Saturday, December 20th, 2014

USGS Warn Californians of the Inevitatable ‘Big One’. They Once Again Fail To Mention ‘The REALLY Big One’

Chris Carrington
The Daily Sheeple
May 13th, 2014
Reader Views: 2,417

4-helicopter-tsunami-destruction_51404_600x450
Wiped off the map: Banda Aceh 2004

A report on Fox News this morning talks about ‘The Big One’, the quake that experts know will one day hit California. From Fox:

Jones is heading up a new effort by Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti to prepare the city for what experts say is unavoidable: a massive quake similar or worse to the one that hit the city in 1994.

The magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake claimed 57 lives and left $20 billion worth of damage in its wake, making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history. Jones warned the next one will likely have a similar impact.

She estimated the death toll from a quake with a magnitude 7.5 or higher could approach 2,000. That is a figure echoed by California’s Democratic Governor Jerry Brown.

“There’s a better than 50-50 chance that we’ll have a catastrophic earthquake in California that will kill thousands of people and be enormously fiscally devastating,” said Brown in January, when he unveiled his proposal for $1.49 million in funding for a fault mapping project.

He specifically told Los Angeles residents to be cautious.

A study conducted by the Los Angeles Times in 2013 found the city houses more than 1,000  concrete buildings at risk of collapse from a major earthquake because they lack steel reinforcement.

Once gain there is no mention of ‘The Really Big One’. The earthquake that will devastate and make a quake triggered by the San Andreas Fault feel like minor shaking. The Puente Hills Fault has recently been considered as more dangerous to downtown LA than the San Andreas Fault. Both have the ability to cause destruction, but not on a scale where the entire state, or even a good portion of it would suffer damage.

California sits in an area that is geologically very active. Plate margins grind against each other causing the tremors. The San Andreas Fault is a huge gash in the landscape that runs from Cape Mendocino down to the Mexican border. It’s a transform, or slide fault. The leading edge of the North American Plate and the Pacific Plate slide past each other. They move in small fits and starts but on occasion get stuck. The pressure builds and builds, until whatever prominence of rock holding them in position gives way, and the plates move causing an earthquake.

The San Andreas Fault last had a major rupture in 1680. The average lapse between major slips is 150 years, meaning that the pressure has now been building for 334 years.

Other faults branch off the San Andreas Fault and it’s some of these that geologists believe cause the constant minor quakes that Californians live with.

The Cascadia Fault is a different animal altogether.

The Cascadia Fault is a subduction zone, an area where one tectonic plate is being forced down under another. In this case the Juan de Fuca Plate is colliding with, and being forced under the North American Plate.

Running from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino California, these plates have been locked together since 1700. There has been no detected slippage, no detected small quakes. This is a feature of the Cascadia, it is silent until there is a sudden and massive release of energy. There will be no warning whatever. No foreshocks, nothing.

On a dark winters night in January 1700 a tsunami struck Japan. It flooded fields, swept away villages for miles inland and cost many lives. Even as far back as 1700 the Japanese had made the connection between earthquakes and Tsunami, but this time there was no earthquake, no warning to allow the people time to evacuate to higher ground. The tsunami was called the ‘orphan tsunami’ because it had no ‘parent’ earthquake. For more than 300 years the origin of the orphan tsunami remained a mystery.

In 1987 Brian Atwater studied soil samples far inland across the length of the fault and discovered that the United States had also suffered a tsunami at the same time as the Japanese. He concluded that Kanamori and Heaton were correct, a massive earthquake had sent a tsunami out from the source of the quake inundating the coasts on both sides of the Pacific.

Recent studies by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania has concurred on the findings of previous studies.

The Cascadia fault is long, very long, just over 800 miles (1300km) in length. Based on the findings of the scientists, the tsunami caused by the 1700 event moved inland for more than 60 miles, wiping out everything in its path. Of course in 1700 Seattle wasn’t there, neither was Vancouver, San Francisco, Portland or any of the other cities and metropolitan areas currently occupied by millions of people.

The Cascadia, courtesy of its length, will give rise to a long quake if the whole fault ‘unzips’ at the same time, as it’s believed to have done in 1700. The first P waves will travel the length of the fracture in a minute or two. The S waves that follow, the ones that cause the real damage, are slower and will cause shaking and movement for about five minutes though their speed can vary depending on the rock they are traveling through.

Any buildings not built to withstand earthquakes will collapse. Depending on the duration and magnitude of the quake it cannot be assumed that even ‘hardened’ buildings will remain standing. Many areas have sedimentary basins under urban sprawl and this amplifies the waves and the damage they cause.

Within approximately 20-30 minutes the tsunami will roll in. Unlike normal waves which have a few yards between them the tsunami waves can have hundreds of miles between them. The entire wall of water displaced when the plates slip hurtles outwards in all directions from the epicenter of the quake. As the waves approach the continental shelf the water at the back of the wave starts to catch up with the water at the front of the wave, which has slowed down as it moves up the incline that marks the start of the continental land mass. Its this that allows the water to build up and give the tsunami its characteristic ‘wall of water’ appearance.

The water will just keep on coming, flowing forward taking almost everything in its path with it. It may or may not be followed by more waves, there is no way to know if it will be a solo wave or a series until it happens. There is also no way to know in advance how deep the water will be. The tsunami caused by an earthquake in Lituya Bay Alaska in 1958 reached 1720 feet.

