Video: Observable Universe Contains 10x More Galaxies Than Previously Thought

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

universe

Astronomers recently analyzed data and came to a surprising conclusion: There are at least 10 times more galaxies in the observable universe than previously thought.

From HubbleSite:

One of the most fundamental questions in astronomy is that of just how many galaxies the universe contains. The landmark Hubble Deep Field, taken in the mid-1990s, gave the first real insight into the universe’s galaxy population. Subsequent sensitive observations such as Hubble’s Ultra Deep Field revealed a myriad of faint galaxies. This led to an estimate that the observable universe contained about 200 billion galaxies. The new research shows that this estimate is at least 10 times too low.

The results have clear implications for galaxy formation, and also helps shed light on an ancient astronomical paradox — why is the sky dark at night?

The decreasing number of galaxies as time progresses also contributes to the solution for Olbers’ paradox (first formulated in the early 1800s by German astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers): Why is the sky dark at night if the universe contains an infinity of stars? The team came to the conclusion that indeed there actually is such an abundance of galaxies that, in principle, every patch in the sky contains part of a galaxy. However, starlight from the galaxies is invisible to the human eye and most modern telescopes due to the other known factors that reduce visible and ultraviolet light in the universe. Those factors are the reddening of light due to the expansion of space, the universe’s dynamic nature, and the absorption of light by intergalactic dust and gas. All combined, this keeps the night sky dark to our vision.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by The Daily Sheeple of www.TheDailySheeple.com.

This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.TheDailySheeple.com.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Andrew Miller

    Nice paintings organized into a cute cartoon. “The sky looks dark to you because you can’t see all this, But we can see it. Trust us.”

    • Lisa Egan

      What possible reason would anyone have for making this stuff up? Please enlighten me.

      • Andrew Miller

        To keep you thinking that you, and every other living thing around you, is the product of random chance in a vast chaotic universe. You are insignificant. You mean NOTHING as an individual. It creates the mindset that enables THEM to control you.

        • Gary

          But isn’t NASA a military organisation? And not just any military organisation, a United States military organisation? And aren’t the United States the good guys? The good guys would never lie to us. Especially not the good guys’ military. 🙂

          • Kendo

            Organization is spelled with a Z… Unless your British. Then it’s OK

          • Al Mather

            Least of his issues.

          • Gary

            Or from Australia. Its a British colony toward the edge of the flat Earth.

          • Al Mather

            But wait Gary… you also say all those back yard photographers and hobbyist astronomers taking pics of satellites are part of the big “evil Jews” plot too…right?

            Plus ALL the astronomers worldwide, …all the Universities, all the students studying astronomy and astrophysics,… all the people in the satellite ,broadband,entertainment and communications industries ….in all the thousands of companies around the world…(and of course their families) for generations now…. in hundreds of countries…all the military satellite divisions … wow..it just goes on when you think about it… and YOU believe they are all operating in concert in some big overarching Jewish plot to mind control people by making them believe in space????

            Gary… Tsk…Tsk….

          • Tim Webb

            Show me a single picture of an orbiting satellite taken from anywhere, let alone a back yard.
            They do not exist.

          • Al Mather

            It’s become quite the hobby of late…There are even tracking Apps for your Iphone that will tell you the exact time and location of various satellite to take pics…I can show you how it’s done…and provide dozens and dozens of pics.

            http://www.diyphotography.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/P900-ISS-Crop.jpg

            http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2009/03apr09/Oscar-Martin-Mesonero1_strip.jpg

            http://www.madmanrc.com/images/ISS-Try3.jpg

          • Kendo

            Have you ever heard of Direct TV or Dish Network. I have personally installed hundreds of their dishes.
            They use a geosynchronous orbit.
            A geostationary satellite can be visible
            through out every night of the year, only entering the Earth’s shadow for roughly
            70 minutes per day, a couple of weeks either side of each equinox.
            During the same period the satellite tends to brighten over several days, twice
            a year, when the satellites orientation favors the reflection
            of the Sun in the direction of the observer.
            The truth shall set you free.

          • Just to let you know, you’re replying to ZIOMAN the known paid shill.

            Hey ZIOMAN! What’s up, shill boy? Having a tough time maintaining you’re stupid ball theory that has been thoroughly debunked? Less people listening to your bullshit theses days? Awww, that’s just a shame.. a damn shame.

          • Al Mather

            Debunked…by who flight tracker boy?

            Wanna go over your flat earth map again?

            Roger…you bring this stupidity to Daily Sheepish … the internet hotbed for conspirotard fuknettery…where practically EVERYBODY so so so wants to believe in conspiracies and boogeymen and …hey ! …if you can blame Jews that’s icing the cake! And as far as I have seen other than your date Gary …who you came to the dance with… everybody either calls you guys morons… or just keeps their distance.

