Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
September 4th, 2012
Reader Views: 1,199
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netenyahu continues to decry that Iran is endeavoring to build a nuclear weapon and admonishes Obamaâs slow move toward military strike.
A âclear red lineâ must be set forth for Iran not to cross, suggests Netanyahu. âThis is a brutal regime that is racing ahead with its nuclear program, because it doesnât see a clear red line from the international community. The greater the resolve and the clearer the red line, the less likely weâll have conflict.â
Netanyahu claims that anti-Semitic remarks were made by Iran at a recent UN meeting. Allegedly, Iranâs President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Israel is âan insult to humankindâ.
Last month, more verbal bashing resulted from General Amir Ali Hajizadeh of the Revolutionary Guards supposedly saying that if Israel strikes Iran, they will be blown âinto the dustbin of history.â Hajizadeh continued: âIranâs response to any practical threat to or aggression against the Islamic Republic will be very fast, categorical, destructive, and overarching.â
General Martin Dempsey, member of the US Joint Cheifs of Staff has come out to explicitly say that he is not in accord with the US military being used for Israeli agendas.
Gilad Erdan, Israeli Environment Protection Minister explains: âDempseyâs comments donât compute with statements made by the White House spokesman with regards to the strength of the relationship between Israel and the US. Israel needs to maintain its right to defend itself, it is the right thing to do and Israel will not place its security in the hands of others.â
Sending a message to Iran through European channels, Obama warned that the sovereign nation to not seek to disrupt US interests in the Persian Gulf. This contingency would preclude a military strike against Iran should Israel attack independently.
The mainstream media are reporting that Obama is trying to talk Israel out of an offensive military show of force against Iran; however Obama is cryptic when it comes to his promises of support to Netanyahu.
More propaganda set to frame Iran is being touted in a threat relayed by Hezbollah (the state-funded terrorist group) that Iran will attack US bases if Israel follows through with their strike against nuclear power facilities.
Iran is taking Netanyahuâs threat seriously with US planned naval exercises with antimissile systems in the Persian Gulf and stricter sanctions on Iranian oil. Yet this all plays into the scripted agreement between Obama and Netanyahu for plans against Iran.
In New York, at the UN General Assembly, Netanyahu and Obama discussed their plans to use military and propaganda to justify and cover their agenda against Iran.
In their scenario, Obama will inform Congress in writing that he will use military force against Iran in response to their alleged nuclear weapons program. In asking for their approval, Obama could be enabled to circumvent their decision.
It is decided that Obama will speak in Israel just weeks before the US elections wherein he will devote the US military to Israelâs plan to attack sovereign Islamic nations. Paralleling this strategy, the federal intelligence and surveillance agencies in the US will be âupgradedâ so that regardless of who is elected this November, the US government will be equipped with the necessary resources to attack Iran.
This is slated for the spring of 2013.
(o_O) Hmmm..I’d have to disagree with this article’s speculative thinking here. The backing of Israel to attack Iran freaked out both Russia & China waaaay to much for the US to go through with it as planned. Here we see Obama & Putin agreeing to not back either side in an attempt to defuse the issue… http://debka.com/article/22324/US-disowns-Israel-over-Iran-strike-No-weapons-or-military-backup. (O_o)..I think there are much easier ways to get the oil than to bluntly lie to Russia’s face. Obama would lose all credibility if he did. If I had to speculate…if any lies are being told by either side…it’s most likely one where someone will sneak weapons in to the side they want to win, while staying out of the limelight.
It certainly is taking a while to decide on which propaganda path to take. Too many on line and pesky hackers. Maybe gauranteeing broadband access to all was a big mistake.
Whatever, in the end the usa taxpayer gets stuck with the bill of another war. Of course social programs will be cut and get the blame. Tiresome.