North American Union: US/Canadian Generals Discussed Fully Integrating Their Militaries

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

us army marching

Ever since the plans for the Trans-Texas Corridor (AKA NAFTA Superhighway) were canceled by the Federal Government and the Texas State Legislature, the theories surrounding the North American Union have largely fallen out of public’s awareness. However, every now and then a story will emerge that suggests that the governments of North America are still quietly conspiring to unite Canada, Mexico, and the US into a superstate, much like the European Union.

The latest revelation of this plan comes from Canada, where it’s been revealed that Chief of the Defence, Staff Gen. Tom Lawson and the former chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, once discussed a plan to fully integrate the militaries of the US and Canada. On the surface this doesn’t sound too surprising, since these forces have been frequently deployed together overseas in recent years. And under NORAD, the Air Forces of both nations are already operating under the same command structure for the most part.

However, this plan was supposed to allow personnel from all branches of the military, including our special forces, to be deployed together in the same units under a single unified command outside of Canada. The discussion was held in October of 2013, and the documents that prove it were obtained by an Access to Information request, which is essentially the Canadian counterpart to America’s FOIA.

What’s more alarming about this military integration plan, is that General Dempsey and General Lawson seriously discussed this idea without the knowledge of the US or Canadian governments.

Daniel Proussalidis, a spokesman from the defence minister’s office, said in an email to CBC News Monday the document was not presented to the defence minister and the government has not considered its contents.

“The government has neither expressed interest in the concept of Canada-U.S. force integration nor directed exploration of it,” Proussalidis told CBC News.

A Conservative spokesman also said the party had no desire to establish a “standing integrated force.”

But the new information from the Defence Department shows the planning was deliberate and sustained, and it happened at the highest levels of both forces.

On the other hand, it wouldn’t be too surprising if these governments knew of this plan, and are just covering their own asses. They know that the majority of their voters would be outraged by the idea of sacrificing their national sovereignty in such a fundamental way. Most of this outrage would probably stem from Canadians, who would rightly recognize this integration as a total takeover by the US military. I don’t think anyone has any doubts that our military would be running show.

And ultimately, that’s probably why the plan was nixed. According to Canada’s Defence Department “Gen. Lawson indicated that Canada was not prepared to field fully integrated land forces at this time…Instead, they are developing the capability to operate together on any mission authorized by the government of Canada. Canada-U.S. co-operation is excellent; we are trying to make it better.”

Here’s what that statement really means: “Those wacky conspiracy theorists on both sides of the border would raise hell, and spark a massive public outcry if we force our militaries to deploy under the same banner. Instead, we’ll continue to quietly integrate our forces over a long period of time, so that our voters won’t be alarmed.”

Just like their clandestine plan to forge a North American Union, these government’s know that their populations would freak out if they tried to place their militaries under a single command, so they’re just taking baby steps instead. They’re hoping that nobody notices the snail’s pace of this plan’s implementation, but make no mistake, it’s really happening. One day we’ll wake up in the North American Union, and wonder how it all came to this.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Lucky

    Can you say NWO.

  • Mike

    To Canadian government, no matter the uniform if you come after our guns expect to see the lead first.

    • We already said that to the government that still controls theirs. We got physical autonomy, but Alexander Hamilton and his successors secured financial control that is still largely present.

  • StevetheHun

    Canada and the United States of America … two countries, each better off on their own.

    Canada lacks freedom, liberty and is a nation of sheep….

    The United States of America is rapidly turning into a outhouse pit.

    Why on earth would one want the other?!

    • Roddy Pfeiffer

      Canada lacks freedom? Why do you say that? Because they are not invading other countries?

      • StevetheHun

        I’d tell you, but the answer is banned in Canada.

        No freedom of speech for one. Thought crimes. Can’t offend Moslems for one.

        • Rush must be from a different Canada.

          • donnawheelerzipeto

            Rush is from Missouri

          • The rock group has been recording longer than the republican mouthpiece has had half of his brain tied behind his back, and they never had to get cochlear implants because they became drug addicts like he believes should be put in prison.

        • kasper-ghost

          And try applying for a weapon. They also have a socialist medical program akin to ours. And the list goes on.

        • Juan TwoTree

          “F” that, StevetheHun! I love to be able to call a Muslim terrorists a friggin terrorist!! The Mslims are dirty, stinking killing bastards!

