How Mexico Plans to Influence U.S. Election and Stop Trump

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

trump wikimedia

What with Donald Trump’s calls to wall off the Mexican border, and his controversial statements about illegal immigrants, it’s no surprise that the Mexican government is not looking forward to a Trump presidency. When asked about Trump’s plan to make our southern neighbor pay for the wall, former president Vicente Fox went so far as to say “I’m not going to pay for that f***ing wall.”

So clearly the leadership in Mexico is vehemently opposed to Trump, but how far would they go to stop him? Officially they’ve claimed that they have no plan to influence the US presidential election, but the actions of their diplomats speak louder than their assurances. For the very first time in history, consulates across the country are hosting free workshops for Mexican immigrants, that will teach them how to become U.S. citizens. Are they trying to trying to influence the election by turning Mexican immigrants into eligible voters?

The timing couldn’t be more perfect, as millions of legal residents are eligible for citizenship, and many of them are concerned about Donald Trump. Bloomberg interviewed some of the immigrants who attended these workshops, and found that many of them were motivated to achieve citizenship, just so they can vote against Trump.

However, the consulates are denying the accusation that they’re trying to influence the election. According to Laura Espinosa, a staffer at Mexico’s consulate in Las Vegas, “We don’t have any opinion on that, because that would be totally interfering in internal affairs of the country.”

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Donna

    Boycott Mexican products

    • ExecutorOffice

      Maria’s cookies and Mexican Coke-a-Cola ?

      • Reverend Draco

        What a load of shit.

        • ExecutorOffice

          You must be looking at your family photo.

      • Human

        Already do that funny man! Why can’t you? What the hell is wrong with you folks? We are talking about people who have no regard for the laws of our country. If they break the immigration laws, what makes you think they won’t break others? Either come in the country legally or don’t come at all. You bleeding heart liberals have no clue, at what point do we stop supporting our own poor to help the poor of other countries? Are you willing to give up your federal handouts so these folks can get them? Legal immigrants are welcome, law breakers aren’t, and this isn’t only about Mexican nationals, this is about Muslim haters also. Get your head in the real world!

        • ExecutorOffice

          a. gfy b. gfy again c. don’t hire illegals piss for brains – it just encourages illegal entry into the uSA you twit. constitutional authority to support ‘ our ‘ own poor. e. no fed handouts you arrogant , pompous POS. f. gfym again.
          Obongo is a legal immigrant and he has droned about 1 million foreigners to death. Go vacation in Brussels numbnuts.

          • txtomt

            I would like to know more as this is very interesting. Where are you going to broadcast and when?

          • ExecutorOffice

            lol,,,,, look for the Giant TinFoil Twin Towers from whence said broadcast shall commence

          • Human

            Well now, that is interesting… So you are saying that illegal immigration is not happening because the grievance is not by the real party of interest, and it is not a civil action? That would be the same as tax fraud because there is no real party of interest, (the government is a corporation), and tax fraud is a criminal offence and the courts only hear civil action? So tax fraud is not something the civil court can rule on. That is one massive loop hole, and the governing body has illegally imprisoned multimillions of people.

          • ExecutorOffice

            lol,,,,,,,,,,just having fun overly stressed out human !!!

          • ExecutorOffice

            as far as unlawful, yet legal for the duped ones – or those like me who don’t want to be gunned down by the tax man for “resisting arrest”, taxation:

            this is just a piece of the blatherings:

            For those of you having IRS issues:

            I know someone who wishes to remain anonymous but wants his story out. I can

            attest to the hassles he went through with the IRS and know that it has been a

            long time since he has had to deal with them. Over a few years he has

            accumulated an enormous amount of documentation and had repeated

            communications with the IRS. They eventually dragged him into UNITED

            STATES DISTRICT COURT and during the trial he changed his direction and

            used Title 15 instead of Title 26 and the Constitution. The case eventually


            His new contention was simple and in some ways similar to my charge concept,

            it is all about the bill not the law. Title 15 relates to “verified assessment”, in other

            words the collector must provide proof to validate the debt and any case

            involving debt must be held in the judicial district court. The concept is that the

            evil ones have circumvented the Constitution and use their law, Title 26, as a

            way to confuse their victims. Tax law does not apply since the IRS is strictly a

            debt collection agency; thusly they are required to follow Title 15. The IRS has no

            way to verify the debt even if they can verify taxes. W-2’s and 1099’s are only

            evidence that some one has paid something, not that someone owes something.

