Obama at the Head of Anti-Second Amendment Movement
The Real Agenda
December 19th, 2012
Barack Obama has pledged to lead a new national crackdown on firearms, with some prohibitions, greater legal controls and a new approach to personal safety that requires a profound transformation of the dominant culture in the United States. For the first time in decades, the tragedy of Newtown, different from previous ones in several circumstances, is being used to launch a massive attack on the second amendment, which clearly states that every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms and that the government cannot legislate against that constitutional right in any way, shape or form.
The issue of gun ownership is one that is little understood by most Americans. After the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, people all over the United States showed up at police departments to hand in their guns and according to recently taken polls, upwards of 50 percent of the population now believes that the idea of limiting gun rights is a positive thing. Perhaps they have been overwhelmed by the fear instigated by the main stream media, which have used the shooting at the Sandy Hook school to call for massive gun restrictions. People cannot see that if there is one thing that should be understood after the shooting is that the government cannot protect them, and that their protection is their responsibility.
Not only have many congressmen shown opposition to firearm ownership, but a large number of¬†them have been quietly working on¬†legislation to limit them, some of the most loyal supporters of the National Rifle Association (NRA), such as Sen. Joe Machin, a member of the powerful lobby for years, yesterday joined the supporters of imposing tighter controls. ‚ÄúIt is time to move beyond the rhetoric, we need to sit down and do something,‚ÄĚ he said.
Indeed, it is a new time. The country lives under a shock like never before. Millions of parents that Monday morning left their children at school have¬†yet to experience the dreadful outcome of the crime perpetrated at the¬†Sandy Hook school last Friday. The shooting did not make them understand that it is their responsibility to protect their own children. Children, teachers and families are always talking about it, how something so horrible could happen, what needs to be done so that does not happen again, but they seem unable to rationalize and come up with the right answer.
Obama picked up the popular sentiment in a speech on Sunday night in Newtown, which promised to use ‚Äúall power‚ÄĚ in his¬†hands to carry out significant change. It is very likely that this is the great cause of his second term and certainly an ambitious one, since at least 80 million people in the United States are gun owners.¬†We can expect two outcomes, if the Obama White House really attempts to enact a massive gun ban: The first would result in the mass enslavement of the population, should the majority of those 80 million decide to hand in their weapons. This is all the government wants. The second, if those 80 million stand their ground and refuse to hand the firearms, but the government imposes some kind of gun confiscation policy the country may be on the way to experience another civil war.
A civil war would not be new. In fact, a minority of Americans¬†fought a war against British imperialism to keep their right to own firearms, after the English crown called for the citizens to hand in their guns. The outcome was the defeat of the British and the Americans kept their right to keep and bear arms. If the U.S. government decides to impose a ban on the possession of firearms and law enforcement decides to comply with such task, we are in the works for one of the bloodiest battles in the history of the United States.
The Media and the Propaganda
‚ÄúWe can not accept events like this as¬†routine. Are we willing to accept that we are powerless over a slaughter of this nature? What policy does not allow us to act? Are we willing to say that violence attacking our children year after year is just the price we pay for our freedom,‚ÄĚ asked Barack Obama. ‚ÄúNo law can eliminate evil from the world, or prevent acts of senseless violence in our society. But that can not be an excuse for doing nothing. ‚Äú
‚ÄúWe have to change,‚ÄĚ Obama said. The problem for Obama is that for him to weaken or completely eliminate the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms, he will have to fight with half of the country and more precisely with a growing minority that understands now more than ever that owning guns has nothing to do with hunting and everything to do with protecting themselves from mentally ill people. Many pro second amendment people are asking what would have happened if the principal of the Sandy Hook school had been a gun owner, or if the teachers had been trained to use guns and had one of their own. Other states and cities around the United States have asked that same question and have voted to give teachers the legal right to own¬†firearms.
Besides the need to defend themselves,¬†pro second amendment Americans¬†will offer firm opposition to Obama, Congress and the main stream¬†corporate media by¬†supporting the¬†concept of freedom as inalienable patrimony of the individual in the U.S., which is¬† subjected to the constant threat of collectivist state authority. This collectivism is reflected in Obama‚Äôs last speech when he called for all Americans to support his gun ban project. ‚ÄúIf we want to educate and protect our children, we are going to have to do together,‚ÄĚ said the president.
Those words are a challenge to the idea that a child‚Äôs safety is the responsibility of the¬†family and not the government.¬†Millions of Americans share the principle that the protection of a child is the sole and exclusive obligation of the parents or close relatives. In that same idea of individual responsibility, which has many positive applications, children are educated and raised to become the best in their communities. Children who are homeschooled, and who are taught real family and social values are more successful as members of a community.
Challenging the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, as suggested by Obama will¬†obviously hit a very sensitive fiber; one of the most sensitive at the core of American existence. This country was founded on individual freedom, and this explains why the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. Those who seek to challenge the second amendment say that limits must be imposed for the safety of the collective, clearly missing the core principles upon which their country was founded. Most of these people are domesticated Americans who actually believe that the government knows better how to protect them, even though the federal government has failed¬†time after time, after time. Fear has taken its toll.
Translating political rhetoric into concrete action¬†will not be easy. Any legislative process to impose greater controls on firearm ownership will be costly all around. The forces opposed to the regulation of weapons ‚ÄĒ the citizenry ‚ÄĒ will not go away overnight.¬†Even after controlled opposition such as the National Rifle Association and the Republican Party failed to¬†come out in defense of the second amendment, other organization like Gun Owners of America and the¬†average¬†folk himself will not let the latest tragedy run away with¬†his right to hold on to their guns to protect himself and his family.
In the¬†U.S. Congress, it is expected that most Republican congressmen will bend over and allow the fake liberal, progressive movement, to which the U.S. president belong, to impose some kind of limitation to the second amendment. Plans have already been drawn by people like Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer and Dianne Feinstein to attack the second amendment.
New gun laws will not fix anything. The problem in the United States is not one of a ‚Äėgun culture‚Äô but one of a mentally ill population, that is drugged up to their eyeballs while suffering the worst crisis of identity in the history of the country. The fake multiculturalism, the racial division, the lack of accountability of both government and corporate American and the hatred campaigns¬†secretly being supported by government grants or tax-exempted NGO‚Äôs¬†have devastated the core of the of the greatest nations in history.
Prohibiting or greatly limiting gun ownership will not only not solve the problem of violence in the American society. In fact, it will make it worse. If today gun-free zones such as schools, churches, malls and sporting events are sweet targets mentally ill people to pull out a gun and kill anyone they want, imagine what will happen in the United States if the country as a whole becomes a gun-free zone.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Luis Miranda of The Real Agenda.
Luis R. Miranda is the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda. His 16 years of experience in Journalism include television, radio, print and Internet news. Luis obtained his Journalism degree from Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, where he graduated in Mass Media Communication in 1998. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting from Montclair State University in New Jersey. Among his most distinguished interviews are: Costa Rican President Jose Maria Figueres and James Hansen from NASA Space Goddard Institute.
Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page