TOTAL FASCISM: “No Cost” License Plate Readers Are Turning Texas Police into Mobile Debt Collectors, Data Miners

| |

THIS IS FASCISM. PERIOD.

txlicenseplate

(This post originally appeared at the Electronic Frontier Foundation)

Vigilant Solutions, one of the country’s largest brokers of vehicle surveillance technology, is offering a hell of a deal to law enforcement agencies in Texas: a whole suite of automated license plate reader (ALPR) equipment and access to the company’s massive databases and analytical tools—and it won’t cost the agency a dime.

Even though the technology is marketed as budget neutral, that doesn’t mean no one has to pay. Instead, Texas police fund it by gouging people who have outstanding court fines and handing Vigilant all of the data they gather on drivers for nearly unlimited commercial use.

ALPR refers to high-speed camera networks that capture license plate images, convert the plate numbers into machine-readable text, geotag and time-stamp the information, and store it all in database systems. EFF has long been concerned with this technology, because ALPRs typically capture sensitive location information on all drivers—not just criminal suspects—and, in aggregate, the information can reveal personal information, such as where you go to church, what doctors you visit, and where you sleep at night.

Vigilant is leveraging H.B. 121, a new Texas law passed in 2015 that allows officers to install credit and debit card readers in their patrol vehicles to take payment on the spot for unpaid court fines, also known as capias warrants. When the law passed, Texas legislators argued that not only would it help local government with their budgets, it would also benefit the public and police. As the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Allen Fletcher, wrote in his official statement of intent:

[T]he option of making such a payment at the time of arrest could avoid contributing to already crowded jails, save time for arresting officers, and relieve minor offenders suddenly informed of an uncollected payment when pulled over for a routine moving violation from the burden of dealing with an impounded vehicle and the potential inconvenience of finding someone to supervise a child because of an unexpected arrest.

The bill was supported by the criminal justice reform groups such as the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition, but it also raised concerns by respected criminal justice blogger Scott Henson of Grits For Breakfast, who theorized that the law, combined with ALPR technology, could allow police officers to “cherry pick drivers with outstanding warrants instead of looking for current, real-time traffic violations.”

He further asked:

Are there enough departments deploying license plate readers to cause concern? Will they use them in such a fashion? How will anyone know? Is it possible to monitor—or better, measure—any shift in on-the-ground police priorities resulting from the new economic incentives created by the bill?

As it turns out, contracts between between Vigilant and Guadalupe County and the City of Kyle in Texas reveal that Henson was right to worry.

The “warrant redemption” program works like this. The agency gets no-cost license plate readers as well as free access to LEARN-NVLS, the ALPR data system Vigilant says contains more than 2.8-billion plate scans and is growing by more than 70 million scans a month. This also includes a wide variety of analytical and predictive software tools.

The government agency in turn gives Vigilant access to information about all its outstanding court fees, which the company then turns into a hot list to feed into the free ALPR systems. As police cars patrol the city, they ping on license plates associated with the fees. The officer then pulls the driver over and offers them a devil’s bargain: go to jail, or pay the original fine with an extra 25% processing fee tacked on, all of which goes to Vigilant.1

In other words, the driver is paying Vigilant to provide the local police with the technology used to identify and then detain the driver. If the ALPR pings on a parked car, the officer can get out and leave a note to visit Vigilant’s payment website.

But Vigilant isn’t just compensated with motorists’ cash. The law enforcement agencies are also using the privacy of everyday drivers as currency.

Buried in the fine print of the contract with Vigilant is a clause that says the company also get to keep a copy of all the license-plate data collected by the agency, even after the contract ends. According the company’s usage and privacy policy, Vigilant “retains LPR data as long as it has commercial value.” Vigilant can sell or license that information to other law enforcement bodies and potentially to private companies such as insurance firms and repossession agencies.

Buried in the fine print of the contract with Vigilant is a clause that says the company also get to keep a copy of all the license-plate data collected by the agency, even after the contract ends. According the company’s usage and privacy policy, Vigilant “retains LPR data as long as it has commercial value.” Vigilant can sell or license that information to other law enforcement bodies and potentially to private companies such as insurance firms and repossession agencies.

In early December 2015, Vigilant issued a press release bragging that Guadalupe County had used the systems to collect on more than 4,500 warrants between April and December 2015. In January 2016, the City of Kyle signed an identical deal with Vigilant. Soon after, Guadalupe County upgraded the contract to allow Vigilant to dispatch its own contractors to collect on capias warrants.

Alarmingly, in December, Vigilant also quietly issued an apology on its website for a major error:

During the second week of December, as part of its Warrant Redemption Program, Vigilant Solutions sent several warrant notices – on behalf of our law enforcement partners – in error to citizens across the state of Texas. A technical error caused us to send warrant notices to the wrong recipients.

