Loretta Lynch Plot Thickens As New Details Emerge Of Her Dealings With The Hillary Campaign

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


Last night we asked a very simple question about why the DNC has failed to cooperate with Russia investigators by handing over their infamous email server to either the FBI or Robert Mueller’s team (see: DNC Server: Most Critical Evidence To Proving “Russian Hacking” Is Being Withheld From Mueller, Why?). After all, if Russia did “hack the election”, as we’ve been told 24/7 by CNN going on 8 months now, then the evidence could very well be on that server. Which prompted us to ask this very simple question:

All of which brings us back to our original question: If the DNC is in possession of actual tangible evidence that could prove once and for all that Russians hacked their servers and attempted to undermine the campaign of Hillary Clinton, why not share that evidence with investigators and enjoy the blissful vindication that its public release would provide?

We concluded by wondering whether the stonewalling from the DNC just might have something to do with this “purely coincidental’ meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix and/or Loretta Lynch’s ‘assurances’ to members of the Clinton campaign that the FBI’s investigation (or, “matter” if you prefer) of Hillary Clinton “wouldn’t go too far“? After all, if evidence of “Russian hacking” were on that server, so to would there be evidence of Lynch’s transgressions…if they existed, of course.

But we’re not the only ones wondering whether there’s more to the Lynch story. According to an article in the New York Postsome testimony that Lynch offered under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee last year could come back to haunt her. In that testimony, Lynch said that she had “not spoken to anyone on either the campaign or transition or any staff members affiliated with them.”

That said, and as we’ve reported before, that statement seems to contradict reports that Lynch personally assured members of Clinton’s campaign, potentially Amanda Renteria, that the FBI’s investigation “wouldn’t go too far…more from the Post:

When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to “anyone” on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.

Lynch’s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.

And then there is that inconvenient Comey testimony in which the former FBI director says that he was instructed by Lynch to refer to the Clinton investigation as a “matter” rather than what it actually was, an investigation.

Now, as The Post points out, there are new developments which would suggest that Comey confronted Lynch about the alleged communication with Amanda Renteria and promptly asked to leave.

And it will press her to explain the discrepancy — along with why she reportedly asked former FBI Director James Comey to leave her office when he confronted her with the document.

And then there is that meeting with Bill Clinton on that Phoenix tarmac that just happened to get noticed by a local reporter who just happened to be on scene.

After all the drama around the Clinton email investigation, which included multiple people being offered immunity and the revelation of what appeared to be numerous federal crimes committed by several people on Clinton’s staff, wouldn’t it be ironic if Obama’s Attorney General were the only one to take the fall? Scandal free administration indeed…

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Zero Hedge of www.zerohedge.com.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Chuck Ashley

    Oh and yet Another very Likely reason as to Why the DNC refuses to hand over the server s that it “May” likely implicate Many senior DNC leaders in the murder of Seth Rich!

  • Tommy p

    There lots more corrupt politicians besides her, but it’s a start.

    • robert

      She instruct Comey to call it a matter

  • straight shooter

    I’m sure she really regrets having met slick Willie on the tarmac now. But it’s still a head scratcher–why was that done in such plain sight?

    • Billy Two Knives

      They were confident the Harridan would win the election by a landslide so were
      not worried about any backlash from their illicit rendezvous. Lynch would have
      remained at Justice, the Harridan would be sitting in the White House and the
      corrupt media would have aided a cover up if necessary.

      • Gracencarroll

        Managing director of Google says we are paying $97 per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family^ho255d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Mitsubishi i-MiEV from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it.Then start by visiting this link
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash545BuzzStudy/GetPay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::~xf255o…..

      • straight shooter

        Yep, that’s probably what it boils down to. They never run short on arrogance, that’s for sure.

    • tommer

      It wasn’t supposed to be plain sight,that’s why they did it on the tarmac.Sadly for them a local reporter noticed and actually asked inconvienient questions

  • elbustaroyjetspeekerson

    Lessee, Jizmie Cummy, Losetta Lunch, Scabby Wuzzaman Slutz, Demanda Cafeteria all stand to be Puppet Patsies for the head Puppet du jour. Soo, did the Statute Of Limitations run out on Eric Holdup, Obufu, the Clittin’ Cabal, Ratfaced Reid, Miss Nuclear Lindsay, et al, etc, ad nauseum, ad infinitum?? Or something????

  • renee ciccioni

    They are all wholly corrupt thats why they all take turns pointing fingers. The corrupt charade didn’t end 01/01/17 it just sped up because they know that they are running out of time to make their way work.

  • SP_88

    The DNC e-mail server is probably so full of evidence pointing to the systemic corruption of the democrats that if they did hand it over, it would implicate all of the high level democrats. Furthermore, it would likely put an end to any further claims that Trump was involved in any collusion with the Russians.
    Any collusion or election meddling was perpetrated by the democrats and the Clinton campaign. And the evidence is on that server. What should happen is they get a subpoena for the server and then confiscate it from them and go through it with a fine tooth comb. And then, prosecute every one of these crooked politicians.
    But we all know that will never happen.
    All these criminals belong in jail. Think about how many people are sitting in jail right now for doing so much less than this. It’s disgusting.