The Fix Is In: Hacked Documents: Obama Gave Green Signal to a Chemical Weapons Attack Plan in Syria

If you think the chemical attack in Syria last week, which killed hundreds of people, came out of nowhere or was orchestrated by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assed, think again.

In January of this year, fully eight (8) month before the attack near Damascus, an obscure Malaysian hacker stumbled across some almost unbelievable information. Back then it was dismissed as nothing more than conspiracy theory and rubbish.

Decide for yourself, and keep in mind that this was widely reported in alternative media circles, and even some of the most popular news services in the world, Yahoo.com and The Daily Mail, carried it.

Curiously, the original story by The Daily Mail (link here) has been wiped clean from the internet, but a Web Archive of it has been recorded for posterity.

Via Yahoo:

London, Jan 30 (ANI): The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.

A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’.

As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,’ the Daily Mail reports.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

According to the paper, the U.S. State Department has declined to comment on the matter. (ANI)

Numerous leaked videos that have appeared since the attack took place last week reportedly showing Syrian rebels launching what appear to be canisters of nerve gas on unsuspecting villagers, adding further credence to the report cited above.

Was this a set up?

Was this chemical attack a premeditated action to justify a U.S. led invasion of Syria?