Leftist Elementary Teacher Changes Declaration of Independence, Forces Students To Recite Gender Neutral Version

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

2017-09-22_1412

In yet another example of the insanity that is modern day liberalism, elementary school students in Mesa, Arizona were forced to recite a gender neutral version of the Declaration of Independence after their teacher “revised” the historical topic to fit their political ideology.

The teacher “transformed” the document by replacing the word “man” with “human” and forced the class to recite the literal fake version as if any leftist could just unilaterally change historical documents to fit their belief system.

This startling occurrence was made public after the mother of a student who attends Salk Elementary School complained to school administrators after she found out her child had been involved. Amazingly, school officials first told the parent that she had “hurt the feelings” of the teacher involved as if it was the parents fault for being upset in the first place.

Eventually school officials, most likely fearing a massive backlash, reversed their tone and called the parent to inform them that what was done by the teacher was against school policy.

KGUN9 reported:

On Wednesday, Vaillencourt said the superintendent’s office contacted her to tell her what the teacher did was against school policy.

A Mesa Public Schools spokeswoman says they have policies in place when it comes to school ceremonies which includes reciting the Declaration of Independence.

The school also released an official statement:

It should be recited as written, and not modified in any way. School administration, when learning of the alteration to the text, provided feedback and guidance to the teacher to restore the document to its original format.

There is not a specific reference in policy to the discussion of political beliefs by a teacher in a classroom, however in practice the district does not allow teachers to share their political views with students. When the teacher used a personal example of how individuals can have differing political views but still be friends, the principal reminded the teacher that personal examples are not appropriate in a classroom setting.

Although something like this may have been shocking in the past, at this point in time it is seemingly par for the course when it comes to extreme leftists who believe it is their right and job to spread their ideology not only to the public at large but specifically to young children.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Alex Thomas of The Daily Sheeple.

Alex Thomas is a staff writer and reporter for The Daily Sheeple. Wake the flock up – follow Alex’s work at our Facebook or Twitter.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • And the teacher is being disciplined for her violation of school district policy and her students trust in her to provide a objective education to them? or not?

    • students don’t “trust”, they are conditioned to respond to authority

      • The only conditioned response I developed in high school was the exercise of the maximum number of ditch days in the classes where that was required to complete them.

    • NRA Instructor

      Where’s her wrist — slap it — carry on —

      • I guess she should have taught using real pornography instead of just lies.

  • darkhorse

    America…this is all the HIDDEN HAND OF THE JEWISH SUPREMACISTS…..they are destroying America and all the good it stands for….how long with you take it??? When is enough enough?

    • renee ciccioni

      Hahahahahaha

      • darkhorse

        you belong in a mental facility, you inbred piece of garbage….

        • renee ciccioni

          That’s funny I thought your toothless redneck ass is typing from a mental institute , I was telling a friend of ,look they are letting the mentally fucked on the internet , how cool and fair.

          • The only danger is them running for elective office by write-in and winning.

          • renee ciccioni

            Then everyone would know she’s the one who said human not men in her class room because everything is documented on the web ,and then people can choose for themselves if she’s electable.

    • Richard O. Mann

      And you are a racist fool. The Jews have nothing to do with the fall of America. The God of the Jews does. America has run it’s course. It has to fall so the next phase can start.

      • You both are superstitious.

      • darkhorse

        here we go AGAIN… with the Jewish-invented word “RACIST”….listen to what this JEW is saying, people…the god of the Jews is causing the fall of America… ARE YOU WITNESSES?? He says that “has run its course”…in WHOSE OPINION, Richard??? Who is determining this? Who is determining America’s “next phase”??? You sure sound like a JEWISH SUPREMACIST…

      • darkhorse

        TO SPEAK THE TRUTH IS TO BE CALLED AN ANTI-SEMITE…

    • Wilfred Golding

      One can be as supremacist as one wishes. It is not going to save one from what is coming. Let the supremacists have their day. I pity these stuck up fools who are soon going to burn in Hell.

