Blaming Obama for Benghazi Could Ensure Clinton’s Presidential Race in 2016

The saga of Benghazi continues to be froth with disinformation because of one remaining factor: placing the blame for the murder of US Ambassador and CIA-asset J. Christopher Stevens, whether directly or indirectly, on Obama will cause an electoral upset and push the American people to vote for Romney on November 6th.

Mainstream propaganda coming out of the Glenn Beck camp, specifically host Andrew Wilkow with guest Ed Klein, now claims (through two anonymous sources) that Hillary and Bill Clinton have been “big fights” for nearly a month over documents that could be released that would prove Hillary’s innocence in the matter over the rent-villa at Benghazi, as well as point the finger at President Obama for not ordering the use of Special Forces teams after “confirmation” that the attackers were al-Qaeda.

Klein has a long history of purveying inaccurate information with anonymous sources known only to him that make claims that cannot be verified outside of Klein.

The terrorist faction Americans know as “al-Qaeda” were created by the US government in the 1980’s when US trained the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) in Afghanistan when the US was engaged in using the terrorist faction against the Russians. The MEK became the CIA-controlled faction known as al-Qaeda. Clinton said: “When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan we had this brilliant idea that we were gonna come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with stinger missiles, and everything else and go after the Soviets in Afghanistan.” This is the creation of al-Qaeda.

Clinton has admitted this fact. She goes on to say: “We were successful. We said ‘great’; and we left Afghanistan . . . Leaving these trained people who were fanatical in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Leaving them well armed and creating a mess at the time we didn’t recognize. When you look back today, the people we are fighting today, we were supporting in the fight against the Soviets.”

Wilkow and Klein refer to the gated-villa in Benghazi as a “US mission” and a “compound in Libya” but fail to call the leased property as it was; further purveying the lie that Stevens was at an extension the US Embassy that is actually located in Tripoli.

Wilkow claims that the Obamas and Clintons have a “very behind the scenes, tense relationship” which directly plays into the political theater being acted out in front of the American public. The old game of feigned in-fighting going on when the truth is that all political banter is the perpetuation of the duopoly that controls the social meme in American politics.

As part of the script, the purpose for this banter centers around Clinton’s much anticipated run for US presidency in 2016. Currently, Clinton is leaving the proverbial door open for continuing on as US Secretary of State if Obama were elected for a second term. Mainstream propaganda is expounding on how this strategy would help Obama gain more women voters to his campaign.

Klein contends that Clinton’s request for more security for Benghazi would have gone through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) special operations, or the Pentagon. And therefore the “ultimate authority would have been President Obama.”

The Special Operations branch of the CIA deals in guerilla campaigns using doctrine and guidance when facilitating “psychological warfare”. The trained operatives used for special operations are mercenaries, such as hired guns, soldiers from Blackwater (or Academi) and other private sectorsecurity firms contracted by the US government to ensure US interests foreign or domestic.

However, diplomatic security is assigned by directives of the US State Department. And Clinton is the member of the Obama administration who exclusively oversees diplomatic security. Those working under Clinton in this matter are Eric J. Boswell, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security; Scott P. Bultrowicz, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security and Director of the Diplomatic Security Service; and Tracy H. Mahaffey, Executive Director for Diplomatic Security.

Under the Bureau of Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) there are 2,000 special agents assigned to protect foreign diplomats visiting the US and diplomatic missions overseas. The DSS us an arm of the US State Department as a conduit for all major security and law enforcement matters. This is an agency of the US State Department; and therefore under control of Clinton.

The DSS would be charged by Boswell to protect diplomats such as Clinton when she conducts her diplomatic missions. The DSS, structured as a law enforcement agency, primarily made up of federal agents.

To confuse the issue more and divert the truth of the matter which resulted in the death of Stevens and 3 others is a meme recently propagated by suspicious sources that Obama had planned to trade the Blind Sheik for Stevens after a faked kidnapping. The story touts Obama’s desire to recreate former US President Jimmy Carter’s success and ultimate sympathy gained by the American public for the Iranian hostage crisis.

This redirection has made its way to Republican nominee Mitt Romney who remarked about the false story that “I—I think the president just said correctly that—that the buck does stop at his desk . . . and—and he takes responsibility for—for that—for that—the failure in providing those security resources, and those terrible things may well happen from time to time.”

Mainstream propaganda claims that a Clinton resignation over the events in Libya would only serve to cause a scandal for the Obama administration. True to appearance, Clinton would only want to paint herself in the best light possible considering she is intending to run for US President in 2016. Setting the stage now, would only serve her positively in the future.

Earlier this month, Patrick Kennedy appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee with a pre-written statement that said the attack in Benghazi was the fault of the Obama administration.

Just six days after this meeting, Clinton admitted that the executive branch of government is not involved in security decisions. Clinton continues: “Nobody wants to get answers more than I do. These were people who I care deeply about. I knew Chris Stevens. I asked him personally to be in Benghazi during the revolution. I personally nominated him to be ambassador because I couldn’t think of a better person to represent the United States: Somebody who understood what was at stake for Libya what was at stake for U.S. I saw how these revolutions could be so positive or hijacked. He understood that. He was instrumental in working with Libyans. I care deeply about what happened that night.”

She went on to explain in an interview with Margaret Brennan, that she takes “responsibility” for the events on September 11th “to avoid some kind of political gotcha.” She explained that she was confused after the attack and the initial demonstrations which appeared to be an unraveling of Obama’s foreign policy, and that “the president and the vice president wouldn’t be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals.”