What You’re Not Being Told About Trump’s War Against the Iran Nuclear Deal

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

Trump Iran

Last Friday, Donald Trump made a hard-hitting speech demonizing Iran. This shouldn’t have come as a surprise considering candidate Trump made it quite clear that he despised Iran. Prior to that, he had spent the last few years criticizing Barack Obama for entering into a nuclear agreement with the Iranian government. President Trump has now further intensified his stance, threatening to derail the deal multiple times before announcing his plan to “decertify” Iran’s compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Donald Trump has vehemently voiced his opposition to the JCPOA over the course of the last few years. “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States ever entered into,” is just one of Trump’s lamentations. He also called it an “embarrassment” and a “catastrophe,” at one point stating it was “incompetently negotiated.”

For the sake of this contention, let’s accept Trump’s assertion that the JCPOA is one of the “worst” and most “one-sided transactions” the U.S. has ever been a party to. If this is true, the simple solution would be to exit the deal completely.

So why hasn’t he exited the deal? The president has been in office since January, has been bashing Iran the entire time, and has flirted with demolishing the JCPOA numerous times. Yet the U.S. is still a party to this deal (remember, it’s one of the worst deals of all time).

Vox explains:

Accounts from inside the White House suggest that it’s supposed to be a kind of Goldilocks compromise: a move that would prevent Trump from having to regularly certify that the Iran deal is working, which wounds his pride given how publicly he’s criticized it, while simultaneously avoiding the potentially catastrophic consequences of quitting the Iran deal.”

If anything, President Trump is actually still acting well within the scope of the agreement – certainly not outside of it. As Vox explained further:

“Decertification, on its own, does not put the US in violation of this deal, because it doesn’t reimpose sanctions. There’s nothing in the text of the deal itself…that requires the American president to certify that Iran is complying with the deal’s terms.”

In other words, this deal is so bad that Donald Trump has decided to act completely within its framework and do nothing concrete to exit it.

The deal itself was formed with the help of China, Russia, France, the U.K., and Germany. In that sense, Trump has very few allies who openly want to see the Iran deal fail. Even among the most anti-Iranian hawks out there, there are none who support Trump’s position on this agreement. U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May gave a scathing speech against Iran earlier this year, and yet she, too, has warned against derailing the deal.

Russia has not been impressed with Trump’s self-proclaimed ability to cancel agreements if he so chooses. Nor has Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, and current High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs Federica Mogherini.

Even Trump’s own anti-Iranian advisors such as Rex Tillerson, General H.R. McMaster, and James Mattis all disagree with Trump’s position on the JCPOA. It was Mattis and Tillerson who had to try to convince Trump to certify Iran’s compliance in July of this year, which enraged the president.

But distancing himself from Obama’s “failures,” opposing Iran at every turn, and threatening to dismantle the JCPOA have been major elements of Trump’s foreign policy.

For those who enjoy fact-based assessments, when it comes to deals the U.S. has entered into, the JCPOA is without a doubt one of the most effective in recent history. If the aim of U.S. foreign policy is to prevent a rival nation like Iran from possessing nuclear weapons, to avoid a war with said nation, and to give some peace of mind to America’s closest allies in the region, the JCPOA is remarkably effective. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found that Iran is in full compliance with the agreement. It has dismantled thousands of its centrifuges and moved as far away from building a nuclear weapon as possible.

In contrast, backing Iran into a corner can only have one effect: an Islamic version of North Korea emerging from the shadows, radically expanding its nuclear program and testing all manner of missiles as a last-resort deterrence strategy to avoid an all-out confrontation. Who thinks it’s better to have the Iran deal fail than to avoid a potential nuclear holocaust?

A moron, that’s who.

As Vox explained:

“Trump doesn’t hate the Iran deal for policy reasons. He’s never offered a detailed public policy case against it, and experts don’t really believe he has one. ‘I don’t think anyone actually thinks he knows anything about the particularities of this agreement,’ says Sarah Kreps, a professor at Cornell University who studies arms control agreements.”

Instead, Trump was provided with an opportunity to continue to talk tough but prevent the deal from failing completely, which would be an “embarrassment,” indeed. According to the Washington Post:

“White House national security advisor H.R. McMaster and other senior advisers came up with a plan – one aimed at accommodating Trump’s loathing of the Iran deal as ‘an embarrassment’ without killing it outright.”

These developments may be the beginning of the end of the Iran nuclear deal. But the fact remains that Trump hasn’t presented any valid reason to oppose the deal in the first place. He most likely has no idea what the text of the deal involves and has ended up doing very little to follow through on his campaign promise to exit the Iran deal completely.

The only embarrassment the rest of us can see is Donald Trump himself, who is single-handedly and systematically destroying anything remotely positive in the international community and risking a full-on war simply to protect his own over-sized ego.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Darius Shahtahmasebi of theantimedia.org.

The “Anti” in our name does not mean we are against the media, we are simply against the current mainstream paradigm. The current media, influenced by the industrial complex, is a top-down authoritarian system of distribution—the opposite of what Anti-Media aims to be. At Anti-Media, we want to offer a new paradigm—a bottom-up approach for real and diverse reporting. We seek to establish a space where the people are the journalists and a venue where independent journalism moves forward on a larger and more truthful scale.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • John C Carleton

    Trump is an Israel firster.
    Iran is the recognized cultural and power head of the middle East. A position which the little crime cabal occupying Palestine, and Holocusting the Palestinian people, (so they can not claim their land rights, it’s called genocide), lust after their illegitimate selves. That is why American labor and blood is meant to take out Iran, so Israhell, can be the big boy in on the block.

    • darkhorse

      Israhel already controls the USA and our military. They engineered 911 to get us into the ME to topple those regimes so that Israhel could control the ENTIRE ME. They want Assad’s pipeline..ain’t being as easy as they thought it might…ditto Iran…Israhel is the ultimate killing machine.

    • THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH YOU DON’ FA

      As I have stated numerous times before, the true capital of JUSA isn’t DC, it’s Hell Aviv. Trump’s masters in IS= REAL-HELL gave him his marching orders during his meeting with AIPAC immediately after being inaugerated and now Trump will obey. He can’t get on his knees or bend over fast enough for Satanyahoo. Every one of the firsters must be expunged from our government.

  • Tanner

    Oh sure it’s a good deal. All we have to do is trust Iran, who chants “death to America” and refuses to allow inspections… Why would anyone have a problem with that?

    • Where do we get the authority to control their self defense when we say worse things about them than anything they have ever said about us? We have committed endless acts of war against them with no retaliation from them for almost a century. They haven’t attacked another country for over 2 centuries.

      • Tanner

        I’ve never seen American’s chanting “death to Iran” in the streets, when did that happen? Or, what have we done that you consider to be worse? If we end up with a nuclear Iran do you think they’ll suddenly stop chanting “death to America?” Obama and Hillary have paved the way for our enemies to destroy us. The Uranium One deal only benefited the Clintons and those in bed with them.

