Obama Rarely Prosecuted Criminals Who Sought To Buy Guns Illegally

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


More than 100,000 convicted felons or other “prohibited persons” tried to buy guns each year during President Barack Obama’s administration by lying on their applications, but the Justice Department only considered prosecuting about 30 to 40 people each year, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

The Obama administration may have publicly aligned itself with anti-gun activists, but it consistently turned a blind eye to prosecute known criminals who tried to buy guns.

A June 2016 Justice Department Inspector General’s report revealed that between 2008 and 2015 the U.S. Attorneys office considered prosecuting “less than 32 people per year” for lying on form 4473, the federal application to buy guns.

Surprisingly, the Obama administration’s harshest critics are gun manufacturers themselves.

“People could do what is called, ‘lie and buy,’” explained Lawrence Keane, a senior vice president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a nonprofit organization that represents gun manufacturers.

“But very infrequently is anyone ever prosecuted. What’s the point of making it a crime if you don’t enforce it?” he asked in an interview with TheDCNF.

“It’s a long-standing problem. And it was certainly true over the last eight years where the Department of Justice did not prosecute people,” he complained.

Daniel D. Roberts, who in 2009 was named Assistant Director of the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division, confirmed that more than 100,000 criminals each year attempt to buy guns even though they have rap sheets.

“When I was there, it was running around 100,000 a year of firearm purchasers that tried to go through to buy guns. I think it’s more than 100,000 now,” he told TheDCNF in an interview. “That should trigger a referral to the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for investigation for lying on the forms.”

Two of every 10 gun denials referred to the ATF was sent to field offices for prosecution, a Justice Department report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics in 2013 and 2014 found. Eight of ten never faced prosecution, according to the report.

Roberts ran the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) checks, that is the main tool the bureau uses to conduct background checks of potential buyers of guns. He left the bureau only last year.

Dave Workman, a senior editor of the Gunmag.com, a publication owned by the pro-gun rights Second Amendment Foundation, claims the Obama administration simply didn’t want to spend the money to prosecute people who lied on their form 4473.

“The Justice Department didn’t want to spend the money or interest or time to prosecute the key people who lied on their 4473,” he told TheDCNF in an interview.

The Inspector General’s report bears out Workman’s observation, stating prosecuting those who lied on their applications was “not the best use of Department resources.”

Prosecutors “hold the view that prosecuting subjects for false statements on a firearm application absent other aggravating circumstances may not be the best use of Department resources,” The Executive Office of U.S. Attorney said.

Keane said, however, the decision eliminated a deterrent effect. “It has a deterrent effect to others that there are consequences engaging in that conduct,” he told TheDCNF.

The Justice Department’s passivity seemed to go against the Obama administration’s public image of being tough on those who lied to buy guns, Workman added.

“It was unusual for an administration that was so ideological on gun control to not go after these guys when they essentially had been caught red-handed,” he said. “That I find a little bit disturbing.”

Even the pro-gun control advocacy group “Everytown For Gun Safety” lamented the lack of Obama prosecutions.

“It is a federal crime for felons and other prohibited gun purchasers to attempt to buy a gun. The (U.S.) Department of Justice, however, has not been prosecuting people who fail background checks at licensed gun dealers,” the group stated on its website.

Similarly, Avery Gardiner, the co-president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence told TheDCNF those who lie on their background check applications should be prosecuted.

“They’re subverting decades-old federal law that keeps guns out of the hands of dangerous people,” he told TheDCNF in an email.

“At Brady, we’d like to see the Department of Justice encourage its prosecutors to pursue these criminal acts,” Gardiner said.

Gun control activists may also be surprised that the denial rate for gun applications plummeted during the Obama administration, from 17.2 denials per thousand in 1999 to only 5.5 denials per thousand in 2014, according to a June 2016 Justice Department report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Under federal law there are ten categories of “prohibited persons” who are specifically barred from ever purchasing a gun, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

Prohibited persons include convicted felons, drug addicts, those committed to a mental institution, people dishonorably discharged, someone who has a restraining order or an individual who has stalked people or have been convicted of domestic violence against women.

The issue isn’t an academic one. Devin Patrick Kelley, 26, opened fire on parishioners at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, Nov. 5, and killed 26 people and wounded 20 others. Kelley met at least three specific conditions that should have denied him a gun.