            I know in your mind you rock their worlds with your awakatude… but nobody is buying this FE stupidity. People just politely cringe and move on. Occasionally someone who hasn’t heard you spew before gets snared in the dumbness for a comment or 2 …but that’s all you got.

            So to answer your question …No… not having a problem maintaining “ball theory”…

          • lol, ahh but you are indeed having a major problem containing the establishment’s Earth globe lie even if your delusions prevent you from realizing it and there’s evidence right here on this page with more people questioning the globe than ever before but you keep being that hero you are in your head if that’s what keeps you ticking but never forget the fact that you are the beta that follows me and Gary around and your actions will never allow you to escape that label 🙂

          • Gary

            Well played, sir. But be careful where you step. I trod in a Mather some time back, and no matter how much I scrape, no matter how much I hose, I just can’t seem to remove the stench of it from my boot.

        • Al Mather

          Understanding the vastness of the universe has no bearing one one’s individuality… & it’s not as though people get their self esteem by judging themselves against celestial bodies or distances… what kind of idiotic conspirotard logic is that? Who are THEY in your little confused brain???

          • Tim Webb

            It’s not the vastness of the universe, even assuming that it is vast, which is his point.
            It is the chaotic and random nature of that universe, according to so-called scientists.
            I think therefore that the confusion is coming from your, er, little brain.

          • Al Mather

            No confusion here… seems that you conspirotards short sell your maker. Just because YOU can’t grasp something…because YOU don’t see the order or beauty or hand of creation…does not mean that other do not.

          • Be careful, Tiim, this shill will follow you around if you post any truth about the flat earth, my comments are full of me responding to his bullshit lies and denial. The only reason I do it is because it wakes more people up, not sure why he digs his holes deeper though, my guess it’s the shekels.

  • TrevorD

    If we continue to look at the universe in a scientific way then we get scientific answers sponsered by `Governments`
    Once we realize that we have no answers to the ultimate questions of the universe we can then understand that is the way it is supposed to be for now.
    True revelation and `Full government disclosure` are nearer than we think.

  • Kendo

    When you consider the fact that the visible spectrum of light is 400~700 nano meters and wavelengths range from 100km~10x6th nm. There is more we can’t see than there is that we can see…

    • Andrew Miller

      Yeah. They always have something to say about it. A camera in “orbit” (The Hubble” is able to see deep into the cosmos, and they give us pictures to tell us it’s true, but a camera on the moon, during the alleged “landings”, still shows a black sky, without even the normal stars we can see from the ground. Throw some more numbers at me. Come on, I’m sure you have some. 🙂

      • Kendo

        No numbers needed, it’s obvious.

        Camera was set for a brightly-lit area so the stars were too faint to see. Too much ambient light causes camera iris to close, blocking out faint light. Look at Apollo 16, they used an ultraviolet type camera that does show some stars 😮

        • Gary

          So… Why don’t they put a camera like the Hubble on the moon now? Oh, that’s right, they can’t get to the moon anymore because there’s too much radiation in the Van Allen belt. Lol.

          Lucky they didn’t know about that in 1969, or those astro-nots would’ve been fried within their tinfoil and duct-tape space module!

          • Al Mather

            Even Van Allen himself has dismissed the stupidity of not being able to travel through the Van Allen belt. More conspirotard stupidity.

          • Kendo

            Well done my properly informed friend.

          • Apparently not informed enough to know that NASA freely admits it, that’s very easy to find… wonder how he missed it? 🙂

          • Well NASA engineers, themselves, disagree:

          • Al Mather

            So…let’s get this straight…you’re saying this evil organization NASA…. controlled by Jews of course… which has been part of this incredible hoax perpetrated on the entire human race for centuries…has somehow (you can’t really give details) faked space travel, moon landings,satellites, all satellite communication,weather monitoring imagery, ISS, all other countries space programs, (like those Jew loving Russians & Chinese)… and thousands and thousand of other details … employed millions upon millions in it’s execution with no one EVER betraying the hoax…. FINALLY BLEW IT!!! ….incredibly …by writing and producing a video (which they edited themselves) where they “accidentally” admit that they can’t get past the Van Allen belts?????

            That’s your conspirotard “proof”????

            That’s the way YOU interpret the reality of this video ,Roger?

            The Orion is being designed for versatility… which will include high earth orbits … prolonged periods in the Van Allen belts has always been a problem.. and trajectories always used which lessened the exposure. The whole purpose of the flight he is talking about is to test things like shielding.

            Nice try conspirotard. Brilliant.

          • Gary

            So what’re ya saying Al? Do you think the Youtube video was another mirage? Perhaps everything we all see is a mirage, and only NASA has the ability to filter mirages from their vision?

