San Francisco Public Utilities Commission reveals plans to possibly use streetlights for surveillance
End The Lie
End the Lie
January 22nd, 2013
Reader Views: 466
In a request for participants (RFP) issued by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) for a secure wireless control and communication system for San Franciscoâ€™s future network of dimmable LED streetlights, it is revealed that the network may also be used for street surveillance, public information broadcasts, gunshot monitoring and much more.
While these Big Brother-esqueÂ plansÂ might seem strange or frightening to some, it really isnâ€™t all that surprising given thatÂ surveillance equipmentÂ has already been placed on public buses in San Francisco and elsewhere (see below video for more information).
TheÂ RFP, dated June 8, 2012 and released byÂ Public IntelligenceÂ on January 21, 2013, reveals that the â€śintegrated wireless communication monitoring and control systemâ€ť designed at first to remotely manage the cityâ€™s future network of LED streetlights, could have many more troubling applications.
While the RFP itself at first glance makes it seem as though the wireless network will be used to transmit street surveillance and other information captured by devices other than the LED streetlights, aÂ reportÂ by Rebecca Browe of the San Francisco Bay Guardian makes it clear that the streetlights themselves will do the surveillance.
â€śEach light has something akin to a smartphone embedded inside of it, and the interconnected network of lights can be controlled by a central command center,â€ť reports Browe, describing technology nearly identical to that in the Intellistreets streetlights (see above linked article for more information).
Some of the â€śfuture needs for the secure wireless transmission of data throughout the City may include,â€ť according to the RFP, â€śelectric vehicle charging stations data transmission, electric meter reading, gunshot monitoring, street surveillance, public information broadcasts, street parking monitoring devices, traffic monitoring, traffic signal control, pollution monitoringâ€ť and the mysterious need labeled â€śothers.â€ť
According to Broweâ€™s report, a pilot project has already begun in downtown San Francisco on Minna between Fourth and Sixth streets involving 14 streetlights.
As of now, these lights remotely read electric meters owned by the city, wirelessly transmit data from traffic cameras owned by the cityâ€™s Municipal Transportation Agency and also transmit data from traffic signals in the area.
Yet many questions are left unaddressed in the implementation of this program.
â€śIs a system of lighting fixtures that persistently collects data and beams it across invisible networks something San Franciscans really want to be installed in public space?â€ť Browne asks.
â€śAnd, if these systems are ultimately used for street surveillance or traffic monitoring and constantly collecting data, who will have access to that information, and what will it be used for?â€ť
Even Sascha Haselmeyer, cofounder of Living Labs Global Award (LLGA), acknowledged that there are some quite notable privacy implications to these types of systems.
â€śMany cities are deploying sensors that detect the Bluetooth signal ofÂ your mobileÂ phone. So, they can basically track movements through the city,â€ť Haselmeyer said.
â€śLike anything with technology, thereâ€™s a huge amount of opportunity and also a number of questions,â€ť Haselmeyer continued. â€śYou have movement sensors, traffic sensors, or the color [of a light] might changeâ€ť based on a condition or behavior detected by the system.
â€śThereâ€™s an issue about who can opt in, or opt out, of what,â€ť Haselmeyer said.
Indeed, it seems nearly impossible to opt out or in of a city-wide system like this.
Mary Tienken, Project Manager for LED Streetlight Conversion Project for the SFPUC, unsurprisingly attempted to downplay the potential to use the systems for street surveillance.
â€śThe [SFPUCâ€™s] interest is in creating an infrastructure that can be used by multiple agencies or entities â€¦ having a single system rather than have each department install its own system,â€ť Tienken said, according to the San Francisco Bay Guardian.
An especially interesting part of Browneâ€™s report is the mention of the interest of Intellistreets in the San Francisco pilot program.
According to theÂ article, Intellistreets CEO Ron Harwood said his company â€śwas a contender for the pilot through LLGA; he even traveled to Rio and delivered a panel talk on urban lighting systems alongside [SFPUC Assistant General Manager Barbara] Hale and a representative from Oracle.â€ť
â€śHarwood seemed less concerned about the activists whoâ€™ve decried his product as a modern day manifestation of Big Brother, and more worried about why his company was not chosen to provide wireless LED streetlights in San Francisco,â€ť according to Browne.
Michael Tardif, Intellistreets ChiefÂ AdministrationÂ Officer, believes this was because of some â€śinside dealâ€ť and declined to discuss why San Francisco had rejected the Intellistreets application.
Perhaps most interesting of all, however, was the SFPUCâ€™s response to a public records request for details on the cityâ€™s participation in LLGA submitted last August.
â€śAfter a duly diligent search we find that there are no documents responsive to your request,â€ť responded an SFPUC public records coordinator to the San Francisco Bay Guardian.
â€śThe San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is not a participant, nor is involved with Living Labs Global Award,â€ť continued the response. â€śPlease know that we take our obligations under the Sunshine Ordinance very seriously.â€ť
While that is clearly a lie, Charles Sheehan, communications manager at SFPUC (referred to only as â€śSheehanâ€ť) in the article, claimed it was just an honest mistake.
Sheehan told the San Francisco Bay Guardian that in the public records division, â€śClearly, nobody had any familiarity with LLGA.â€ť
Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me atÂ admin@EndtheLie.comÂ with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.
End the Lie was founded in 2011 with the goal of publishing the latest in alternative news from a wide variety of perspectives on events in the United States and around the world. For more information, find End the Lie on Twitter and Facebook or check out our homepage.
Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader. The Daily Sheeple is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.