Rand: Obama’s New Supreme Court Justice Will Be a “Conflict of Interest” to Decide Immigration Constitutionality

It’s like no one knows math.

After the untimely (or, timely, depending on from who’s perspective you look at it) death of Justice Scalia, Obama is now set to nominate his third Supreme Court justice — out of only nine justices — for life. While campaigning for reelection in Kentucky, Rand Paul talked about the huge “conflict of interest” this poses.

Via WKMS:

Citing the recent 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that halted Obama’s Clean Power Plan, Paul said that with the absence of Scalia, a sympathetic appointee would tip the scales in favor of the president’s immigration policies.

“It’s not that I’m implying he doesn’t have the power. Sure, he has the power to nominate somebody,” Paul said on Friday.

“But it sure doesn’t look very fair if he’s going to be picking the person that’s going to decide whether it’s constitutional or not.”

Can you just imagine? Everything Obama wanted to get passed and couldn’t will now fly right through the Supreme Court including immigration. Really there might as well not even be a Supreme Court anymore after Obama gets done with it. Why would they appoint anyone in government for life anyway?  What an asinine idea. Speaking of life, how old is Ruth Bader Ginsburg again? 82? Is there any precedent for a single president getting four Supreme Court justices?

Then again, Hillary has already made the comment that Obama would be a great Supreme Court justice himself…

Related Reads

Supreme Justice Scalia Just Died; Now a THIRD of the Supreme Court Will Be Obama Nominees

Gee, That’s Not Suspicious at All: Justice Scalia Already Embalmed

Obama Is Skipping Scalia’s Funeral, Too Busy Picking out Scalia’s Replacement

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by of The Daily Sheeple.