            You heliocentrists will make up any excuse to cling to your obsolete theory.

          • Al Mather

            No,Gary…. I called just the ONE stupid conspirotard “proof” a mirage.. because its a famous infrequent mirage… Reported in the news as a mirage…. Described as a mirage by the photographer himself! Makes one wonder why that one famous mirage is such a popular fellate earth “proof”… If the planet were actually flat wouldn’t we see “proofs” all around us in nearly every direction … Instead of having to keep recycling the same idiotic claim using the same images of that ONE famous mirage? No… The above NASA video is quite real … As are the Van Allen belts… As are the rockets and the science behind them.

          • Gary

            Not really, Al. You’ve been shown plenty of evidence the Earth is flat, but claim every photo demonstrating thus is a mirage.

            I don’t care what some guy called Van Allen says. I simply point out the hypocrisy of NASA saying they can’t get past the Van Allen belts because of the radiation, when they reported no such problem in ’69. NASA disproving NASA. But you still believe…

          • Al Mather

            That wouldn’t be hypocrisy …that would be inconsistency… IF he actually said that..but he hasn’t said that. Only in your moronic interpretation.

          • Apparently all one needs to pass through the Van Allen belts is the lack of knowledge that they exist 🙂

          • It is not Paranoia

            Haha! Mirage is the funniest ball-word!

          • Gary

            Lol. The NASA shills are praising each other for disregarding NASA’s nonsense.

          • Al Mather

            More like the fellate earth conspirotards are butt smooching each other to try to remove the sting of getting spanked …yet again.

          • Gary

            “Well done my properly informed friend”, said to one NASA shill to another NASA shill, about a comment made by the latter NASA shill disputing what a NASA employee said about NASA’s inability to get past the Van Allen belts.

            So now we all agree that NASA is a big fraud, you want us to believe you NASA shills instead? You guys haven’t even shown us any photographs of your space vehicles made with tinfoil and duct tape. Lol.

          • Al Mather

            LOL!!…
            Gary.. adjust your meds… I have gone ,in your conspirotard brain,..from being a shill for the masonic Jews… to being an agent of the CIA, now you think I work for NASA…

            I already explained to you that I head the Gary division at JWO…

          • Gary

            Dream on, shill-boy! Its all a mirage! Lol. 🙂

          • Kendo

            You must be thinking about the JWST scheduled to launch later this decade. It will be parked in orbit almost 1/2 way to the moon and give us even better pictures of the universe.
            BTW your information regarding the Van Allen belt is flawed and lacking data 🙂

          • Tim Webb

            The key to understanding these things is to realise that there is a firmament above our heads which is composed of “molten glass”, and which prevents the atmosphere above our heads from escaping.
            It also prevents so-called “spacecraft” from escaping into the region commonly described as “outer space”.
            Anyone who doubts these things should investigate the fate of the GoFast amateur rocket project, which was seen to spin violently on its vertical axis as it headed skywards, but then instantaneously stopped spinning despite having no thrusters to achieve this effect.
            It had struck the molten glass previously mentioned.
            NASA, I am afraid, is a masonic conspiracy whose primary intent is to delude us into believing that we live on a globe earth.
            Thus any information they release to the public can safely be consigned to a rubbish bin.

          • Kendo

            So your saying the Hubble telescope is not really in space or in fact does not even exist?

          • Correct.

          • Kendo

            A few years ago I instructed a rocket club for a semester. We built a total 12 rockets of different designs and payload capabilities. We had a 80% success rate. The vertical axis spin actually helps stabilize the rocket. To stop the spin before decoupling (stage separation) a simple device called the “yo yo de-spin device” is used to slow/stop the axis spin. It was invented, built and tested at Caltech. But if you prefer to think it was molten glass that’s OK too 😛

          • Ummm, you can’t have a fixed starfield and a heliocentric theory at the same time, it’s one or the other so if you can see an acknowledge constellations then there wasn’t any big bang because if there was the stars would not be in fixed positions in the sky relative to one another, never to distort their configurations, for as long as man has stared upwards and never distort, that would be impossible from the result of an explosion that ever expands.

          • Kendo

            Your logic is flawed. Not only is the universe expanding, but it’s speeding up. You can’t think in terms of months or even years. You need to see it as centuries and Millenniums. Just because you can’t see moving it doesn’t mean it’s not. As far as the fixed star field and heliocentric theory… It’s like when your driving at night and the moon is following you… and while I’m thinking about it how come the mast appears on a ship on the horizon first? The earth is at least a bump :]

          • It is not Paranoia

            Can I ask you honest question? How do YOU know that the universe is expanding? What is your experience to base this on?

            Or you just know it becuse you’ve been told by somebody like NASA?

            And I don’t mean to be rude in any way.

