Saturday, July 26th, 2014

Gun Grabbers Call For Re-Education Programs In Public Schools

Brandon Smith
Alt Market
December 20th, 2012
Reader Views: 972

Was the shooting of 20 students in Newtown, Connecticut the Neo-Liberal version of 9/11?  The question merits considerable thought, but let me explain further what I mean.  In the aftermath of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks, a sense of shock and awe sunk into the minds of the American populace like nothing seen in decades.   This overwhelming fear, this logic crippling terror, infected the public to more destructive ends than any deadly virus in existence.  Conservatives were especially vulnerable to the infectious symptoms of the event, abandoning all reason and even their small government values to support the fascist inklings of the Bush Administration; a Neo-Con (fake conservative) driven presidency with ambitions of constitutional reversal.  Whatever you may believe about the true causes and culprits behind 9/11, no one can deny that Bush and his ilk sought to exploit the tragedy to gain political capital to be used in the destruction of American civil liberties.

More than a decade later, the Neo-Liberal (fake liberal) Obama Administration and its minions continue the Bush legacy by exploiting our latest tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary as a means to an end; a political opportunity to assert federal authority as more valuable than constitutional freedom.

The onset of the illegal wars thrust upon the Middle East after 9/11 brought with it mass resistance from the “left” side of the political spectrum.  Protests abounded, dissenters were numerous, and Bush responded in kind with unprecedented domestic surveillance programs and attacks against free speech.  Democratic leaning citizens saw the criminality of it because they were unhindered by bias.  The archetypal manipulation of 9/11 and the fear mongering of the terrorist myth was less effective on them.  However, times have changed…

With a Democratic president in the White House, the left has grown addicted to their perceived (but illusory) social leverage.  The intoxicating symptoms of power overdose have clouded their vision, and that which they fought against in the Bush years now appears rather fair and acceptable to them today.  Obama has so far committed every war atrocity that Bush was ever guilty of in his tenure, while expanding on liberty nullifying pieces of legislation Bush set into motion.  Liberals cry out in horror at the deaths of 20 children in Connecticut while cheering a man like Obama, who orders predator drone strikes that result in the deaths of children everyday.  Of all the people in this country, self proclaimed “progressives” are the most hypocritical and the most disappointing as human beings.

Adding to that disappointment, Obama’s more aggressive socialist support base (useful idiots) along with the establishment controlled mainstream media are attempting to squeeze every last ounce of political advantage from the Newtown massacre to gain superiority in a battle over one of the last portions of the Constitution that people still seem willing to fight and die for:  The 2nd Amendment.

In the past few days I have seen an unprecedented tidal wave of media stories promoting anti-gun sentiments and prejudice against gun ownership.  Counterpoints to this philosophy are almost never given credence in print or on television, and when they are, gun rights advocates are interrupted with incessant Alinsky arguments attacking their characters or distracting away from the real issues.  What the MSM is attempting to do (blatantly and shamelessly I might add) is to create the illusion of consensus.  Through a deluge of constant propaganda, they hope to implant the false perception that a “majority” of Americans are in support of strict gun control or even confiscation.

What I have found though in my seven years as an analyst in the independent media is quite the opposite.  America’s appreciation of gun rights and gun ownership is increasing exponentially.  Not because of some newfound love affair for “hunting”; that’s just nonsense.  Instead, the public is embracing our gun culture because they are slowly realizing the need for self defense in these precarious times, and this need extends to defense against a highly corrupt government (hence the public’s right to military style weapons).  Gun ownership has even increased amongst Democrats after the election of Barack Obama, and gun sales have skyrocketed beyond all expectation.  Interestingly, some gun grabbers are willing to admit that 2nd Amendment principles are pervasive in the U.S., and have suggested that the Obama Administration target not only gun ownership, but our “gun culture” as well.

Numerous mainstream articles have been published attacking the gun culture as the root cause of all our nation’s ills, but I felt one Reuters piece in particular stood out as indicative of the truly despotic depths to which leftists (who claim to be champions of freedom) are willing to sink:

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/12/14/obama-should-treat-gun-control-like-lbj-did-civil-rights/

The piece begins by comparing the battle for gun control to the battle for civil rights of black Americans during the reign of Lyndon Johnson.  As painful and absurd as this sounds, the author appears to take the premise very seriously.