        • Again, where do we get the authority to control their self defense when we say worse things about them than anything they have ever said about us?

          • Tanner

            You didn’t answer any of my questions – But, I’ll tell you. It’s our responsibility to prevent weapons from those who are incapable of responsible guardianship of said weapons… Much like you wouldn’t give a 357 magnum to 4 year old. Iranians threaten violence to the US and Israel continually – so your answer is : Here, have some nuclear weapons. They want to kill us – we shouldn’t help them.

          • Where does “our responsibility to prevent weapons from those who are incapable of responsible guardianship of said weapons” come from, aside from our exceptional megalomania? Gaddafi gave up such weapons and was brutally murdered as a result.

          • Tanner

            Again, you didn’t answer any of my questions… Use some logic.

          • How does committing continual acts of war against other countries constitute logic?

          • Tanner

            No, I said “YOU” should use logic… If you’re being mugged in a parking lot do you think handing the mugger a gun would help defuse the situation? Sometimes we go to war to prevent attacks on us or our allies. Still haven’t answer even one question – to tough for you?

          • America has mugged almost every other country on the planet. When did Iran mug us?

          • Tanner

            So, you actually believe we should be helping our enemies, the people who chant “death to America”… We should help them achieve weapons that they can use against us? This is going to help us?

          • We don’t need to help them, we only need to protect ourselves, if and when we are attacked in reality, rather than in your paranoid delusions.

          • Tanner

            Part of protecting ourselves is not turning over Uranium and tons of cash. Your plan is to help them get everything necessary for a “fair” fight – My plan is to prevent them from getting the resources to fight with in the first place.

          • Since Iran has never attacked us in the history of the world, they aren’t allowed to protect themselves from their nuclear neighbor, Israel, who is openly planning to attack them?
            You need to stop believing everything the people on Faux News tell you.

          • Tanner

            Your too far left – you’ll never be right!

          • I am no where on the left-right socialist political spectrum. I have the same political orientation as the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, and they never thought about disarming another country to protect themselves. Your thinking belongs in the Third Reich, not America.

          • Tanner

            No, no you’re not the same as our founding fathers. When someone chants for your death- probably the worst thing you can do is supply them with the means to kill you. Just sayin’ – I think it’s a bad idea.

          • We have never supplied them with the means to attack us.
            Uranium One is not a government agency, it is a Canadian corporation with assets in America, in particular in Wyoming, where I live.

          • Tanner

            Obama and Hillary paved the way for the Uranium One deal- The Clinton Foundation made millions off the deal. Obama provided the money they’re currently using to enrich their nuclear program.

          • They committed treason in the process. Instead of arresting, prosecuting, convicting and executing them, you want to attack a country that has never attacked us? Have you been examined for sanity by a psychiatrist, because based on your posts, s/he wouldn’t find much. Your concept of logic isn’t.

          • Tanner

            Obama & Clinton, I definitely want them arrested… I never said I wanted to go to war – I just want to halt the Irian nuclear program. It should be able to be accomplished without war. And, BTW you’re definitely a Lib no matter what you say… They always accuse people of being crazy when they lose a debate.

          • Our government committed an act of war against Iran when we, working with the Israeli Mossad, planted the Stuxnet hack in the controller of their centrifuges, causing millions or billions of dollars of damage. Why didn’t they demand reparations in the World Court of the Hague, where there are outstanding indictments against all of the Bushes and Cheney, who are very careful where they travel, so they won’t be arrested and extradited to the Hague?
            If you are of the belief that the left-right spectrum is the only place where an educated person’s political position can be, you need to take the World’s Smallest Political Quiz and find out where yours is. http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.php

          • Tanner

            I’m impressed that you know about the Bush’s and the Stuxnet hack but my position is simple: we need to protect ourselves from the people who want to do us harm. Iran is not our friend – they want us and Israel gone! I don’t care if we’re playing world police or if things aren’t fair. I want the best life possible for my kids and their kids.

          • Will WW3 be fairer because we caused it instead of the Iranians, who have no nuclear weapons? Your children’s lives will be poorer than yours because we are destroying the world to protect ourselves and our allies, who hate us more than our enemies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=XHbrOg092GA

          • Tanner

            You bring no solutions to the table – just criticism. Until you have a better plan, I’d like to keep nukes out of Iranian hands. Giving them nukes will not improve the lives of my kids. Why are you so critical of government but no one else’s… Do you really think only our politicians lie, cheat and steal. I should believe the Iranian government but not my own… Are you even American?

          • The Iranians don’t have any nuclear weapons. If they wanted them, they could just buy them from the Pakistanis, like Kim might have, if he wasn’t being bullied by our annual military exercises off the coast of his country.
            If you haven’t watched Kevin Shipp’s video, you should.
            I was born in Carlsbad, New Mexico, but I’m not particularly proud of my government being the biggest terrorist on the planet.

          • The Military Instinct: The Human Race as Feral Dogs
            By Fred Reed
            October 20, 2017

            As Washington bombs Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Iraq, and Syria, militarily threatens Russia, Venezuela, North Korea, and China, sanctions Cuba, North Korea, Russia, Ukraine, Iran..one may wonder: Why?

            Are wars about anything, or just wars? In modern times, a reason of sorts is thought decorous, yes: Ruritania is threatening us, or might, or does something wrong, or Ruritanians don’t think rightly about the gods. We must kill them. And yet everywhere in all times, almost miraculously, some reason for a war is found. It would seem that wars are not about anything, but just what we do.

            Recently the collapse of the Soviet Union appeared to offer a prospect of extended peace. There seemed nothing left to fight about, at least on any scale. Yet the United States quickly launched a half dozen wars of no necessity and threatened others. Why?

            Because wars are what we do.

            It may surprise many people to learn of evidence for a genetic foundation of human behavior. This should not be surprising. Dogs form packs, mark territory, and bark furiously at strange dogs. So, it seems, do people. An empire is just the result of these canine instincts.

            Consider conservatives, as they are more relevant to the fighting of wars. (Liberals appear as genetically determined,)

            Conservatives tend to be tribal, intensely loyal to their group–race, country, ethnicity, religious faith–which in national terms becomes patriotism. They lack empathy. They see the world in terms of threats, conflict, and dominance. They favor capitalism and the Second Amendment, revere the military, speak of blood and soil, oppose taxation of themselves to give to the less fortunate.

            An important point here is that these traits clump together, although there is no logical connection. For example, one might rationally favor ownership of guns as necessary to self-defense yet oppose having a large military as unnecessary. One might favor a large military in what appeared a dangerous world, yet favor extensive governmental charity as what one might see as common decency.

            Yet this almost never happens. If you tell me that you oppose abortion, with confidence I can predict that you fit the description above of a conservative. If you tell me that you oppose the Second Amendment, I can be pretty sure that you favor abortion, acceptance of immigrants, marriage of homosexuals, and so on.

