowd seems to believe. And this is exactly the plan. The muggles are being controlled by the information they are allowed to have. This is found in the controversial PROTOCOLS OF THE
WISE MEN OF SION:

“For them [the masses or cattle] let that play the principal part which we have persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the goyim [the masses or cattle] will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of it will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.”

Population Control 

One of the other key passages that we took from Plato’s Republic was the idea that populations should be controlled and unwanted life should be disposed of like trash. In other words that some were worthy of life and others weren’t. This is a concept that comes through in Darwin’s ideas about ‘survival of the fittest’.

Remember that the full title of Origin of Species was “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.”

One of the major influences on Darwin was Thomas Malthus who received the blessings of French deist Jean-Jacques Rousseau and David Hume (look on the back of David Hume’s statue on Edinburgh’s Royal Mile and you will see a sun-god symbol). Malthus authored the ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF POPULATION where he concluded that society should adopt policies that prevent the human population from growing disproportionately larger than the food supply.

Malthus, again finding a root in Plato’s Republic, proposed genocide, specifically targeting the poor. For instance:

“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlement in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders.” (Malthus, 412)

Malthus believed that by such methods, the undesirables in society could be effectively culled. He said regarding children:

“We are bound in justice and honour formally to disclaim the right of the poor to support. To this end, I should propose a regulation be made declaring that no child born’ should ever be entitled to parish assistance’ The [illegitimate] infant is comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place’ All children beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this [desired] level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons.” (Malthus, 411, 430-1)

The logic behind the idea that those who serve society least should be destroyed was reiterated under Darwinism as the survival of the fittest.

Eugenics 

This naturally leads to another idea put forward by Plato that people who were perceived to have pure genetic materials should be encouraged to breed amongst themselves to produce a race of supermen fit for ruling over the masses.

Eugenics actually found its Enlightenment era origin in Charles Darwin’s cousin, Sir Francis Galton. He regurgitated the thoughts of Plato in HEREDITARY GENIUS which was a racist argument advocating a system of selective breeding for purposes of providing ‘more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing over the less suitable’. In other words trying to artificially speed the course that evolutionists thought we were on naturally.

In truth, selective breeding had been practiced for some time amongst the elite. Inbreeding was commonplace amongst the ruling class to protect the genetic purity of their future stock. Galton merely took this idea and popularised it as a legitimate science.

This very same tradition was practiced by Charles Darwin in the hopes of maintaining a genetic superiority in his bloodline. Darwin married the youngest granddaughter of his maternal father. Researcher Ian Taylor reveals the outcome of this project.

“Darwin’s idea of inbreeding to produce superior stock can be seen to be a complete disaster in the case of his own ten children. Of the ten, one girl, Mary, died shortly after birth; another girl, Anne, died at the age of ten years; his eldest daughter, Henrietta, had a serious and prolonged breakdown at fifteen in 1859. Three of his six sons suffered such frequent illness that Darwin regarded them as semi-invalids while his last son, Charles Jr., was born mentally retarded and died in 1858, nineteen months after birth.” (Taylor, 127)

But where science fails, scientism continues stubbornly on. The concept was still promoted heavily within the scientific community. If they had followed God’s wisdom of course they would have heeded the warning not to commit incest and they would have been all the better for it. In their own human wisdom however they persisted and reaped the consequences. In 1901, the statistics department of London’s University College became the headquarters for the Eugenics Education Society. Motivated by Galton’s vision of a future utopia ruled by genetically engineered elite, the Eugenics Society would grow into a successful political movement and would inspire Hitler’s holocaust against the Jews.

This attempt by the elite to keep their bloodlines pure has created 13 elite Illuminati bloodlines. These dynasties more or less control world affairs and are engineering a global order that leads to the coming of the Anti-Christ. They are believed to be:

1. Astor
2. Bundy
3. Collins
4. DuPont
5. Freeman
6. Kennedy
7. Li
8. Onassis
9. Reynolds
10. Rockefeller
11. Rothschild
12. Russell
13. Van Duyn

The only one we will be focusing on is the Rothschild family but feel free to research the others. There’s one more key principle we have to understand.

The Hegelian Principle 

The Hegelian Principle is one of the most important ideas behind Darwinism. Philosopher George Hegel believed that a pantheistic world spirit was directing ‘an ongoing developmental (evolutionary) process in nature, including humanity,’ which embodied itself as a ‘dialectical struggle between positive and negative entities.’ This conflict always resulted in a ‘harmonious synthesis’.

What this basically means is that life is gradually evolving towards harmony through conflict. On the one hand you have a Thesis and then directly opposed to it you have an Antithesis. As the two come into conflict with one another, the inevitable result is a Synthesis of the two. Very simply:

Thesis v. Antithesis = Synthesis

Hegel believed he was seeing this occur in nature all the time but Freemasons and occultists everywhere saw that this could be used to help bring about a singular One World Order. The motto off the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry is “Order out of Chaos”. Like eugenics, they attempt to artificially advance the process by deliberately setting up opposing ideas to one another so that they would eventually cause the two to compromise and reach a middle ground.

British politics is a great example of the Hegelian Principle in action. Originally there was a left wing Labour party and a right wing Conservative party. Through years of rubbing them up against each other, they have both compromised and moved into the centre ground to the extent that the British public now has no real choice at the polling office. They are voting for basically the same ideas and the same party dressed in different colours.

It’s through the Hegelian principle that the world is gradually homogenising and separate cultures are beginning to merge into one another. Sometimes the homogenisation occurs naturally as the world gets smaller and sometimes situations are deliberately manipulated and conflicts created to aid the progress towards a One World Order. Of course, where conflict between two opposing ideas is necessary to create a synthesis, bloodshed and violence is encouraged by the elite. From the conflict of World War I for example, there came the League of Nations which was a synthesis; countries cleaving together in unity for peace. Similarly, after World War II, the synthesis was found in the United Nations. Wars are also useful for the Illuminati because they help keep populations down.

Having taken time to establish the principles of the Enlightenment and what they set out to achieve, we have to introduce ourselves to the Rothschilds. They were behind much of what was to follow.

Next: The Rothschilds