The U.S. Government Is Practically Begging for Global War

| |

Mushroom Cloud

More than two decades after the Berlin Wall fell, it appears that the United States and Russia are engaging in the same sort of proxy wars that were so common during the Cold War. Everywhere that Western and Russian spheres of influence meet there is the potential for conflict, and the two aging superpowers have shown their willingness fight through their neighbors. However, this game of chess has taken on a whole new dimension that is radically different than what we saw during the Cold War.

The whole point of a proxy war is to resist your enemy without actually engaging with him. Once the nuclear arms race began, it became clear that the massive ground battles of World War Two were a thing of the past. If a war starts between Russia and the US, it’s only a matter of time before the conflict escalates into nuclear annihilation. Like the computer says in Wargames, “A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.” That makes America’s current actions in Ukraine all the more puzzling.

The Ukraine Freedom Support Act (UFSA) of 2014 authorizes lethal and non-lethal aid. Besides what’s already being supplied.

Including communications equipment. Body armor. Night vision goggles. Humvees. Radar. Counter-mortar detection units. Binoculars. Small boats. Various other gear.

Sniper and assault rifles. Hand grenade launchers. Mortars and shells. Stingers. Anti-tank missiles. What’s known may be the tip of the iceberg.

UFSA legislation “authoriz(ing) (Obama) to provide defense articles, defense services, and training to the Government of Ukraine for the purpose of countering offensive weapons and reestablishing the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine…”

Gone are the days of quietly supplying the Mujahideen with stinger missiles in Afghanistan. I’m sure Russia knew we were helping their enemies in the 80’s, but our government didn’t really make this fact public, and that’s a crucial strategy with proxy wars.

Remember, the goal is to not fight your enemy directly. But on the global stage, making a public statement to harm your enemy, forces your enemy to take action in a public way. They can’t be seen as weak, so they must swiftly return fire for all the world to see. As you can imagine this has the potential escalate quickly, especially between two nuclear armed superpowers. What starts as a proxy war can quickly turn into a real war with millions of casualties. In the words of Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov “Russia will not be able to leave this without a response.”

But the United States hasn’t just made a public attempt to supply Russia’s enemies. They’ve also directly threatened them in subtle ways.

The Pentagon has threatened Russia with redeploying nuclear cruise missiles to Europe, accusing Moscow of violating two arms control treaties.

“We don’t have ground-launched cruise missiles in Europe now obviously because they’re prohibited by the treaty,” said Brian McKeon, principal deputy undersecretary for policy at the Department of Defense.

“But that would obviously be one option to explore,” he added.

It appears that the United States is playing hardball with Russia, when they’re really in no position to do so. Russia’s nuclear arsenal has recently surpassed America’s, and their ability to deploy these weapons has America’s top brass rather worried. Russia is currently deploying bombers, submarines, and ICBM’s that could be just as advanced and stealthy as our own, if not more so.

It should come as no surprise that Russia’s military may be able to surpass our own in the near future, because they’ve kept their priorities straight. While the United States has spent the past 15 years training and equipping its military to suppress low budget insurgencies all over the world, Russia has never stopped preparing its military to fight our own on a conventional battlefield. While we were busy fighting the War on Terror, they caught up to us.

And now the United States thinks it can bully Russia and arm their neighbors. It’s like they think it’s still 1991, when Russia was in free fall mode. Russia isn’t some second rate backwater we can push around. They’re an advanced nuclear armed superpower that delivers nearly half of Europe’s fuel supply, while all we can deliver is a broken military and an economy that is rapidly circling the drain.

They have all the cards, and yet our government continues to poke the Russian Bear with a stick. It should be perfectly clear by now that our government is hell bent on starting World War Three. There will be no more pussyfooting around like the Cold War. Except this time, I don’t think anyone believes that the US will come out on top. Not only are we desperately trying to start a war, we’re practically begging to lose.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Loisteehee

    The jews running the US and israel want ww3. Please notice that the zionist jews want the Christians, Muslims and the minorities to do the fighting because the jews are the chosen people and we are the unwashed and unclean.

    • Spencerhut

      Please explain just how the Jews want WW3?

  • tayronachan

    So will it be WWIII, or counter-revolution/Civil War? It looks like a race to see which one happens first.