            We all have access to the same information about the world, to the internet, the same books and newspapers, and we all live in very much the same society. Yet liberals and conservatives arrive at sharply differing conclusions from identical evidence. This suggests an innate predisposition.

            Soldiers invariably fit the conservative pattern, prizing loyalty to their units and to their country, seeing threats everywhere, and becoming alarmed easily. For example, if an ancient Russian prop-driven recon plane, technically a bomber in the Fifties, flies near England, fighters will leap into the air to intercept it, grrr, woof, though the idea that the Russians would send one ancient bird to bomb Britain is lunatic. It is very like dogs barking frantically at a passing pedestrian.

            People in general seem designed to think about small groups, not countries of millions of people. It is impossible to think of, say, Russia as millions of individuals, especially when we have never seen even a single Russian. The almost invariable response is to compress a whole nation mentally into a sort of aggregate person. As I write, America is barking at North Korea, said to be a rogue state threatening several other countries. Countless men from the President through Congress to growling patriots in bars are saying angrily that “We can wipe North Korea of the face of the earth.” We’ll show the bastards.

            North Korea consists of twenty-five million people of whom perhaps fifty might want to attack anybody at all. The let’s-nukem men–almost always men, who are genetically more truculent than women, which is also true of dogs–think of the whole country as one pudgy man with a bad haircut. “We must punish North Korea” makes sense to them in these terms. Exactly why several million children in kindergarten need to be burned to death does not enter their minds.

            A great deal of international behavior makes sense, or at least makes no sense but does it in a consistent manner, if you look at the history of empire. This too appears to be instinctive, and therefore presumably genetic. Throughout history men–again, always men–have formed armies and set out to conquer, usually at the price of unspeakable bloodshed, lands they didn’t need. Sometimes the plunder brought a degree of benefit, seldom commensurate with the cost, but often not.

            Over and over and over, one country conquers its neighbors, sometimes forming large empires but often small ones almost lost to history. Then a new one arises and bursts the bubble of the first. This is instinctual as a dog peeing on a hydrant.

            We see this now. The United States has no need for an empire of perhaps eight hundred military bases around the globe or to fight constant and exhausting wars for places it doesn’t need or even like. America has no need of Afghanistan, for example, and is there only to keep China out–that is, from the instinct for empire. Again, peeing on hydrants.

            The lack of empathy usual in conservatives, in soldiers, appears all through military history, from the practice of putting cities to the sword to today’s indiscriminate bombing. It results from the tribal instinct. A fighter pilot will in time of peace be a good citizen, perhaps a good father, obey the laws and, should an earthquake occur, work tirelessly to save the trapped. Yet order him to bomb a crowded city in a country that has done nothing to deserve it–Baghdad, for example–and he will do it and pride himself on having done it.

            The behavior is innate and immutable, unchanged over the millennia, but today we seem to need to pretend to decency. Militaries and “intelligence” agencies, the chief vessels of brutal behavior, have become very sensitive to revelations of what we now call “atrocities.” Actually, atrocities are what militaries normally do. The norm now is to employ euphemistms–collateral damage-and to insist that atrocities are “isolated incidents.” Today governments, to maintain public support for the wars, or as least to discourage attention, carefully censors photos of disemboweled children or the CIA’s torture chambers. But the butchery continues as it did among stone-age savages. Pilots still bomb cities. The CIA tortures and probably enjoys it. Plus ca change, plus ca doesn’t.

            There is a slight difference. Militaries now know they are doing wrong, This is why soldiers become furious when persistently asked about atrocities. They would rather you not know. Yet the bombing continues and from the less politically careful conservatives come cries of, “Untie the hands of our soldiers,” and “Let the military do its job.”

            It is innate. We do what we do because it is how we are.

          • TrevorD

            Excellent summary.

          • Hillary 2020

            Good to hear from you again my friend. I hope all is well with you and yours.

          • TrevorD

            All good thx. I see you are still doing a good job in `slaying the dragons.`
            Excellent….

          • Paul

            guess what the controlled opposition club did to my account on infowars?

          • Hillary 2020

            Removed a bunch of comments? I see we’re on the back channels. Some scary s*** going on.

          • Paul

            I was just posting normal friendly posts, then when posting a red sign came up saying, banned by infowars… Looked deeper into the information… An account can be banned by a single site.. I think they ban the IP address, so one can’t just make another account… I will see about ways around that…

          • Hillary 2020

            That sounds very familiar. I doubt if they banned the IP address. Probably just the email. I wouldn’t be surprised if you could be back on right now with a new account, just do it under another email. Same Avatar, same username. I wouldn’t change a thing…

          • Hillary 2020

            Remember that Hoosier daddy? I remember him talking about getting banned and then coming back on the same day. Guest talking about IP addresses was basically a bunch of bullshit. I would be shocked if it was any more than your email. And just the fact that we’re still talking like this means it was Infowars and that Disqus didn’t have anything to do with it. If it was Disqus, the account would have disappeared and it probably would have been the IP address being banned.

          • Hillary_2020

            Any luck on that app?

          • Paul

            It will be a trial and error task… When infowars ban all the real accounts and just have guest, Zeusly, TraitorSlayer, Herps and a few others left, they will be satisfied… They better hope the fake account operators order the products…

          • Hillary_2020

            It’ll be hard for unemployed accounts to buy any product period lol.

          • Hillary_2020

            That has me wondering why yours got banned by IP address and mine got banned by email only… Could it be that I post from more than one IP address? If you’re using your phone data to do your posting wouldn’t your IP address change if you were using Wi-Fi instead?

          • Paul

            They went all out, full tilt to ban my account… They have the option to do a 7 day suspension of an account… They went to straight ban on my account…
            I know they are watching for my account to reappear… Let them play themselves out watching… They could even have some programs in place to automatically ban my profile if it reappears….

          • Hillary_2020

            Pretty much same thing here. Six months later, no change.

          • Hillary_2020

            That’s what I was afraid of also. Remember that I waited a couple of days? Also treaded pretty lightly for the first month or so. I’m not sure if that was really necessary or not…

          • Paul

            I think the IP address would change…

          • Hillary_2020

            Definitely.

          • Hillary_2020

            I imagine there’s a lot of free wifi hotspots where you reside… Each one with its own address… Even though I almost exclusively use data, I leave my Wi-Fi on. That way when I go to Walmart or any other place with a hotspot my address changes up. Could be what saved my ass the first time… They didn’t know what to ban so they just went with the email.

          • Paul

            I was just doing some research…. They can ban by email, IP address or by both including word, I guess that would be username…

          • Hillary_2020

            So when you tried you used a completely different email company? You’ll never know for sure until you get some place with WiFi and try a different address…

          • Paul

            I made progress… changed e mail, changed IP address, was able to get in….