          • Kendo

            No offense taken.

            A look at Edwin Hubble’s earliest pics (circa 1930) of star fields and then subsequent pictures of the same fields decades later (over 80+ years of pictures available) and super impose them over each other using a PC and you will see how they change position. It can be confirmed using “red shift” changes. I use the same process of taking pictures of the same section of sky every night over a period of days to find asteroids.
            This technique was also used over a 60 year period to see multiple stars in an elliptical orbit around a black hole.

            ( strangely looks like an electron the way the suns circle around the black hole)
            I’m sure there are other ways to prove expansion as well, but I will only tell you of what I can observe. Not what others may say is true.

          • It is not flawed and I think in yugas and if the universe was ever expanding you would indeed be able to track that ever-expanding movement.

            As far as the fixed star field and heliocentric theory… It’s like
            when your driving at night and the moon is following you…

            One may think that the moon is following them at night because it is big and bright but the simple fact is that the moon is indeed moving and we can accurately track that movement and predict its course over time. This is visibly proven to the human eye when you look up the next night and see the moon in a totally different spot in the sky than the night before and since we all can clearly see that it shows up at different points in the sky we call all also agree that the moon moves but what about the the stars?

            No matter what analogy you try to fit into it the simple fact is that the stars have all remained fixed in respect to one another since the beginning of time which is physically impossible for any explosion, even the atheists’ big bang creation explosion. If what we observed when we looked up at night was the result of an explosion, even if the stars were trillions of miles away, over time the position of those stars relative to one another would distort in the same way a firework explodes into something fancy but quickly distorts in shape because it is the result of an explosion.

            it’s the whole sky that moves at night as one like a rotating snow globe with the only exceptions being the wandering stars(planets) and the moon.

            and while I’m thinking about it how come the mast appears on a ship on the horizon first? The earth is at least a bump :]

            lol, good one but that is the result of your visual perspective and it’s the same reason why the train wheels disappear first in the distance even though you can be looking at the in the distance train on a verified flat plane. The whole “the ships hull disappears first” argument has been crushed with the use of telescopes and binoculars because they bring that hull right back into view which means it isn’t any curvature that’s preventing you from seeing it. I recently posted time lapse video of Chicago from over 50 miles away on the other side of Lake Michigan and you can see all of the buildings and when I used NASA numbers to verify what I was seeing the equation depicted that those buildings should have been [1400ft – the height of the buildings] out of sight!

            I will show you this math if you’re ever interested, the numbers prove what I am saying, in fact, try it for yourself: Pick a very far away but still visible point you know of or can find online across a body of water preferably because water is flat(it doesn’t bend around big spheres, it always settles flat and level) and take its distance in miles and then use a reference point for the height of a person, I use 6ft just for simplicity, then use this calculator: https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial to find out how far the object you are viewing should be hidden by this curvature NASA tells us about. If you have the ability to approach this subject objectively you will clearly see that we do not live on a ball at the dimensions we have been given and this can be applied anywhere on earth where you can see far enough.

            Just because we live on a flat plane doesn’t mean you can see infinitely because our visual perspective limits us which is why it always looks like the sky is touching the ground in the far distance and over water the moisture levels in the air are so rich that on many days you just can’t see that far but that has nothing to do with the shape of what we inhabit.

          • Al Mather

            More faulty premise BS… of course water holds to the curvature of the earth… and the hull disappears first as it sails away and no telescope can bring the hull back because the curve has obscured it.

            Tell us Roger…if your constant go-to proof of Chicago across Lake Michigan is not a mirage …just as those who live there say it is…

            (explained here)…

            http://www.abc57.com/story/31830937/skyline-skepticism-the-lake-michigan-mirage

            Why is it we don’t see these kind of “proofs” all around us??? Why is this seemingly the only one fellate earthers seem to regurgitate. Should we not be able to see tall buildings and structures at great distances everywhere we look???
            But we do not… the curve of this glorious planet obscures them ..

            https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

            By the way …NASA came to the whole planet,curvature,universe thing a few hundred years after it was common knowledge ,Rog.

          • More faulty premise BS… of course water holds to the curvature of the earth

            Then why are water lines on the sides of canals provably flat and not curved? Hmmm???

            Tell us Roger…if your constant go-to proof of Chicago across Lake
            Michigan is not a mirage …just as those who live there say it is…

            Well see I always believe my own eyes over what freemasons or internet shills say and because of this reason when I look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHcDP9sHk4E
            I see Chicago, not a mirage or illusion of Chicago but actually Chicago and since this is a time lapse video which records during changing light conditions it’s pretty obvious that this is no mirage but you keep on denying for shekels like a good shill 🙂

            Why is it we don’t see these kind of “proofs” all around us??? Hey shill, have you ever called it anything different than a horizon line? Have you called the sea anything different than sea level? Is there a shill sea shill curve or a or a horizon shill curve I am not privy to that holds you to these ridiculous beliefs? The proof is everywhere, all around us, most people are just trained not to see it.By the way …NASA came to the whole planet,curvature,universe thing a few hundred years after it was common knowledge ,Rog.Freemasonry is older than NASA, Al.