The article attempts to promote the idea that desegregation was achieved due to the actions of the Johnson Administration, who supposedly used the threat of cancelled supplemental funds to state schools as a means to force them into enrolling black students.

The goal here is to promote a worshipful attitude towards the Federal Government as the sole arbiter and savior of the people.  It’s funny, but I thought it was the dissenting protests of millions of civil rights activists that ended desegregation, NOT Lyndon Johnson, who by all accounts was a racist who only wanted to use the black community as a voting block to revitalize the Democratic Party.

In this White House recording, Johnson complains that using the argument of discrimination to impose federal controls on taxation in Texas was not working because there were too many “n*ggers” voting there to make it seem plausible:

Johnson is also famous for this quote:

“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” 
From Ronald Kessler’s “Inside The White House”

Clearly, Johnson saw the tragedy of the oppression of the black community as a tool he could exploit to further his goal of decapitating states rights.  Progressives and centralists often use the argument that if the states are left to their own devices they will implement freedom crushing legislation like segregation.  I would point out that anti-constitutional and anti-freedom actions by ANY government, whether state or federal, need to be stopped by the citizenry.  The federal government is supposed to keep the states in line constitutionally, but states are also supposed to keep the federal government in line constitutionally.  In the meantime, the people are supposed to keep BOTH of them in line constitutionally.  The Federal Government was never designed to be an unaccountable and unstoppable dictator in the affairs of the states or the populace.  They do not get the last word; the Constitution and the people do.

In light of this information on Johnson, I find it interesting that the author of the Reuters article above uses Johnson’s methodology as an argument for Obama’s gun control.  Whether he realizes it or not, he has made a very astute comparison.  Obama does not care about Sandy Hook, the children who were killed, or similar tragedies in general.  Like Johnson, though, Obama does care about how he can use the event to further federal power and chew away at our constitutional rights.

The LBJ / Obama connection aside, the article gets much worse…

The author goes on to propose that Obama use Johnson’s strategy of flaunting federal money as a carrot to get states to submit to centralized gun control.  This plays into the overall meme that the mainstream media is pushing post-Newtown; the idea that Obama must bypass Congress and take action against gun rights unilaterally.  You know…like an emperor…

And still, it gets even darker…

What is the author’s ultimate methodology?  What edict does he hope the Obama Administration will implement?  Use the threat of lost federal funding to force schools across the country to institute government approved “gun safety and violence prevention” programs.

But what does he mean by “violence prevention”?  The author dances around the specifics of the issue while throwing out a couple small placations to states rights advocates, but slips up by admitting he wants the gun control ideology taught to schoolchildren while blaming the American “gun culture” as equally responsible for the attack at Newtown:

“…Public debate and discussion about the role of guns and gun culture in American society must be a key component of that process. The question that many Americans will be asking is: Why did the shooting occur and how can we prevent another shooting in the future? It is not just that guns are available, it’s also the culture that surrounds them. It’s about the people and the tools, not one or the other. A comprehensive attempt at gun control would better inform Americans about gun safety and the hazards of guns. But how best to do that? I offer one possible solution: the power of federal government intervention through schools.”

“…the Obama administration would begin to chip away at a culture of violence that is clearly deeply rooted across the country…If we can link federal funds to mandatory standardized testing then we can certainly do the same for gun-control education. This will not only be a practical step to ensure that an event like the Newtown shooting does not happen again. It’s also a moral one to combat a culture that’s buying an increasing number of guns—guns that can easily have dire effects in the future.”

And there you have it.  The answer, according to gun grabbers, is to force schools to reeducate your children to fear and disdain the very idea of gun ownership.  This is almost the equivalent of a “Prima Nocta” policy against the gun rights movement.  Essentially the Reuters author’s philosophy is to “breed us out”, taking away our ability to pass on our 2nd Amendment principles to our children through propaganda conditioning, instead of trying to fight us head on.

Is this really the point we have come to in America?  Where hack journalists feel no qualms about openly calling for the execution of political propaganda in public schools to manipulate little kids into believing what the establishment wants them to believe?  I realize that this is sadly already happening in many ways, but it has always been a subversive and secretive process because, well…because it is abhorrent and they know it!  Now, they openly petition for it as if it should be commonly accepted?!