            After reading all of Title 15 Chapter 41 Sub V section 1692 I can see his point

            is valid. Knowing that IRS is by corporate charter and their own admission a debt

            collection agency this all seems to make sense. I have started using this

            information in my own situation and will keep the group informed on the situation.

            This man told me he sent one letter, received a very uninformative denial

            response and sent a response to that response. This was done during his trial.

            He has not heard anything since, which was over a year ago. His case was

            terminated with no decision. I looked it up and the court just says CLOSED AND

            SEALED. I have not seen a case terminated this way.

            Conclusion: Once again it seems the evil one’s primary strategy is to get us to

            fight the wrong battle. Although Title 26 is the Internal Revenue Code, the IRS is

            just a collection agency and thereby is required to follow Title 15. If we don’t force

            them to verify the debt then we are agreeing the “bill” is valid. This, to me, is no

            different than the court tricking us into fighting an accusation when we should be

            fighting a charge.

            TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 41 > SUBCHAPTER V > § 1692

            § 1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

            (a) Abusive practices

            There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices

            by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal

            bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.

            (b) Inadequacy of laws

            Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.

            How to stop the IRS with Debt Collection statutes 1

            (c) Available non-abusive collection methods

            Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the

            effective collection of debts.

            (d) Interstate commerce

            Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and

            through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection

            practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.

            (e) Purposes

            It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt

            collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection

            practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect

            consumers against debt collection abuses.

            § 1692a. Definitions

            As used in this subchapter—

            (1) The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission.

            (2) The term “communication” means the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or

            indirectly to any person through any medium.

            (3) The term “consumer” means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any


            (4) The term “creditor” means any person who offers or extends credit creating a debt or to

            whom a debt is owed, but such term does not include any person to the extent that he receives an

            assignment or transfer of a debt in default solely for the purpose of facilitating collection of such

            debt for another.

            (5) The term “debt” means any obligation or alleged obligation of a consumer to pay money

            arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the

            subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, whether or

            not such obligation has been reduced to judgment.

            (6) The term “debt collector” means any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate

            commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any

            debts, or who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due or

            asserted to be owed or due another. Notwithstanding the exclusion provided by clause (F) of the

            last sentence of this paragraph, the term includes any creditor who, in the process of collecting his

            own debts, uses any name other than his own which would indicate that a third person is

            collecting or attempting to collect such debts. For the purpose of section 1692f (6) of this title,

            such term also includes any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the

            mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security interests. The

            term does not include—

            (A) any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name of the creditor, collecting debts for

            such creditor;

            (B) any person while acting as a debt collector for another person, both of whom are related by

            common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, if the person acting as a debt collector does

            so only for persons to whom it is so related or affiliated and if the principal business of such

            person is not the collection of debts;

            (C) any officer or employee of the United States or any State to the extent that collecting or

            attempting to collect any debt is in the performance of his official duties;

            (D) any person while serving or attempting to serve legal process on any other person in

            connection with the judicial enforcement of any debt;

            (E) any nonprofit organization which, at the request of consumers, performs bona fide consumer

            credit counseling and assists consumers in the liquidation of their debts by receiving payments

            from such consumers and distributing such amounts to creditors; and

            How to stop the IRS with Debt Collection statutes 2

            (F) any person collecting or attempting to collect any debt owed or due or asserted to be owed or

            due another to the extent such activity

            (i) is incidental to a bona fide fiduciary obligation or a bona fide escrow arrangement;

            (ii) concerns a debt which was originated by such person;

            (iii) concerns a debt which was not in default at the time it was obtained by such person; or

            (iv) concerns a debt obtained by such person as a secured party in a commercial credit transaction

            involving the creditor.

            (7) The term “location information” means a consumer’s place of abode and his telephone

            number at such place, or his place of employment.

            (8) The term “State” means (please note it says ‘means’ here instead of ‘includes’) any

            State, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth

            of Puerto Rico, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing.

            § 1692b. Acquisition of location information

            Any debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of

            acquiring location information about the consumer shall—

            (1) identify himself (using a pseudonym is not identifying oneself), state that he is

            confirming or correcting location information concerning the consumer, and, only if expressly

            requested, identify his employer;

            (2) not state that such consumer owes any debt (IRS forms violate this);

            (3) not communicate with any such person more than once unless requested to do so by such

            person or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such person is

            erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location information;

            (4) not communicate by post card;

            (5) not use any language or symbol on any envelope or in the contents of any communication

            effected by the mails or telegram that indicates that the debt collector is in the debt collection

            business or that the communication relates to the collection of a debt (IRS forms violate this);


            (6) after the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with regard to the

            subject debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney’s name and address,

            not communicate with any person other than that attorney, unless the attorney fails to respond

            within a reasonable period of time to communication from the debt collector.

