As reports surface of Israel’s plan to attack Iran, propaganda from mainstream media (MSM) is also bubbling up to counter those claims. The purpose: keep the general public completely confused until the moment of attack.
A document , leaked and reported on, supports other articles about Netanyahu asserting that Israel will strike Iran before November. This document is purported to have come from senior level members of the Netanyahu security cabinet. And MSM is saying that because of its origination, it is impossible to verify and therefore a fake piece of propaganda.
Insider information now being touted as illegitimate, when it has been used over the decades to break news by numerous reputable media agencies. However, when the leak revolves around an Israeli agenda to attack another sovereign nation, the leak becomes propaganda which is impossible of having a shred of truth to it.
The leaked document refers to actions that the Israeli and US governments have already taken to subvert Iran’s nuclear power program under the false claim that it is hiding a nuclear weapons program.
According to the leak: “The Israeli strike on Iran will include crippling Iran’s electricity grid and telecommunications network, firing tens of missiles to Iran from Israeli territory and submarines in the Persian Gulf, and bombarding the houses of top Iranian scientists and military commanders.
The strike will also involve cyber-attacks to render Iran’s internet and telecom networks as well as radio and television, telecommunication satellites, and fiberoptic network dysfunctional.”
The plan to strike Iranian nuclear facilities before US November elections has been validated by meetings with Ehud Barack, Israeli Defense Minister and Matan Vilni, Israel’s new ambassador to China. While discussing the possibilities of war and the cost of casualties, the war is projected to last 4 weeks with an estimated 500 Israeli deaths due to Iranian missile strikes.
The UN Charter states that all members shall refrain from “the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” Specified in Article 51: “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.”
However, Obama sits as the head of the UN Security Council which is a conflict of interest in the case of pre-emptive strike against Iran.
The latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) provided to the Obama administration is a carbon copy of Israel’s Mossad intelligence which embellishes Iran’s nuclear program. While UN inspector’s findings that Iran’s nuclear progress is “far beyond the scope known”, suppositions that because they do not know, Iran must be manufacturing nuclear weapons – simply because they say so.
Netanyahu and Obama have decided to attack Iran together. They are working out the details now behind closed doors. Yet they have agreed that the attack will happen in a few weeks or months. Both leaders agree that they have similar interests in the region and will support each other.
Tying the state-sponsored US proxy war in Syria to Iran, the US has accused Iran of building training facilities in Syria as efforts to support Assad’s military forces. The irony is that the US has a CIA-supported training facility in Turkey (just a few miles from the Turkey/Syrian border) where al-Qaeda recruits young people, the CIA trains and arms them, then they are transported over the border into Syria and become known as the Free Syrian Army (FSA).
Leon Panetta, US Secretary of Defense stated at a Pentagon briefing: “There’s now indications that they’re trying to develop or trying to train a militia within Syria to be able to fight on behalf of the regime. So we are seeing a growing presence by Iran and that is of deep concern to us.”
Martin E. Dempsey, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, retorted: “I actually think that’s why Iran is stepping in to form this militia, to take some of the pressure off the Syrian military.”
Netanyahu told Panetta earlier this month that the US must make a decision as to whether they are on-board with Israeli plans to strike Iran. Yet, this meeting, covered by the MSM was planted to make Obama appear to be on the fence when it comes to war with Iran.
The US support of the FSA has recently increased, while the UK has also pledged funds to contribute to the globalist agenda of forced regime change which benefits Zionist schemes.
In HR 1905 , Zionist lobby American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) published a message to Congress that demands the creation of a “virtual state of war with Iran, even though Iran has no nuclear weapons program.”
HR 1905 effectively:
- place virtually all of Iran’s energy, financial, and transportation sectors under U.S. sanction. Companies conducting business with Iran in these sectors face losing access to U.S. markets
- impose sanctions designed to prevent Iran from repatriating any proceeds from its oil sales, thus depriving Iran of 80 percent of its hard currency earnings and half of the funds to support its national budget
- impose tough new sanctions on the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
- target Iran’s use of barter transactions to bypass sanctions, the provision of insurance to Iran’s energy sector, and the provision of specialized financial messaging services to the Central Bank of Iran
John Block, senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) and former spokesman for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), says that Iran will no doubt strike Israel. He paints Israel as sitting ducks, helpless to fight against Iran. Block advised members on Capitol Hill that the US should take these accusations to hear and that “Iran that could give nuclear technology to their terrorist allies, including those like Al Qaeda and Hezbollah.”
AIPAC proudly states that they have the backing of the UN as well as the US to impose “economic pressure on Iran”. They assert that the US and Israel must “unite in a tough response to Iran” against the false threat of Iranian nuclear weapons.
Albert Pike’s dream and the book of Revelation is coming to fruition.
Yes, as long as they say this id the threat. I guess it has been since the 70s. Do you think the hostages were planned? GASP?
Many people in the know, are now convinced that an attack on Iran is likely in September or October. Even our own defense secretary said he expects Israel to bomb Iran within those months. There are many good reasons to think that this could turn out to be the case, but then again, there are a few other reasons to think it may not happen until spring.
The reasons the strike on Iran could happen in September or October:
Iran is close to acquiring nuclear weapons. The cloudy winter season will obscure Iran’s nuclear weapons program and Iran could become nuclear before Spring.
Iran’s nuclear program is rapidly being moved far underground and soon Israel will not be able to do much to hinder their program with conventional weapons.
Iran already has enough nuclear material to make at least 6 nuclear bombs. This cannot be allowed to continue from a nation that vows to wipe Israel off the map.
If it looks like Obama is going to win, it will be to Israel’s advantage to hit Iran before the election, because if Obama did not support Israel after an attack and before the election, he would lose.
There also is the likelihood that if Obama is falling in the polls that he will order a strike on Iran himself to get a bump in the polls. He might even want to delay the election if the worst case terrorist scenario turns out to be a reality. I do not put anything past Obama. The tragic thing about such an American strike under Obama is that it needs to be done, but if it is done, it will very likely get Obama reelected. If that happened, he would continue his Marxist program of deconstructing America.
The supreme leader of Iran instructed all high level people in Iran to get ready for war, because he believes war will come within weeks.
I believe there will be a short period in the next couple of months where there will be four American Aircraft carrier groups in the area before two of them are scheduled to return to port. It is not likely that we would have that kind of firepower in the area again for many months. It also is not likely that having this much firepower in the gulf just before the election, at a time when Iran’s weapons program has reached a red line, is just some routine scheduling coincidence.
The already occurring economic downturn will take some of the pressure off extremely high oil prices occurring during an Iranian strike.
The reasons the strike may not happen this year:
Someone could convince Israel that America will do the bombing next spring if sanctions do not work.
If it looks like Romney will win the presidential election, Israel probably would wait until He takes office and try to coordinate a joint strike with him.
Israel probably would like to have the issue with Assad and his weapons of mass destruction resolved before they take on Iran.
It obviously has not occurred to the loons that any attack would ultimately be pointless. Would only waste lives and annoy and unify the Iranian people. It would have limited impact on Iran’s civil nuclear program (it is underground in multiple locations) which could easily be switched to make a bomb if the Ayatollah give permission. The only way to stop any alleged nuclear program would be to invade Iran.
Iran may not even respond so as to highlight the naked and unfounded aggression.