The CDC is lying to you again: flu reality vs. flu fiction

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


I now have the official CDC flu-death statistics for the year 2010.

They were provided to me by Martin Maloney, who, some years ago, contacted me to show how the CDC was lying all the way along the line about numbers of flu deaths. Many thanks, Martin, for your good work.

2010 is apparently the most recent year for which the CDC has issued a final report. It was released on May 13 of this year.

The report comes through a sub-agency of the CDC, the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS).

On page 89 of the report, “Deaths: Final Data for 2010,” in Table 10, we find the following:

Influenza and Pneumonia [deaths]: 50,097.

Influenza [deaths]: 500.

Pneumonia [deaths]: 49,597.

In 2010, the CDC reports 500 deaths from the flu.

But the CDC PR people have trumpeted, over and over, that 36,000 people die every year in the US from the flu.

They’ve hyped this number, to emphasize how dangerous the flu is. They use the 36,000 number as a way to promote the flu vaccine. They use it to work for their pimps in the pharmaceutical industry.

Yet, their own numbers show 500 deaths in 2010, not 36,000.

Actually, if you dig below the surface of their PR, the CDC states in their literature that annual deaths from the flu range from about 3000 to 49,000.

This is obviously nowhere near the low 500-death figure for 2010.

And it isn’t only 2010 that’s at issue. In a recent article, I laid out how the CDC routinely reports, in the fine print, far fewer than 3000 flu deaths in a given year.

It gets even worse. When you break down that low figure of flu deaths per year in the US, you find that only a small fraction of those have been confirmed as the flu.

By confirmed, I mean tested for, in order to find a flu virus in the body of a person who has subsequently died. That is essential.

So for example, for the year 2001, the CDC, in its small print, listed 257 flu deaths. But of those, only 18 were confirmed to be the flu.

As you can see above, the CDC has a mortality category called “Pneumonia plus Influenza.” They initially lump the numbers of deaths together. This gives the superficial impression of many deaths. Then, they break it down.

How do they justify that combination-category? They claim that many pneumonia deaths stem from the flu. They use a computer model to make the calculations.

But in conventional medical literature, there are at least 10 different types of pneumonia. Trying to model which ones stem from flu cases is a fool’s errand.

The CDC is lying about about flu-deaths. Again.

They’re trying, as usual, to inflate danger and promote it and sell vaccine. That’s their real job. Our job is to protect ourselves and others from the government.

Jon Rappoport

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News.

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Heimdall

    That is part of the biological and genocidal attack on the people. It goes right along with the genetic attack (GMOs) and the Anthropogenic Global Warming lies, as well as the Malthusian genocidal directive of the elitists to reduce global population (genocide) by billions.

    Say, isn’t one of Obama’s “Tsars” or Czars a Malthusian genocidist who has written a book proposting brutal malthusian population reduction programs?

    It is really pathetic that the alternative media accept directions for the terms that will be used and the statistical figures that will be quoted from the mainstream media. Why would people who supposedly are opposed to the Corporate Media Whore Presstitute version of events, accept what is really a psyop, a psychological operation, psychological warfare against the populace?

    An example of the “alternative media” acceptance of the psyop terminology is the use of the word “scandal” for what are really full-blown major crimes and impeachable offenses.

    Another example is the blind acceptance of mainstream media statistical claims. For example, Paul Craig Roberts, economist and former Treasury official under Reagan, has shown that the real unemployment figure reached at least 24% while mainstream media, and many so-called alternative media blindly quoted the government figure.

    Now many self-proclaimed opponents of the immigration amnesty proposal are quoting government approved figures for the number of illegal aliens in the country. How can a government that fights tooth and nail against implementation of current immigration law, a la Arizona, which supports amnesty for invaders, and which continually lies about employment and other critical economic statistics, be trusted and blindly quoted concerning numbers of illegal aliens in the country? Is it not more logical to assume, based on the above-mentioned facts, that the statistical claims of the number of illegal aliens in the country is vastly understated?

    I ask the “alternative media” to put on their thinking caps and use their critical thinking and observational skills and to read a wide variety of material so that they can extrapolate as I have done. The alternative media is not alternative if it easily falls into elitist organized criminal traps. When alternative media fall for psyops, they are not alternaitve at all.