Monday, December 22nd, 2014

GMO Labeling Bill Shot Down In Senate Just Days Before March Against Monsanto

Daniel Jackson
The Daily Sheeple
May 24th, 2013
Reader Views: 2,378

organic-gmo

Just days before the massive worldwide event know as March Against Monsanto, the Senate has once again sided with Monsanto by overwhelmingly voting against a bill that would have allowed individual states to choose whether or not to label GMO foods.

With a vote count of 71 to 27, the Senate denied the right of the people to know what is in the food they eat. The Senate also took a direct shot at the 10th Amendment in denying individual states the right to make their own decision in regards to GMO labeling.

Shortly before the vote, sponsor Senator Bernie Sanders said that, “the concept we’re talking about today is a fairly commonsense and non-radical idea.

“All over the world, in the European Union, in many other countries around the world, dozens and dozens of countries, people are able to look at the food that they are buying and determine through labeling whether or not that product contains genetically modified organisms.”

Sanders also noted that in the past he has helped pass laws in his home state of Vermont that would require GMO labeling but hasn’t seen those laws actually be enacted over fears that Monsanto would sue the state. This bill would allow states to do what they want without fear that the company that brought us agent orange could end up having more power than an entire state government.

Opponents of the bill were also vocal, with one Senator claiming that there was no evidence that there is any difference between GMO and non GMO despite known facts that point to the exact opposite.

The Huffington Post reported:

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), the chair of the Agriculture Committee, argued that the measure “is not germane to the farm bill” in the first place. She also said the labels run counter to science and the public interest in healthy food.

“This particular amendment would interfere with the FDA’s science-based process to determine what food labeling is necessary for consumers,” Stabenow said.

“It’s also important to note that around the world now we are seeing genetically modified crops that have the ability to resist crop diseases and improve nutritional content and survive drought conditions in many developing countries,” she added.

“We see wonderful work being done by foundations like the Gates Foundation and others, that are using new techniques to be able to feed hungry people,” she said, although it was not clear how labeling would affect such efforts.

Either Stabenow is so naive she is literally just repeating Gate Foundation/Monsanto talking points or she is (like many in Congress) in the pockets of big agriculture.

At this point it seems that attempting to make GMO labeling a reality by going through Congress may be impossible and a more grassroots type of movement is needed. Luckily, that may actually be happening.

The vote against GMO labeling came just two days before the worldwide event known as March Against Monsanto. While the mainstream media has largely stayed quiet about the now viral worldwide movement against GMO’s and Monsanto, tens of thousands of people are planning to rally across the country.

March Against Monsanto has announced that on May 25, tens of thousands of activists around the world will “March Against Monsanto.”

Currently, marches are being planned on six continents, in 36 countries, totaling events in over 250 cities, and in the US, events are slated to occur simultaneously at 11 a.m. Pacific in 47 states.

Many have questioned what the overall goals of the movement are and spoke about the need for a clear message as to why they are marching. The official March Against Monsanto website has outlined this.

On May 25, activists around the world will unite to March Against Monsanto.

Why do we march?

  • Research studies have shown that Monsanto’s genetically-modified foods can lead to serious health conditions such as the development of cancer tumors, infertility and birth defects.
  • In the United States, the FDA, the agency tasked with ensuring food safety for the population, is steered by ex-Monsanto executives, and we feel that’s a questionable conflict of interests and explains the lack of government-led research on the long-term effects of GM products.
  • Recently, the U.S. Congress and president collectively passed the nicknamed “Monsanto Protection Act” that, among other things, bans courts from halting the sale of Monsanto’s genetically-modified seeds.
  • For too long, Monsanto has been the benefactor of corporate subsidies and political favoritism. Organic and small farmers suffer losses while Monsanto continues to forge its monopoly over the world’s food supply, including exclusive patenting rights over seeds and genetic makeup.
  • Monsanto’s GM seeds are harmful to the environment; for example, scientists have indicated they have contributed to Colony Collapse Disorder among the world’s bee population.

What are solutions we advocate?

  • Voting with your dollar by buying organic and boycotting Monsanto-owned companies that use GMOs in their products.
  • Labeling of GMOs so that consumers can make those informed decisions easier.
  • Repealing relevant provisions of the US’s “Monsanto Protection Act.”
  • Calling for further scientific research on the health effects of GMOs.
  • Holding Monsanto executives and Monsanto-supporting politicians accountable through direct communication, grassroots journalism, social media, etc.
  • Continuing to inform the public about Monsanto’s secrets.
  • Taking to the streets to show the world and Monsanto that we won’t take these injustices quietly.

We will not stand for cronyism. We will not stand for poison. That’s why we March Against Monsanto.

For more information you can visit the March Against Monsanto Website.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Daniel Jackson of The Daily Sheeple.

