As reports surface of Israelâ€™s plan to attack Iran, propaganda from mainstream media (MSM) is also bubbling up to counter those claims. The purpose: keep the general public completely confused until the moment of attack.
AÂ documentÂ , leaked and reported on, supports other articles about Netanyahu asserting that Israel will strike Iran before November. This document is purported to have come from senior level members of the Netanyahu security cabinet. AndÂ MSMÂ is saying that because of its origination, it is impossible to verify and therefore a fake piece of propaganda.
Insider information now being touted as illegitimate, when it has been used over the decades to break news by numerous reputable media agencies. However, when the leak revolves around an Israeli agenda to attack another sovereign nation, the leak becomes propaganda which is impossible of having a shred of truth to it.
The leakedÂ documentÂ refers to actions that the Israeli and US governments have already taken to subvert Iranâ€™s nuclear power program under the false claim that it is hiding a nuclear weapons program.
According to the leak: â€śThe Israeli strike on Iran will include crippling Iranâ€™s electricity grid and telecommunications network, firing tens of missiles to Iran from Israeli territory and submarines in the Persian Gulf, and bombarding the houses of top Iranian scientists and military commanders.
The strike will also involve cyber-attacks to render Iranâ€™s internet and telecom networks as well as radio and television, telecommunication satellites, and fiberoptic network dysfunctional.â€ť
The plan to strike Iranian nuclear facilities before US November elections has beenÂ validatedÂ by meetings with Ehud Barack, Israeli Defense Minister and Matan Vilni, Israelâ€™s new ambassador to China. While discussing the possibilities of war and the cost of casualties, the war is projected to last 4 weeks with an estimated 500 Israeli deaths due to Iranian missile strikes.
TheÂ UN CharterÂ states that all members shall refrain from â€śthe threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.â€ť Specified in Article 51: â€śNothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.â€ť
However, Obama sits as the head of the UN Security Council which is a conflict of interest in the case of pre-emptive strike against Iran.
The latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE)Â providedÂ to the Obama administration is a carbon copy of Israelâ€™s Mossad intelligence which embellishes Iranâ€™s nuclear program. While UN inspectorâ€™s findings that Iranâ€™s nuclear progress is â€śfar beyond the scope knownâ€ť, suppositions that because they do not know, Iran must be manufacturing nuclear weapons â€“ simply because they say so.
Netanyahu and Obama haveÂ decidedÂ to attack Iran together. They are working out the details now behind closed doors. Yet they have agreed that the attack will happen in a few weeks or months. Both leaders agree that they have similar interests in the region and will support each other.
Tying the state-sponsored US proxy war in Syria to Iran, the US hasÂ accusedÂ Iran of building training facilities in Syria as efforts to support Assadâ€™s military forces. The irony is that the US has a CIA-supported training facility in Turkey (just a few miles from the Turkey/Syrian border) where al-Qaeda recruits young people, the CIA trains and arms them, then they are transported over the border into Syria and become known as the Free Syrian Army (FSA).
Leon Panetta, US Secretary of Defense stated at a Pentagon briefing: â€śThereâ€™s now indications that theyâ€™re trying to develop or trying to train a militia within Syria to be able to fight on behalf of the regime. So we are seeing a growing presence by Iran and that is of deep concern to us.â€ť
Martin E. Dempsey, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, retorted: â€śI actually think thatâ€™s why Iran is stepping in to form this militia, to take some of the pressure off the Syrian military.â€ť
NetanyahuÂ toldÂ Panetta earlier this month that the US must make a decision as to whether they are on-board with Israeli plans to strike Iran. Yet, this meeting, covered by the MSM was planted to make Obama appear to be on the fence when it comes to war with Iran.
The US support of the FSA has recently increased, while the UK has also pledged funds to contribute to the globalist agenda of forced regime change which benefits Zionist schemes.
InÂ HR 1905Â , Zionist lobby American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) published aÂ messageÂ to Congress that demands the creation of a â€śvirtual state of war with Iran, even though Iran has no nuclear weapons program.â€ť
HR 1905 effectively:
- place virtually all of Iranâ€™s energy, financial, and transportation sectors under U.S. sanction. Companies conducting business with Iran in these sectors face losing access to U.S. markets
- impose sanctions designed to prevent Iran from repatriating any proceeds from its oil sales, thus depriving Iran of 80 percent of its hard currency earnings and half of the funds to support its national budget
- impose tough new sanctions on the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) and Iranâ€™s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
- target Iranâ€™s use of barter transactions to bypass sanctions, the provision of insurance to Iranâ€™s energy sector, and the provision of specialized financial messaging services to the Central Bank of Iran
John Block, senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) and former spokesman for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), says that Iran will no doubt strike Israel. He paints Israel as sitting ducks, helpless to fight against Iran. Block advised members on Capitol Hill that the US should take these accusations to hear and that â€śIran that could give nuclear technology to their terrorist allies, including those like Al Qaeda and Hezbollah.â€ť
AIPAC proudly states that they have the backing of the UN as well as the US to impose â€śeconomic pressure on Iranâ€ť. They assert that the US and Israel must â€śunite in a tough response to Iranâ€ť against the false threat of Iranian nuclear weapons.