Scientific study to produce a comprehensive report means that all sides of an issue have to be looked at.
Bearing that in mind, how can the IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change state in their new, most comprehensive report to date, they have scientific evidence that climate change…on the warming side, is going to have major implications for the future of mankind?
Once again they have investigated global warming not climate change. If they had investigated climate change they would have looked at the possibility of the planet cooling and they have not. Looking at both sides of an issue is what makes a study scientifically sound, it’s what makes a report something that can be called comprehensive.
What we see once again from the IPCC is a one sided and biased view of the impacts of one sort of climate change only.
The report has been published just three weeks after real scientists warn that we may be entering an El Nino, and a strong one at that. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
- El Nino cycles release massive amounts of tropical heat into the atmosphere and can raise global temperatures to record levels.
- Above normal levels of rainfall hits many coastal areas such as California changing drought to flood in a short space of time.
- Water evaporates more readily due to increased temperatures leading to shortages in some areas.
- Hurricanes are suppressed
- Ice melt due to elevated temperatures.
- Winter snow is reduced to almost nothing in many usually snowy areas.
- Crops can be ruined and harvests reduced on those that remain.
- Pacific Northwest sees a decline in the amount of salmon caught and in the size of the fish.
All of these things are also on the IPCC list of events that signify climate change…AKA global warming.
This is the map that the BBC has produced based on the latest reports. Comparing it to the list above is interesting to say the least.
The timing of the IPCC report will mesh very nicely with the often intense heat an El Nino creates. Of course it’s possible that the favourable conditions will subside and it will just fizzle out and the El Nino will not arrive at all.
We should assume that in order to save face that geoengineering methods currently employed by the warmists will continue so as not to disrupt the accelerating One World Government movement that is being implemented by the elite.
By controlling the weather they will control the food, and by controlling the food they will control the people.
The IPCC is quite open about the fact that it doesn’t check on the science supplied to it by it’s ‘volunteer scientists’ and that it conducts no scientific research of its own. From the IPCC website:
The IPCC is a scientific body under the auspices of the United Nations (UN). It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It does not conduct any research nor does it monitor climate related data or parameters.
So, scientists from around the world, send in their opinions about what is happening with the weather and the IPCC collate it and produce a report.
It’s rather like a kidnapper cutting letters out of various newspapers to form a ransom note. If you have enough small snippets you can assemble them to say anything you like. (source)
What I’d really like to see is a list of those scientists, you can bet your bottom dollar that the majority of them work for governments with a very vested interest in pushing the global warming agenda.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).
Contributed by Lizzie Bennett of Underground Medic.
Lizzie Bennett retired from her job as a senior operating department practitioner in the UK earlier this year. Her field was trauma and accident and emergency and she has served on major catastrophe teams around the UK. Lizzie publishes Underground Medic on the topic of preparedness.