      • Razedbywolvs

        No Hate speech for you.

        Be sure not to get the official number of people killed in the Holocaust wrong.
        Remember, it was like 6 billion.

        • Roddy Pfeiffer

          I thought it was 6 trillion. You must be an anti-Semite..

          • Most anti-semites are semites.

          • anti-semite is a racist word

          • Ya think?

          • Indeed, no group or race should get their own word because that, in itself, is extremely racist and wreaks of supremacy yet people lob it around like it is okay to use which gives it undue legitimacy. Racist covers it all, no favorites.

          • Who would enforce such lack of freedom of speech?

          • You already do yourself every single day

          • Against whom?

          • Whatever the imbedded PC rules dictate to your psyche, I am not you therefore I do not know.

          • I don’t have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

          • That’s why I said psyche, I know.

        • donnawheelerzipeto

          It was 6 million, and that’s 6 million too many. Nazis also killed mentally ill and physically disabled Germen citizens

          • Razedbywolvs

            Well that is very round number. You would thing the Germans being the most anal retentive people on the plant about record keeping would have an exact count, or maybe they just stooped at exactly at 6 million. After all we do keep extensive records on the POW’s we keep in America and we are not even know for our good record keeping skills.
            The majority of them are black citizens, so it must be a holocaust agents blacks.

    • There are more sheeple in America than mammals in Canada.

    • Lorraine CyrLongmire

      I’m from Canada and I see people here have no balls. They let our government bully them.

      • Canuck

        They get bullied because the majority of people are not educated on what is going on. Look up in the sky, chem trailing (Geo Engineering) right in front them, GMO’S in most of our foods (Most of Europe and Russia, SAY NO TO GMO’S, Fluoride in our water, Deadly levels of Radiation from California all the way to Alaska (never mentioned on main stream news), Bill C51 (Anti Government, you disappear), the TPP (The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multinational trade agreement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property (IP) laws across the globe and rewrite international rules on its enforcement. Then you have Agenda 21 which is now called Agenda 30 bring in the New World Order. I can go and on. Get educated on these subject, soon.

        • Lorraine CyrLongmire

          I agree, i am aware of the chemtrails, the GMOs, the corrupted government’s etc. Still have lots to learn. I was part of the Occupy Movement.

        • kasper-ghost

          You forgot the radiation levels we get in the ocean, and our land from the Japan Fukushima meltdown. If #4 goes, we all go. And it’s very volitile if there is another tsunami. And no mention from our wonderous (ad sarcasm) government in regards to that either.

    • disqus_dGZxBjnnY3

      hahahahaahhaa they are BOTH nations of sheep

  • Roddy Pfeiffer

    It’s a way to grab all of Canada’s natural resources.

    • Nexusfast123

      Especially water….the US is going to annex its neighbor. No surprises there as the US respects no other nation and the route to Russia’s resources has been closed down.

      • The surface of the planet is mostly water. There is no shortage of water, just potable. If we weren’t so cretinous in our use of nuclear power, we could install nuclear reactors aboard floating power stations that would use all of the waste heat to distill sea water, the value of which could make the electricity free. Instead we have groups of morons like TEPCO polluting the oceans with nuclear waste.

        • kasper-ghost

          TEPCO which was built by General Electric. Japan at least has their elderly out there with toothbrushes trying to clean up that mess. All the while GE does and says nothing. Bat Rastards!

          • TEPCO bought GE reactors (which are about the only ones on the market) and did their own engineering and management. GE isn’t as incompetent as TEPCO is in technical areas and would never have placed the backup generators in swampable buildings.

  • Vows of Vengeance

    They already use that term. We are already the North Amerikan Union.

    • Yeah, but everybody likes to hold on to the dream , lol. Glad to see you’re awake.

  • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

    Hello, Mr. & Mrs. America-hello?! Response: crickets…

  • Right to the Point

    Reminds me of the Nazi’s annexation of Austria…..

    • We need to be acting like the survivors in the Polish ghetto.