Daniel Jackson is a seasoned journalist with a passion for exposing corruption and the lies of the global elite. DJ has a passion for truth and liberty that is shown through his extensive reporting on numerous globally significant topics not normally covered by the corporate controlled media. He is is a writer, researcher and editor for The Daily Sheeple. Wake the flock up!

Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide

Get Regular Updates!     Enter Email Address           privacy information  

Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


  • hsabin

    Individual states should NOT allow the federal government tell them what to do!! Citizens living where these crops are grown should determine GMO or not. I would choose NOT as no one knows what we have altered in fooling around with the genetics of plants.

    • Anonymous

      Remember, your own city, county, town and state can BAN and totally refuse Monsanto
      and genetically engineered foods for good (bypassing the soft approach and already corrupted FDA and USDA). Mendocino County in CA completely banned and refused any GMO plants, food and animals in their own County. And Santa Cruz in WA has followed by their own Local initiative on ballots.

      We need to kick Monsanto out – town by town, city by city and not allow them to co-exist at all in your own local neighborhoods and adjacent to our pure food supplies, land and farms. WE need to kick them out completely. No compromise. It’s time.

      State and Local Victories in Banning GMO’s.

      OREGON: GMO Free Jackson County: Makes it unlawful for any person to propagate, cultivate, raise, or grow genetically engineered plants in Jackson County.” A video about the effort can be found here: http://youtu.be/imzPue6xGCs

      GMO Bans in Effect

      Colorado
      City GMO Restriction: In the City of Boulder, it is illegal to plant GMOs on public land. The City is the largest land owner in the city, with approximately 40, 000 acres under its control.

      Washington
      San Juan County: Washington was able to pass what is known as Initiative Measure No. 2012-4, which actually bans the growth of genetically modified organisms within the county.

      Maine
      Town GMO Ban: On March 25, 2006 the town of Montville approved a resolution that declared itself a GMO free zone. “Montville Bans Genetically Modified Seeds,” Bangor Daily News, 27 March 2006
      http://youtu.be/imzPue6xGCs

      California
      County Yes No Prohibited
      Mendocino 57% 43% Yes
      Marin 61% 39% Yes
      Butte 39% 61% No
      Humboldt 35% 65% No
      San Luis Obispo 41% 58% No
      Sonoma 44% 56% No

      County GMO Ban: Measure H passed by voters (March 2004) in Mendocino County which states that “it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to propagate, cultivate, raise, or grow genetically modified organisms in Mendocino County.” (Measure has yet to be codified)
      http://www.gmofreemendo.com/

      Santa Cruz County, California – Passed by Board of Supervisors (moratorium)

      County GMO Ban: Marin County voted for a measure which states that “it is unlawful for any person or entity to cultivate, propagate, raise or grow genetically modified organisms in Marin County.” (2004)
      http://www.smartvoter.org/2004/11/02/ca/mrn/meas/B/

      County GMO Ban: Trinity County passed Ordinance No. 1284 which states that “it is unlawful for any person to propagate, cultivate, raise, or grow genetically engineered organisms in Trinity County.” Chpt 8.25 of County Code (2004)

      City GMO Ban: City of Arcata City ordinance states that “it is unlawful for any person, partnership, corporation, firm or organization of any kind to sell, distribute, propagate, cultivate, raise or grow seeds or crops of genetically engineered organisms in the City of Arcata…” Ordinance No. 1350 (2004)
      http://www.environmentalcommons.org/arcata-ordinance-1350

      City GMO Ban: Point Arena passed Ordinance No. 193 which states that “it is unlawful for any person, partnership, corporation, firm or organization of any kind to sell, distribute, propagate, cultivate, raise or grow seeds, whole plants, or crops of genetically modified organisms in the City of Point Arena” Chpt 8.25 of City Code (2004)
      http://www.environmentalcommons.org/Point-Arena-Ordinance

    • Anonymous

      Wonder if all this back and forth is to keep the states and local cities from a total refusal of Monsanto/GMO’s – it could go on forever. Plus, the govt WANTS to regulate, not set you free.

      • JD Straw

        Yep!

  • Bob Marshall

    Obama’s senate is a disgrace to America.

    • JD Straw

      Obama, too—not just the senate

  • Trikzta

    Monsta=NWO=Agenda21. Monsta=Nazi=Bankstas.
    Monsta=eugenics=genocide.
    Monsta takes your eye off the ball that Bayer and others are outflanking us with.

  • JD Straw

    It’s a disgrace and downright dirty shame that this administration along with FDA and USDA are upholding these Monsanto crooks’ dirty deeds

Get Regular Updates!
Get Sheeple news delivered to your inbox. It's totally free and well worth the price!
email address privacy

Copyright 2009 - 2014 The Daily Sheeple. (v.8)

The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader. The Daily Sheeple is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.