          • Al Mather

            “Then why are water lines on the sides of canals provably flat and not curved? ”

            Are you really this dumb? This has to be an act…
            The canal is on the same planet…the earth curves ..8 “over EACH mile ..the entire canal curves…that equates to approx 1/7,920 of and inch per foot…. you ain’t going to see a curve. Always the same stupid faulty premise /ignorance of scale with you.

            The VERY VIDEO YOU ARE USING AS “PROOF” is a Josh Nowiki video… HE claims the image is a mirage..that sometimes you see 5 buildings ….sometimes 12 of them…sometimes it’s upside down.
            Get a new “proof” Rog…this one is played.
            AGAIN I ask… WHY is this ONLY “proof” you keep regurgitating there would be an INFINITE number of proofs all around us in every direction if the earth actually WAS flat… instead of this ONE conspirotard retread that has been disproven and discounted even by it’s creator..

            “have you ever called it anything different than a horizon line? Have you called the flatness of the sea anything other than sea level?”
            “The proof is everywhere, all around us, most people are just trained not to see it.”

            Moron ….give up the ignorance of scale bit… it’s a big planet …you can’t see the curve of it standing on it….DUH!

          • Are you really this dumb? This has to be an act… The canal is
            on the same planet…the earth curves ..8 “over EACH mile ..the entire
            canal curves…that equates to approx 1/7,920 of and inch per foot….
            you ain’t going to see a curve. Always the same stupid faulty premise
            /ignorance of scale with you.

            Canals don’t curve, fool, they can’t, they’re built on top of datum lines that engineers lay out to be specifically level or the canal structure itself wouldn’t work, read up on it then you won’t sound so stupid.
            The VERY VIDEO YOU ARE USING AS “PROOF” is a Josh Nowiki video… HE
            claims the image is a mirage..that sometimes you see 5 buildings
            ….sometimes 12 of them…sometimes it’s upside down.

            Time lapse video to prove it’s a mirage and not a real image? I think you have that concept reversed 🙂
            Here it is for anyone reading:

            AGAIN I ask… WHY is this ONLY “proof” you keep regurgitating there
            would be an INFINITE number of proofs all around us in every direction
            if the earth actually WAS flat… instead of this ONE conspirotard
            retread that has been disproven and discounted even by it’s creator..

            Like I can’t prove this anywhere else? This can be replicated from anywhere on Earth where you can see far enough, it’s just that these examples are well documented. There’s a video of some guy online standing at a point in new jersey or PA somewhere, I forget, but he clearly showed us in the video that he could see both New York City and Philadelphia from the same spot and they are hundreds of miles apart, I’ll post that one in the future so you can deny that too!

            Moron ….give up the ignorance of scale bit… it’s a big planet …you can’t see the curve of it standing on it….DUH!
            Oh yes you could see the curve of a 8k wide ball in the middle, it curves 8 inches x miles² = inches of curvature, moron, if you are able to see 5 miles of the horizon line you will be observing a 16.67ft curve, definitely noticeable and certainly wouldn’t look completely flat like it does, go up a little higher and it gets easier because the horizon line gets wider, even pilots when they fly as soon as they reach altitude their attitude indicators stay steady for the entire flight and attitude indicators are gyroscopes so if the plane had to keep nosing downwards to follow your ball the attitude indicator would display the downward orientation of plane relative to sea level but alas… it doesn’t move until the pilot starts their descent.

            Are attitude indicators installed in planes by flat earthers just to trick pilots?

          • Al Mather

            The datum lines are on the SAME PLANET IDIOT…..

            “Like I can’t prove this anywhere else? This can be replicated from anywhere on Earth where you can see far enough, it’s just that these examples are well documented. There’s a video of some guy online standing at a point in new jersey or PA somewhere, I forget…”

            OH! you think ..maybe …if you remember right there’s some other conspirotard video with a guy seeing something far away… you’ll get back to us? …LOL! …FOOL, realize …these “proofs” would be EVERYWHERE!! It’s a big planet full of cities with big buildings, mountains, etc…. IF the earth was really flat these “proofs” would be something that EVERY person sees EVERYWHERE…EVERYDAY! Not just this one thing that some guy on Youtube says he saw so the earth is flat! It would be everywhere you look in an urban area…GUESS WHAT? IT’S NOT!