          • Hillary_2020

            I knew you would.

          • Paul

            From what I am seeing, it seems they even blocked the avatar image code, so will have to get around that too…

          • Hillary_2020

            Nothing like a little overkill…

          • Paul

            Infowars operates on the premise that they are the victim… Everyone feel sorry for poor good guys infowars, for trying to get the real truth out, is their message…
            Alex has been in business for a quarter of a century, that doesn’t sound like anyone is banning him to me…

          • Paul

            I wouldn’t doubt guest is from the computer industry, profession or trade… guest probably has it set up that his email address and IP address changes every post he makes… He obviously has a way to hack into his own profiles and set, post numbers and up vote numbers to anything he wants…. I bet infowars couldn’t ban guest even if the wanted to, they’re stuck with guest… They will just have guest and TraitorSlayer left in the comment sections some day…

          • Hillary_2020

            Another thing I was just thinking about. “guest” has so many accounts with so many fake up votes on each one even if old Sparky has been banned numerous times there’s always another account to plant him on. And since all of his accounts are hidden, who would know the difference?

          • Paul

            Exactly, guest has a revolving door of fake accounts… He hits the sort by best, fake supporting and fake self up voting with a number of fake accounts, then puts them away, takes out more to do the same…
            guest could have ten fake, Leviticus Falwell accounts in use itself that all appear to be the same account…
            guest has a cheating system that works…
            We were talking months ago, suspecting that Roco could be four or more different accounts, that all look the same…

          • Hillary_2020

            That’s your only option. You’re going to have to go unrecognizable for a while… Hopefully the comment section will get back to normal before too long and you can bring this one back…

          • Paul

            They definitely banned by both e mail and IP address… I have the way around that now…

          • Hillary_2020

            Multiple ways to oppress freedom of speech…

          • Paul

            I know from experience that if an account goes right back on and even post, “Alex is great”, they would ban the account right away…
            From experience, I know they watch like crazy fanatics for the account to reappear… When they’re so tired from watching, they can’t watch anymore, is the best time to reappear… Too funny, but still shows how much they are against freedom of speech….

          • Hillary_2020

            I know. I waited a couple of days and then took it very easy for a while…

          • Paul

            I suspect my next account will be banned, I will probably have to make something completely unrecognizable if I have to…

          • Hillary_2020

            Maybe not. My ling has survived a lot longer than I expected it to lol. Of course this time the whole comment section seems a lot different… I guess it doesn’t really matter if the ling is banned or not. If I don’t dare use it for fear of being banned, what good is it?

          • Paul

            What I have done in the past after getting a second account banned is make a completely different username and avatar… That works the best… Those form moderators aren’t as swift as they like to think they are…They will usually resort to go by profile recognition to ban an account, instead of what words are written…

          • Hillary_2020

            That’s what you’re going to have to do…

          • Paul

            I think what may be happening is the troll club mass flags my posts, which give form moderators the oportunity to ban…

          • Hillary_2020

            That’s what I was thinking…

          • Paul

            Maybe enough flags to an account’s posts, causes the form moderator or a program, to ban the account without even reading the posts….

          • Hillary_2020

            I know for sure almost everything is automated on Disqus and I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of it is on Infowars also. I see they switched the featured comment on one of the articles, first time I seen that happen…

          • Hillary_2020

            Mine also works on those two sites, as you saw on the one. Not too many familiar faces though I noticed… Same thing just happened to Onyx. Those comment sections are like a ghost town… Even us bannedlings are welcome lol.

          • Paul

            Infowars will be a ghost town comment section too, if they continue to ban everyone…

          • Hillary_2020

            I haven’t checked for a few hours but earlier today their comments section traffic was way down. Even PJW article had little traffic…

          • Paul

            One fanatic infowars will never be able to ban is guest… guest will back hack that comment section and make the whole thing do crazy $hi+….

          • Hillary_2020

            Unfortunately I think you’re right. I should volunteer to be a moderator for them. I’d make it my hobby to chase “guest” and all his suspected accounts… Like a labor of love lol.

          • Paul

            I think since the infowars ccomment section has become such a joke, an account called, “guest’s neighbor” is needed to support guest in the most earnest way….

            “OK guest, your neighbor here. I up voted you, like you told me to. How do I up vote you again?”

            “Tell me again guest, what article am I suppose to up vote you next?”

            “Was that enough up vote to get you the featured post guest?”

          • Hillary_2020

            “guest”s drooling neighbor kid? Works for me lol.

          • Paul

            guest and his fist bumping bud…. guest being the special needs one, out of the pair..

          • Hillary_2020

            I’m still chuckling on your comment about the kid telling everybody about his new retarded friend lol.

          • Hillary_2020

            Made a little mistake on that banned site. Go to explore instead of channels and go down 29.

          • Paul

            I saw that…. I made a short comment…

          • Paul

            I did a post on queens…. After they study the post for 3 days for political correctness… They will allow the pending post in the comment section… Welcome to Canadian censorship… Alex is catching up….

          • Hillary_2020

            That’s a long time to study…

          • Paul

            They are a little to the left of Kim Jong Un…

          • Hillary_2020

            Now that’s what I call far-left. Can you imagine how the trolls would react if they had to wait 3 days for their comments to pop up lol.

          • Paul

            They would fly off the handle… Even more so, if their comment never appeared…

          • Paul

            For guest, that would be at least three trips to the mission..

          • Hillary_2020

            He was probably late getting back and they gave his bed to somebody else… He’ll probably end up sleeping on a park bench tonight… If I worked for the government I could solve the homeless problem overnight… I’d Just reclassify all of them as outdoorsman lol…

          • Paul

            Infowars creating a diversion that they are the poor censored victims… When they are banning real comment section accounts, left and right…. Everyone presently in the infowars comment sections, should be getting the drift of that by now… Only 26 comments in their latest censorship whining article is a message in itself…

          • onyxinjun

            Check out the “Tranny activist thread” on IW sometime..go back a bit..the one’s I called out the other night are right there…Neo, E Star, Chappie,FSOAB..these are the one’s talking smack on me for weeks..and they still are!! Its pretty funny really..these same 4 or 5 hanging out on the same thread..every night..as long as I can remember…i’ve known moat of them for months.I think they are in the same building. Look at what they get away with in one night…it’s funny..there is NO WAY if there was moderation over there, they could get away with that.

          • Paul

            I write to PJW once and awhile… I think I will let him know what is going on in the comment sections… He won’t be amused….

          • Hillary_2020

            Good idea. Seeing how much it’ll impact the readership of his articles, I can’t imagine he wouldn’t be interested in that…

          • Paul

            Another good person to write to could be Sergeant Joe Biggs… A fellow who has dodged bullets for freedom will understand…

          • Paul

            What could be a new username? “The dog catcher”. “Soros paid troll Buster”. “I salute Trump” . “Hatchling Crusher”. Lots of possibilities…

          • Hillary_2020

            I’m kind of partial to “The dog catcher” lol.