      • darkhorse

        but I want them in Hell RIGHT NOW…before they can damage any more innocent people.

      • ReverendDraco✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

        Hell is in Michigan – it’s more likely that people will freeze than burn.

  • renee ciccioni

    Who gives a shit , how is saying human rather than man so offensive to a bunch of stuffy ass people, she didn’t alter anything important. People get your mind off of nonsense distractions , so much more important things to worry and think about. So stuffy , DAMN !!!

    • SP_88

      It’s not a big deal in the big scheme of things. In fact I thought that they would have changed a lot more than that.
      But I will say this: in a time when school students are being suspended from school for such ridiculous behavior as biting their pop-tart into the shape of a gun or pointing their finger like a pretend gun and saying “bang”, or when they suspend a five year old for making terroristic threats, and then they cite these ridiculous school policies that prohibit such behavior, behavior which is perfectly normal for any average child, I have no problem with a teacher being reprimanded for changing an official document such as the Declaration of Independence in an attempt to push their politically correct ideology onto their students.
      And for the record, the word “man” or “men” in the context of this document is indeed gender neutral. “Man”, in this context, has always meant the hu”man” race, and is not intended to be interpreted as excluding wo”man” or wo”men”. Perhaps if this teacher wasn’t so wrapped up in their political ideology, they could have taught this to the students instead. It makes a lot more sense to make these students understand the proper context of these words than to change them unnecessarily in a way that doesn’t even alter the meaning of the document, but instead causes the students to become confused about the meaning of these words. Because now these students are going to be unaware that “man” means “human” and is not the equivalent of “male” in this context.
      Also, I totally agree that we have a lot more important things to worry about than nonsense like this.

    • 2+2=5

      • Don’t be silly, it is 3.

        • ReverendDraco✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

          Actually, it’s chair.

          • Unless it is a pony.

          • ReverendDraco✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

            A Pony! Where?

          • Hiding under the chair.

          • ReverendDraco✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵃᶜᶜᵒᵘᶰᵗ

            I wondered what that noise was.

          • Elaine.Benes, II

            No, that is the name of the servant girl in the hilarious show Another Period…LOL

    • Phil_Ossifer

      It’s important in the sense that it attempts to condition the students to accept the idea of historical revisionism and censorship. The Declaration says “…all MEN are created equal” simply because it was universally understood that “men” meant “mankind,” or all humans. By changing the wording rather than explaining why it was written the way it was written and the historical context of the terms’ usage it promotes the idea that it is acceptable to reinterpret (that is, change) history according to modern political beliefs (e.g., liberal beliefs). This is how liberals operate – everything must be evaluated by modern standards no matter how long ago something happened and without taking into account the social mores and beliefs that existed at the time.

      • renee ciccioni

        OK mankind is the same as humankind so what’s the big deal , men are human , so humankind includes me she didn’t say womankind . What a weird obsession . By the way only someone who is insecure would focus on.

        • Phil_Ossifer

          “…that all MAN are created equal?” Grammatically that makes no sense. Remember, the writers of the document were educated men who understood the use of the English language.

          • renee ciccioni

            They may or may not have been speaking of women as well there are many debates about that . The fact of the matter is that women were denied property ownership, women were not allowed voting rights , women were not allowed to enter any type of legal agreements . The same was for slaves and the reason behind such treatment was women and slaves are property. So it appears that the writing of the declaration of Independence was soley intended for wealthy and propertied males of a certain ethnicity . So I don’t know what was intended I was not there , but I do know what the attitude and mindset was.

      • Rift

        I agree, It’s a slippery slope. Starts small changing a word here or there, then you change more and more until your left with something unrecognizable.

    • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

      It is important since “teachers” are essentially government agents whose primary purpose has become molding our children into good little servants who will worship the state. Failure to understand the implication of this, or worse, to willfully ignore it, only serves to embolden and empower the State and it’s status quo of purposeful intellectual mediocrity.

      • renee ciccioni

        First off who is she empowering by saying human rather than men ? Atleast she’s not a diddler. Wow !!

        • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

          She’s empowering an idea which the State seeks to compel The People to unconditionally accept. Therefore, it is empowering the State. It is more easily achieved through influencing generation after generation of children in the mainstream public “education” system. Ask yourself this-if it were your children being forced to read the bible, would you feel differently? If they were being taught that traditional Republican conservatism were political gospel-would you approve? If your children were being influenced to believe anything that is 180 degrees from your core beliefs, how would you feel? Then ask, why is it so important for the State to redefine the original meaning, intent and scope of The Constitution?

          • renee ciccioni

            I get what your saying , but it was one word not a whole document such as the Bible or conservative doctrine , this has nothing to with anything negative it’s a word a very inclusive word ” human” . I would not want to be a teacher or any other form of public servant these days , because people are horrible these days.

          • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

            I understand your point as well. For me, this goes to the heart of “The Constitution is a “living, breathing document” argument. Just what single word is ok to change before it’s meaning is sufficiently altered to pervert the original intent? Already and unilaterally, this teacher has perverted The Constitutions meaning in order to justify her “need” to change the wording. The Founders were wise men who very clearly understood the need for precise wording as well as punctuation. ALL of it’s words, every comma and period were carefully placed in order to frame it’s meaning and intent. It is an art which has been lost and/or altered to us commoners through generations of neglect. (sound familiar?) Changing what appear to be “meaningless” words in a document which was SO meticulous in it’s phraseology and punctuation that it’s intent was clear, yet which left room for meaningfully broad interpretation of it’s scope and which allowed for the certain, future evolution of The People, is, in effect, an attempt at suffocating it one breath at a time. The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution are “living, breathing documents” only to those who desire to kill them. They are priceless in their originality to any and all who cherish and desire Liberty. It’s imperative that we remember whose purpose it serves that these documents be altered, rendered irrelevant and, ultimately, whitewashed from the pages of history.

          • renee ciccioni

            All I was pointing out is that there is this notion of overreacting about everything as if it’s the end of the world , she is a teacher who worded what came from her mouth in a way she felt was right she’s not petitioning to alter the document or anything like that , she didn’t curse or abuse the children . The over the top reaction is like children being sent home for wearing a T-shirt or for having a plastic butter knife or people freaking out about a mother breastfeeding her baby in public , it all lacks discernment.

          • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

            I would agree if it weren’t part of a larger, impossible to ignore pattern within the public school system. My reaction stems not from anger or some overreaction-I’m only pointing out what I divine from these stories. Quite honestly, I’ve resigned myself to expect these kinds of things from public educators. What angers me is the righteous indignation of the people who feel they have a duty to introduce and project their politics, upon other people’s children, disguised in a cloak of “morality”. It is one thing to introduce ideas to students and allow them to exercise their critical thinking abilities and allow them to be engaged in the entire process. It is another altogether when it is pontificated to them. In my opinion, the teachers who do these things are abusing their positions and violating the trust that parents have placed in them.

          • Men is not exclusive of humans.

        • Who was Thomas Jefferson empowering by using men?
          Very few Americans are aware of the duty assigned them by the Declaration of Independence. I am.

          • renee ciccioni

            Wealthy property owning male of a certain ethnicity , considering the attitudes and what was going on at that time.

          • Since wealthy property-owning males were those who were mutually pledging to each other their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor, and the document was clear that the issue was the innate rights of all human beings being disrespected by King George, the common inference of the time would be to use men instead of mankind, everyone involved being human. What most fail to understand is that they were actually declaring themselves as an appropriate replacement for the rule of the king, not that they were freeing anyone. That has been the inaccurate premise of every government resistance movement since.

          • renee ciccioni

            True all of that ..

          • Guest

            And, for good reason. they were the ones who had the most at stake and knew that if the mobs could vote, they would vote their earnings and property into their own pockets through the legalized theft now being used by the government to do just that.

          • “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
            – Thomas Jefferson

          • renee ciccioni

            Thank you , so true, to many people romanticize the wealthy.