            “Oh yes you could see the curve of a 8k wide ball at its equator, it curves 8 inches x miles² = inches of curvature, moron, if you are able to see 5 miles of the horizon line you will be observing a 16.67ft curve, definitely noticeable and certainly wouldn’t look completely flat like it does”

            First off… your horizon is equidistant .. meaning you can only see so far in any direction so it will always appear level, you probably can’t grasp that ..but it’s a moot point, regardless ,you are trying to say that even if that reality were not the case…at many miles away…over a span of 26,400 ft the eye is going to detect that 1/1,583 of difference … Dream on. More ignorance of scale.
            Thanks to something called gravity …which I know you pinheads deny… the plane just has to keep maintaining thrust to resist gravity as it maintains altitude. That was a special kind of stupid that ONLY flat earthers would dream up.

          • Datum lines are provably flat, idiot, it matters not if they are following a curve of your ball, they would still be curved then!!! WHY CAN’T YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??

            …and you CAN see the flat earth everywhere, go high enough and it’s right there, bring come binoculars to view objects that are supposed to be out of view, very easy for honest researchers.

          • Al Mather

            Yes canals and datum line ARE in actuality be curved, moron… but thanks to the realities of gravity and scale of the planet … WHICH YOU CAN”T SEEM TO GRASP….they are also for all intents and purposes level. Remember …EVERY POINT IS PLUMB to the center of gravity…the earths curvature accounts for a deviation of ~2.9 thousandths of an inch spread over 100 feet of horizontal distance…

            WHY would we need to go “high enough” fool… if the earth was flat ??? Why is it we see substantial wide buildings from a distance the bottom hundreds of feet are obscured ??? What is obscuring them?? These proofs would exist in the billions from every angle ,..everywhere, moron… not just a couple recycled BS youtube clips and conspirotard memes on Fellate earth blogs…

          • Gary

            Ever the excuses with you, Al. Why is it always excuses?

            “Oh, oh, the canals and datum lines are really curved, they just don’t look it ’cause the planet is so big” and “Oh, oh, it is a planet spinning on its axis and about the sun, you just can’t feel it or measure it ’cause its so big”…

            You lost this debate a long time ago. Now you’re just generating material to demonstrate what a weak case you Masons have got. Lol.

          • Al Mather

            It really is a big planet Gary… if you weren’t so afraid to leave Mommy’s basement, you would be amazed… quivering, I’m sure.. but still ..impressed.
            And… just like the spinning of our big beautiful planet…. we can always count on you to jump in and set of a big grenade of stupidity.. to distract from your BFF Roger looking foolish.
            Well done.

          • Gary

            C’mon, Al. You know there is only so much patheticism one can bear from a shill, before one must comment.

            But you’re doing well for the team. Your constant excuses for why things are different from what our senses and science show us are so transparent, we’ll have all thinking, non-shill readers understanding the Earth is flat in no time. 🙂

          • Al Mather

            Hahaha…. oh yeah Gary… just look at the way they are all jumping on that fellate earth ,cult of stupidity, bandwagon …
            You 2 or 3 are like mentally challenged rats on a sinking ship…

          • Gary

            And yet the more you talk, the more of us there are. Your NASA bosses must be thrilled with your progress, Al.

            Pretty soon, I’m sure they’ll have you supporting flat Earth for the simple fact that anyone reading your dribble will almost instantly be convinced you are wrong about absolutely everything. 🙂

          • Al Mather

            After all this time on Disqus pushing this stupidity… trying to squeeze it into other discussions… you 2 idiots have not had one taker… Unless people calling you a moron is what you were going for.

            Remember the Flat Earth article the Atlantic ran last year … Fellate earthers and all the sock puppets,crawled out from under every rock and lined up to get laughed at and spanked.
            They ran another article a month or 2 ago…and not one FE moron showed up. Lesson learned? Or are the ranks that thin in such a short period of time?
            Like I said… rats jumping off the sinking ship.

          • Gary

            …or 4 or 5 or 6 or… 🙂

          • Al Mather

            3 is generous… I don’t count sock puppets.

          • Gary

            Lol. Says the Sock Puppeteer.

            You make me laugh, Al. I can’t say that about many NASA shills.

          • Al Mather

            Well good… You should have some laughter in your life Gary… Even if it is delusional . Sitting in your Mommy’s basement… At your age… Spreading anti Jew hatred, flat earth stupidity, watching porn, while posting your bizarre comments on religious discussions. I can’t imagine a more miserable and despairing existence…

          • You’re getting too fucking stupid to respond to anymore. Read up on datum lines you dolt, they have NOTHING to do with your imaginary curve of your imaginary ball.

          • Al Mather

            Datum lines are set according to sea level… dumbfuck… which is in the shape of the planet…because it’s on the planet… go talk to an engineer instead of getting your knowledge from Fellate earth fuknut sites.

