Obama: Being a Stay-at-Home Mom Is “Not a Choice We Want Americans to Make”

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


In a quest to get more American children enrolled at even younger ages into our government indoctrination centers, er, public schools, Obama recently made a pretty straightforward statement on Uncle Sam’s position regarding stay-at-home moms. Watch for yourself:

Speaking in Rhode Island on Halloween, Obama said, “Sometimes, someone, usually mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make.”


“That’s not a choice we want Americans to make.”

To be a stay-at-home mom? No stay-at-home moms in America, then?

Oh really? Shouldn’t it not be a choice women have to make?

And “we”? Who in the hell is “we”? Who cares what choice the government wants women to make in their personal/professional lives anyway? As a mom, I don’t consult King Obama and his band of merry morons every time I make a parenting decision, and frankly, I am scared of any parent who would.

Talk about flushing society down the toilet…because we all know how loving and nurturing public schools in this country are. Definitely a mom replacement there!

It really should go without saying, but because of how stupid this particular comment from our president is, I’m going to say it anyway. Most moms don’t work in lieu of staying home with their children because they want to. Most moms these days work because they have to in order to support their kids…not because they choose their job over their children and definitely not because the government wants them to choose their job over their children.

Obama then went on to talk about how we need to get 6 million American children enrolled in preschool programs on the taxpayer dime…blah blah blah…

Obama and his administration have long been pushing longer hours of indoctrination for children, tossing around both longer public school days and completely doing away with summer vacation.

“Now, I know longer school days and school years are not wildly popular ideas. Not with Malia and Sasha, not in my family, and probably not in yours. But the challenges of a new century demand more time in the classroom,” Obama quipped in September 2009.

As previously reported, even New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has been talking about expanded school hours and instituting a school dinner program (because the crappy school lunch program Michelle Obama has been touting all over the place has been going over oh so well):

This agenda has obvious benefits for the State, whose metabolism is fueled by greater power and expanded mandates. There are also some pretty naked benefits for the many corporations which benefit from government contracts – including some pretty lucrative business in school lunch programs.

Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper reported back in October about the latest trend in schools to ban students bringing their own brown-bagged lunches – unless they have a special recommendation from their doctor!

Why? Ostensibly it is to promote a “balanced and healthy diet” for the kids, of course.

But behind the veil, is more profit through a captive market – tens of millions of school children eat billions of dollars worth of school food every year.

Agricultural surplus – subsidized by the USDA-administered Farm Bill – is given to schools free of charge; contracting food suppliers, however, frequently make substantial profits by processing that food into derivative products…

The rest of that article has a pretty in-depth example of how our taxpayer-funded public schools provide big kickbacks to Big Ag corporations like Tyson Chicken, etc. through school food programs.

So less stay-at-home moms is a boon for the government agenda in multiple ways. It means more propaganda and indoctrination (and in the case of government preschools, at a younger age) with an added financial kickback to mega corporations.

Again, the idea, of course, is that more time spent in school is supposed to mean improved academic performance. But the more well-read and educated youth of our nation’s past didn’t have longer school years; they had a more substantial curriculum. Take a look at the case for The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, penned by former education department official Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt. It has loads of leaked documentation detailing the downfall of the education system in this country — info which won’t exactly motivate parents to want to send their children to these schools for even longer hours (if at all).

Beyond longer school days, though, the idea to break apart the family so both adult members of a household can be taxed instead of just one was initially a Rockefeller and CIA propaganda campaign to ultimately destabilize society. Where do you think the whole feminism movement, which relied heavily on propaganda via the media, to socially re-engineer (and thus control) women (and their role in the family and reproductive habits as well) came from in the first place?

Do a little research…it’s pretty sickening.

It isn’t shocking that the government does not value stay-at-home moms and their role in a child’s life and society in general. If anything about the establishment puppet-in-chief’s comments is shocking at all, it is the fact that he actually admitted the government’s position on camera.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.

Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa and Aaron also recently launched Revolution of the Method and Informed Dissent. Wake the flock up!

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Sir TuberKopf

    Fits right in with the “Blame Duck Presidents” agenda to divide America.

    This man is such a “Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad” commie pig.

  • Nichole Koonce

    Wow I had to do a double take at the Authors name. read like my daughters rant on a social media site after she heard Lord Obama.

  • Loisteehee

    Well, Mr. Obama, what is so wrong with being a stay at home mom and taking care of the children? The phucking government is not qualified to care for and teach and feed children.

    • 1PissedAmerican

      Mochelle will take care of therm she’s a stay at home mom living in public housing and government steak and lobster.

  • curenado

    There is nothing but lies and rot that belches out of satanist islam’s disgusting messiah. So glad it is almost over for that Kenyan scan and all his ilk. People will be happy to. Joyous.

  • Pop_Korn

    To bad Barry Soetora is not a stay an home (Kenya) whatever.

  • jim_robert

    Apparently, after tonight’s election, Obungler is not a choice Americans want either.

  • Chris Sky

    This is just another way for the government to say “we don’t expect your family to be able to survive without government assistance and BOTH parents in the work force.. this gives us the added bonus of being the primary influence in your child’s life from an even earlier age, and making you even more of a slave!” -Obama admin

  • Joe Lizak

    Just watch a You Tube video of a school teacher adding 12+13=25 using Common Core. It takes her 5 minutes to explain and show you how they come up with the answer. This simple math problem shows you our school aren’t working.

  • Joe Lizak

    Being a black man, Obama should know all to well about “stay at home moms”.

  • Joe Lizak

    The same people who tell you your 3 month old twins should be in day care are the same ones that say giving them pills is good to.

  • PJ London

    A mom’s job is to provide an education, unfortunately most, having been raised through the schools, are incapable of even providing simple training.
    Mom should provide a safe environment where a child’s curiosity is fostered and rewarded.

