Tech Billionaires Are Secretly Funding a Plan to Break the Human Race out of The Matrix

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


On the southwestern edge of Lake Titicaca, Peru, there is an ancient 23-foot doorway known as the Aramu Muru. Local natives call it the “Puerta de hayu Marca,” the gateway to the lands of the gods and immortal life. Throughout their history, the natives have described people disappearing and appearing at this doorway.

In 1998, purported extraterrestrial contactee Jerry Wills claimed a tall blonde humanoid named Zo taught him how to access Aramu Muru and enter “another universe.” Wills further claimed that Zo illustrated to him how our universe is an experimental simulation within his species’ universe. They built it to understand their own reality, which is itself nested inside a larger universe.

The next year, in 1999, the blockbuster science fiction film The Matrix came out and forever emblazoned into our collective subconscious the idea that our existence is a simulation created by a more advanced race of beings. Incidentally, the film also made long black trench coats, black sunglasses, and my last name all the rage, but I digress…

A few years after the release of The Matrix, philosopher Nick Bostrom published the Simulation Argument, a concise paper entitled “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” It presented a trilemma, a mathematical breakdown of why at least one of three provocative scenarios must be true.

“(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a ‘posthuman’ stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation.”

The “posthuman civilization” to which Bostrom refers defines a period of time after which humans have merged with technology. This is sometimes referred to as post-Singularity, with the ‘Singularity’ describing futurist Ray Kurzweil’s designation of a society in which humans are post-biological, living synergistically with artificial intelligence.

The Simulation Argument presupposes the development of this posthuman civilization, at which point, Bostrom states, advanced humans or AI might develop simulations of the past in the same way that current scientists create test environments; some of the simulations would likely be for entertainment reasons, as well, in the same way humans currently create video games and movies.

In recent years, a number of high-profile figures have come out to state their belief that we are living in a simulation. Chief among them is tech magnate Elon Musk, who has stated that the video game No Man’s Sky confirmed his belief that someday simulations would approximate reality so comprehensively that they would be indistinguishable from reality. Apparently, he was sitting in a hot tub with friends when he finally converted.

Musk is the CEO and brains behind Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and OpenAI. In recent years, he has expressed bold plans for his companies that he believes will advance the human race: with Tesla, he wants to spearhead a transportation infrastructure that doesn’t rely on burning hydrocarbons; with SpaceX, he wants to assist in humanity’s gradual extraplanetary migration to Mars; and with Neuralink and OpenAI, he wants to facilitate humanity’s merger with advanced computer technology.

When he was asked about whether humans are living inside a computer simulation, Musk made headlines last year by saying he thinks the chances are one in billions that we aren’t.

“The strongest argument for us probably being in a simulation I think is the following: 40 years ago we had Pong – two rectangles and a dot,” Musk stated. “That’s where we were. Now 40 years later we have photorealistic, 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously and it’s getting better every year. And soon we’ll have virtual reality, we’ll have augmented reality. If you assume any rate of improvement at all, then the games will become indistinguishable from reality, just indistinguishable.”

Here Musk is referring to the exponential growth of technology, the lynchpin of the Singularity theory. If in 40 years we’ve gone from the two-dimensional pong to the cusp of augmented and virtual reality, imagine where we’ll be in another forty, or a hundred, or 400. Provided the human race survives, one may assume we will achieve the ability to produce simulations with sentient beings. Already, the Department of Defense has created the Sentient World Simulation, a real-time “synthetic mirror of the real world with automated continuous calibration with respect to current real-world information, such as major events, opinion polls, demographic statistics, economic reports, and shifts in trends,” according to a working paper on the system.

In recent years, other scientists have conducted research and even experimentation in attempts to show actual evidence of the Simulation. Heads turned last year when theoretical physicist S. James Gate announced he had found strange computer code in his String Theory research. Bound inside the equations we use to describe our universe, he says, is peculiar self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code.

team of German physicists has also set out to show that the numerical constraints we see in our universe are consistent with the kinds of limitations we would see in a simulated universe. These physicists have invoked a non-perturbative approach known as lattice quantum chromodynamics to try to discover whether there is an underlying grid to the space/time continuum.

So far their efforts have recreated a minuscule region of the known universe, a sliver of a corner that is but a few femtometers across. But this corner simulates the hypothetical lattice of the universal grid, and their search for a corresponding physical restraint turned up a theoretical upper limit on high-energy particles known as the Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin, or GZK cut off. In other words, there are aspects of our universe that look and behave as a simulation might.

With news that there are two anonymous tech billionaires working on a secret project to break us out of the Matrix, it’s hard to know whether we should laugh or scream in horror. Simulation talk is great epistemological fun and metaphysical amusement of the highest order, but it may speak to an underlying anxiety regarding the merging of our reality with machines, or an underlying existential loneliness. It’s even been posited as a solution to the Fermi ParadoxWhy haven’t we met aliens? Well, because we live inside a world they built.

Our earth is marooned in a cosmic void so vast it would take our current Deep Space I propulsion system an astonishing 81,000 years to reach the nearest star — in a galaxy of hundreds of billions, which is, itself, just one of hundreds of billions. The thought that it’s all 1s and 0s rendered by a futuristic microprocessor is philosophically sexy but, perhaps, sociologically lazy.

