NPR Promotes the Idea of a Carbon Taxing Us for Having Kids Because We’re Causing Climate Change

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

baby

In a long fearmongering fluff piece titled “Should We Be Having Kids in the Age of Climate Change?” about how the world is overpopulated and too many people = man-made global warming so we’re all gonna die unless we stop procreating, NPR is promoting not only all of that propaganda, but the idea that people in developed nations should be carbon taxed by the government for having children.

By 2050, it is estimated that every developed nation on the planet will be facing a population with twice as many elderly people as young people. This is happening all over the place. As the workforce shrinks and older citizens retire, countries like Japan that are suffering what has been dubbed “demographic suicide” are actually trying to pay their younger populace to reproduce.

NPR and its current climate change profile darling Travis Rieder, Assistant Director for Education Initiatives at the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins, say they should not only stop doing that immediately but should actually tax people for having kids at all.

For the sticks part of the plan, Rieder proposes that richer nations do away with tax breaks for having children and actually penalize new parents. He says the penalty should be progressive, based on income, and could increase with each additional child.

Think of it like a carbon tax, on kids. He knows that sounds crazy.

“But children, in a kind of cold way of looking at it, are an externality,” he says. “We as parents, we as family members, we get the good. And the world, the community, pays the cost.”

Two things.

First, as with all eugenics plans, this one would obviously benefit the rich and wealthy who could afford to pay such a tax and thus, afford to have more children. So the wealthy will be the only ones having any kids. We all know it won’t matter if the tax is “based on income,” not considering how the majority of people’s incomes are these days, especially in America where the middle class is being systematically stamped out and pay rates have long ago stagnated while the price of everything needed to survive including food and utilities continues to skyrocket.

He also conveniently ignores the fact that birth rates are plummeting below replacement rate everywhere, except in some African and Middle Eastern countries where death rates are abnormally high. At this rate, the world’s population growth isn’t going to simply reach zero and hold steady. Eventually it’s going to start dropping, and when the freefall begins, it’s going to be fast. Then we’ll have an entirely different “population problem” to deal with, and overpopulation won’t be it.

Think [amazon text=Children of Men&asin=B000QGAU4E].

This is all going according to the Rockefeller Eugenics Slow Kill Plan. David Rockefeller talked about it himself.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.

Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa and Aaron also recently launched Revolution of the Method and Informed Dissent. Wake the flock up!

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
[yottie id="4"]

23 thoughts on “NPR Promotes the Idea of a Carbon Taxing Us for Having Kids Because We’re Causing Climate Change”

  1. They are pushing for more than just controlled child birth rates. They are also pushing for the euthanasia of the sick and elderly. These people are just PURE EVIL. They are the ones spewing the most hot air and should be taxed for every cubic nano meter of air they breath.

    1. agreed. it’s easier to formulate context when one understands that the biblical adversaries are running the show which are todays: Nastyyahu, ISISraeli’s, Neo-Cohns, Trasheknazis, et al.

  2. There is only one culprit when it comes to “Climate Change” and that is the folks doing the Geo-engineering which are causing the weather situation to be what it’s. How do you account for that variable in your climate change statistical analysis? We should be very loud in saying “HELL NO” this is not acceptable. Yet another part of the NWO trying to past this idea to the public.

    1. The term “global warming” actually involved taking a chance and predicting the outcome, that’s why. Why hem yourself in when you can use a catch-all term like “climate change” (an inevitability) and ultimately claim you were right regardless of what happens?

      If they say global warming they lose all credibility the minute they can’t prove an increase in temperature. As to why they have any “credibility” in the first place…..well, that’s the hard question to answer.

  3. The Bible says, “Be fruitful and multiply”. God’s law trumps man’s law. These morons on the left work for God’s arch enemy. Do not believe their lies. They want to get rid of us (they refer to us as “feeders”) so they can have everything on this planet for themselves. It’s that elementary.

  4. IDIOTS!

    WHITES ARE NOT REPRODUCING ENOUGH TO GROW OUR RACE, MUCH LESS SUSTAIN IT. THE COLORED MASSES ARE POPULATING LIKE LOCUSTS! THE WHITE “CARBON FOOTPRINT” IS GETTING SMALLER, NOT LARGER! THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF CARBON THIS AND CARBON THAT IS SIMPLY THE NWO AGENDA TO SUBJECT US TO THE LIKES OF A THIRD WORLD AND MAKE BILLIONS ALONG THE WAY! INTERESTING THAT THE POORER THE COUNTRY THE MORE PROLIFIC THEIR BIRTH RATE IS! MUST BE ALL THAT’S LEFT TO DO IS FORNICATE AND MAKE BABIES. MORE INTERESTING IS HOW THESE COLORED MASSES ARE ABLE TO FEED THEIR LITTLE PICANIINIES NO MATTER HOW MANY THEY HAVE WHILE IN ABJECT POVERTY. THERE IS SOME DYNAMIC GOING ON HERE THAT DEFIES THE IMAGINATION! THE NWO DOESN’T CARE ABOUT THESE SAVAGES EXCEPT FOR THE NATURAL RESOURCES THAT ARE ENSCONCED IN THEIR GROUND OR TO AGITATE THEM TO HATE WHITES!

    1. It makes me crack up that the liberals say we are declining in population so we need immigration. Then they turn around and say we have to reduce earths population to 500 million. Why not push this crap on the third world.

      1. Well we can’t be racist, obviously, everyone knows that’s the WORST thing you could ever be. We can sure as hell bomb the ever-loving shit out of their country if we find something valuable in it though lol.

          1. I like that others still see the hypocrisy of it all. We’re practically an endangered species anymore.

  5. Overpopulated by what standard? There’s more than enough food (the bulk is thrown away), more than enough land (it’s an issue of efficient use), and there’s no record amount of death due to lack of basic essentials (food, water, shelter). Resources aren’t the limiting factor, it’s misuse of those resources.

    The slow death of us all? Give me a break, your slow death will happen LONG before overpopulation takes YOUR life or the life of anyone old enough to read or respond to this article.

    Don’t tell me you’re taking a “for the good of the species” approach to this. If you are back off of your law of nature stance, the law of nature also proves out that no living thing truly values the good of the species over its own personal gain. The altruism myth is just that. Tragedy of the commons…. better get it before someone else, because it’s likely someone else won’t share your misplaced morals or ethics. Show me one living thing that operates on a “good of the species” mindset and I’ll show you the hidden agenda.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.