The Superhero Complex: Are We Incapable of Saving Ourselves?

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

superhero

If we felt empowered in daily life, would we be so enamored of superheroes constantly saving our world from destruction?

It’s been widely noted that the U.S. film industry ably functions as a pro-global hegemony propaganda machine: even when the plot features evil rogue elements at work in a global-hegemony agency (Pentagon, CIA, NSA, etc.), the competence of the agency is never in doubt, nor is the agency’s ability to rid itself of the evil rogue element.

Evil conspiracies are revealed and the Good Guys/Gals win.

This depiction of official competence and the moral righteousness of patriotic employees is not surprising; these agencies have long “cooperated” with Hollywood on many levels.

More troubling is the recent film-industry depiction of our dependence on superheroes and their superpowers to set things right. The benign view is that Hollywood is always seeking new billion-dollar source materials for multi-film franchises, and comic book heroes are tailor-made for franchises: not only can multiple films be made about individual superheroes, but the potential for mix-and-match combinations of superheroes is practically endless.

The less benign view is that the popularity of superhero movies reflects a deep insecurity and worrisome desire for fantasy saviors, as if mere mortals can no longer save themselves with their pitiful real-world powers.

Psychoanalyzing the zeitgeist of films has long been a popular parlor game: much has been written about the popularity of monster films (often featuring nuclear radiation as the trigger of the mayhem) in 1950s Japan, and the meaning of the American Noir films in the 1950s.

Correspondent C.D. recently submitted an interpretation of Hollywood’s superhero movies: is our collective fascination with superheroes reflecting a sense that we no longer have the power to save ourselves?

“One of the things I’ve been thinking about lately is the idea of TPTB (the Powers That Be) using entertainment, specifically movies, to keep the masses from rising up. Have you noticed how many modern movies use the archetype of the hero, but place that hero in opposition to some type of system (e.g. the Empire in Star Wars), or we have superheros. In both instances, there is a type of cathartic release for the audience’s frustrations with the current system. When the evil empire is defeated in the movie, people get an emotional release and they feel less motivated to deal with the real world empire.

When a superhero takes care of the problem, the audience is lulled into the pattern of thinking that someone else will take care of things. Also, often these superhero movies present the average Joe/Jane and the authorities as incompetents who need saving, which reinforces a feeling of helplessness to take on big powers. I’m sure others have come up with this type of analysis and I may be repeating what they have said, but it’s worth further consideration.”

Thank you, C.D. I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to say that many people sense their power within the system is extremely limited, as is their power to radically transform their own situation.

As for cheering for the ragtag rebels resisting the Empire–how many people feel divested from America, that is, they sense their “ownership” in the Empire’s wealth and power is near-zero? How many feel disempowered and disenfranchised?

It’s not much of a leap from social, political and financial divestiture to feeling that it takes superpowers to change one’s circumstances or save the system from disorder and destruction.

Are we incapable of saving ourselves from a self-destructive status quo owned and operated by the few at the expense of the many? If we felt empowered in daily life, would we be so enamored of superheroes constantly saving our world from destruction? If we felt the system still had the wherewithal to restore itself, would we need so many superheroes?

Or maybe it’s all just good clean (highly profitable) fun, or a sci-fi/fantasy updating of Greek Mythology. Still, that practically every other movie is another installment of the superhero franchise seems to beg for a look beneath the surface appeal of these escapist extravaganzas.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Charles Hugh Smith of Of Two Minds.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Cynical Old Bastard

    Short answer to your question:

    Yes. You are.

  • dav1bg

    And girls watched too much Cinderella.

  • It largely depends on what you think we need to save ourselves from.
    In most cases, we are our own worst enemies, so all we’d need is for us to cut ourselves some slack. That is pretty easy to do if one isn’t driven by their ego.

  • elbustaroyjetspeekerson

    Please SAVE me, Wundertwat!

  • Gil G

    You mean it was/is a conspiracy to normalize the police and military as opposed to the good old days when the everyday people defended themselves through well-regulated militias?

  • That is why the Government dictates Hollywood & media, the superhero complex is created by them ON PURPOSE, to brainwash the masses they cannot save themselves and to continue the status quo.
    WAKE UP SHEEPLE !
    REVOLUTION NOW !!!

  • John C Carleton

    Sure Americans can save themselves.
    Pedophile, bribery, war criminal, scuzz ball trials in DC and the “State” capitals!

  • gazoo3

    Only children are into this crap.

  • Tatiana Covington

    This is what Christianity is from word one: always the conditioning of enormous numbers to pray instead of work, to rely on someone who never comes instead of standing up for oneself and fighting back, fighting to win.

    “Waiting for Godot” and all that. The savior myth is a very bad idea. We must rely on ourselves, as in fact we have done for more than a million years.