          • Paul

            It would look funny replying to Roco as, The dog catcher…

          • Hillary_2020

            The only problem is it would look pretty obvious…

          • Paul

            2nd account banned…

          • Hillary_2020

            No doubt about it, they’ve gone full moderation censorship…

          • Paul

            Infowars, There’s a war on (to ban accounts) for your mind.

          • Hillary_2020

            Old Herpes is still continuing that exchange I had going with him. I think I’ll start throwing Bible verses at them with the ling account. Then I can say ban that you pricks.

          • Paul

            Herpes, that is too funny… Often his posts are so smug, they’re funny…

          • Hillary_2020

            And annoying…

          • Paul

            Herpes is someone I wonder should be in a hospital…

          • Hillary_2020

            Psychiatric lol.

          • Paul

            In the area you reside, are there ever any real life superheroes? We have them in Ontario… When you said psychiatric, it made me think of real life superheros…. Real life superheroes deserve their liberties though…. They do their duties….

          • Hillary_2020

            Not many real life superheroes around here lol. Not too long ago I was just joking around with some family members about how nobody famous has ever come from this area.

          • Paul

            Hamilton, Ontario has The Iszling, aka The Isz….
            The main industry in Hamilton is steel manufacturing… I have never hung around Hamilton, but drove by a number of times…. It is a sanctuary city… The Iszling needs sanctuary, his feelings have been hurt too many times…

          • Hillary_2020

            He /she definitely has psychiatric issues…

          • onyxinjun

            The Isz told me the other day, “forget ego, upvoting one who is clearly melting down, is not the way”, so I upvoted him. That one upvote…and a coupon..would guarantee, he and I, could enjoy a breakfast of eggs, and a little bacon here, at the Western Siszllin. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

          • Paul

            The Iszling is only 73 km from Niagara Falls…
            The Iszling obviously needs a holiday…
            I have driven on the QEW there myself…

          • onyxinjun

            Any chance the Isz will be a barrel rider going over the falls? I would give him an upvote if he survived the drop..no kidding.

          • Paul

            I suspect The Iszling is too paranoid to venture too far from home… Maybe going to a well known bar, not too much more…

          • onyxinjun

            I suspect “The Isz” is busy rummaging through accounts…looking for an edge…while he has a dark cloud hanging overhead…while posting on a form now of “MAGA”, blending into all the other fake constructs..that will give him the most upvotes..in other words…saying whatever needs to be said, as to appear as one of the club..or appear as an intellectual among the sheep.

          • Paul

            You got that right…
            If you want to easily destroy the isz in a posting battle, you have to use his paranoia… For example make a reference to a bar or restaurant he goes to, that makes him loca…

          • onyxinjun

            At least we can take comfort..on these other channels..besides “IW”..if the mods don’t like you, or what you are saying…they simply say “move on”, and you comply,or get banned temporarily..unlike the latter where there is no warning..no recourse..noone real on the other side you can deal with…in other words “fair”.

          • Hillary_2020

            And in your case no good reason. That’s pretty crappy that they don’t provide a way to get ahold of the site…

          • onyxinjun

            Just looked at the Trump hat chick thread…and there are all the one’s I got into it with…spewing the filthiest crap..and mentioning me by name..lije they have been for weeks. No way they are real posters.

          • Paul

            Infowars, You are the (banned) resistance.

          • Hillary_2020

            The sad thing is that at one time they really were the resistance… Not anymore.

          • Paul

            The reason I went on infowars is because I was tired of the lack of freedom of speech on Canadian sites… The infowars libertarian ideas were similar to the libertarian ideas I have… Libertarian ideas that big corrupt governments, global elites and big corporations do not want the common public to be successful and they’re giving them a false reality….
            Now infowars is going againt freedom of speech, just like the Canadian sites did, no different, actually even worse…

            Maybe their ultimate goal is to have a paid subscription comment section or a free limited option or paid prenium option…
            With the prenium option the account can do pretty much what they can do now, with the free limited option an account can’t reply, can’t up vote, can’t receive an up vote and can only make one post per comment section….

            Maybe they will just go full subscription and that’s it, or having to pre order up votes, even pre order comments slots to fill in….

            Following the money, will show what direction these coment sections are going in….

          • Hillary_2020

            That was the reason I started reading Infowars also. They were great when they were libertarian…

          • Paul

            I can post a comment on Prison Planet and News Wars with this original account… I don’t know for how long though…

          • Hillary_2020

            I’ve never even tried that with this one. Maybe I’ll give that a try…

          • Hillary_2020

            As barren as those comments sections look I would say forever lol.

          • Paul

            Alex probably looks over sort by best comments and makes a list and hands it to a form moderator saying, “I want these people banned”…

            They don’t want anyone in the comment sections who really knows what is going on and exposes what is really going on…

          • Hillary_2020

            The only competition they want is controlled opposition…

          • Paul

            There are suppose to be government subsidies paid out, that the general public doesn’t know too much about… I don’t know how government subsidies work in the United States, but there could be a possibility that infowars is given government and or corporate subsidies… That is something they wouldn’t tell their readers and listeners….

          • Hillary_2020

            Probably just one of many things they wouldn’t tell their readers and listeners…

          • Paul

            I bet there is a massive long list of hidden information about infowars, the public would like to know… I read somewhere, infowars employees sign a nondisclosure agreement…. They can’t tell their secrets… It would make a great book, all their secrets revealed….

          • Hillary_2020

            No doubt about that…

          • Paul

            Will probably have to make a 3rd account that is completely unrecognizable… unless I can bring the 2nd one back….
            It proves how much they want to ban a real account…

          • Hillary_2020

            I saw 7 comments listed but only read 4. They deleted the last three that you made? I didn’t see anything in any of those comments that would be bannable. Those f****** mean business this time.

          • Paul

            I think the last three comments must have been deleted, probably were mass flagged by the troll club…

          • Hillary_2020

            Figures…

          • onyxinjun

            I caught a ban on IW…multiple flags on me at once…perhaps site mod…but not positive. Waiting till Wednesday, to see if it’s 7 day or permanent…and go from there. I kicked the Isz..hus buddy KingKong(he is Isz, or knows him well)..he knew plenty about me, despite being a week old account, and stating he’s commented for years…had 7 upvotes at the time…I hit 2 others as well in the same post..and I was out…around Tuesday night. I can upvote, but can’t comment. Waiting, before I go Mailinator, or try other means. Good day to you, and H2..PS..I just posted next to Leviticus on Breitbart, anr upvoted him for fun…he’s desplaying that ascii art again..the middle finger 😂😂😂😂

          • Paul

            I was also banned from infowars only, on Friday morning… I was banned and not one post deleted that morning… Just banned for the sake of being banned…
            The previous day 14 of my post were removed… I was under attack by, “Obama the magical negro.” Nothing wrong with that account name to infowars…. They removed my posts to Obama, maybe they thought it was the real Obama….
            I made a new account with an IP blocker, changer, it was good for a few posts, then banned….

