Ten Basic Forms of Fake News Used by Major Media

| |

fakenews

The basic purpose of these ten forms is the presentation of a false picture of reality.

You could find more forms, or divide these ten into sub-categories.

The ten basic forms are:

* Direct lying about matters of fact.

* Leaving out vital information.

* Limited hangout. (This is an admission of a crime or a mistake, which only partially reveals the whole truth. The idea is that by admitting a fraction of what really happened and burying the biggest revelations, people will be satisfied and go away, and the story will never be covered again.)

* Shutting down the truth after publishing it—includes failing to follow up and investigate a story more deeply.

* Not connecting dots between important pieces of data.

* Censoring the truth, wherever it is found (or calling it “fake news”).

* Using biased “experts” to present slanted or false “facts.”

* Repeating a false story many times—this includes the echo-chamber effect, in which a number of outlets “bounce” the false story among themselves.

* Claiming a reasonable and true consensus exists, when it doesn’t, when there are many important dissenters, who are shut out from offering their analysis.

* Employing a panoply of effects (reputation of the media outlet, voice quality of the anchor, acting skills, dry mechanical language, studio lighting, overlay of electronic transmissions, etc.) to create an impression of elevated authority which is beyond challenge.

These are all traditional forms and methods.

Here’s an example of a big story that deployed all ten forms of fake news: the Swine Flu pandemic of 2009.

In the spring of 2009, the World Health Organization (elevated authority beyond challenge) announced that Swine Flu was a level-6 pandemic—its highest category of “danger.” In fact, there were only 20 confirmed cases at the time (direct lying about “danger”). And W.H.O. quietly changed the definition of “level-6” so widespread death and damage were no longer required (another aspect of direct lying).

The story was, of course, picked up by major media outlets all over the world (echo chamber effect, fake consensus, never connected dots re W.H.O. lies), and quite soon, Swine Flu case numbers rose into the thousands (direct lying, as we’ll soon see).

Medical experts were brought in to bolster the claims of danger (biased experts; important dissenters never given space to comment).

In the early fall of 2009, Sharyl Attkisson, then a star investigative reporter for CBS News, published a story on the CBS News website. She indicated that the CDC had secretly stopped counting the number of Swine Flu cases in America. No other major news outlet reported this fact (omitting vital information).

Attkisson discovered the reason the CDC had stopped counting: the overwhelming number of blood samples taken from the most likely Swine Flu patients were coming back from labs with: no trace of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. Therefore, a gigantic hoax was revealed. The pandemic was a dud, a fake.

Despite Attkisson’s efforts, CBS never followed up on her story (shutting down the truth after exposing it). Never probed the lying by the CDC (failure to connect dots). In a sense, CBS turned Attkisson’s story into a limited hangout—a further investigation would have uncovered acres of criminal behavior by both the CDC and the World Health Organization, to say nothing of the governments and media outlets that supported these lying agencies. The mainstream press essentially censored Attkisson’s revelations.

Then, about three weeks after CBS published Attkisson’s story, WebMD published a piece in which the CDC claimed that its own (lying) estimate of 10,000 or so cases of Swine Flu in the US was a gross understatement. Truly, there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US (doubling-down on lying).

And that was that.

Which leads to an 11th form of fake news: if one lie doesn’t quite fly, tell a much bigger lie.

And these mainstream sources are currently shouting and bloviating about independent media spreading fake news. I guess you could call that number 12: accusing their opponents of committing the crimes they are, in fact, committing.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News.

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Phil_Ossifer

    Humans seem to have a built-in need to have the approval of those whom they believe are “higher” than them and the presstitutes play on this need. This is why the media try to portray themselves up as the ultimate Oracle of Truth and Arbiter of Social Justice when, in reality, it is all bullsheeyit. If the campaign of 2016 did anything good it once and for all exposed the mainstream media as a bunch of partisan hacks who openly lie and slander those they don’t like in order to advance liberal agendas. The emperor is buck naked and now people are starting to take notice.

    • Cynical Bastard

      Exactly, Phil. Exactly.

  • Kiva

    I tried to point this out to someone about CNN lies and they threw a baby fit.They are an adult too. I had proof from here that you shoed and yes the person said it was lies.News would never lie. Oh well.She told me I am dumb for believing what I read on here

    • Cynical Bastard

      Don’t even try to argue with them anymore, Ki. It’s pointless.

      Calling it a lie is their main tactic (and a clear sign of indoctrination) when confronted with facts. From there it goes directly into name-calling. The pattern is always the same. First they reject the facts then they call you an idiot. It never varies.

      • Phil_Ossifer

        Yep…”I hereby reject your reality and substitute my own.” This is how modern liberalism works. Don’t like something? Then act like it doesn’t exist. Or, if that won’t work, denounce it as racist/sexist/homophobic/anti-Semitic, yada, yada and criminally slander anyone who disagrees with your version of reality. Reality, though, remains the same for everyone regardless. Like I always say, history and reality don’t change simply because you lie about them.

        • Cynical Bastard

          Yep, That’s pretty much says it all, Phil. To me it’s utter insanity… and it’s everywhere! You can’t escape it.

          What’s worse is they actively seeks us out. If you go to one of their websites and offer up a differing opinion you are ruthlessly attacked, then blocked and banned. But that’s not enough for them. They follow us to the websites we frequent and do the same things.

          They want to stamp out all free thought and opinion and make everyone into mindless drones following their party lines. Don’t think on your own… we’ll give you the opinions we want you to have.

          • PoshZolA

            Just put your disqus account on private then they can’t follow you anymore.