      • Right to the Point

        If by “survivors in the Polish ghetto” you mean setting up the same self-regulatory, shadow type, governing bodies which use our original Constitutional Republic as the template, then I agree. In fact, I have been suggesting we do just that and start a New Continental Congress.” The time has come to use the vehicles of the past to “Self-Determine” our future…

        • I think it’s time for us to write a whole new constitutional document, placing absolute individual rights in the first article, and making their violation an act of treason and the only crime prosecutable by the confederation.
          There are a multitude of things that we could carry over from the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, but it is essential, IMO, that we make one of the rights the full access of the individual to the justice system, so that s/he could bring charges against offenders in the court systems of the individual geopolitical divisions, even if the prosecutors wouldn’t, and would make them personally liable for misfeasance, malfeasance, or non-feasance , as another act of treason. If we make it too dangerous for government agents to commit treason, we’d have fewer of them doing it, but we’d have to take their prosecution out of the hands of their fellow traitors.

          • Cal

            The US Constitution is not the problem.

            The problem is the people who is constitutionally mandated to carry arms, train, and BE the Militia so that there could never be a police state or martial law (yeah, they knew about them back then, control is a ongoing problem. Neither of those are lawful here in the USA), that would be “We the People of the united States”.

            The problem is those who have never even read the US Constitution talking like they know what is in it.

            The problem is those same people do not know that our rights are natural, and are NOT given by the US Constitution, but PROTECTED within it in writing. That puts into writing what those that SERVE WITHIN our governments are forbidden to do, what they are allowed to do only under certain circumstances and in a specific put-into-writing way, and what they are delegated to do (US Constitution).

            Those same people also do not know that the Militia is the People’s tool, along with Grand Juries, and Grand Jury Investigations which are NOT UNDER any branch of our governments – state or general (federal). That the delegation of authority comes from the people. That the three branches of the American government is “We the People…” as the source of all delegated authority and the weaponized arm that enforces the Constitutions of our governments and the laws of the land, and protects our borders. The states, each with a republican form of government and their own Constitution as the highest LAW of that state except in the RARE instances when it conflicts with the US Constitution (supreme LAW of our land that all laws, treaties, regulations, codes, etc MUST follow). The general government (federal) which is defined and created in writing by the US Constitution and is delegated the authority to deal with mostly foreign affairs.

            Benjamin Franklin: “Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.”

            The problem is the Treasonous and Domestic Enemies of the USA that are serving within our governments that all need to be removed, and I am not talking just about those elected.

            About forbidden agencies acting as if they have any delegated authority at all, let alone any lawful authority. That are using authority from all three branches when it is DELEGATED to a particular branch and sometimes to a specific listed in writing position which is NOT lawful or binding on the American people.

            Basically there is a lot of Treason and *Terrorism going on in America.

            *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of
            force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

            Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the

            Patrick Henry: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.”

            Thomas Jefferson: “The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes.”

            Thomas Jefferson: “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, And if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”

            George Washington: “The
            preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the
            Republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply,
            perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands
            of the American people.”

            James Madison, Federalist 46: “… the ultimate authority … resides in the people alone”

            Thomas Jefferson: “The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”

            Think about that. It is time to have our constitutional republic done exactly as it is written and intended to be ran, and it is NOT with a police force, a standing (permanent) military, nor with an out of control government that is full of corruption.

          • Where have I EVER said that the Constitution is the problem? Ignorance of it has always been the problem.

  • bubba

    This was part of the NAFTA game plan. I believe that after the export of good paying jobs to Mexico, the belief was that the illegal immigrants streaming into the U.S. would cease. The next step would have been opening of the borders, followed by common currency, followed by the United States of North America. 9/11 messed up these plans; but I believe they are still on the back burner!

  • Gearmoe

    NWO development marches forward as current leadership sets up to disarm and create Socialism of USA.

  • It will take the reduction of the American and Canadian population to absolute penury and the confiscation of their means of self-defense to combine them with the Mexican population which has scarcely emerged from feudal situations. If we continue to trust the criminal gangs that govern us, it is a matter of time, and they can wait.

  • Why do you let them?

  • Ben

    It has mostly been done. It’s called the North American Union. TPP is the next step

  • We~see

    Uploaded on Dec 21, 2008

    And yet you do nothing!
    started in 2005
    you see Now?
    Washington seeks to prevent a long battle over the labels with Canada and Mexico

  • Sir TuberKopf

    This new union will need a constitution….. How much you want to bet there will be no second amendment, free speech, protection against warrantless searches etc.