          • onyxinjun

            Yeah they took me out Tuesday night. I had two that were bashing me for two days everytime they saw me..nothing done about them. Some said just change avatar, and name..some said use Mailinator.Nahh..i’m not sure I would start over. What sks is there’s no way to contact the mods for IW. All I did was claim several were using multi id’s…and that another had been trashing my name for weeks. That’s it..and I see today, all of them are using profanity, and sowing discord. Unbelievable.

          • Paul

            I wouldn’t be surprised infowars uses volunteer form moderators… I think Alex is a cheapo and hires everyone on the cheap…. The videos are quantity instead of quality… I have seen your posts many times and they would receive bashing that was irrational..
            Write to infowars thru their contact and go technical issues….

          • onyxinjun

            They are all volunteer from what i’ve seen..and I have had more trolls in the last two weeks than I have seen in a month..I don’t how involved AJ is toward the comment section..it all seems automated with no human oversight…or some really dumb bulbs running the show.. I mean comon..we get bounced for calling out self upvoting accounts, cheaters, trolls…while you can actually have an account with profanity in the account name…and they act as tho they don’t see it…something is broken on the sjte. I’m looking now…and every other cpmment breaks policy.

          • Paul

            The infowars comment section is a joke…

            If some account posts two year old political slogans like, “MAGA”, “Lock her Up”…. then it’s all good for the comment section…

            They don’t want anyone who can think for themselves….
            They don’t want anyone to have an original idea…

          • onyxinjun

            A ROYAL joke..one of these maggots”Neo” was a friend..then turned on me. He was banned a couple weeks ago..then came back after one week..still posting his fake American hero crap…comments filled with filth..but yells MAGA, after every comment…so it’s acceptable…pfftt..

          • Paul

            If someone goes in those comment sections with the intention of keeping it real, then they are guaranteed to be banned in time …

            Also quoting Bible verses every post, might help from being banned…

            Profanity, Bible verses and political slogans is the formula….

          • onyxinjun

            I see it all the time..as long as you profess to be a prophet..oracle…or chosen one..you are safe..yet over a week I see them post the most divisive/profane subjects, and content…within a day..who are they chosen by???

          • Paul

            They are self chosen…

            They could also be the so called mysterious, Soro’s paid trolls, destined to infiltrate and destroy…. A paid troll would probably be provided with all the most up to date cheating tools….

            I wouldn’t doubt infowars staff are in the comment sections, trying to control the narrative….

            Different political offices are probably in the comment sections, doing some cheap political advertising..

          • Paul

            I don’t understand why they would ban you, other than you thought for yourself…

          • onyxinjun

            I went after trolls..and they don’t seem to know, or care the same one’s had been harassing me for days. It’s messed up.

          • Hillary_2020

            Profanity, Bible verses, political slogans and shooting or hanging anyone who doesn’t agree with them. You forgot shooting or hanging anyone who doesn’t agree with them lol.

          • Paul

            Capital punishment with no trial… Not even an unfair trial…

          • Hillary_2020

            TraitorSlayer lol.

          • Paul

            TraitorSlayer, how does that escape the ban fan club….?

          • Hillary_2020

            Threats of violence are perfectly acceptable on Infowars comment boards…

          • Paul

            TraitorSlayer uses a full menu of script cheating tools… The auto reply bot script of ten cookie cutter TraitorSlayer replies is a good example.

            If he doesn’t get banned for using reply scripts, then nobody should get banned for use of any words…

          • Hillary_2020

            Him and his psycho troll buddies fit the Infowars narrative perfectly…

          • Paul

            The latest article about Infowars whining about being censored, only received 26 comments… People are not feeling sorry for infowars anymore…. Three years ago, that same article would have received 250 or more comments…

          • Paul

            Keep in mind they ban by both, email address and IP address and maybe by username in addition…

          • onyxinjun

            Doubtful I would go back unless they lift it. Hoosier got clipped? He was one of the greats.

          • Paul

            I suspect many good accounts got deleted for prejudice reasons, that is only the prejudice of the form moderator … It is like infowars is out to harm themselves by casting out their customers…

          • onyxinjun

            Judging by the threads today…I think we are just part of the “purge”. It looks barren of most real posters…and hundreds of new profiles taking up whole threads.

          • Paul

            I wonder if those new profiles are computer generated…? They could post computer generated comments, that are pre-written )

          • onyxinjun

            My thoughts exactly…just saw one thread…maybe 5 posters on it..but they each had 20 or so comments to each other…really long comments..i’s like that on several other threads.The real posters are being drowned. I checked out banned camp channel, couple others..these channels actually have the mods commenting within, and everyone kbows who the mods are. Not sure if that’s good or bad, but they could say anything..yet I didn’t see alot of spamming, or self upvoting nonsense..

          • Paul

            An article comes out, and an account can instantly write a small essay on it? It seems what they’re doing is unatural…

            Do some accounts get articles before other accounts, is a thing I have been wondering? How can some accounts write so many comments in so little time? It seems what they’re doing is unatural…

          • onyxinjun

            Many of “these”, seem to drop mass amounts of data in a short time..and many are typing..as soon as you hit “send”. Way faster than what a “human” is capable of.

          • Paul

            The auto reply bot scripts, loaded up with cookie cutter replies…

            Also the cut and paste style of replying of just changing a few words… The Isz made famous…

            Something is also going on, when an account places 5 lenghty posts, on 5 articles all at the same time….

          • onyxinjun

            Several “groups” I see make it to the same thread…every night…and argue with each other…yet stay together…the same 5..and protect each other…for 6 hr shift.

          • Paul

            If one or two of those groups massed flagged one individual account, that would be it for that individual account…

          • onyxinjun

            A friend of mine said he could do it using multiple id’s as well. He said usually after 3 or 4 days passes,a live person will catch it, and release it…not so far.

          • Paul

            I have a feeling they would be too lazy to let a banned account back on…

          • onyxinjun

            I have to agree with you. It would require them to do work.There’s the reason you can’t reach out to site mods in the first place..there’s like 4 total(verified) and it’s easier for them to leave it banned.

          • Paul

            This is an alternative idea… Get the infowars postal mail address off of their site… Write a letter on paper, mail the letter to infowars and a few copies to large newspapers and or websites…

          • onyxinjun

            Well..I sent an Email to tech support(good idea) but as usual…crickets..what boggles the mind is how much better all the Disqus channels are..they have mods..everyone talks..bo spamming..no upvote cheaters(I rarely see more than 6 upvotes per) and there’s never 10 hots attacking you..or some random dirtbag telling you to put a gun in your mouth.These troll groups on IW..they would not survive these other Disqus channels..I saw one thread in “banned camp” had 3 mods(clearly labeled) and they were the nicest people..said thank you for coming by…come back anytime..wtf? IW comment section is crap compared to these other channels.