That there is anxiety about reality being manufactured in a society obsessed with simulated pleasure and mediated experience isn’t altogether surprising. It’s the ultimate, though perhaps accidental, expression of resistance to a culture steeped in consumerism and artificial growth.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Jake Anderson of

The “Anti” in our name does not mean we are against the media, we are simply against the current mainstream paradigm. The current media, influenced by the industrial complex, is a top-down authoritarian system of distribution—the opposite of what Anti-Media aims to be. At Anti-Media, we want to offer a new paradigm—a bottom-up approach for real and diverse reporting. We seek to establish a space where the people are the journalists and a venue where independent journalism moves forward on a larger and more truthful scale.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Joe2D2

    After feeling like I’ve been living in a comic book reality since at least the Clinton presidency, I would not at all be surprised if living in a simulation is found to be fact. Not to mention that eerie feeling of Deja Vu or that creeping sensation that comes over me when I attempt to define the meaning and purpose of it all. A synthetic classroom makes perfect sense. I guess we’ll see.

  • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

    I’ll reserve judgement about all of this since most of it is way over my head-but when you consider that the elites of this world have succeeded in creating the reality we live in, it begs the question-how much of our world is real?

    • The Tuna Fairy

      That would depend on what you are defining as “real” and THAT gets all kinds of sticky…

      I have a friend who I learn a lot from, my reality doesn’t look at all like her reality, how much of that is just totally different lifestyles, and how much is we actually see the world as different things when we see it? My personal opinion is the basic molecular structure of the world is probably not manipulated by the elites, but our perception of it definitely is. And me and my friend have radically different perceptions. I find it really educational to talk to her, just to try to see what she’s seeing in the world and to learn what the manipulation looks like though her eyes. Helps me see what may be in front of mine.

  • Wolf of Enlightenment

    Here is something to chew on:
    How do we know if we are individually an AI program within the matrix (coded to not know we are AI) or an organic being plugged into the program?

    • SP_88

      I’ve wondered the same thing. I’ve also wondered if we are all together in a simulation, and able to see each other and interact with each other, or, if I’m in a simulation and everyone else is just part of the simulation. In other words, is everyone real, or just me. Or just you.
      Or perhaps just some of us, and we can’t really tell the difference between others who are real and the ones who are just part of the simulation. Although if that’s the case, perhaps we do notice the ones who are also real, but we can’t quite put our finger on what exactly is different about them, it’s something we sort of just know, like a sixth sense or something.
      And any of these scenarios would work with either of the possibilities you suggested.

      • TrevorD

        “is everyone real, or just me.”
        I get that sinking feeling every single day,

      • Wolf of Enlightenment

        When I go down this thought trail, I then often wonder if/when I get unplugged, will I have a different family/friends and will all the previous memories come flooding back and would I remember this life just as much as the ‘real’ life. How long in real time is the simulation life? Minutes, Hours, days or more? It is a pretty fun thought exercise… at least to me.

        • SP_88

          I believe if we are organic beings plugged into a simulation, we will probably remember being in the simulation. If we only exist as data in a simulation on a computer, we will simply cease to exist when the simulation is shut down.
          Here’s a question, and you sort of touched on it already, if we are organic beings plugged into a simulation, does time pass in real time, or could we live many, many lifetimes in a few days and then when we wake up we could live out our natural lifetime?
          There’s so many possibilities to consider.

          • Wolf of Enlightenment

            I think being plugged in helps explain the crazy nature of dreams. What if the dream world is snipits of both worlds.

          • SP_88

            Possibly. Although I would suggest that if we are organic beings plugged into a simulation, this would be the dream state, and our “dreams” would be snippets of reality, or whatever world our organic bodies reside in.
            It could also just be another part of the simulation. Or it could be actual dreams, but based on our experience within the simulation, and possibly mixed with the occasional memory from a previous experience in our organic world.
            This is a rabbit hole without a bottom. 🙂

          • Wolf of Enlightenment

            I know. True or not, it is a great mental exercise.

          • SP_88

            Absolutely. That’s one of the reasons I enjoy doing it. It really gets your brain working to try and think of all the ways such a scenario could work. And every idea has the potential to branch off into several other possibilities.
            And I don’t care if it’s real or not, it’s just speculation and mental exercise. Plus it’s fun. It’s potential to be real is unknown at this point.

  • Andrew Miller

    But flat earthers are called stupid or psychotic.

    • SP_88

      Because we can see that it’s not.

    • Wolf of Enlightenment

      They are not stupid, they are gullible and ignorant.

  • Simon says

    don’t know about you guys but I wouldn’t take that pill Neo took…leave me in the matrix…I don’t want to actually see whats in the splooge they are feeding us and if most had the facts proven they would take themselves out…

  • Jimmy Yost

    Oh great. So now we’re going to have these techies-as-saviors coming along to rescue us all? Give me a break. It seems as if the Lord has cut the human race loose to see just how insane it is capable of being. And now we have these techie types cheerleading the insanity as the parade progresses.

  • Joe2D2

    Your low IQ and lack of life experience is shining through, my little snowflake. Better get back to that safe space before you get hurt by a microaggression.