    “Training is memorizing the fact that the earth revolves around the sun.

    Education is understanding the laws of planetary motion which allow you to arrive at that fact.

    Training to perform a task is not, in and of itself, a bad thing. It’s a necessary part of navigating the modern world with its constantly shifting technologies and methodologies. The problem comes when training replaces education. The majority of educational institutions around the world specialize in teaching children how to act, not how to think. This creates adults who lack character, ambition, intellectual integrity, and an ever-expanding sense of identity.”

    “A proper education must be entirely voluntary and initiated by the curiosity of the student to learn the particular information at hand. A five-year-old will not learn how to read without the desire to know how to read. A teenager will not learn algebra or chemistry without a desire to understand them. This desire can either come from a fear of negative consequences from not learning them (“bad grades,” punishment, parental and social scorn, the pathological fear of being perpetually stuck flipping burgers to make ends meet), or a genuine enthusiasm for gaining new knowledge and abilities. ”

    Gregory V. Diehl

    “There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.” — Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961

    Until we understand, grasp and incorporate the truth of Buckminster Fuller (below) we are doomed to class, social, racial and all the other warfares that abound.

    “We must do away with the absolutely specious notion that everybody has to earn a living. It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest. The youth of today are absolutely right in recognizing this nonsense of earning a living.

    We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everybody has to be employed at some kind of drudgery because, according to Malthusian-Darwinian theory, he must justify his right to exist. So we have inspectors of inspectors and people making instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors. The true business of people should be to go back to school and think about whatever it was they were thinking about before somebody came along and told them they had to earn a living.” ~Buckminster Fuller

  • 1PissedAmerican

    Only if your a ILLEGAL immigrant welfare baby machine dropping your kids off @ public schools in your $50 TRUCK can you stay home, everyone else out the door we need you to pay for the these border jumping criminals.

  • Mike

    That would be because the liberal progressive agenda wants the government to raise little robots instead of self thinking kids with family values.

  • Mike

    At least now the women know who does not want them to have a choice.

    • Justin OB

      talk about a “war on women”…

      • Mike

        The democrats are at war with everyone, they just use the hate and racism to get votes.

  • Justin OB

    He needs more cattle in the workforce to be taxed in order to pay for all of the illegals he is bringing in to the country. Somebodys gotta pay for it

  • dan

    Just think of them as stay at home community organizers…..

  • Cracker122049

    Anyone that supports this fool is a sheep standing in the butchers chute waiting for slaughter. Bad thing is that if it would be a Republican there in his place the same thing would apply. This rogue government is certainly not doing things for the citizens of this country,they are only interested in controlling them.Teach them at a young age to comply and if they don’t drug them till they do. Damn the school shootings! This is not going to be fixed at a voting booth or a courtroom and I do think a lot of others are coming to that conclusion too.

  • suzie30

    This is why I don’t want to have any children. The world is just so messed up. All people care about is increasing their material wealth. There is no respect for family life at all. Why have kids if someone else is going to raise them. Women nowadays are just baby making machines. They physically make children but have no emotional attachment to them. It all just selfishness. They are hoping the child will look after them in their old age. As far as I can remember society and the world was better off when the role of the woman as a homemaker was highly respected. I rather be a slave to my family than be a slave to corporate America. It is sad that a woman’s selfworth is defined by a pay check and not how happy her family is. Look at the state of the world now. Increases in bullying at school .Children going into schools and killing people. ADD. Broken homes and dysfunctional families to the extreme.
    None of this craziness existed in the early 20th century. Children do these things because they are crying out for attention from their parents. Instead what do parents say ??? Go play with your IPAD you are annoying me . Leave me alone to pursue my selfish desires. THE WORLD IS A SAD PLACE.
    Why do you think the cost of living has gone up so much since women went out to work . It is because business men saw that families now have two incomes and not one. So people saying that having a two income home is a necessity is a lie. This is so only because families have told business men that we have two families now.
    Also would you hang out with your nanny in real life. So why do you trust her with her children. The nanny herself usually comes from a ghetto background and is just looking after your child to make money. She doesn’t and will never care about your child in the way you do.
    Instead of supporting materialism , society should support the woman in the home. Measure should be put in place to ensure that say if something happens to the woman’s husband, the family can still continue to be happy with her at home. Maybe housewife insurance or higher government benefits. It can work . Think of all the billions of money the government wastes on wars and developing ammunition for wars. All this could go instead to making society better.
    If the role of the woman at home was fully supported by society . There would be NO issues and NO whatifs.
    Also people say that if you stay at home you become isolated. Why is this. That is because most women are not housewives. If most women were housewives then there would be a strong community to support housewives. There would be no isolation.
    Also for women who work. To what extent do you find that people at work are your friends ?? The very competitive nature of the work environment prevents women from having real friendships at work.
    How many people at work can you call you real friends. It is all just a myth .
    This is families where both people work outside the home have more problems. All of you are buying into the lie.
    Working in an office gives you a false sense of security. Many of you only realise it when it is too late.
    We must go back to traditional values.
    A woman in the home is not inferior . She is superior to the man who goes out to work. Children need care an attention and a proper family life NOT material things.
    I had everything I needed physically growing up but emotionally I suffered because my mother was always emotionally distant from us and called motherhood slavery.
    To this my broken family life affects me and I often suffer from depression. I find it very difficult functioning as an adult.
    Why can’t governments see this.??

  • PJ London

    True, but I have an ongoing education. I use blogs to get me thinking, if my remarks cause someone else to think, well and good, if not, I have still achieved my purpose, documenting my thoughts.

    • Abigail Emerson

      Please keep thinking and thinking often.

      • PJ London

        Thanks Abigail, haven’t looked at this in over a year.