          • Paul

            I have had real accounts tell me they figure infowars comment sections have Soros paid trolls, Asian students in the USA… Shills of every sort…

            Infowars seem to have the attitude F U, we have Trump now….

            I never said one thing bad about Trump in the comment sections…

          • Paul

            On infowars, the mods must be right out of the troll camp….

          • onyxinjun

            I think you got it right…but the ones i’m seeing now are not your standard macros bold type Leviticus/Roco jobs..or insert ascii art jobs..they are full length 150 words, or more, 20 to a thread..and same 5 or 6 the whole length of a 100 comment thread. It’s like there has been an upgrade, to what people will notice, or believe are real posters.

          • onyxinjun

            I saw at least 5 that got busted out, and are trying the gray variant..slightly different name..you know that’s not gonna work..but recently, some of worst were back after just a few days. I worry…without us all around..the Isz ego is going to inflate to even loftier proportions. His posts look half dead. He still maintains he never got banned before. 😆😂😂 Yeah, like his ego would allow him to give up an account with over 65k upvotes.pffttt.

          • Paul

            The Isz wouldn’t give up to be The Iszling without a reason…
            I see your point, it would be like I came back on as Paul’s…

          • onyxinjun

            He isz a legend in hisz own mind..and guards his eggs(upvotes) with the care a crocodile would…upon the nest.

          • Paul

            The Isz told me before, he wanted to be famous… He already covered being annoying, to the max..

          • onyxinjun

            I considered coming back as “Onyxinjling” just for fun..and Paul”The Dog Catcher”…wouldn’t that be fun????😆😆😆😆😆

          • Paul

            “guest’s neighbor” would be funny…

            “guest, was I suppose to reply, Lock her up or him up?”

            “OK, guest I up voted that comment like you told me, was there anything else you wanted?”

          • onyxinjun

            I agree… so many possibilities…”The Liszard”, “Bacon n Eggsz”, “Niagara Leszbian”, “Rocofelller”,”Live in a gross stairwell” ..

          • Paul

            “The Iszard” “Isz Retarded” “Iszabizabuzza” “Reverend Roco” “TraitorRetard” “Isz banned” “Lee ann’s g string” “ling hunter”
            “The Rocoling”

          • onyxinjun

            Hahaha..Lee Annsz g string,..tha dinglaling…The Rocoling..so good.

          • Paul

            “Isznukshuk” “Roco’s Essentials” “The banned resistance.”

          • onyxinjun

            I purchased a loafer today..just one… that Roco can chew on..instead of doggie treats all day…I have a dozen eggz that the Isz..can hatch, on his nest..and no amount of Macros bs pre-paid spam from Illviticus will make me like him anymore.

          • Hillary_2020

            I remember Hoosier daddy saying that he was banned many months ago. He reincarnated himself though. I’m not positive but I’m pretty sure Michael Moore-on is one of his latest…

          • onyxinjun

            That’s crazy they would clip Hoosier…one of the nicest. I know for sure that Michael Moore-on has been”Thirsty?…and”I’m your real Dad”, because I get along swell with that one…he never mentioned Hoosier tho. Hmm..

          • Hillary_2020

            I could have been mistaken about…. I always thought I’m your real dad was his next account but I could be mistaken. Seems like a lot of similar comments but could be wrong…

          • onyxinjun

            You could be right..but he told me personally about his other names..just not Hoosier..of which I was aligned with..and had a good friendship with…not saying he is not..just saying he hasn’t told me.

          • Hillary_2020

            It probably isn’t him. Sometimes I put a little more stock in my detective skills than what’s probably warranted lol.

          • Paul

            The new infowars tee shirt that has the infowars logo in big red font, needs to be changed to, infowars – Against Freedom of Speech….

          • Hillary_2020

            Or “Censorship Rocks”…

          • Paul

            A tee shirt that says, “You are the banned resistance”.

          • Paul

            I used to be on a comment section, when I would say anything about anti male feminists or feminist scammers, my account would get deleted… That site would just ban by e mail address, never by everything possible like infowars does…

          • Hillary_2020

            Infowars wants to hurt as many innocents as possible.

          • Paul

            I have had prople ask me, if Alex sells natural health products, why does he look so unhealthy…
            In the area I reside, I am the only one who goes on infowars, except for a fellow I know who might read the odd article or watch a video once and awhile…

          • Hillary_2020

            All that lead and mercury probably isn’t helping him any lol.

          • Paul

            Check the latest PJW article, I am in… Was able to get around the avatar problem by going as unknown image, bit of a fluke but trial and error…

          • Hillary_2020

            When you get a chance Google Gary Rea banned from Infowars. And look closely at the date of the article and see how much it pertains 9 years later…

          • Paul

            I will check out that article… It is very weird to ban an account for use of words. It would make more sense to ban an account for use of actions, such as bots, scripts, hacks etc… What guest and TraitorSlayer does… Words don’t bother me in the comment sections, it’s the bot and script operators that make the comment section a joke…
            TraitorSlayer admitted he uses auto reply scripts…
            guest admitted he uses fake self supporting accounts…
            The isz, that’s just a paranoid mess, that needs mental health…

          • Paul

            I read the article… It is just like the article was written this week… The comments on the article are really accurate.. People are leaving comments on the article still this year, as I just did…
            Obviously infowars does not want to improve their comment sections… Given the same comment section crap has been going on for a decade, tells me it is comming from the policies of Alex himself…

          • Hillary_2020

            Like you said, it was just like it was written this week. I’d like to think that maybe it’s just an overzealous volunteer or employee, but if it’s Alex himself that is a major disappointment…

          • Paul

            I think it is the policies coming directly from Alex… Employees and volunteers come and go, policies stay in place… It is like the shows on television about cults, how they talk about policies from the cult leader are written in stone and followed to the letter…. They always go back to the policies on what to do and what not to do…

          • Hillary_2020

            I just read the same thing. Sounds like a lot of potential for collateral damage. Innocent people not being able to post because of email domain and IP address having a broad sweep.

          • Paul

            Their blocking of freedom of speech is on the increase all the time….I guess they never thought that blocking accounts is also blocking wallets to order the products… Maybe that’s why they started selling tee shirts for under ten dollars that use to be over twenty dollars….

          • Hillary_2020

            They’re on the Trump train now. Who worries about money lol.

          • Paul

            I was thinking the same thing… I wonder what happens if a cracker jack democratic politician beats Trump the next election, where does that leave infowars?
            I think Trump will win the next election, I know people who doesn’t think he will win at all…

          • Paul

            Maybe guest contacted infowars and offered to be a volunteer form moderator… I know for a fact that other sites have only used volunteer form moderators…
            I once wrote a long article about form moderators and what qualifications they have to be a form moderator… There are no qualifications, that’s the problem… Any form moderator can hold any prejudices and use them…

          • Hillary_2020

            Very scary. You just read my mind. I was thinking the same damn thing just a short time ago… And you’re right, no qualifications necessary other than volunteering the time to do it.

