Eco-Fascists Upset: Global Warming Not Big Topic in Presidential Debates

In debates between Presdient Barack Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney, climate change is not a topic being discussed. Both candidates and moderators are glossing over the subject.

Alarmist scientists are warning that the planet will spin into destruction, sea-levels will rise exponentially, and drought will facilitate food shortages. The environmental community is seething with gritted teeth because their faux-cause is not being purveyed during the 2012 Presidential Debates.
Alarmist are using efforts like the Citizens Climate Lobby (CCL) is pressuring Capitol Hill to reintroduce this bill in letters to elected officials that use fear-mongering of man-made climate change as the purpose of such legislation. The CCL claim : “As evidence keeps mounting about the dangerous trajectory of human-induced climate change, it becomes clear that Earth’s natural systems are rapidly approaching tipping points for global warming. Failure to act now will doom future generations to one cataclysm after another –shortages of food and water, displacement of millions from rising sea levels, more frequent and severe weather disasters, and the breakdown of civil society.”

Michael Mann, eco-facist from Penn State University remarked: “Given that climate change may be the greatest challenge we face in the decades ahead, to be silent on the issue over the course of four debates does a real disservice to the country.”

]Mann has been at the center of propaganda ever since he published his hockey stick graph which became the cornerstone of climate change mythology. Essentially, Mann created a fake 1,000 year temperature reconstruction that has since been discredited. This exposure of the truth has been dubbed Climategate.

According to Mann’s own correspondence with co-conspirators the theory of man-made climate change is admitted to be a complete hoax. While efforts were made to hide evidences proving this fact from the public, scientists who knew this were fired or stonewalled to keep the ruse, editors knowingly assisted in altering published documents which displayed evidence contradicting the climate change alarmist view.

To counter the factual evidence surrounding Climategate, propaganda studies like a most recent one, funded by the Chinese Science Foundation, released by researchers at the University of Leeds in England and China University of Geosciences that claims global warming has contributed to mass extinctions throughout the history of the planet. During times of extremely hot temperatures, nearly all of the world’s species become wiped out.

Alarmists have suspected that volcanic emissions have caused catastrophic events such as mass extinctions. In this new study, they assume that this was the cause of the death of the dinosaurs.

Back in May, eco-facist scientists claimed that dinosaurs released so much methane through flatulence that they caused global warming and destroyed not only themselves, but the environment. Scientists are equating these dinosaur assumptions to the methane expelled by cows which is estimated at 100m tons per year. Ruxton and Wilkinson claim that cows are similar to sauropods that expelled massive amounts of methane into the atmosphere.

Researchers are now decrying that global catastrophe will take place by 2050 unless there is a drastic reduction in emissions caused by food production. Their main target is animals like cows, which emit greenhouse gases through their flatulence.

A popular mode of geoengineering is solar radiation management (SRM) which is a technique for blocking the sun’s light from hitting the earth in order to prevent heating effects onto the planet’s surface – mimicking the effects of volcanic emissions. SRM consists of spraying crystals and toxic chemicals such as sulfate aerosols and barium into the upper atmosphere.

According to the Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy (GGTP) report, produced by the Congressional Research Service, the US government “has joined with other nations . . . as a participant in several international agreements on climate change.”

Oversight concerning geoengineering research and experimental projects is allocated to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy (DoE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), and the Department of Defense. Although there is no provision, many of the UN’s international treaties relating to climate change, maritime pollution and air pollution are used to govern the pursuit of geoengineering.

SRM will directly amplify specific areas of study as the have chosen sulfuric dust the mimics the emissions of volcanoes. An intended consequence of SRM is that our skies are whitening because of the nano particles being released to reflect sunlight. Sulfate aerosols cause whiter daytime skies and sunset to glow brighter.

According to a study conducted by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in 2011, the Arctic is currently cooling and the effects brought on by sulfuric aerosols would cause more damage to the planet’s natural ability to cycle through its temperature fluxuations.

The focus of solar geoengineering is in the Arctic where the alarmists theorize that the necessity is the greatest to combat the melting of the ice-sheets. However, their disregard for natural cycles of the earth and the cyclical flow of melting and refreezing of these ice-sheets are the real danger to our planet’s normal seasonal cycles.

Leighton Steward spoke before Congress in 2009 and explained how carbon dioxide does not affect the earth’s temperature. Steward pointed to the carbon tax scheme that follows the false assertion that amounts to having humans pay for breathing. CO2 levels are lower than they have ever been. This is causing a real danger to the future of plant life on earth as they need carbon dioxide to live.

Klaus–Ekart Puls, physicist and meteorologist, has analyzed the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claim that regulating CO2 will “regulate climate change.” Puls found that the IPCC’s assertion is based on “speculative model projections, so-called scenarios – and not prognoses. Because of climate’s high complexity, reliable prognoses just aren’t possible.”

Mainstream propaganda reports  hat the Greenland Ice Sheet is melting at an exorbitant rate, which will free 240 billion tons of fresh water into the oceans annually. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is focusing on this as a cause for more alarm. Havoc will be realized as New York City will see seas rising which may displace residents and cause massive damage.

However, Danish researchers have studied archival photos to compare current claims of rapid melting. Kurt Kjaer, led author of the study and professor at the University of Copenhagen, stated that the glacier is melting and reforming at a normal rate and therefore “it’s wrong to use the current melting rate to make predictions about sea level rise in the coming century, as some studies have done.”

Puls agrees that sea levels have risen, however “it’s important to remember that mean sea level is a calculated magnitude, and not a measured one. There are a great number of factors that influence sea level, e.g. tectonic processes, continental shifting, wind currents, passats, and volcanoes. Climate change is only one of ten factors.”