The London Bridge Attack And What Is Behind The String Of Terrorism

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

London Bridge attack terrorism

“The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, ‘just to keep people frightened.’” – 1984

There is much to say about the attacks that took place in London last night. If Teresa May has her way, however, there will be little chance to say anything. The ice queen of the common people has, in the wake of the horrific attacks, not only called for a suspension of the general election but also for greater control over the Internet. Now, with British SAS troops moving into London and much of the city already acclimated to seeing fully armed British soldiers on the streets, Britain has abandoned all pretense of the “Western freedoms” it once inaccurately portrayed itself as representing. The U.K. is now openly embracing the commune-fascism it once went great lengths to keep hidden.

May, in her totalitarian speech, claimed that the Internet needed more control because terrorists were allowed “safe spaces” online where their ideology could take root and blossom. Therefore, May wants the U.K. to bring legislation and pressure to bear on private companies to regulate and censor content and spaces online under the guise of preventing terrorism.

Of course, the U.K. could stop funding ISIS and other terrorists and terrorist organizations across the world. It could immediately ban Saudi Arabia from funding Wahhabist mosques all across England. It could cease allowing more immigrants from entering a country that has long suffered from an enormous shortage of jobs and whose communities are the locales from which these terrorists almost solely come from. The U.K. could even re-prioritize police efforts to arrest and prosecute victimless drug crimes and focus on actual violence and terrorism but, I digress. It appears that freedom, economics, and reason are now passé, while shutting down free speech and free thought sounds like a much better option.

There are, however, at least three points that need to be made about these acts of terrorism as well as the previous ones in relation to the U.K. Indeed, there are three levels to any discussion of the attacks at London Bridge.

First, after decades of unfettered immigration from cultures often far different than that of the U.K., the British people are now reaping what has been sown by their government in the form of often violent hostility to anything British and British culture in general. Granted, many of the immigrants have entered Britain from lands that jolly ol’ England bombed, occupied, or generally terrorized for decades and, thus, you can see why British patriotism might not be the highest on their priority list. Still, after decades of such policies which were admittedly implemented for the purpose of changing British culture forever, England’s cities contain areas where white Britons are now afraid to go for fear of being attacked by “immigrants,” and members of council who refuse to shake the hands of their female constituents because it violates their extreme form of religion. Anyone who has traveled to England and especially London in the last few years can attest to the vast demographic changes that have taken place as a result of Britain’s open immigration policies.

The elephant in the room is that the overwhelming majority of terror attacks are coming from these communities. Most Westerners, however, are afraid to state the obvious because doing so will undoubtedly open them up to catcalls of “racism” and “xenophobia,” the punishment for questioning the sacred cow of “cultural diversity.”

But the question of terrorism in the U.K. is not that simple. Right wingers would have everyone believe that such terror is the work of “Muslims” and immigrants and that the issue doesn’t go any deeper than that. Some people, according to them, are just bad seeds at the macro level and so “they” are the problem and “we” are the good guys. “Muslims” are taught from day one to hate Westerners, Christians, Jews, and all non-Muslims. Even the ones who aren’t violent and who act like any other Westerner, according to the right wingers, are just acting, waiting for their chance to destroy Western society and impose the caliphate from within.

But where does radical Islamic terrorism really have its roots? It certainly is not in Syria since both the Syrian government and the Syrian people have been the greatest force against it for the last six years. It certainly wasn’t Saddam Hussein and it isn’t Iran. In fact, it’s nowhere that the United States and the U.K. have been bombing for the past several decades. The roots of extremism come from British allies like Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.

More importantly, the roots of extremism are firmly planted in the halls of MI-6, the CIA, and other Western intelligence agencies as well as the halls of the British government who not only manipulate jihadists, but actually create, fund, and direct them throughout the entire world, including on British soil.

Simply put, the U.K. is experiencing the results of the arming of terrorists across the world, allowing Saudi Arabia to fund Wahhabist mosques throughout England, and engaging in imperialist wars all over the planet. Whenever you dump money into terrorism and incubate it on your soil, shit tends to happen.

After all, when you allow a foreign country to pour millions of dollars into mosques that teach children and angst-ridden young people in the ways of extremism as well as hatred for an authoritarian government that keeps them down, all the while dropping bombs on their next of kin overseas, what exactly do you expect to follow?