    • watchmanonthetower

      UN Agenda 2030…

  • We~see

    check this out ..
    Uploaded on Dec 21, 2008

    started in 2005
    and Now
    Washington seeks to prevent a long battle over the labels with Canada and Mexico

  • We~see
  • sunshine

    This is true, on at least one military base I’ve been on, there have been Canadian military personnel there, with their own offices and everything. I am not in the military and really do avoid it as much as possible so I don’t know much about whether it’s nationwide, what it means (or what they say it means) but it does happen.

  • Berni Merten

    I don’t understand the article! Our armed forces in Canada are vastly superior to the American armed forces. We don’t do “friendly fire” such as destroying a Doctors Without Borders field hospital or on numerous occasions firing on each other! When often out-manned 10 to 1, Canadians consistently defeat Americans at war games!! Uniting the Canadian armed forces with the Americans would definitely be a major disaster!!

    Furthermore, our present Prime Minister does not act like a closet Muslim.

  • David in MA

    “this plan was supposed to allow personnel from all branches of the military, including our special forces, to be deployed together in the same units under a single unified command”

    Actually this would illegal under the American Constitution.


    If you’re in the military, it sounds like a good time to resign and quit!


    Yup, America is owned by The Crown!

  • Benton Marder

    And the Secretary of the Navy will now sing, “I’m the Monarch of the Seas, the Ruler of the Queen’s Nah-vee !” Which Queen? ‘God bless us all; that’s quite another thing.’

  • ccambridge

    Well of course that reflects the globalists corridor of power. Not a surprise at all.

  • Anothereno

    Go for it! I wouldn’t care, NWO would only be a bad thing if bad people are in charge…….. wait wait, every politician I’ve seen are corrupt soooo, current system doesn’t work, new system wouldn’t work, nwo wouldn’t work, old system didn’t work….. Nothing will be flawless….

    Best bet would be bigger punishment for political corruption like capital punishment or life in prison, but alas that won’t happen as politicians are the ones making the laws…

  • Cal

    Because you are not just an average Joe herein America due to the efforts and sacrifices done by our forefathers. You, and all Americans (not the Obama ones – but that is another comment) are the sovereigns of this nation. That is why our representatives (< — key word here is that they represent our wants or are disloyal or traitorous in their actions) SERVE within our governments.

    "The people or sovereign are not bound by general word in statutes,
    restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign, … It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)

    “The law subscribes to the king (in America, the people) the attribute of
    sovereignty; he is sovereign and independent within his own Dominion; and owes no kind of subjection to any other potentate upon earth. Hence, it is, that no suit or action can be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have jurisdiction over
    him; for all jurisdiction implies supremacy of power”. Chisholm
    vs. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419,458

    Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105: “No state shall convert a liberty
    into a license, and charge a fee therefore.”

    Stock v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 289 In Interest of M.V., 288 Ill.App.3d 300, 681 N.E.2d 532 (1st Dist. 1997) “Where a court’s power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the structures of the statute.” “The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract.” see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”

    Patrick Henry: “The Constitution
    is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it
    is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”

    President Jefferson successfully urged Congress to appropriate federal funds to provide firearms to state militiamen who did not own their own guns. Congress complied, and during Jefferson’s second term and Madison’s first, "public arms" were supplied at federal expense to
    state militias all over the nation.

    The militia was intended to prevent the conquest of America by a foreign power, but it was also intended to prevent the conquest of America by a central national government and its standing army.
    At his first inaugural, Jefferson explained that "a well-disciplined militia" is "our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till
    regulars may relieve them" and also a guarantee of "the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; [and] economy in the public expense."
    As Jefferson understood, there was an intimate connection between
    sovereignty and the possession of arms. As long the people were
    armed, the people would rule.

    Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution: "Let the American youth never forget, that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings and blood of their ancestors; and capable, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, property, religion, and Independence … Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They
    fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because
    they dare to be honest and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them."

    Thomas Jefferson: “When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself public property.”

    James Madison: “The ultimate authority resides in the people, and
    that if the federal government got too powerful and overstepped its
    authority, then the people would develop plans of resistance and
    resort to arms.”

    Richard Henry Lee, Member of Continental Congress, Signer of the
    Declaration of Independence, U.S. Senator: “To say that a bad
    government must be established for fear of anarchy is really saying that we should kill ourselves for fear of dying.”