|
Saturday, May 18th, 2013 |
|
Home
RSS Feed
Newsletter
Boomark Us
Facebook
Twitter
|
|
The Myth of Overpopulation: Force Mass Sterilizations in Developing Nations
Susanne Posel
Economists claim that overpopulation is causing poverty in underdeveloped nations. In the Philippines, there is an initiative to control the burgeoning population by forcing family planning onto the citizens. Josefina Natividad, director of the University of the Philippines’ Population Institute (UPPI), explains: “If you increase access to contraceptives for women … you will have births averted.” The UPPI began with a grant from the globalist think-tank the Ford Foundation in 1964. They influence the Philippine government with research and coercion to push population control agendas with a focus on its impact on local and international communities. The UPPI works with UN-sponsored non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to receive technical assistance in providing reproductive health products. A reproductive health bill is being pushed by Catholic priests in the Philippines that is expected to “slow population growth”. The church asserts that this will lead to the ideal that abortion is a viable way to keep more children from being born. Father Melvin Castro, executive secretary of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines’ Episcopal Commission on Family and Life, says that: “It’s our firm belief that contraceptives will never be the answer. They are poor not because they have no access to contraceptives but because they have no work. Give them work and it will be the most effective birth spacing means for them.” The government wants to pour state funds into contraceptives. They disregard the lack of work as a contributing factor to the poverty levels in the Philippines. Using statistics from the World Bank, the government believes that reducing the amount of children will free up resources that would have otherwise been allocated to those people being born. According to the RAND Corporation, the push for family planning services have had a tremendous effect on the human population globally. It is in a massive decline that will begin to show itself beginning in an estimated 50 years. Based on the agendas of the UN fertility rates worldwide have fallen in underdeveloped nations and these trends are expected to continue. Because the global Elite claim that global population growth drains our economy and resources, as well as provide a costly burden to the citizens of a nation, the women of developing nations must be refocused to believe that family planning programs and contraception will improve their lives. The United Nations Population Fund (UNPFA) provides information to coerce women into believing that any child not planned is unwanted and should be terminated. The access to reproductive services are at the center of the UN’s contention that “reproductive choice is a basic human right.” This globalist program endeavors to make reproductive rights a subversive after-thought to supporting family planning services throughout the developing world. These services, as well as the information needed to make good choices, are usually provided as part of a constellation of reproductive health services. Through adherence to the Millennium Development Goals, the UNFPA pushes to achieve their targets by 2015. In July of this year, at the London Summit on Family Planning, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announced a partnership with Merck to bring fertility control pharmaceuticals to developing nations. Pharmaceutical giant Merck announced in a formal statement that they will donate $25 million over an 8 year period as a “Merck for Mothers” campaign in line with the BMGF depopulation agenda. By claiming that this initiative is to “reduce maternal morality around the world” and will “advance efforts to help reach United Nations Millennium Development Goal 5, which calls for a 75 percent reduction in maternal mortality and universal access to reproductive health by 2015.” Both Merck and BMGF have outlined a plan that focuses on 3 “key areas”:
By 2020, Melinda Gates hopes to extend the use of forced sterilization through manipulation of foreign governments to further the scheme of preventing 80 million of “unwanted pregnancies” in places like Africa, India and Southeast Asia. Gates believes she can prevent 40% of people who would otherwise have been born, thereby justifying family planning as a scheme to make women healthier who have “families are more successful and their communities are more prosperous.” Simply put: the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has classified “unwanted” pregnancies and they are focusing on eventually eliminating this number to reduce the world’s population. Africa, a big focus for the BMGF is being targeted along with Muslim nations. Geophysicists at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research states that only 282 billion people could be “packed onto the planet” with all other land reserved for food cultivation only. Earlier this year, it was discovered that tens of millions of “aid” funds from the United Kingdom (UK) have been used to forcibly sterilize women in India. The US and the World Bank are also sending funds through “foreign-aid programs”. The campaign for mass sterilization originated in the 1970’s. Its first incarnation was halted after mass riots which forced the Indian government