MIT Lecture Asks “Is Islamophobia Accelerating Global Warming?”

| |

global warming

To social justice warriors, racism is the ultimate sin. It’s unforgivable. Unless you don’t know you’re a racist. That’s okay because everyone is a racist, and they just haven’t learned to check their privilege yet. Except for minorities. They’re not capable of being racist. Unless of course a person of minority persuasion doesn’t believe in social justice or political correctness. Then that person is definitely a racist.

I’m getting off topic. SJW logic has a habit of doing that, because it’s not logical or consistent at all. The moral code of the SJW is not absolute. It’s entirely situational. The real ultimate sin for these people isn’t racism, it’s disagreeing with them. They’ll jump through all kinds of mental hoops to paint you as the bad guy if you disagree with them. Their movement has reached a point where no argument has to make sense, so long as it attacks people who disagree with them.

And that’s the only reasonable explanation for the following. For the past two days, MIT has been hosting a guest speaker by the name of Ghassan Hage, who has been arguing that Islamophobia is accelerating global warming. According to the description of his event:

This talk examines the relation between Islamophobia as the dominant form of racism today and the ecological crisis. It looks at the three common ways in which the two phenomena are seen to be linked: as an entanglement of two crises, metaphorically related with one being a source of imagery for the other and both originating in colonial forms of capitalist accumulation. The talk proposes a fourth way of linking the two: an argument that they are both emanating from a similar mode of being, or enmeshment, in the world, what is referred to as ‘generalised domestication.’

Does that make sense at all? Of course not. It doesn’t even explain anything. It’s very typical of SJW logic. In their minds, every perceived problem in the world is rooted in oppression. That’s the crux of their movement, because it makes it possible for them to attack anyone who might try to puncture their precious safe space bubbles. Nobody is safe from them though, because when you can get away with nonsensical arguments, you can belittle literally anyone in the world.

Fortunately, these people won’t be around for much longer. Humans may not be all that logical, but we can smell bullshit of this magnitude. Once a movement starts to scrape the bottom of the rhetorical barrel to make an argument, and once they start to make the bombastic and outlandish accusations, their stupidity becomes impossible to ignore, even among the sheep.

Someday soon people will just stop listening to them, at which point they’ll be relegated to their rightful place in society. They’ll be among the shambling, raving homeless, who spout wild conspiracy theories on the streets as passersby try to avoid eye contact with them. Without money, attention, or respect, that’s all they are anyway.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Again the idiots call “Islamiphobia” racism when Islam is a religion.

    • The left doesn’t make sense, it just shouts.

  • Sammy

    Yes. All the bovine fecal matter used by the globalists trying to cover up the truth about the vile ‘slum movement is creating methane.

  • Tabbytha

    A site considered a “wild conspiracy theorist” site clamoring for other people to be made fun of as insane people spouting “wild conspiracy theories”… god, you guys really aren’t going to be able to stop anything with this kind of hatred focus in you. The elites are pushing for and indoctrinating people into this world viewpoint and instead of stopping them you wish desperate poverty, homelessness, misery and immense ridicule on the victims of mind control! you’ll let the other sheep fall prey to the wolves, watching, laughing and preening yourselves on how much better you are then them! This world is defiantly SCREWED!

    • We should all learn to be perfect like you 🙂

  • Stew E

    What is really funny about these idiots is their lack of global travel and experience with other cultures. I have traveled all over for work over the last 20 years, and I have seen it all. If these dumdasses think they understand Muslims, and that Muslims are victims, they obviously never been to the Middle East or Asia. Countries in the Middle East are incredibly rascist, and they all have Christianphobia. They always think you are trying to convert others to Christianity. Do not even ask about racism. In Asia they treat black people like animals, it is really sickening. The Middle East is no better. Did you ever see Asian Muslims or African Muslims making the pilgrimage to Mecca? Hell no you don’t, because they do not want to be murdered. Reality is a bitch! We already knew most liberals are uneducated and have no real work experience, but now we can say they are not well versed on culture and world travel.

