Fighting words and incitement are legal categories of expression unlawful in many jurisdictions. The general legal interpretation is these expressions on their face are intended to evoke violence and hatred from a targeted victim. Is it credible that nobody within NATO pointed out the obvious headquarters’ similarity to Nazi symbolism, and its provocation to Russia if built???
Whatever the purpose of NATO’s choice of architecture, its easy for the public to see that NATO “leadership” supports current and ongoing US/UK/Israel illegal Wars of Aggression, led by the US.