These types of mistakes are not acceptable and we deeply apologize to those who received the warrant correspondence in error and to our law enforcement customers.

Vigilant is right: this is not acceptable. Yet, the company has not disclosed the extent of the error, how many people were affected, how much money was collected that shouldn’t have been, and what it’s doing to inform and make it up to the people affected. Instead, the company simply stated that it had “conducted a thorough review of the incident and have implemented several internal policies.”

We’re unlikely to get answers from the government agencies who signed these contracts. To access Vigilant’s powerful online data systems, agencies agree not to disparage the company or even to talk to the press without the company’s permission:

You shall not create, publish, distribute, or permit any written, electronically transmitted or other form of publicity material that makes reference to the LEARN LPR Database Server or this Agreement without first submitting the material to Vigilant and receiving written consent from Vigilant thereto…

You agree not to use proprietary materials or information in any manner that is disparaging. This prohibition is specifically intended to preclude you from cooperating or otherwise agreeing to allow photographs or screenshots to be taken by any member of the media without the express consent of LEARN-NVLS. You also agree not to voluntarily provide ANY information, including interviews, related to LEARN products or its services to any member of the media without the express written consent of LEARN-NVLS.

You might very well ask at this point about the legality of this scheme. Vigilant anticipated that and provided the City of Kyle with a slide titled “Can I Really Do This?” which cited a law that they believe allows for the 25% surcharge.The law states that a county or municipality “may only charge a fee for the access or service if the fee is designed to recover the costs directly and reasonably incurred in providing the access or service.”

(read more at the EFF)

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Dave Maass of EFF.org.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • lolzngiggles

    Criminals manipulating the laws to allow its criminal activity. Needs to stop.

    • http://www.dontflyoverwater.com BillyJoeBobCarsOnBlocks

      The more the sheeple are shorn, down to bleeding skin, it might wake enough up to remove the interlopers and re-install the Republic

    • Razedbywolvs

      http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/4121-Wisteria-Ln-Palo-Alto-CA-
      Palo Alto is really expensive but 1.6 is still way to much.

  • http://www.dontflyoverwater.com BillyJoeBobCarsOnBlocks

    1. Got a warrant Orificer? ( No, oh,,,,lawsuit time,, you and the legislators)
    2. Can you, under oath and via notarized affidavit authorize payment in anything other than gold or silver coin? ( Yes = time to motion the pretend court for a hangin’ )

  • whiteberry

    They will stop at nothing to enslave us all!

  • Truthsetsyoufree

    Money-sucking bastards. Fuck you, Vigilant Solutions and TX law enforcement.

  • Smarty

    The saddest part of this bullshit is that A LOT of our “fellow Americans” own and/or work for businesses such as Vigilant. They are selling us out to pad their own pockets. They are also selling out their friends, relatives, and future generations by being part of the enslavement game. They are traitors. There is no other way to describe them. It would be nice to start posting the names and addresses of people who work in these industries so that they can be tried in “the court of public opinion”. They are 99% of the problem because if they didn’t invent and sell this technology, it wouldn’t be available to use against society. It’s time for the masses to change up the game…..

  • curenado

    Bizarre, sick and suffering situation, but chronic and languishing, not lethal. Apparently the house wins all mistakes too – total racket

  • Mike

    I used to admire Texas, but they have now allowed the left to corrupt their political system. Now I feel sorry for them. Once a great state, the citizens have allowed it to become a liberal regressive breeding ground. Soon there will be no way any republican, conservative, or right of the aisle presidential candidate could ever win again. Which by the way is part of the left’s plan, hence all the ILLEGAL INVADERS AND SUCH.

  • Frank

    If you’re one of those that get pulled over, making a road-side payment with your credit card is OPTIONAL, so make the officer give you a ride to see the judge (as long as you can avoid having your vehicle towed – which would be an extra cost). If you owe a fine, you’re still going to pay it, but you can make it inconvenient and subvert the Vigilant system and deny them their 25% Service Charge. Normal credit card fees are 1% to about 3%, but Vigilant is the Devil and the law enforcement agencies that have signed-on to this program have made a deal with the Devil. FYI: Driving around without license plates displayed is a minor Equipment violation by most state Traffic codes – usually available on-line. If you have valid license plates for your vehicle, just put them inside of the passenger compartment, like on the dashboard or somehow visible through the rear window – even if at an angle. This will defeat the plate readers, but still comply with the requirement that the license plate be “visibly displayed.”

  • http://robertsrevolution.net Robert Farrior

    Revolution is the only recourse!
    robertsrevolution.net

  • ccambridge

    Ahhh Amerika. Are the owners of Vigilant former NSA employees?

  • Tatiana Covington

    How about just leaving others alone?

  • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

    The SCOTUS has been very clear several times that we do not have an expectation of privacy in public places.