|
Saturday, May 18th, 2013 |
|
Home
RSS Feed
Newsletter
Boomark Us
Facebook
Twitter
|
|
Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA?
John Aziz
Should President Obama (alongside Lindsay Graham and John McCain) be wearing an orange jumpsuit?
Welcome to the beautiful and surreal reality of life under American corporatism, under a Congress that churns out thousands and thousands of pages of (often contradictory) legislation a year. If providing material assistance to al-Qaeda is illegal under the National Defence Authorization Act (2012), and Obama and Congress are sending $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian opposition, aren’t Congress and President Obama violating their own law? Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department) not be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain” to prevent Obama and Congress from assisting al-Qaeda? Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers? Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by John Aziz of Azizonomics. Leave A Comment... |
Break away from the herd and stay up to date with The Daily Sheeple.
           |
v.8
THIS MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE!!!!
DID YOU INTENTIONALLY WRITE THIS TO COME OUT IN THIS WAY OR ARE YOU JUST DUMB? I MEAN, YOU COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE MEANT TO HAVE WORDED THIS IN THIS WAY!..LOOK AT WHAT YOU GOT HERE;
If “PROVIDING ASSISTANCE” to al-Qaeda is ILLEGAL
(STRIKE THE WORD MATERIAL)
under the National Defence Authorization Act 2012
AND..Obama and Congress ARE SENDING $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian “OPPOSITION!!”,
aren’t (aren’t?!!!) Congress and President Obama violating their own law?
Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department)
“NOT” be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain”
to prevent Obama and Congress
from {{ASSISTING}} al-Qaeda?
Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers?
YOU’VE GOT THIS WORDED “SO POORLY” IT’S UNCOMPREHENSIBLE!
Pretty sure you mean: Incomprehensible.
apparently some have no sense of SARCASM….hope thats not too many syllables for you to COMPREHEND
I got it. Talk to your english-as-a second-language teacher if you need help with this.
I think the word you were looking for is “incomprehensible.” And yes, our government does stupid hypocritical stuff all of the time; I’m tired of it myself, to put it mildly.
makes sense to me, perhaps you need to read it more slowly or something, few syllables at a time perhaps?
yeah, i dont understand how the first guy can’t understand its irony the writer tapped into… OBAMA AND THE LAWMAKERS ARE VIOLATING THEIR OWN LAWS BY FUNDING “TERRORISTS”…dumbass
By paying your federal taxes each year, YOU are giving material support to the enemy…Namely, Obama,pelosi,reid,dodd,frank,ect…..
Makes sense to me. Arrest Obama under his own unconstitutional law. Priceless.
ARREST! Hell, execute them.
Just one more law, Obama, and his whole government are breaking. Since Obama is an illegal alien occupying the Office of the President, everything he’s done is illegal. If you’re not aware of Sheriff Arpaio’s evidence, especially what he found in Hawaii, you don’t know the most important evidence he found.
@kseniya, you meant: incomprehensible.
Either it is a law or it is not. A law applies equally to all citizens of this nation so if they are suspected of aiding terrorist organizations then that should be examined exactly the same way they would do if it was you or I.
Cara! I like a comment made by one of the girls in the movie “Bad Girls” when she said “if your laws don’t protect me, then they don’t apply to me”