American Judges and State Representatives Delphi the Public into Supporting Gun Bans

An interesting fact about the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 (CSA) is that the language seems to have been taken from a proposal made by Russia and China in 2011 to regulate the internet under the guise of fighting cybercrime.

At the UN, under direction of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the International Code of Conduct for Information Security states that international cooperation must be created to combat cybercrime and political dissension.

In this document, the UN would take a more “important role in formulation of international norms, peaceful settlement of international disputes, and improvement of international cooperation in the field of information security, and enhance coordination among relevant international organizations.”
Yet unknown to most, hidden within the CSA is a national restriction of “high capacity magazines” which obviously have little to do with cybersecurity.

In a statement US lawmakers want complete restriction of “online and mail-order sale of ammunition” while claiming that this new law would make our nation “safer for law-abiding Americans who are sick and tired of the ease with which criminals can now anonymously stockpile for mass murder.”

The Batman shooting was cited as inspiration for the bill.

Obama will evaluate the CSA, while the White House spokespeople will not confirm whether or not he will “support” it.

Pat Quinn, Illinois Governor, is now decrying that his state instill a total ban on assault weapons because of the deaths at the Aurora Theater.

While purporting to be a supporter of the 2nd Amendment, Quinn claims: “There is no place in the state of Illinois for weapons designed to rapidly fire at human targets at close range.”

Yet, Quinn has no problem with soldiers or local law enforcement having access to those weapons. It seems that only the citizens must not be allowed to procure these firearms for self-defense.

The amendatory veto power afforded the Governor will allow him to add language that would halt the sale, manufacture, purchase, and possession of “semi-automatic assault weapons and attachments.”

The term assault weapon is a catch-all phrase that really is meant to invoke the ideal of scary weapons in the hands of every day citizens. When the mainstream media refers to them, it is pure psy-op designed to coerce the public into giving up their Constitutional right to self-defense.

In Delaware, a federal judge has ruled that the Wilmington Housing Authority can prohibit residents from carrying firearms in “common areas” and that this decision is in line with the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution.

In an amicus-curie brief, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence stated: “Yet again, a court has affirmed that the Second Amendment does not infringe on gun owners’ rights when it comes to common-sense restrictions on the carrying of guns in public spaces.”

The original ruling of the US Supreme Court in 2010 said that “state and local governments couldn’t impose blanket bans on gun ownership.” In response the WHA simply banned guns in common areas, thereby imposing the same restriction by using different language to mask their infringement on the 2nd Amendment. And it worked. This time, their word-play was enough to dupe federal courts.

Let’s not forget that Eric Holder, US Attorney General, appearing before a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, back in February, said that the Obama administration is focused on reinstating former President Clinton’s “assault weapons” ban.

Holder said : “This administration has consistently favored the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we’ve seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico.”

False flag attacks like the Batman shooting and governmental cover-ups like Fast and Furious are manufactured so that the disarmament of the American public is the endgame. Their purpose is to facilitate this coerced national “debate” where we are being Delphied into believing that by relinquishing our ability to defend ourselves, we will be free of violence.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by of Occupy Corporatism.