          • Kendo

            Would you say we in the Dvapara or Kali yuga?
            On another note:
            The whole “the ships hull disappears first” argument has been crushed
            with the use of telescopes and binoculars because they bring that hull
            right back into view which means it isn’t any curvature that’s
            preventing you from seeing it…
            I have to disagree with that as I spend a lot of time near the ocean and I have have a telescope there and use it quite often and can see cruise ships and freighters coming and going. I also go fishing some 20~30 miles off shore and can tell you that when returning to shore I can view a particular radio tower through my binoculars and I can always see the light flashing on the horizon. As I get closer it rises. Am I missing something? And don’t even get me started on the tides, I’ll save that for another time.
            I’m headed to Fort Jefferson and the Dry Tortugas next week weather permitting and I will see if I can dig up my 1300mm lens and let you know what I find.

          • Descending Kali Yuga, ends in 2025, then 300 year transitioning period onto Ascending Dwapara

          • It is not Paranoia

            That made me laugh. Good job Gary!

      • Al Mather

        Daylight in space moron… the stars do not show for the same reason they do not show in flash photography…. grow a brain.

  • lotuspetal

    10x more galaxies, 10x more lies… “im such a small insignificant ant that means nothing and everything i know has no meaning” the average indoctrinated american

    • Kendo

      More stars than there are grains of sand on a beach… Kind of makes your head explode just thinking about the possibilities.

      • I’m dying to find out what’s inland in Antarctica, personally. Love to see the actual north pole also, not BS, guided tours for tools..

        • Kendo

          Sounds interesting, maybe next year. This year I’m searching for the aft section of the Atocha. She went down 1622 near Rebecca shoal, east of the dry Tortugas. some of the cargo has been found, but estimates say at least 1/3 is still there spread along the sea floor in 50′ of water

          • Well good luck in your search! Glad it’s not near the north pole or Antarctica, would hate to see your boat sunk by water military patrols on those parts.

          • Kendo

            Captain Andhøy was unprepared using a fiberglass boat in cold waters. Steel works better against Ice and frigid temps.
            I will be in waters with a temps between 76~85. I also have my friends in the coast guard on speed dial in my Sat phone and a sturdy fishing pole and spear guns. I just worry about the weather and pirates.
            (And if I have enough ammo)

          • Damn, you’ll be in pirate waters? Yeah… bring friends and ammo then

          • Kendo

            Aaaarrgghh E Matey I will be carefull. especially on Jolly Roger Drive in the 33042

          • Ohh, in that case your biggest worry would be butt pirates.

          • Kendo

            i be searchin for 70 pounds o emralds

          • Then bring Jack Sparrow with ya, he’ll pick you up in the Black Pearl!

          • Al Mather

            You know that Sat phone isn’t going help you,dude…. cuz there are no such things as satellites.

          • Kendo

            I saw what they did to the Ady Gil. I guess I had better bring my Ham Radio just in case.

          • Al Mather

            They fight the good fight … Sea Shepherd… I give what I can… couple times a month I play guitar with one of their financial directors, who opened my eyes a bit to the urgency of some of their campaigns.

  • It is not Paranoia

    Of course!! And all the galaxies are just 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 quadruplezillion light years away!

    This is so stupid.

    • Gary

      But not if you use normal trignometry. Only the trignometry where the Earth location changes by 300+ million kilometers between Summer and Winter, but we can’t prove it or test it, you just have to have faith in NASA that it really happens.

      Oh NASA, your daddy must be so proud of how big your lies are becoming.

      • Kendo

        Do you mean trig O nometry? It all makes sense now.

        • Trying using spherical trig in the very far south seas like all of the sailors who have lost their lives over the years using a globe for navigation…. or use plane trigonometry and accurately plot your course! I sure hope you never bet on your ball in that scenario because that’s an icy cold death.

          • Kendo

            I know right

    • Al Mather

      If anyone knows stupid… it’s you Paranoia.

      • ..and I don’t know a more pathetic shekel grubbing paid shill, Al Mather! I know of a good deal of them scumbags, too!

        • Al Mather

          Sure ,Roger … somebody feels so threatened by you and your scary awakened brilliance …your pictures with words and your YouTube clips… they hire and pay people just to keep your enlightenment in check…. good thing you’ve got such a firm grasp on reality … otherwise you might develop an unrealistic sense of self.

          • Riiiight shill man and people who are totally mentally healthy chase others around for years online because they disagree with them sooo so much, lol, do you even read the shit you write, dude? Do you even have the “sense of self” to realize that you are dysfunctional? Rhetorical questions, of course 🙂

          • Al Mather

            Riiiiiight…flat earth pushing neo nazi conspirotard thinks my comments are a bit “off the wall”…Lol!