Lastly, we cannot ignore the history of terrorism in the Western world, particularly the terrorist acts that have taken place in the years after 9/11. Almost all of these attacks appear to have been the result of pre-planning by Western intelligence agencies much more so than any that are organic “homegrown” or simply jihadist-based terrorism. That is not to say that the will, desire, and means to conduct such attacks against British society do not exist. Quite the contrary. However, in the vast majority of the attacks in Britain, the assailants were well known to authorities, many having even been arrested, released (from rather serious crimes), and monitored before, during, and up until the very moment the attacks took place. Such is a hallmark of false flag government-sponsored terror.

These attacks are much more often than not, completely engineered by Western intelligence agencies or, at the very least, known about beforehand and allowed to happen for political purposes. Whether it is terrifying the domestic population into accepting a greater police state or more foreign wars, or whether is simply an attempt to change and direct the public’s mood in one direction or other, false flag terror has been used expertly throughout the post-9/11 Western world. Thus, it would be entirely naïve to suggest the timing of the attacks is not intentional. Indeed, only a week before the general election as the wave of popular sentiment appeared to be leaning to the apparent anti-war Jeremy Corbyn when ISIS attacks innocent people in the most grotesque fashion, not only inspiring a “crackdown on the Internet” but also a suspension of the general elections. This suspension is likely to last just long enough to smear Corbyn as a weakling and a naïve peacenik who isn’t fit to lead in the modern world of domestic terror and constant violence.

But if it is not a coincidence that the attacks occurred when they did, what does that mean? Clearly, it means that the real organizers were members of a deeper state apparatus than anything resembling bearded freaks in a London flat, obsessing over jihadists forums.

The UK has never been known for freedom and democracy but now even the semblance of normalcy and relative calm has disappeared from England and, once again, British people will be living in a country full of troops on the street where the freedoms of thought, speech, and even expression will be suppressed. The troops will serve to remind them that they live in a truly authoritarian country and to make sure that anyone who doubts the new reality will be relieved of their disbelief.

The wars will not stop, however, and neither will the terrorism unless the British people initiate a revolution of their own which brings about an end to the U.K.’s foreign wars, funding of terrorism, trampling of rights at home, and destructive immigration policies.

Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President, and Resisting The Empire: The Plan To Destroy Syria And How The Future Of The World Depends On The Outcome. Turbeville has published over 1000 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is BrandonTurbeville.com He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

Image Credit: RT

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Brandon Turbeville of www.activistpost.com.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Ken, Megapolis

    Daily Sheeple please help.
    Forgive my earlier jokes which dissed everyone connected to your website.
    I was drunk and accused you lot of being same, me the only sober voice. I am sure you never believed me and my pranks LOL.
    I observed in my lifetime how the annual event became the monthly event. Few years on it is now the weekly event. What happens when a bomb going off is soon going to be the daily event???
    I have serious misgivings about the whole damn thing. You get me?
    I observed how serious cover ups surrounding both the Church and the BBC ref peedo stuff too evil to print here.
    I believe that a group of people not known to me are making too much money from terrorism to just let it all go and move on to a new agenda.

    Please google image search ‘armed police scarborough’.
    Scarborough is a sleepy Yorkshire holiday resort. I think I must pack my bags and leave for good the UK.
    But to where???

    • Irenerdavis


      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dp355c:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. Follow this link for more information
      !dp355c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs645DirectPlusGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dp355c:….,…..

  • Cynical Old Bastard

    (Giggles like a drunk virgin on Prom night) This is so damned exciting I’m about to piss my britches.

    It’s like watching a really scary movie… ya know… one of the good ones where you truly can’t figure out if the hero person is gonna make it in time or not… or even live or die…

    Are we even gonna make it ’til fall?

  • SP_88

    Anyone see the movie “V for Vendetta”? That’s what this is. My only question is why would they let such a movie out into the public to be seen? Why would they broadcast their intentions like this?
    Hollywood is as much under the control of the deep state as Washington or London. So why would they do this?
    The only thing I can think of is if they make this agenda into a movie, then any attempt to apply this theory to reality will be met with ridicule and derision. But the truth is that many times a movie is interesting because it is congruent with reality. In fact, many movies are based on true events. Of course that can be a bit of a stretch.
    Unfortunately, because of this, the only people who will draw any parallels between the movie and reality are people who already know what is really going on. They are basically preaching to the choir.

    • Matrixixixix

      Hollywood movies are used as a means of predictive programming for the masses. As you immerse yourself temporarily onto the ‘reality’ of the movie your subconscious becomes imprinted with the themes of the storyline. Then when these themes reappear again outside the movie we have been already prepared to accept them as reality. This is why the news stories are so produced & theatrical, to trigger the emotional response of the subconscious imprinting left by the movie.
      On a more exoteric level, the elite believe that this method is informing the public of their plans and therefore they haven’t violated the universal law of free will, and the karmic debt for their negative actions is then transferred to the masses for allowing the plans to be followed through.