to back down. The Indian government is attempting to curb the Indian population from growing. Over 1 million women are sterilized each year. Makeshift camps were constructed with the “aid” money. Documents showed that this effort was specifically designed to reduce the Indian population through coerced or forced sterilization. Based on the Rockefeller Commission report, population stabilization is an endeavor worth pursuing, although its success would take decades because of the high incidents of reproduction by marriage. However, with the destruction of the family, this problem could be solved. Furthermore, the stabilization of the global population would reallocate resources to be better spent in terms of quality versus quantity. Concluding that the best way to achieve population stabilization is to coerce the nation’s citizens that they freely choose abortion and not having a child at all as part of an acceptable societal norm. By way of implementation of social barrier and cultural pressures, the average citizen would rather go with the flow and chose not to procreate for the sake of being part of the herd. Simultaneously, by reforming the acceptable amount of children born into a married household, the impact of population growth would seem to be natural. And trends would take care of social conformity. Those who had more children would be shunned. Increasing access to abortion clinics with the inception and popularity of Planned Parenthood would give unacceptable pregnancies a viable solution. This would distract and control another Baby Boom from occurring. Using images on television, film and print media to control the ideals of the modern family to fit the model of a population stabilized by no longer being plagued with “run-a-way” births; but focusing on the example of small-families as the best way to go. Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism. Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page . Leave A Comment... |
Break away from the herd and stay up to date with The Daily Sheeple.
           |
v.8
The population is clearly out of control. There’s a reason it’s doubled in the last 40 years and led to widespread famine and disease in (under)developing countries. Do you guys ever see anything in the news that gives you even a little bit of hope? The slant and bias towards conspiracy in all of your stories (even this one, which outlines a problem that could lead to the worldwide collapse you’re afraid of, the population of the planet) makes Fox News Channel look like a reliable source of unbiased Democratic election coverage. I’m the most pessimistic person I know, but sometimes, you guys are just….way….way…..way….too attached to the tinfoil hats.
The population is not out of control at all. A simple calculation proves it. See the article Everyone Can Fit In Texas on the web site guerillatics
You are deluded. If you ‘put’ everyone in Texas they would all die. Not enough water, power, sewage disposal, etc. Aside from the need to produce power, create jobs, etc.
Just because there is space does not mean it should be filled with people, not enough jobs or resources.
Many people should not be parents and lots are forced to see their children into bondage.
Plenty of resources, and their would be plenty of jobs if government got out of the way and allowed the free market to flourish. Africa has more resources than anywhere on the Planet and they are starving not becuase of lack of resources but because of government. Wherever you look and whatever the problem its government.
You are a dim light bulb. There is no such thing as a free market. Idiots like you believe that resources are infinite and we will always ‘adapt’. They are not as we all live with in a finite system which is the Earth. For instance ff you don’t believe in the Russian theory of renewable oil resources then we are depleting a finite energy resource. Has sod all to do with government you moron. The major controllers of global resources are transnational corporations.
I agree, Wolfgang. We need look no further for the ultimate proof of this than the USSR. That was the ultimate expression of government gone rogue. It eventually consumed the entire nation… and then collapsed.
Too bad that so few here in the USA get it. We are not suffering from a bad economy. We are suffering from an over-dose of government. We need about 1/3 to 1/2 of the government that we have. All we need is enough to keep order, maintain public infrastructure, and provide a military capable of defending the USA.
What we do not need is troops stationed at 700+ military bases around the world and sticking our nose into every BS problem that comes along. We also do not need government to run every single facet of our lives. Let us LIVE O-U-R lives!
People in the US are so ill informed. The ultimate expression of government gone wild is the US industrial military complex which had a ‘GDP’ larger than the whole of the Soviet economy. Hence the warning from President Eisenhower.
The only reason the vast majority of people subsist in the US is because of government. It is not government that has ‘gutted’ US industry it is US transnationals and Wall Street. Government did not close down 50,000 manufacturing facilities in the US.
Yes, you should bring your ‘storm troopers’ home. In fact the clowns that run America cause the problems. If you didn’t arrogantly interfere the world would be a lot better for it.