It seems like only a few months ago (because it was) when the government that rules America was condemning the brutal crackdown against protesters by the Ukrainian government. The then-Russian backed regime was fending off large crowds of protesters who were angry about the Ukrainian governmentâs close ties with Russia, resorting to violence and anti-riot tactics to disperse the crowds.
In a statement issued by the White House on January 19th, before the new Western backed âlegitimateâ government of Ukraine took power, US officials condemned the violence against protesters:
âWe are deeply concerned by the violence taking place today on the streets of Kyiv and urge all sides to immediately de-escalate the situation. The increasing tension in Ukraine is a direct consequence of the government failing to acknowledge the legitimate grievances of its people.
Instead, it has moved to weaken the foundations of Ukraineâs democracy by criminalizing peaceful protest and stripping civil society and political opponents of key democratic protections under the law. We urge the government of Ukraine to take steps that represent a better way forward for Ukraine, including repeal of the anti-democratic legislation signed into law in recent days, withdrawing the riot police from downtown Kyiv, and beginning a dialogue with the political opposition.
From its first days, the Maidan movement has been defined by a spirit of non-violence and we support todayâs call by opposition political leaders to reestablish that principle. The U.S. will continue to consider additional steps â including sanctions â in response to the use of violence.â
In a noble yet ironic âselective at bestâ attempt to stand up for human rights, what the US government said in the above statement made sense. Kind of.
While fighting for freedom of speech is a good thing, it should be stood up for even when itâs inconvenient. Now, as the US and allies in the West deliver billions in loans, tech and intel to the new central-banker-run government in Ukraine, Kiev is fully engaging (and killing) pro-Russian protesters in the East of Ukraine and even in the SouthwesternÂ port city of Odessa. Ahh yes, the sweet smell of selective humanitarianism.
Then âlockstep with American political talking headsâ US media outlets immediately began referring to these pro-Russian (former)protesters as insurgents, militants, militiamen, radicals, separatists and terrorists just before the killing started a few months ago. They knew it was coming.Â 40 pro-Russians were burned alive in a building on Friday and there was hardly a mention of it in the news. You see, now the protesters are called terrorists so itâs okay to kill them. When did the media stop calling them protesters and start calling them terrorists? When it became politically convenient. Iraq remembers.
The US government (and citizen by default through taxes) is actively supporting the crony, human rights abusing, unelected Ukrainian regime through billions in loans, military training and equipment of which we can only speculate about.
As an American citizen, I do not consent to this insane foreign policy. And, according to a recent survey by the Wall Street Journal, it seems that at least 47% of Americans agree with me:
Americans in large numbers want the U.S. to reduce its role in world affairs even as a showdown with Russia over Ukraine preoccupies Washington, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds.
In a marked change from past decades, nearly half of those surveyed want the U.S. to be less active on the global stage, with fewer than one-fifth calling for more active engagementâan anti-interventionist current that sweeps across party lines.
âŠThe poll findings, combined with the results of prior Journal/NBC surveys this year, portray a public weary of foreign entanglements and disenchanted with a U.S. economic system that many believe is stacked against them. The 47% of respondents who called for a less-active role in world affairs marked a larger share than in similar polling in 2001, 1997 and 1995.Â
Good! So the propaganda isnât working, but the government doesnât really care about public opinion anymore. After all, how many Americans would actually support sending billions of US dollars to an oppressive Ukrainian puppet regime while our own schools and infrastructure dwindle into a bureaucratic wasteland and the country falls $16+ Trillion into debt? Not me.
Another small detail to remember as the US government escalates tensions in Ukraine under the banner of de-escalation (I know itâs Orwellian, but what isnât nowadays) is that the American government likely helped overthrow the democratically elected, Russian-aligned former government of Ukraine. As this leaked tape of a conversation between diplomats proves, the US government hand picked central bankerÂ Arseniy Yatsenyuk to be the new âlegitimateâ leader of Ukraine long before the coup took place. Oh yeah, âFuck the EUâ while weâre at it!
Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, later haphazardly apologized for her remarks that were recorded and leaked anonymously when she appeared at a press conference, clearly shaken up and taken back by the leak:
So while the US government and their media cohorts continue to push for the Westâs version of âstability, democracy and self-determinationâ in Ukraine, the truth is that they were and continue to be part of the driving force causing these very problems they seek to fix. But hey, whatâs new?
In no way do I seek to condone Putin or Russiaâs actions in Ukraine. Russia is also a large oppressor in the region and is an oligarchy which is structured and governed much like America, for the rich. The Russian-American proxy war in Ukraine will have one guaranteed loser, the innocent Ukrainian civilians who are caught in the crossfire of this banker resource conflict. Both American and Russian citizens must regain control over their governments or these injustices will continue. Please share this article if you think WWIII is a bad idea.