            § 1692c. Communication in connection with debt collection

            (a) Communication with the consumer generally

            Without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector or the express

            permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, a debt collector may not communicate with a

            consumer in connection with the collection of any debt—

            (1) at any unusual time or place or a time or place known or which should be known to be

            inconvenient to the consumer. In the absence of knowledge of circumstances to the contrary, a

            debt collector shall assume that the convenient time for communicating with a consumer is after 8

            o’clock antemeridian and before 9 o’clock postmeridian, local time at the consumer’s location;

            (2) if the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with respect to such

            debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney’s name and address, unless the

            attorney fails to respond within a reasonable period of time to a communication from the debt

            collector or unless the attorney consents to direct communication with the consumer; or

            (3) at the consumer’s place of employment if the debt collector knows or has reason to know that

            the consumer’s employer prohibits the consumer from receiving such communication.

            (b) Communication with third parties

            How to stop the IRS with Debt Collection statutes 3

            Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, without the prior consent of the consumer given

            directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as

            reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not

            communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than the

            consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor,

            the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.

            (c) Ceasing communication

            If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that

            the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease further communication with the consumer, the

            debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt,


            (1) to advise the consumer that the debt collector’s further efforts are being terminated;

            (2) to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor may invoke specified remedies which

            are ordinarily invoked by such debt collector or creditor; or

            (3) where applicable, to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor intends to invoke a

            specified remedy. If such notice from the consumer is made by mail, notification shall be

            complete upon receipt.

            (d) “Consumer” defined

            For the purpose of this section, the term “consumer” includes the consumer’s spouse, parent (if

            the consumer is a minor), guardian, executor, or administrator.

            § 1692d. Harassment or abuse

            A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass,

            oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the

            general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

            (1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person,

            reputation, or property of any person.

            (2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to

            abuse the hearer or reader.

            (3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer

            reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 1681a (f) or 1681b (3) [1] of

            this title.

            (4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.

            (5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or

            continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

            (6) Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, the placement of telephone calls without

            meaningful disclosure of the caller’s identity.

            § 1692e. False or misleading representations (the IRS violates everything in this section)

            A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation (IRS forms

            violate this in several ways) or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without

            limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this


            (1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by,

            or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or

            facsimile thereof. (too many violations to list for this one)

            (2) The false representation of—

            (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or

            (B) any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector

            for the collection of a debt.

            How to stop the IRS with Debt Collection statutes


          • txtomt

            So we now know that anything you post is coming from an intestinal garbage point of view. Yes?

          • ExecutorOffice

            you are describing DC and attorneys wherever they are found.

      • ©₦@®£€$ ₣€N€¥

        Point well taken.

  • NonYo Business

    Lol. Drama drama drama. What a load of crap.

  • Mike

    boycott all companies that hire ILLEGAL INVADERS.

    • Jessiejevans1

      “my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….

      two days ago new Mc.Laren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Hereo!589➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsJobs/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:::::o!589……….

    • ExecutorOffice

      Local Dairy Farms included.

  • Why is my comment on this news “PENDING”? “PENDING” what? “PENDING” who? “PENDING” why? “PENDING” when?

  • Nam Marine

    To HELL with the Mexicans !…………………….VETERANS FOR TRUMP !

  • Alleged Comment

    The Demoncraps and it looks like even the Retardicans have SOLD America down the road. To the Chinese, and to every country South of US.

    You have been BETRAYED! Even the negro up there is not a legal “president”.

  • Talon

    Looks like the wall just got ten feet higher.

  • barbarakelly

    i LIKE YOU SOLUTION DONNA. I’m getting a little tried of countries meddling in our affairs.

  • Guillotine_ready

    Our government has been trying to form a North American union for a long time and we need to make certain it fails and never is attempted again. Our nation has been invaded by illegals and drug cartels for decades and we need to put an end to it. Not wait for sell out politi-tutes to do something against their own interest which will not happen.
    I have nothing against the Mexican people and nothing against their culture which is much richer and more colorful than our own. I am only against the gangs and drug cartels that come here illegally, and the repeat felons our justice system sets free alll the time.
    Maybe we need a coup in this nation led by the people, not the military and certainly not by politicians.
    Jail George Soros for war crimes, Jail Rick Snyder for crimes against the people and jail the congress for selling out our entire nation.