Schiff continues to exhibit pattern of lies and false ‘evidence’

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the chair of the House Intelligence Committee seems to have a problem with trying to pass off falsehoods as truth.

For example, he loudly and repeatedly claimed for over two years to have concrete proof that President Trump was collaborating with Russia, but he never actually presented any evidence and the Mueller report cleared President Trump. Then he used his opening statement into the whistleblower report to read a fake transcription of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President. When called on it, he claimed it was meant to be taken at least in part as a parody.

Now the pattern continues…

Prior to the House Judiciary Committee holding its first public impeachment hearings, Schiff’s committee released its 300-page report on impeachment. Included in the document were the personal phone records of Nunes — the House Intelligence Committee’s ranking member — Rudy Giuliani, journalist John Solomon, among others. Schiff did not say how he obtained the records or why he publicized them.

According to Nunes, who spoke with Fox News on Saturday, the records of his that Schiff publicized are not accurate.

“Finally, yesterday, I had a chance to go through all of my phone records, and I can tell you — my phone records do not match what Schiff and the Democrats put in that report,” Nunes said.

In response to a follow-up question from Fox News’ Ed Henry, Nunes added, “Let me tell you what I have. What I have doesn’t match [what Schiff released].”

When asked if he would release his personal phone records, Schiff said that is a question for “AT&T, House Democrats, Verizon, and the courts.”

Nunes also announced during his interview that he plans to take legal action for having his civil liberties violated.

“We’re definitely going to take legal action,” Nunes said. “We need to get to court to try to stop that from happening again.”

No word yet if the others who had their alleged phone records revealed have noticed any discrepancies between what was published and what their records show or if they also intend to seek legal recourse.