          • Phil_Ossifer

            You obviously know nothing of the real history of the south. The wealthy plantocrat was a small minority. Even some free slaves had slaves of their own. It has also been shown that, over his lifetime, a slave got back roughly 95% or more of his productivity in cradle-to-grave care for himself and his family. This is why slavery, by 1861, was losing favor. Plantocrats were learning that it was more profitable to free the slave, pay him a day wage and let him fend for himself. Then the war intervened. Had it not the institution of slavery would have died out on its own.

          • Large McBighuge

            It’s extremely refreshing to read comments from a well read individual that truly understands. Thank you for your comments. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

    • Guest

      the left is doing all they can to feminize the culture, men and the country so that Men will not stand and up and fight for their land against tyrants, particulary the god of the left, satan and his antichrist. That is what this is all about.

      • renee ciccioni

        She said humankind not womankind . WOW someone is off their meds .

        • Guest

          Oh, look, a feminazi defending twisting of the Declaration of Independence. Let me educate you, Molly Yard: its the same principle.

          • renee ciccioni

            Meds definitely meds..

          • Could just be over consumption of excitotoxins.

          • renee ciccioni

            Lol

          • The Tuna Fairy

            mmmm…. have some more MSG!

          • Given that it is faster acting, it was more likely to be that super-sized cup of aspartame-poisoned soft drink.

          • Guest

            said the needs to be straitjacketed feminist writing from her cell at the sanatorium.

          • Why would anyone be straitjacketed at a sanatorium? They are places of long term treatment of infectious disease like TB, not mental illnesses.

  • FollowDaMoney

    She is what we call a Propagandist(Liar) and needs to be removed from any and all teaching responsibilities. I would suggest that she send her resume to CNN or the DNC.

  • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

    Further proof that “education” in modern parlance is simply a euphemism for propaganda and political indoctrination. It embodies the power of the State through it’s relentless efforts to control thought and speech. This should not be confused with the issue of free speech since the “teacher/indoctrinator” is a defacto agent for the State. These ideas could have been presented to the students in a way which would have actually engaged and encouraged the students use of critical thought-an otherwise core tenet of true education. Today’s classrooms have become little more than repositories of political dogma and thought control run by zealots who fancy themselves as intellectual superiors over anyone who dares to view the world through an alternative prism. To efficiently build robots you must have an assembly line. That is what the institution of “education” has become.

    • John Smith

      WOW ! Perfectly said ! I totally agree. Well done !

      • HollyRSkinner


        Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !sk224d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleHomeCashJobsGlobeOpportunity/earn/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!sk224l..,…

      • NikitaBPierce


        Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !sl370d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleLegitimateSwiftJobsFromHomeJobs/get/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!sl370l..,…

    • Indoctrination is seldom limited to political. The venues of indoctrination are becoming wider every day.

      • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

        True-perhaps I should have said ideological rather than political. Either way, it ultimately becomes politicized.

  • Guest

    Matan los professores.

  • Roy Hobs

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of …”

    Posterity — 1 :the offspring of one progenitor to the furthest generation.

  • Richard O. Mann

    The left is taking their lead from people like Hitler, Stalin, and other tyrants over the years. You indoctrinate the children. And when they are adults, they will follow you and what you teach. It’s been going on for years. The colleges are already pretty much under the control of the left/socialist/communist. Obama got his training from this same people. The only way to stop it, is to take your children out of the public school system. They are not getting educated. They are being programed.

    • The only practical difference between the communists on the left end of the left-right spectrum and the fascists on the right end is the state ownership of the means of production represented by Marxism. Indoctrination isn’t limited to children, it is comprehensive and lifelong.

    • Laurence Almand

      True. Read the good book BRAINWASHED to find out how the Leftists are taking over our “educational” institutions.

  • Johannes Lorenz

    Why have they not terminated this red? TERMNATE – with extreme prejudice. I mean fire, of course. Fire. ha ha

  • NRA Instructor

    She needs to be fired — cant be trusted !

  • Jeff

    This moron wants gender neutral? I have just the thing: Sterilization. The b*tch goes first.