      • SP_88

        Ok. Makes sense. It’s just not how I would do it. And so it makes it harder for me to understand why they would do it like that.
        The problem I have with that is that so many people are in denial about the deep state. They argue that they either don’t exist or that they are not really “out to get us” or that they aren’t really responsible for all the terrorist activities that have been going on.
        When I first saw that movie, I thought, how much more obviously could they spell it out for us. It was exactly how I believe things are.
        But most people see these kinds of movies and they think it’s just a movie. It doesn’t make them think about what’s going on in the world. To them, it’s just fantasy.
        People nowadays do have a tendency to want everything to be taken care of for them. People no longer have a desire to take care of their own needs. And as this government nanny state progresses, people become more and more dependent on the government for their needs. And these people have no idea that this will put them in a very difficult position when the government begins to slowly take away their rights and freedoms. And these people certainly don’t care that by letting the government take over their responsibilities, they are screwing the people who don’t want or need any help from the government.
        “If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.” The government is giving people fish. And making sure that they don’t learn how to fish. And the people seem to be ok with this. And that’s the problem.

        • Matrixixixix

          Yeah spot on. It’s really frustrating when people refuse to see what’s right in their face. Waking up is very confronting for many people because they are faced with dismantling their belief system, and their vision to rebuild it based on truth has been veiled by a lifetime of programming from school, media, consumerism & social expectations/acceptance etc.
          We are far from being doomed though. Despite all the negativity being broadcast & talked about there is an alliance of very aware good people working from within to sabotage the cabal. The NWO is well behind schedule due to the efforts of these patriots of humanity & the groundswell is growing. The sleeple will wake in time, the collective consciousness will reach tipping point and all will be in the open and undeniable no longer.

          • SP_88

            I really hope so. For some reason I go back and forth between believing that we are doomed and believing that there is a growing number of people who have become awakened.
            The truth is that whenever there is some sort of revolution that brings down a tyrannical government, it’s always a very small percentage of the population that does it. All it would take is about 1% of the people, or less, to force the criminals out of our government and bring it back to where it should be.
            And that’s certainly possible. 1% of the population in America is 3.2 Million people. How would they stop that?

          • The Tuna Fairy

            I too “go back and forth between believing that we are doomed and believing
            that there is a growing number of people who have become awakened” some days I’m optimistic, some days I get very cynical.

            I wish, if we did manage to force the criminals out of the government, there was a way to keep them out. When I’m in cynical mode, I feel if we did get them out, we’d just end up with new ones.

            There’s a school of sociological thought that says the main drives of humans are security, sensation, and power, in varying balances in each person. The ones who want power are the ones who will push to have it. Someone (Robert Heinlein, I believe, without looking it up to be sure) advocated government positions be filled like jury duty, and imagined everyone trying to get out of it (my wife is pregnant, I can be governor this year!!) so you keep out the power hungry types, or at least limit their time in office.

            The power I personally crave is the power to live my own life without having to be subject to the whims of the power-hungry sorts.

          • SP_88

            Well that makes feel better. At least I’m not the only one riding this crazy rollercoaster.
            Does it ever occur to you that the best person to lead the country is probably a person who least wants to do it?
            People who crave power are the ones who should never have power, because they are the ones who will most likely abuse it.

          • The Tuna Fairy

            Yes! Look up the Heinlein stuff if you have never read it, you pretty much just quoted him 😀
            He was a wise man.
            If I could be in any fictional book, being a member of Lazarus Long’s family would be one of my top choices….

        • The Tuna Fairy

          “”If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.” The government is giving people fish. And making sure that they don’t learn how to fish.”
          You forgot: And punishing people who just want to do their own fishing.

          • SP_88

            Good point. Thanks for adding that.

  • n1mrod

    Did ya hear the one about a guy in a cave..

  • Nexusfast123

    The Mayor of London

  • Herman Nelson

    The English people need to go to a mirror, look into it and point the finger at the face they see and blame it. You wanted to be safer, you willingly gave up your rights to defend yourself to be safer. You depend on the police to protect you. Sorry to say when seconds count, the police are minutes away. The police and your politicians sold you a pig in a poke. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c32682d572434cd91657d7822fab6666547b03aae6bd77e61f7b2b6a0959195c.jpg