Sunday, March 29th, 2015

U.S. Copyright Surveillance Machine About To Be Switched On, Promises of Transparency Already Broken

Mitch Stoltz
Electronic Frontier Foundation
November 16th, 2012
Reader Views: 2,446

The “Copyright Alert System” ‚Äď an elaborate combination of surveillance, warnings, punishments, and “education” directed at¬†customers of most major U.S. Internet service providers ‚Äď is poised to launch in the next few weeks, as has been widely reported. The problems with it are legion.¬†¬†Big media companies are launching a massive peer-to-peer surveillance scheme to snoop on subscribers. Based on the results of that snooping, ISPs will be serving as Hollywood‚Äôs private enforcement arm, without the checks and balances¬†public¬†enforcement requires. Once a subscriber is accused, she¬†must prove her innocence, without many of the legal defenses she‚Äôd have in a courtroom.¬†The “educational” materials posted for subscribers¬†thus far¬†look more like propaganda, slanted towards major entertainment companies’ view of copyright.¬†And all of this was set up with the encouragement and endorsement of the U.S. government.

One of the mechanisms that was supposed to ensure some degree of fairness was independent auditing of the P2P surveillance methods used to identify alleged infringers, and of the ISPs’ procedures for matching Internet Protocol addresses to actual humans. But last month, the group set up to oversee the system – the Center for Copyright Information -revealed¬†that its “independent” reviewer was¬†Stroz Friedberg, a lobbying firm that represented the¬†Recording Industry Association of America¬†in the halls of¬†Congress from 2004 to 2009. Needless to say, RIAA’s former lobbying firm is hardly an “independent” reviewer. And CCI could have discovered the relationship between Stroz and the RIAA ‚Äď it‚Äôs on the¬†public record, in reports that lobbyists must file with Congress every year.

It gets worse. In response to criticism of this obvious conflict of interest, CCI acknowledged that “[r]ecent reports that a former employee of Stroz Friedberg lobbied several years ago on behalf of RIAA on matters unrelated to CCI have raised questions” about the group’s impartiality.¬† In the name of ‚Äúmaintaining transparency,‚ÄĚ CCI released the¬†Stroz report¬†to the public last week.

But it turns out the CCI has a funny definition of ‚Äútransparency.‚ÄĚ Nearly every significant detail of how the massive P2P monitoring scheme will work is redacted out of the public version. What remains is this: CCI hired a company called MarkMonitor, which will join BitTorrent networks and collect the Internet Protocol addresses of computers that are sharing certain movies and songs (MPAA and RIAA members supply the lists). Their software, described only as “collection mechanisms” and “scanning systems” in the public version, compares the beginning, end, and some of the middle of the file against a reference version, and, if they match, emails the ISP with the IP address of the accused file-sharer. The ISP then sends an escalating series of warnings and punishments to the subscriber, including mandatory “copyright education” and potential bandwidth throttling or blocking of popular websites.

There’s a lot we simply can’t tell from this heavily redacted report. Most importantly, we have no way of knowing if legal, non-infringing uses of copyrighted movies and music will be flagged as infringing, leading to escalating “mitigation measures” for law-abiding Internet subscribers. We don’t know what, if any, protocols other than BitTorrent the system will be snooping on. And we don’t know how, or how accurately, the ISPs match IP addresses to the names of actual human beings. That process, says CCI, was described in another Stroz Friedberg report that hasn’t been released.

CCI and its backers have made every effort to portray the system as¬†fair and balanced. But subscribers are rightly wary of a copyright surveillance machine that dispenses warnings and punishments based on a secret process.¬†Hopefully CCI will go to greater lengths to find an ‚Äúindependent‚ÄĚ reviewer next time ‚Äď but we‚Äôre not optimistic.

According to CCI, this fatally flawed system, created via a backroom deal with¬†no subscriber input,¬†will start spying on U.S. subscribers’ Internet usage, and sending out warnings and punishments, before the end of 2012.¬†¬†In light of what we already know, the better course would be to¬†press reset.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Mitch Stoltz of Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide

Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page

Get Regular Updates!
Get Sheeple news delivered to your inbox. It's totally free and well worth the price!
email address privacy

Copyright 2009 - 2014 The Daily Sheeple. (v.8)

The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader. The Daily Sheeple is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to