  • Nexusfast123

    What for? There will be no one left. Nuclear war would be inevitable. Being the masters of a dying and dead planet will be a Pyrrhic victory.

  • Nexusfast123

    Russia and Israel are not on good terms.

  • Rick E.

    This is imbecilic at best! How in the hell do the warmongers think that they can win a nuclear war, when our military has lost every single so-called illegal war since WW2??? And lost them to jungle and mountain peasants! This is suicidal and ridiculous!

    In addition, NO ONE wins a nuclear confrontation, as the resulting radiation will kill what’s left in the world above ground.
    The elites will come out of their luxury bunkers to a dying and poisoned world, so how in the hell are they going to spend their money? And what will they spend it on? Poisoned real estate?

    • Nexusfast123

      They may never be able to come out of their bunkers due to radiation levels that may take decades to subside.

    • Infidel51

      Silly unwashed peasent. Your life has no value.

    • http://privacy.com MARCUS

      tactical nuke strikes. not every war is an “all out” war, and that applies to nukes too. you’ve been lead to believe during the cold war that every nuclear conflict would instantly become a mutually assured destruction scenario. It wont. Not that I’m advocating nuclear war here, but I thought I’d point out what I thought was obvious…

  • Mike

    The global elitists are the ones pushing for war, they control the governments of the world and they would love to see half or more of the population of the earth dead. The global elites are the ones we need to be at war with.

  • Rebel Mel

    Defund the evil! Quit allowing them to use your money.

  • Joe Lizak

    Just watch the finances of each nation. The Ruble is crashing today. Putin raised interest rates to 17% today to stop the rubles decline. It worked for about an hour. American banksters seem desperate. They sneaked through language on the Debt Ceiling Bill that makes taxpayers responsible for their $303 trillion dollar derivative casino bets on the price of oil. Oil is priced at about $55 bucks a barrel right now. Somebodies losing their shirt. So…the next time we have a disaster like we did in 2008, and banks need another bailout, then look for a big war to start.

  • Mysterio! BOOGAH BOOGAH

    the US govt? whats that again?

  • M Fr Nch

    War is useful to distract and reduce the population and they hope kill off a lot of people who are hip to their bullshit and corruption. We have the least trusted and most corrupt bunch of asshats in positions they should not be in I have ever seen.

    • Nexusfast123

      Nuclear war would most definitely kill of the population. Maybe 100%. The destructive power of modern nuclear weapons is beyond imagination. The Russians have a larger nuclear arsenal than the US (add in China as well).

  • apeman2502

    Lobotomy. Connecticut. 1977 to 1979. With the Rockefeller U.N. and the Bush criminal cabal waiting in the wings to con us all out of everything..

  • Nexusfast123

    Here is an interesting site to cheer you all up….

    http://www.nucleardarkness.org/index2.php

  • Infidel51

    The bankers need a world war to cover their crimes which are about to explode in dramatic fashion.

  • Dennis Richmond

    If anyone is interested in what GOD has to say ??? He calls them the synagogue of Satan !!! They are NOT Jews !!! So STOP calling them Jews !!! You ALL sound RACIST !!! If you don’t know what you are talking about then learn more before you Comment !!!

  • usmcmailman

    Don’t worry. “They” will find the War they seek !

  • David West

    They have their lemmings..don’t think for a second that the Japanese bankers are not taking their directives from the BIS.

  • http://privacy.com MARCUS

    given the overuse of the word “tactical” to sell 5.11 pants and do-dads, I can see how you might be confused a bit so..
    of, relating to, or constituting actions carefully planned to gain a specific military end.

    (of bombing or weapons) done or for use in immediate support of military or naval operations.
    (of a person or their actions) showing adroit planning; aiming at an end beyond the immediate action.
    “Tactical” nuke strikes would be strikes that involve lesser yield warheads, most likely on targets of immediate military interest to the attacker. It may also apply to such things as high-altitude blasts for EMP effect, etc. They don’t have to nuke the mainland to “win”.

  • http://privacy.com MARCUS

    repeat away, I’m not talking about nuking mainland America so your point is irrelevant.

  • http://privacy.com MARCUS

    it is indeed obvious you missed my point. Thanks for pointing it out though.

  • http://privacy.com MARCUS

    Its so obvious, its now a topic of its own on the ‘sheeple: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-logistics-of-the-next-global-conflict_022015

  • http://privacy.com MARCUS