            So which is it Roger…. either I’m mentally unbalanced ….or acting as part of the vast Zionist conspiracy which is hoaxing mankind into believing in the planets and the universe…

          • It’s both, shillboy, because you have to be mentally unbalanced to work for that genocidal machine but people like you will do anything for money or the Zionist agenda.

          • Al Mather

            Sure, Rog….. so YOU BELIEVE that I’m a “mentally unbalanced “person working for an evil Zionist “genocidal machine”…. who PAY ME to have sporting fun with conspirotard dweebs …here on Disqus …who believe the earth is flat & universe doesn’t exist.

            Like I said…good thing you have a firm grasp of reality.

          • Such a firm grasp that I need to be followed apparently, eh Al? 🙂

          • Al Mather

            I freely admit I enjoy tearing apart the stupidity of flat earth… just like you and your ilk like going around trying to rewrite reality on a variety of(((((jews))))topics. I like flat earth because to me it represents the absolute stupidest conspiracy there could be ..and the folks that buy into it fascinate me as they must either be in some state of mental /emotional defect … or just playing as an exercise in logic.

            It just works out that there are only like 3-4 people dumb enough to push FE nonsense on Disqus….You just happen to be one of them.

            Every once in a while some FE numbskull pops on with a comment . After I engage them with some logic or a “hard question ” they usually disappear never to be heard from again…

            As much as I tear it up…you and the boy toy like to try to “prove ” it..Always trying to spread it like manure. Two sides to the coin, Rog.

          • I’ll admit you may be able to run over people just waking up that don’t have a good handle on the topic but I’ve clearly proven you wrong on so many occasions it’s not worth even worth counting them and I’ve used pictures, maps, videos, logic and mathematics to back my claims up which are solid enough that your denial of them highlights your shill status to anyone intelligent enough to realize it.

            As far as any (((jew))) topics, don’t know why you even attempt to go there as I can back anything I say up about the (((jews))) using their own words and their own text which gets pretty hard to argue with but you’ll argue anyway, lol, and it’s hilarious to watch you deny what some of those people say and do when they freely admit it.

            Every once in a while some FE numbskull pops on with a comment . After I engage them with some logic or a “hard question ” they usually disappear never to be heard from again…

            So you’re better at debating than they are or you know more about the topic from your position than they do at theirs which doesn’t make you right, I’ve clearly proven that you are not right, so has Gary. I should troll your ass when you do it on another thread somewhere, give you a taste of your own medicine, I know I’d be a breath of fresh air to anyone you’re picking on.

          • Al Mather

            Be my guest Roger…

            I have to laugh at the …” I’ve clearly proven you wrong on so many occasions it’s not worth even worth counting them and I’ve used pictures, maps, videos, logic and mathematics to back my claims up which are solid enough that your denial of them highlights your shill status to anyone intelligent enough to realize it”

            I love it …it’s what keeps you coming back for more… more spanking on display.

            Your “proofs” of maps and videos and pic …and what you 2 delusional idiots pass off between each other as logic.

            What the reader has seen…if they follow at all…is you having to squirm or tuck tail and run time after time. Your silly distorted maps, your idiotic FE videos, the Sigma Octanis thing, the circumnavigating flights, THIS Chicago thing …where the guy who made the video is saying .. YES! It’s a mirage!… your level of Dunning – Kruger is text book. Aside from these public spankings what you seem oblivious to is the fact that NO ONE is buying this stupidity…even here on Dully Feeble! You have nobody but your boy toy to share the indignity with!

          • I think that what the reader has seen who knows about you being a shill will realize that one of us will always run out of time and one of us is paid to have unlimited time so you try to use your paid-time shill position to discredit me and say that I run from your bullshit when the reality is that I have a real job, not shilling for the establishment, and then you try to say I run from you when I can’t afford to spend anymore time on your lies which is another weak, beta stance to have.

            “I always have the last word because I have unlimited time because I’m paid to do this thus I’m always right and I always win” – lol… whatever, more readers are posting about the flat earth and less are buying yours and NASA’s bullshit but just close your eyes, click your heels together and repeat “I’ll always respond last” which makes it all go away and you win every single time because you are full of soo much truth! 🙂

          • Al Mather

            Awww… look how cute you are! ..
            Does calling me Beta,somehow let you feel less eviscerated????

            Your assertion & logic are, as always ,really solid stuff there Rog. You joined Disqus after me and have like 4 times the comments. Every time I shred the stupidity you post with a paragraph you come back with a page…

            You can be the alpha conspirotard… Gary can be the Beta… ( if he has it in him) … I’m not even your species dude… I’m more the zookeeper.. putting you conspirotards on display.

          • lol, how come you’re losing then?