          • Paul

            A form moderator is no lawyer who would know what is libelous, slanderous and illegal or not…

          • Hillary_2020

            Big news! My last comment on underneath Stardoll site is pending. Am I going to be banned from underneath Stardoll??? Oh no, not that, anything but that!!! LoL.

          • Paul

            We will have to go on a Canadian snowfkake site called The Queens Journal, or The Oueens University Journal, if it’s easier to google from your area… Canadian censorship at its best… It is the template for what Alex wants to be…

          • Hillary_2020

            I remember you telling me about that one. We only have to wait 3 days for a messages to get through, if they get through lol.

          • Paul

            That’s the future of infowars, right on The Queens Journal….
            Canadian style censorship…. The Queens Journal will have a typical news story about how some woman went to a coffee shop, was called a racial name by another patron, cops were called, cops rushed in, but the name caller was able to slip away beforehand , the hunt continues…

            In reality, the poor taxpayers, paying for schoolyard foolishness…

            I even quit TripAdvisor due to censorship, other sites too…. Pretty soon there will be no sites left to say anything…

          • Hillary_2020

            China style internet…

          • Paul

            I hear that site use to be a booming site years ago….

          • Hillary_2020

            I better be careful. It would be a fate worse than death if I developed an unquenchable interest in dolls and couldn’t comment on their site…

          • Paul

            If someone said something bad about Islamic Barbie, they would probably be banned for life…

          • Hillary_2020

            Total political incorrectness lol.

          • Hillary_2020

            Found an interesting Channel. On your Disqus home page, go to channels and scroll down I think it’s like 29 down. It’s called Banned camp. A channel for people in our predicament. Only looked at it for a minute or so but will go back later…

          • onyxinjun

            Is that where you have to choose 3 channels to get started? I don’t see one for the banned…I could use a support group..I’m Onyxinjun…i’ve been banned…HELLO ONYXINJUN!!!

          • Hillary_2020

            Oops. My mistake, go to explore instead of channels and go down 29 channels and you’ll find that site.

          • onyxinjun

            Got it..thanx..looking at subjects now H2.

          • Hillary 2020

            Surprisingly it’s still functional. I’m going to go back and read your latest exchanges. We’ll see which one of those humps did it. Don’t give them the satisfaction. Just do what I did…

          • Paul

            My account is functional on anything but infowars… It was banned by infowars…

          • Hillary 2020

            Same thing that happened to the other side. I know I waited a couple of days but I think a couple of minutes would have been sufficient. If it happened again I wouldn’t hesitate to be back 5 minutes later…

          • Hillary 2020

            Well that didn’t take very long. About 2 minutes. Old Sparky / “guest”. I guess the featured comment section went to his head. It makes fake up votes look like small potatoes…

          • Paul

            The answer is why Alex can bilk almost 1 million out of readers and listeners and not go to jail…. just to pay for his divorce by not using his own money…. Controlled opposition???

          • Hillary 2020

            Looks like our Irish hooligan is involved also…

          • Paul

            For sure, look how he sought my account out on infowars today…

          • Hillary 2020

            Until just a few hours ago I actually had the one on the other side hidden. Those weird accounts kept showing up to up vote me on the last three comments I made directed to him. I suspect he has some techie shenanigans he knows how to pull.

          • Paul

            I wouldn’t doubt that every one of my posts were multiple fake account flagged… guest did a post today where he gloated that he had a friend who worked for disqus who looked up my IP address… That’s a pretty good admission that he was involved in addition…

          • Hillary 2020

            I read that. What a crock of shit. Like anybody from Disqus would give him the time of day.

          • Tanner

            Centrist – according to your test.

          • I score a perfect 100% on both parts of the test, putting me at the top of the Diamond Chart, along with the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, something you would know if you were to read what they wrote about almost everything they thought about while participating in their Committees of Correspondence.

          • Tanner

            LOL! ….I’m sure you do. You’re so superior to the rest of us mortal beings. Unfortunately, not everyone is a “Diamond” and certainly no one else is of your superiority in the world so we have to be prepared for those who lean left, right or want to do us harm. Since you are so superior and completely unbiased which you’ve managed to conceal heavily in your posts – I’ll humbly move on and not bother you any further. Get well soon!

          • You will be expressing pride at being an exceptional American who scored 50% on two tests that the founders would have aced?

  • Cause you know, there is nothing wrong with shipping 3 nuclear warheads from Dyes AFB TX straight to Iran in 2013.

  • Frank Energy

    So then why did USA fly like .4B to 1.2B in USD cash to Iran…….

  • SP_88

    This is just hubris. He doesn’t like it because there was a lot of bad press about it during the campaign. Because it was negotiated by Obama, who was a very weak, limp wristed president, many in the alternative media thought this was a very bad deal. And nobody made sure that Iran was actually following the terms of the deal, at least not according to articles about it.
    But now it appears that this is a good deal, and Iran is complying with it. I guess I just can’t keep up. And I haven’t read enough about it to say that I know one way or the other.
    There is an article about it on The Federalist that says we have no idea if Iran is complying with the deal. I didn’t read it. And even if I did, I have no way of knowing whether it’s true or not. For all I know, Trump could be right.
    I’ve read that Iran hasn’t attacked another country in over a century. But I’ve also read that they are financing a lot of terrorism as well, which could be true, or it could just be unproven accusations to make them look bad.
    It’s become very difficult to trust anything in the media anymore.

    • Scrollock

      I don’t even trust this website anymore.

      • Which can only be because you refuse to do your own due diligence instead of believing all the propaganda that you can consume.

        • Scrollock

          Pardon, your bias is showing.

          • So is yours, and it appears to believe everything you are told.

          • Scrollock

            And I’m sure you’re going to say the reason I don’t believe you is because I’m stupid, oafish, a neo-libtard, etc. What, exactly, are you trolling for? Do you think I’m going to say that you are right and I am wrong? It’s because of people like you that I no longer trust this website. Your ad hominem attacks show a lack of depth to your arguments which is normally associated with progressive trolls. Instead of asking why I have a certain opinion, you attack me for expressing it. This s a progressive tactic, and shows me that it would be to my advantage to ignore your posts rather than respond to them.

          • You are apparently too ignorant to block me. I don’t have that problem.

  • Iran is the crown jewel in the neo-cons’ plan of conquest in the middle east.

  • The “deal” wouldn’t have been needed if those working on it had merely bothered to check with the IAEA with respect to the fact that Iran has always been in compliance with their inspection protocol and has never been found to be engaged in the enrichment of nuclear weapons grade uranium, which is of much higher purity than that required for use in nuclear reactors.