Connect with us

The Daily Sheeple

Climate Change Propaganda Focuses on Future Carbon Taxpayers

From the wildfires in Colorado to the rising energy costs, the hoax of man-made climate change appears to be a valid global problem.


Climate Change Propaganda Focuses on Future Carbon Taxpayers

From the wildfires in Colorado to the rising energy costs, the hoax of man-made climate change appears to be a valid global problem. Meteorologists are decrying 2012 will see the warmest spring in American history. They claim that an atmospheric high-pressure ridge has mounted over the heart of the US corn and soybean producing states. This prevents moisture and allows heat to steadily build causing record droughts and devastation to crops.

In response, the US government has lowered conditional ratings for these crops considerable and experts have lowered their production estimates.

In Saudi Arabia, authorities have reported that while temperatures were recorded at 109, rainfall in Mecca produced the hottest downpour in recorded history.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reported last week that these drought conditions are comparable to the drought in December 1956.

At the 2009 UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen, Sir Nicholas Stern, leading climate economist in Britain and fellow global warming alarmist, said that these talks are the “most important gathering since the Second World War, given what is at stake.”

While China and the US are responsible for 40% of global carbon emissions, President Barack Obama drafted the “ Copenhagen Accord ” (CA) that promised empty commitments for cutting national carbon emissions without an international or internal enforcement mechanism. This upset the alarmist community.

Obama argued for the US adherence to international mandates with the CA. Currently Congress has not passed climate change legislation, although the UN want the US and other world governments to adopt their globalist controlled approach to climate change and the mitigation of energy use by the citizens of the world.

As of now, the US agenda on climate change is based on the UN document, Geoengineering Governance and Technology Policy (GGTP). This document was produced by the Congressional Research Service and the US government “has joined with other nations . . . as a participant in several international agreements on climate change.”

All geoengineering projects in the US are directed in the “absence of a comprehensive [climate change] policy” that will “modify the Earth’s climate” and make these technologies available to “foreign governments and entities in the private sector to use unilaterally without authorization from the US government or an international treaty.’

However, in paragraph 1 of the CA, Obama confirmed “the scientific view that the increase in global temperature should be below two degrees Celsius.” He further elaborated by stating, “we agree that deep cuts in global emissions are required… so as to hold the increase in global temperature below two degrees Celsius.”

The recent damage to our biosphere appears to be caused by global warming. As the global temperature has risen by 0.8 degrees Celsius, fear-mongers like Kerry Emanuel of MIT, who is an authority on hurricanes says: “Any number much above one degree involves a gamble, and the odds become less and less favorable as the temperature goes up.”

Thomas Lovejoy, former chief biodiversity advisor at the World Bank (WB) explains: “If we’re seeing what we’re seeing today at 0.8 degrees Celsius, two degrees is simply too much.”

And James Hansen, eco-fascist and scientist for the NASA Goddard Institute, uses psy-ops to convince the public that human production of CO2 is the problem we must stop at all costs. “The target that has been talked about in international negotiations for two degrees of warming is actually a prescription for long-term disaster.”

While Hansen admitted in his 2000 study , entitled Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario, that “rapid warming in recent decades has been driven mainly by non-CO2 greenhouse gases . . . not by the products of fossil fuel burning, CO2 and aerosols” Hansen has joined the bandwagon of climate change hoaxers who want to support the UN’s scheme to enact a global carbon taxing plan to redistribute wealth from the hands of the citizens and into the coffers of the global Elite.

Because globalist scientists working to validate the human problem claim that 565 gigatons of carbon is released into the atmosphere annually, the idea of a “carbon budget” is the scheme to calculate how much oil, coal and gas could be utilized safely before their effects cause the temperature of the Earth to rise to an unmanageable degree.

Even the scientists working for the global Elite on this global warming scam admit that the mathematical analysis on the supposed increased numbers on global temperatures are not exact, but rather an educated summation and worth using in lieu of empirical data because they are just convinced that they are right.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has used erroneous computer model data since 1970 and has justified their false flag with support of climatologists like Tom Wigley of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): “Looking at them as they come in, they hardly differ at all. There’s maybe 40 models in the data set now, compared with 20 before. But so far the numbers are pretty much the same. We’re just fine-tuning things. I don’t think much has changed over the last decade.”

The reality is that the IPCC created their man-made global warming scam by tracing radioactive carbon as it travels through the upper atmosphere, the oceans and lower atmospheric levels to find correlations to link anthropomorphic influence to global warming.

By using nuclear science as the basis for climate change computer models, environmental scientists who purvey this lie use the emissions from nuclear power reactors and measure their accumulation in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. They then disregard the obvious negative effect of nuclear radioactive particles in our atmosphere and translate that data into the lie that CO2 emissions are causing the problem because this is the link necessary to enact global carbon taxing.

Simply put: the actual climate change threat is the nuclear power we are forced to use and not the mythology of anthropomorphic influence and CO2 emissions.

Because of the globalist Elite’s effect on our climate, Native American cultures are suffering as coastal erosion, droughts and other manifestations threaten their way of life.

Tribal communities from Alaska to North Dakota have come to the symposium at the Smithsonian Institute’s National Museum at the American Indian to implore Congressional leaders to enact changes within federal agencies that assist in preserving resources and bring attention to the impact of climate change on indigenous people.

One of the concerns of the alarmists supporting man-made climate change is that young people today are “lukewarm” about the issue. Jon D. Miller, author of The Generation X Report , a study on social memes and climate change commissioned by IBM, states that “We found a small but statistically significant decline between 2009 and 2011 in the level of attention and concern Generation X adults expressed about climate change. In 2009, about 22 percent said they followed the issue of climate change very or moderately closely. In 2011, only 16 percent said they did so.”

Alarmists are concerned about reaching a new generation of people with the unscientific fear-mongering that only climate change is able to provide.

Since future generations would be paying the carbon tax, they want to make sure that the “Gen X” adults are concerned about climate change; and therefore willing to gladly pay a global tax to ward off pending doom.

According to Miller, the study showed that “better educated young adults are more likely to recognize the importance of the problem, but that there is a broad awareness of the issue even though many adults prefer to focus on more immediate issues—jobs and schools for their children—than the needs of the next generation.”

Globalists will be focusing on more propaganda to brainwash a new generation of people into thinking only a global tax can save them from rising sea levels, terrible droughts and monstrous weather patterns that will plague the planet without the absolute submission of every person to the agendas of global governance.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page .

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page .


More in Science

Top Tier Gear USA
To Top