Lituya Bay is an extreme example, an un-survivable example unless you happen to be Howard G Ulrich or his son. the Indonesia earthquake on boxing day 2004 has been estimated to have had a wave height of between 30-50 feet.

So what do you do with your 20-30 minute warning? Obviously you want to get as high as possible. This is often easier said than done. In a city littered with debris, the dead and dying and glass falling from skyscrapers without warning getting out is going to pose many problems. Highways will be buckled and impassable and there is a great danger from gas main explosions and fires.

Some countries are investing in vertical evacuation centers. High platforms/shelters on stilts that allow the water to pass through the base of the structure without putting extra stresses on masonry that maybe already damaged from the earthquake. FEMA has issued a community guide detailing where such structures will be built / are being built along the West Coast of the United States.

If you don’t have access to a vertical evacuation shelter, or you prefer not to be at the mercy of FEMA,  multi-story parking lots with open sides can offer some possibility of escape. The water is able to flow through the building and out the other side, reducing the chances of collapse due to the weight of the water pressing against it. Be prepared to stay in such a place for a considerable time, help and/or escape is not going to be coming fast. Carry as much food, water and emergency equipment as you can without the weight slowing you down. Think Katrina multiplied by 1000.

It can take anything from a few hours to many days for the floodwaters to subside and even when it does the emergency is far from over. Disease and death with be rife and you should head out of the area as soon as is humanly possible to give yourself the best chance of survival.

Cascadia is locked, loaded and ready to fire. It’s not a case of if, but a case of when. Sadly, with so many variables, an earthquake/tsunami combination is almost impossible to prepare for adequately. The only sure-fire way to survive  is not to be in the area in the first place. (source)

Does the United States Geological Survey think that by keeping quiet it will prevent the Cascadia rupturing? They constantly refer to the San Andreas and it’s associated faults causing major damage in downtown LA or San Francisco, but never seem bothered about the rest of the state.

The damage from a megathrust earthquake of the Cascadia Fault would be enormous, and the loss of life caused by the quake itself and the resulting tsunami would be massive. With so many cities directly in the firing line, the whole state of California would be severely affected.

California grows 85% of the fresh produce consumed in the United States, and any disaster that befalls it will affect the nation as a whole. Can you imagine the United States with 85% less fresh food available? It doesn’t bear thinking about. A rupture of the Cascadia Fault would be a catastrophe of national importance, something that would affect every American to some degree.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Chris Carrington of The Daily Sheeple.

Chris Carrington is a writer, researcher and lecturer with a background in science, technology and environmental studies. Chris is an editor for The Daily Sheeple. Wake the flock up!

Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide

Get Regular Updates!     Enter Email Address           privacy information  

Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


  • Joseph Lizak

    The most likely scenario for a huge tsunami is an unknown fault to slip somewhere in the Pacific ocean probably near Australia. Also if a space rock decides to impact the earth not at an angle but straight down like the one in Arizona it will most likely hit the ocean. If that happens a wave of such great size will form it will roll inland 100 miles wiping out everything in it’s path. Of all the disasters this will be the worst.

  • Doccus

    Actually, in all deference To Joe below, Cascadia is *undoubtedly* going to be the worst Pacific earth-caused tsunami. He may be entirely correct about the damage caused by a space rock, but should it be caused by a fault instead, the evidence is clear that Cascadia will dwarf previous Tsunamis yet seen.
    Consider this..the 8.0 quake that dropped the sea floor so drastically in 2011, was three times closer to Japan than N. America and the Cascadia plate, yet the 1700 quake caused a tsunami THREE times as high in JApan, and one which went 3 times as far inland, as the MArch 2011 wave.. this would require a 9.4 to 9.6 quake, maybe even nearing a 10 on the richter scale. A similar wave would decimate the coasts of the whole of Japan, and reach China and the Phillipines with a sizeable wave. America and Canada’s coastlines would be obliterated entirely, and even S.America would be in trouble.
    Seems pretty huge to me. Since I live right on the west coast of Canada it certainly concerns me…yikes!

    • Joseph Lizak

      Yes you make a good point about the 1700 Cascadia quake. I was thinking about that “trench” out near Australia that’s the deepest place on earth. We know nothing about it really, and it’s massive. It’s like 2 mount Everest’s piled on top of one another. Some day….something there will slip like a landslide or an earthquake. Just imagine July 1958 Latuya Bay Alaska. That landslide caused a wave 1700 feet high!

      • Doccus

        Well, it is possible, but there’s continual water agitation so any loose material would likely already bejarred loose. Plus there’s no previous history of it happening. Anything is possible though, and it certainly is deep enough. Things are against it however, such as the damping effect of the water and the trench itself.
        Dampening effects not present at the Canary islands, I might add, and the most commonly compared to Alaska’s Tsunami in potential size. I don’t think it would have nearly as much power to traverse the ocean as Cascadia would have, though,

Get Regular Updates!
Get Sheeple news delivered to your inbox. It's totally free and well worth the price!
email address privacy

Copyright 2009 - 2014 The Daily Sheeple. (v.8)

The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader. The Daily Sheeple is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.