Since Hillary Clinton isn’t president, she’d like to have a different job: running social media giant Facebook. The former presidential candidate pondered the question Friday at Harvard University and said she would like to run Facebook.
According to Fox News, during an event at which she received the prestigious Radcliffe Medal for “transformative impact on society,” Clinton was asked which company she would like to lead as CEO. Without any hesitation, Clinton named Facebook, noting that the social media giant has vast power and controls the flow of information. Because apparently, the censorship and permanent bans of those people not liberal enough isn’t quite as authoritarian as it could be.
But it’s not like Mark Zuckerberg runs Facebook much different than we can assume Hillary Clinton would.
— Larry Kim (@larrykim) May 29, 2018
“It’s the biggest news platform in the world … but most people in our country get their news, true or not, from Facebook,” she said. Remember, anything not true is anything Democrats don’t like. It was the same in Nazi Germany.
The Nazi Propaganda Ministry, directed by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, took control of all forms of communication in Germany: newspapers, magazines, books, public meetings, and rallies, art, music, movies, and radio. Viewpoints in any way threatening to Nazi beliefs or to the regime were censored or eliminated from all media.
Most of the books were by non-Jewish writers, including such famous Americans as Jack London, Ernest Hemingway, and Sinclair Lewis, whose ideas the Nazis viewed as different from their own and therefore not to be read. –The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
What’s absolutely terrifying, is the voting Democrats who already want and have been somewhat successful at shutting down alternative opinion. Nothing could be more similar to the actions of the Nazis. Censorship is already here, but just imagine how bad things could get should Hillary ever take over Facebook.
Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg openly endorsed Clinton’s candidacy while a co-founder of the social media giant, Dustin Moskovitz, led a nearly $30 million effort to defeat now-President Donald Trump. Other Facebook employees contributed more money to Clinton’s campaign (some $114,000) than to those of any other candidate, according to Federal Election Commission data that takes into account only donations over $200, The Hill reported.
The former US secretary of state’s openness to run Facebook came at the time when the tech company is coping with a number of scandals, including alleged misuse of user data that allowed political campaigns, including possibly Clinton’s, to target potential voters after acquiring the data of millions of people. Similar to Cambridge Analytica, the company that was forced to shut down amid the data misuse scandal, the Clinton campaign itself may have harvested the data of potentially millions of users to get an edge over Trump.
In the midst of the election, Clinton’s campaign launched a mobile application called “Hillary 2016” that allowed every user to pair their friends list on Facebook with their phone contacts – and give the campaign permission to access that info.
People who didn’t download the application – or weren’t even Clinton supporters – weren’t given an option to prohibit their Facebook friends from pairing their phone numbers with Facebook accounts and indicate their likelihood of voting for the Democratic candidate. –Fox News
Sounds like Cambridge Analytica. Has anyone else picked up on the obvious similarities? And not just between Hillary Clinton and Joseph Goebbels…
“Tyranny cannot defeat the power of ideas.” –Helen Keller on the Nazis burning her books.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).
Contributed by The Daily Sheeple of www.TheDailySheeple.com.
This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.TheDailySheeple.com.