Here is the bottom line:  If you can’t convince people through rational debate that your position is the correct one, and, if you have to threaten them, lie to them, or brainwash them before they will adopt your ideas, then there is something wrong with your ideas.  The truth wins out eventually under its own power.  Only disinformation needs to be forcefully injected into the public consciousness.  Obviously, there are a great many truths behind the concepts of individual self defense and gun ownership if gun grabbers find it impossible to prevail without subverting our youth.

As I mentioned in my article ‘Teachers:  It Is Time To Arm Yourselves Regardless Of The Law’, the Liberty Movement has already offered a solution to potential gun violence that can and does work far better than gun restriction or confiscation; let teachers carry their own firearms, training to defend themselves and their students.  We should demand that this solution be given the consideration it deserves instead of being outright ignored in the public arena.  If we allow gun grabbers to “shame” us into silence, or, god forbid, reeducate our offspring, the outlandish Orwellian concepts peddled by the mainstream today will seem like child’s play compared to the tyranny of tomorrow.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Brandon Smith of Alt Market.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.

To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page.

Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide

Get Regular Updates!     Enter Email Address           privacy information  

Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


  • chris martel

    The hard part is trying to get Americans to pay attention to what the government is doing. I have been advising everyone I know to turn the idiot box OFF and read the news from sites like and even liberal sites as well. We all know that if a person takes the time to actually read the news, they will be less susceptible to buy into all this PC crap about how bad guns are, oh they are bad all right, as far as the government is concerned, they fear them. Far too many people are willing to give up their basic rights so they can sit home and play video games and watch the inane drivel that is being passed off as entertainment on tv. Turn the idiot box OFF!!!!!

  • Jean

    I’m suprised anyone cares about propaganda being pushed in shcools any more…
    Social Studies? (Especially now that it’s all CAIR-approved?)
    DARE programs?
    Anti-bullying?
    Anti-smoking?
    Anti-drinking?

    Best example is probably drinking. I was allowed to sample whatever my parents had, even when out. Somehow I’m not a drunk @ 37. But I know of several guys who binged themselves to oblivion in high school and college, well – let’s not even discuss. (Playboy termed my first college “professionals.” You might not like the source, but if they’re callin a school professional drinkers…?)

    My father is going on 70 now; still smokes half a pack a day (Mom’s been a bitch to get him to stop; while I don’t like his smoking, at this point? She’s just afraid to be alone, there’s no altruistic motive. Like any other woman, it’s all about HER wants.) His peak was 2 packs a day. He’s smoked for something like 5 decades plus. Also drinks quite a bit, mostly whiskey. Not a drunk, built his own business, ran it and managed it through tough times, raised me, sent me to college, raised my sister, still taking care of my mother… Who has all SORTS of idiotic schemes in her mind about what she can and can’t do… But so far hasn’t done anything majorly destructive to herself. (Meaning, accident-inducing stupidity of the potentially Darwinian variety.)

    She is an artist, used oil-based paints and thinners for years. I’m afraid all her hare-brained stuff is of her own doing. Also drank, even while pregnant (it was an acceptable thing then), and I was exposed to asbestos and lead-based paints and god only knows how many other things, given my dad’s work as a chemist… Probably Thermite, C-4, napalm, various other propellants and high explosives, given his field.

    Still here, healthy, not a druggie, and my biggest flaw in that sense is, I’m a lapsed Catholic.

    Old school mates? Some dead, some in prison, some happily married, many I don’t know about. Most finaly woke up to how we’d been brainwashed. Most not alcoholics – though as a funny aside, I rented a place from a recovering alcoholic… One of the smartest, and MOST AWARE, people I’ve known in my life.

    Tells you something… Sheep are there to be shorn of wool, nothing more. He wasn’t a sheep… Neither am I. Yet I still hear parents screaching over how alcohol will poison their children (at 5, under parental supervision). It will turn them immediately into psychopaths who at 18 will shoot up a school… (??? WTF, woman? You really ARE off your rocker… Even funnier when you take a good look at the woman screaming and realize she’s an ex-”party girl”… Casual sex and drink and drugs were her way of life, so now she’ll judge EVERYONE who isn’t locked down to prevent them doing WHAT SHE DID… And not because it was destructive to her – she doesn’t want her children to have the CHOICE, because they’ll choose BADLY… Who is the role model again? Oh, yes, ex-party girl slut mommy. Hmm… Wonder why the children would make the wrong choice? )

  • KB

    jean: I take it your relationship with your mom, and women, is tenuous at best? You make some valid points; however, unfortunately, they got lost in the unresolved issue aisle.

