New System for Police to “Detect Gunshots” Also Records Your Private Conversations

Editor’s Note: There’s a reason the Bilderberg Group asked “Does privacy exist?” at their annual screw-the-world meeting last year. They know it no longer does.

t’s been almost a week since New York Police Department deployed a new ShotSpotter gunshot detection system. However, the innovation has raised privacy concerns among New Yorkers while tracking loud bangs, the system records private conversations.

Questions arose after New York Police Department deployed 300 hidden microphone sensors around the city. They are aimed at identifying the sound of gun shots, and then activate nearby cameras and immediately alert law enforcement officials.

he two-year pilot program will cost New York a total of $1.5million annually.

Both the mayor Bill de Blasio and police commissioner William Bratton say that ShotSpotter should help officers to respond more quickly to shootings. According to statistics, in 75 percent of cases when people hear a gun shot sound, they do not report it to the police.

The ShotSpotter is aimed at fixing that. Its sensors are connected to thousands of cameras set up around the city as part of the its Domain Awareness System, an all-seeing intelligence-analysis complex that collects and analyzes data captured by surveillance cameras, gunshot detectors, license plate readers, Geographic Information Systems mapping and social media feeds.

Four years ago the department tested another system, but rejected the technology, as it could not identify the difference between real gunfire and similar sounds, like a car backfiring. Today’s system is said to be more sensitive.

Police commissioner William Bratton, who used to be a member of ShotSpotter’s board of directors, before returning to the NYPD in January 2014, says in the future, ShotSpotter will be able to identify which type of a gun was used, and whether multiple shots were fired from different guns.

But the system and especially how capable it is of recording people’s voices has raised serious privacy concerns.

“The concern is that if conversations are capable of being intercepted, that’s a bigger problem. That’s like a Big Brother. And that’s not about one’s safety that’s just now meddling everyday conversations of people. And the question is what police is going to do with those conversations?” lawyer Frank Camera told RT.

(read more)