Liberals Attack The FAMILY: If You Have Kids, YOU Are Destroying The Planet

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


It seems as though the more desperate the liberal democrats become to sell their radical agenda to the American people, the more strange and nonsensical their arguments become.

Take a recent article published by NBC News, for example, which suggests that if the people of the earth would just stop having children, then we could slow down global warming and save the planet from an imminent catastrophe.

“[H]aving a child is a major contributor to climate change,” writes Travis Rieder, the author of the piece. “The logical takeaway here is that everyone on Earth ought to consider having fewer children.”

In reality, however, there is nothing “logical” about this idea at all. First of all, it has been proven time and time again that the global temperature isn’t rising at a more rapid rate than it has dozens of times in the past, even long before human beings walked the earth.

Second, even if there has been some warming, it is not being caused by human activity. And finally, would telling people not to have children really be a good idea, even if climate change was as serious a problem as the Left tells us it is? (Related: All of the lies about climate change and global warming are debunked in this one astonishing interview.)

In America, we are blessed to have something called liberty. That means that as long as parents can take care of them, a mother and a father can have as many children as they want. Even if the author of this NBC article suggests that parents should be encouraged to stop having children as opposed to being forced to stop having children, it is still utterly ridiculous.

While Rieder does acknowledge that it would be tough to convince people to stop having children because of how uncomfortable it is to imagine a world without babies, he ultimately argues that “the seriousness of climate change justifies uncomfortable conversations.”

Rieder then uses a ridiculous analogy to argue that people who have children are partially responsible for climate change: “If I release a murderer from prison, knowing full well that he intends to kill innocent people, then I bear some responsibility for those deaths – even though the killer is also fully responsible. My having released him doesn’t make him less responsible (he did it!). But his doing it doesn’t eliminate my responsibility either.”

The author then brings his own daughter in as an example, arguing that once she is “an autonomous agent, she will be responsible for her emissions. But that doesn’t negate my responsibility. Moral responsibility simply isn’t mathematical.”

As absurd as all of these arguments are, the fact of the matter is that unfortunately, the “have-less-children-to prevent-climate-change” movement appears to be gaining traction. This past July, NPR’s Morning Edition interviewed a researcher by the name of Kimberly Nicholas, who argued that while she acknowledges that its not her place to make decisions for other people, having fewer children can be an effective way to combat climate change.

In addition, Nicholas argued that living without a car, avoiding airplane travel and eating a vegetarian diet are also good ways to slow the increase of global temperatures. (Related: Climate change science implodes as the IPCC climate models are found to be totally wrong.)

So in other words, in order to fight back against something that the science community has yet to officially acknowledge actually exists, people should stop having babies, get rid of their cars, never step foot on an airplane again, and eat fruits and vegetables for the rest of their lives.

This is why so many conservatives argue that the radical environmentalists want to send us back to the Stone Age. Truth be told, progressives really aren’t about progress at all; they are about regression, and just plain stupidity.

Sources include:

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Jayson Veley of

The NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams, receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books. The NaturalNews Network is not for sale, and does not accept money to cover any story (or to spike it). NaturalNews Network is what the news industry used to be, before it sold out to big business.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • SP_88

    Apparently, anything on the leftist agenda could be blamed for global warming.

    • ReverendDraco✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

      To the regressive left, gobal warming is caused by whatever they say causes it – the science is settled!

      • Rey d’Tutto

        If it’s Settled, it ain’t Science.
        That would be Tech. There are more than a few steps between developing a Theory and Production of Goods and Services.

  • Undecider

    Let them kill themselves.

  • gazoo3

    Climate change is bullshit. Pollution is real. The environment is the biggest issue, period. Bees and all other insects are disappearing at an alarming rate. Nearly half of all wildlife on Earth has dissapeared and continues to. The oceans are over fished and dying off. We must ban herbicides and pesticides and monoculture farming and stop habitat loss. Before it’s too late. We have one generation at best at the current rate of destruction. Start growing your own food and eating only organic if possible.

    • Rift

      Couldn’t agree more, their making carbon the issue while making no mention of all the sludge companies are allowed to dump into the waterways. I live not too far from a nuclear power plant, when I was talking to a local water tester he mentioned that the plant paid an absurd amount of money to block a ground water study. Hmm now why would they want to do that? Could it be related to the local frogs having the wrong number of arms and eyeballs.

      • gazoo3

        Blocked by who ? Where do you live ? Maybe you can alert the EPA or you state epa or the local news or the Sierra Club.

        • Rift

          Good ol groton ct, the guy who told me that was epa, Said they were in the process of laying off all there water testers too, guess it’s a see no evil speed no evil thing.

          • gazoo3

            I lived in Lyme for a time in the 90s. Connecticut is a great state. There has to be some organized resistance, try the Sierra Club.

  • jimmy joe

    Actually, this is an agenda started by the rockefellers called EUGENICS!, amongst others Bill gates is also a very big influence on this agenda. There is so much info on this agenda, and this aspect of it, particularly, that its scary to think that I was reading about it several years ago.

  • Frank Energy

    From the article –having kids is analogous to releasing a killer that you had control of.

    Hmmmm I am surprised they didn’t take the next logical liberal step and to emphasize that it is only the whiteys who should stop having kids, because having white kids is like promoting white supremacy (and murder).

  • moTrouble69

    Save the planet…kill a liberal. Or better yet all of them.

  • Mike

    If you are a liberals, you are destroying the planet with all the hot air you brain dead morons keep putting out.

  • Phil_Ossifer

    Okay, shitlibs, put up or shut up: when are you going after the Catholic Church for its no artificial birth control policy as contributing to climate change? That policy has caused overpopulation in Central American and South American countries as well as places like the Philippines and Puerto Rico. Oh…silence. Could it because those places are inhabited by non-whites?

    This is the agenda – the only overpopulation that shitlibs consider detrimental to the planet is…wait for it…WHITE PEOPLE. So when a shitlib says to stop having kids to protect the planet, what he really means is for WHITE PEOPLE to stop having kids…probably because they might grow up and vote Republican?

  • Mary

    Let’s take a look at a cross-section of the globalists who are pushing depopulation: George Soros has 5 children; Ted Turner has 5 children; Bill Gates has 3 children; Pelosi has 5 children; sir Evelyn Rothschild has 3 children and 2 step chlldren; need I say more? They just don’t want YOU having children.

    • Phil_Ossifer

      That’s because they consider us untermenschen, or leben unwerdig zu leben (life unworthy of life). Themselves, on the other hand…

      These self-proclaimed ubermenschen are using the nonwhite races as a weapon against the only race that can offer them real competition – the White race.