    • Jean

      Used to be good.
      One long run-in with a bad apple will sour you permanently.
      Seeing that all the others did the same, the only difference was the extent?

      That’s a mind-f*ck. PTSD levels. I don’t even recognize myself anymore.

      Mom and dad don’t talk to me much anymore; they are Irish and Italian descent Roman Catholic. I’m living with a woman. (My sister, based on her time living with us, is a “serial monogamist”, but gets a pass.)
      My grandmother on my mother’s side was a manipulative batch to my mother (mom was middle child.) One aunt I have barely met because of her actions; the other was either selfish or in the closet. Selfish as in, not capable of parenting, career-oriented. (Like a janitor’s career future.)
      On my dad’s side, grandma was a tough bitch (in a good sense, very capable, no nonsense.) But that side of the family was not good at keeping in touch…
      So, family life not good, no, but my realizations weren’t the cause.
      And desire to have a relationship with a manipulative bitch – her words – is nil.

  • http://NONE Arizona

    REUTERS is owned by the queen of england,who would have ever guessed???? all the foreign newspapers are owned by her and the rothchild banking cartel,SO there screaming about anything is to father their being able to RIP EVERYONE OFF,these same newspapers were used to bring adolf hitler to power,NOW OBAMA,the new american NAZI,only,there the fools this time cause HE’S THE ANTI-CHRIST and will kill everyone of them and they don’t realize it yet,WHEN they do figure it out the BIBLE says they will try to kill him not realizing he can’t be killed,THATS WHEN EVERYONE WAKES UP……..we hope……..

  • http://NONE Arizona

    REMEMBER KIDS,when the ANTI-CHRIST IS shot,LUCIFER takes his place and then all HELL BRAKES LOOSE,HE declares him self to be JESUS CHRIST,will you be FOOLED,the LORD warned he would FOOL almost everyone,so far he BATTING 100…in america…….

  • http://NONE Arizona

    THE LORDS REAL HEBREW NAME, IS “YAHUSHUA” and the FATHERS NAME IS “YAHUVEH” both hebrew names,the LORD AND THE FATHER WERE NOT “GREEK” they were hebrew,the names in the BIBLE were written in greek,THE FATHER ALLOWED IT,but he does want to be called by his correct name,remember you were told,LUCIFER IS NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO SAY THERE NAME,think I’am kidding ? next time you meet a devil worshipper say the real names of the father and son to them and watch what happens……………..

  • ncjoe

    Yeah, let’s reeducate kids that random violence is a bad thing. Let’s reeducate children that picking up a gun is not the best solution to a problem. I say reeducate because fuckheads like you have sent the message that guns are the end all be all. I bet many of you morons are stroking your gun and jacking off wishing you could shoot me because I tell you the plain truth, you are brainless and spineless morons.

    • Mark

      ncjoe says: QUOTE
      I bet many of you morons are stroking your gun and jacking off wishing you could shoot me because I tell you the plain truth, you are brainless and spineless morons.

      Your a Sad excuse for a human being…
      You can educate ignorance but in your case you can never fix stupid…
      Go slither back into your hole.

      • Jean

        I wonder why NCJoe thinks we’d bother to waste a bullet on him? Kitchen knife is good enough, gets the job done. ;-)

    • JW

      Can we get ncjoe banned from posting? If he was providing a thoughtful argument, I’d have no problem with him hanging out on this board, but it’s got to the point where his profane comments have completely stripped him of any credibility to make a rational post.

      • reader

        seconded, i never post here, but i read a lot. i have never seen one relevant or intelligent thing come from ncjoe, he is an obvious troll.

    • Lutz

      You are the ideal idiotic NWO sock puppet.

  • Lowtolerance

    I went to educate my kids how to pick out a nutcase like ncjoe. Turns out it comes natural to them, so no need.

Get Regular Updates!
Get Sheeple news delivered to your inbox. It's totally free and well worth the price!
email address privacy
Copyright 2009 - 2013 The Daily Sheeple.
v.8