Kelley in 2012 fled the Peak Behavioral Health Services hospital in New Mexico where he was sent for a serious mental illness condition after being court-martialed by the Air Force on charges of assaulting his wife and child. Kelley also stalked two teenage girls. Finally, he pled guilty to the charges, spent a year in military prison, and was given a bad conduct discharge.

Yet, he presumably withheld all of this information on his gun application. He was able to buy four guns between 2013 to 2017 in Colorado Springs, Colo., and San Antonio, Texas.

A scathing September 2016 Justice Department Inspector General’s report found prosecutions of criminals who sought guns under the Obama administration were “extremely low.”

After the Sandy Hook elementary school killing, Obama issued a report in January 2013 titled “Now is the Time: The President’s Plan to Protect our Children and our Communities by Reducing Gun Violence.”

“The Attorney General would ask U.S. Attorneys to consider whether additional efforts would be appropriate in areas such as the prosecution of felons who illegally seek to obtain a firearm, and persons who attempt to evade the NICS system by providing false information,” one part of the plan stated.

But the Inspector General’s Office found that “there was no significant change in the number of NICS cases pursued for prosecution [after] the President’s January 2013 plan to reduce gun violence.”

The number of prosecutions “remained extremely low” since former Attorney General Eric Holder unveiled his “Smart on Crime” initiative in August 2013, the report found.

“Significant number of prosecutions remained extremely low,” the Inspector General’s Office concluded.

Prohibited people who lie on their gun applications or actually obtain guns under false pretenses are routinely referred to the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agency. ATF prosecutions dropped precipitously under the Obama administration.

“The percentage of cases referred by ATF that were accepted for consideration of prosecution also has decreased,” according to the report.

U.S. Attorneys “accepted 80 percent of ATF field division referrals for consideration of prosecution in calendar years 2002 and 2003, 60 percent in FY 2008, and 38 percent in FY 2013,” the report added.

Keane calls the current background check program “broken.”

“The system we have is broken and needs to be fixed. What’s the point of extending background check when the system doesn’t work now?” he asked.

Stephen J. Morris, another former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division, who served in the bureau for 28 years said in an interview he also thinks the overall system of reporting background checks lacks accountability and is broken.

“There are a lot of laws that have been passed that mandate that records be submitted to the NICS at the FBI,” Morris said. “But in the end of the day, if there’s no accountability, if there’s no consequences for not entering the data, then the system is broken at that point.”

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Richard Pollock of The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available
without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For
licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Herman Nelson

    Sounds great.. Until the government starts expanding the list of “prohibited persons”. The Lautenberg amendment is a prime example.

    Lets say your girlfriend punches you, you hit back, she picks up the phone and calls 911 stating you just punched her. The police show up and investigate. At this point in time, the male is walking a tight rope to whether he loses his rights or not. It doesn’t matter if she threw the first punch, it matters to who picked up the phone and called 911.

    This becomes a slippery slope of criminal creation.

    • yes and that goes for the court system out here in Cali…whomsoevereth files first gets the jackpot…

  • Guillotine_ready

    Actually if you are not currently locked up in a jail cell the second amendment supports your right to bear arms against gov tyranny. Not for hunting or even home defense first it is against gov tyranny. Any questions?

    • SP_88

      Right. It’s only these unConstitutional federal laws that prohibit people from exercising their rights. It is unConstitutional to take away someone’s rights after they’ve paid their debt to society.
      If someone is convicted of a crime, and they are sentenced to time in prison, when they get out, all of their rights should be restored in full. Once you complete your sentence, you’ve paid your debt to society, supposedly. Well, apparently not, because now you’ve also lost your second amendment rights for the rest of your life.
      What other right is so heavily regulated? Or regulated at all? Or limited?

  • jimmy joe

    So it wasn’t obama then, just a bunch of tarded federal pigs. Boy, the headline made me think it was him personally that let those slip!! Fucking idiots!!

  • cold340t

    And No-One Prosecuted Bushjr./Cheney or was prosecuted for 9/11 either! But, but but Obama! Yah, I know what 9/11? Sad! MAGA!

  • Cynical Old Bastard

    Didn’t even read the story. Not the President’s job to prosecute folks. Simple as that.

  • obama rarely did anything except use his pen to write an ungodly number of executive orders, gave himself pay raises, and stuffed his pockets with taxpayer’s cash…oh and talk a lot of shit