    • Marcy Brown

      “my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet 98$/hr”…..!ce1154etwo days ago grey MacLaren P1 I bought after earning 18,512 DoIIars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k DoIIars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over. hourly 87 DoIIars…Learn. More right Here !ce1154e:➽:➽:➽➽➽➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsLinkedGetPayHourly$98…. .❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦::::::!ce1154e….,

  • frankw

    What kind of bizarro world do these “intellectuals” inhabit? The question doesn’t even make sense.

  • varlog

    “Is Islamophobia Accelerating Global Warming?”
    Since both only exist in the imaginations of some people, I would say yes.

  • FollowDaMoney

    Since when has hating murders and liars become a racist phobia?

  • jim_robert

    Funny. An obvious left wing lecturer who is probably Muslim. Here is what Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof of atmospheric science at MIT – who actually knows a thing or two about the subject – says:

    .” Dr. Richard Lindzen of MIT, professor of atmospheric science has stated “Al Gore is wrong. There is no consensus on global warming.” and the frantic alarmism all over the media has, in Dr. Lindzen’s own words, “nothing to do with science.” For good measure, Dr. Lindzen added while speaking that the Heartland International Conference on Climate Change in New York in March, 2009, “I think [there is] one point you should notice as one discusses the science, and that is that global warming alarm — as far as I can tell — has always been a political movement, a highly organized one…And although it took me a while to realize this, opposing it has always been an uphill battle.” Dr. Lindzen concluded his remarks at the Heartland conference by noting most of his colleagues subscribe to global warming either because they fear for their jobs, or find it a way get project funding, and quipped about climate models, similar to how scientists debate intelligent design, that climate models are an example of “unintelligent design”, indicating that climate models are being fed erroneous information in order to get the results that global-warming alarmists want Dr. Lindzen has a lengthy (~1.5 hr) highly academic presentation on why he disagrees with AGW at http://vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS_Site_03/Lectures/Colloquium/100210Lindzen/f.htm#.

  • jim_robert

    More from Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof of atmospheric science at MIT, vs the fascist left:

    Dr. Lindzen has also specifically stated the phony “consensus” behind global warming is similar to Soviet Lysenkoism and is “unscientific,” and stating that “With respect to science, the assumption behind consensus is that science is a source of authority. Rather, it is a particularly effective approach to inquiry and analysis. Skepticism is essential to science; consensus is foreign. When in 1988 Newsweek announced that all scientists agreed about global warming, this should have been a red flag of warning. Among other things, global warming is such a multifaceted issue that agreement on all or many aspects would be unreasonable.”” Drs. William Briggs, Robert Carter and David Legates call this new Age of Disenlightenment one where there are unrelenting “attacks on independent researchers, and the exaggeration or misrepresentation of climate research results,” which are, in fact, “every bit as pernicious as direct scientitic fraud.” Perhaps it is, as famed neuroscientist famed neuroscientist Paul Broca once said, “The least questioned assumptions are the most questionable.”

  • jim_robert

    “Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data…That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT

    “[W]hen data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data” to agree with models’ projections. MIT meteorologist Dr. Richard Lindzen.

    Dr. Lindzen of MIT noted that the US has spent around $70 billion on AGW, and “the last thing anyone in the world would want to do is solve the problem.” )He also noted that “those who are advancing global warming get better grants and get well funded by our federal government compared to us who are skeptical.”

    Dr. Patrick Moore, an ecologist and the co-founder of Greenpeace, also has said “We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science,” while returning to Dr. Will Happer physicist at Princeton Univ, who has stated “Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense,” at a Texas Public Policy Foundation meeting. Happer, Dr. Richard Lindzen of MIT and others at this meeting said claims of the hottest year on record are “nonsense” because there’s so much uncertainty surrounding surface temperature readings — especially since scientists often make lots of adjustments to weather station readings

    • Tatiana Covington

      There is not really any problem! It’s just a mirage.

  • Tatiana Covington

    You’d have to be crazy to believe it. All right, does Islam accelerate global cooling?

  • Stew E

    You must be referring to the same Mecca in Saudi Arabia. They one which shall arrest you if you have a bible. No they are not against Christians at all. I work with Saudi Arramco, so guess again