|
Monday, May 20th, 2013 |
|
Home
RSS Feed
Newsletter
Boomark Us
Facebook
Twitter
|
|
Final UN Arms Trade Treaty Disarms America With Clinton’s Signature
Susanne Posel
The UN International Arms Trade Treaty Conference (ATT) is wrapping up in New York and their final draft is completed . In 2009, Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State, proudly announced that the Obama administration was in full support of the ATT. It was the intention of the US government to assist the UN in implementing and establishing “common international standards for the import, export, and transfer of conventional arms to help prevent the acquisition of arms by terrorists, criminals, and those who violate human rights or are subject to UN arms embargoes.” Clinton stated that “the United States is prepared to work hard for a strong international standard” concerning global gun control. “The United States is committed to actively pursuing a strong and robust treaty that contains the highest possible, legally binding standards for the international transfer of conventional weapons.” In 2010, the US began talks with the UN regarding the initial drafting of the ATT. With perfect globalist rhetoric , the UN claims that it is “not pursuing a global treaty to ban gun ownership by civilians.” But rather a “tightening controls over the international import, export and transfers of conventional arms, because without such controls it is easier for weapons to be diverted from the legal trade into the illegal market, and into the hands of terrorists, drug traffickers and criminal cartels.” However, with the confirmation of the Fast and Furious scandal, it became clear that new new gun regulations were coming to America. Trent Franks, Arizona House Representative commented to a House Judiciary committee in 2011 that: “If the American people learn that the motivations for all of this was to make a case to deprive them of their Second Amendment rights or to make a case to further the (Justice) department’s ability to further regulate gun rights within the United States, that would make them very angry. Clearly, an attempt to use Fast and Furious as a way to bolster the request for that long-gun regulation would have been foolhardy.” The Obama administration supports international regulation of all “advanced conventional weapons, including tanks, armored combat vehicles, artillery systems, military aircraft, military helicopters, naval vessels, missiles, missile launchers, small arms and light weapons, and combat support equipment. It should also include parts, components, and/or technology to manufacture, modify, or repair the covered items” as stated in the ATT. When talks concerning the global gun grab began in 2010, the US claimed to “want a treaty that will prevent, or at least significantly impede, illicit trade in conventional weapons by reinforcing national commitments and supplementing those obligations, thereby elevating the degree to which the worldwide trade in conventional arms is conducted in a lawful, transparent, and accountable manner.” Indeed it was through seemingly lawful procurement that the Department of Justice (DoJ), as stated in a demand letter, required border-state gun stores to report multiple gun purchases by an individual in a 7 day period could be used to confuse the actual issue. US Attorney Dennis Burke wanted to connect the guns shipped to Mexican drug cartels to Fast and Furious, and ultimately introduce the “enforcing gun sale laws at (gun stores) and gun shows.” Terry Gowdy, House Representative, said: “The federal government certainly aided and abetted gun trafficking, which then may very well have been the proximate cause of a border agent [Brian Terry’s] death.” Fast forward to the Batman shooting where James Holmes entered a crowded theater in complete SWAT gear (which consisted of a tactical armored vest, throat protector, groin protector, a gas mask and a ballistic helmet) and threw two gas canisters into the crowd while opening fire with an assault rifle, shotgun and a .40 caliber Glock pistol. The result: 12 people dead and 59 injured.
The Batman shooting prompted a nationwide dialogue about gun control while the UN was putting the finishing touches on an international treaty that would eradicate the 2nd Amendment and disarm Americans, all in one fail swoop. The cover story is that guns in the hands of violent criminals are dangerous. And potential criminals lurk around every corner. The claims that legal procurement of firearms is not part of the discussion are distracting from the truth of the matter. The ATT clearly states that the UN, after Congressional ratification, will force the US government to:
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), which was ratified by the US Senate in 1969 may be the loophole to allow Obama and Clinton to destroy the 2nd Amendment and enact international mandates on gun control in America after the treaty is signed by a member of the Obama administration (i.e. Clinton herself). That signature alone will implement the ATT within the domestic US regardless of a formal rejection by the current Senate. The VCLT views international treaties above the laws of sovereign nations wherein disputes are directed to an international tribunal as defined by the Charter of the United Nations . Essentially, the UN will have the legal backing to force any nation that has signed a treaty to do their bidding; or face international mandates as recognized by the international community and not the individual laws or constitutions of independent countries. In the final draft of the ATT, the establishment of a UN sanctioned “national control system” will regulate:
The ISU will be an internationally appointed supervision department that controls all records concerning arms trade who also can force governments to implement international amendments and mandates as is or could be decided at a UN General Assembly meeting regarding the ATT. A national enforcement department would be installed to prevent diversion from the ATT. However, this department would also readily assist individual implementation of the ATT should a country have trouble allocating their existing laws or regulations to the ATT. The UN, under the ATT demands that all nations “offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.” To join the ATT, world leaders need only accept or sign the treaty. Once signed or accepted, the ATT must be implemented within 30 days to ensure “transfer competence” with regard to changes in governmental structure that may occur due to the ATT. After the 30 day allotment, the UN expects the ATT to be in full control of all matters regarding arms control. Nations, under the ATT, may take each other to a UN tribunal court to facilitate legal matters of dispute. That tribunal will interpret the ATT and negotiate between the parties. In the end, the UN will govern the right of arms control, legal matters concerning arms control and the methods and means by which arms are allocated to individual nations. Within the ATT, there is not one mention of the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans or even how the ATT may affect those rights. In fact, the provisions of the ATT are in contrary to existing laws and if signed, would simply supersede laws in existence to conform to the international mandates proposed in the ATT. The ultimate goal of disarming Americans in clearly noted in its silence and ambiguous tone toward the sovereignty of nations that allow by Constitutional right that their citizens bear protective arms. The UN’s complete disarmament of the entire world begins with the simple stroke of a pen.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism. Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page . Leave A Comment... |
Break away from the herd and stay up to date with The Daily Sheeple.
           |
v.8
The former Ambasador says that the Obama administration is trying to fly under the radar so the media won’t pick up this story. But Obama and the media are owned by the same wealthy people. They are not afraid of the media, they print only what they want and use the media to spin everything. It is the internet media they don’t own or like.
Off topic but please respond: About 3 wks ago a southwestern man wrote that since about a week before the first heat wave hit the nation, the UN chemtrail planes had shown a double presence in his skies. I noticed the remark because I had noted that since about a week before the hotspell the skies in my area had been devoid of the usually daily chemtrails and my area has no heatwave. Anyone else in normal temp areas or heat wave areas noticed any changes in the number or chemtrails in their skies since the first heatwave?
I have noticed more than the usual number of planes flying overhead. Sometimes continuously. In a few different areas I frequent.
Also people cannot always get flights out of philly. Some have to go to atlantic city or newark???? Strange.
me too, more chemtrails than usual and more reports of sink holes than usual too, they are happening in more than one place, I suspect those underground tunnels the Gov. has built under ground , they go down 2 miles and they are all over, also have an underground high speed rail, how would you like to live over one of those? no thought is given to the people of this country, esspecially not by the UN who thinks they own the eworld. they are oging ot find out they don’t.
I would also note that we have had zero chemtrails since that first week without spray planes. That is about a month without chemtrails. I have been watching the skies for years and not had more than a few days without the chemtrails and those were rainy/stormy days. What is the status of amount now vs before the heatwave in your areas? Please respond with a state or region as well as “more” or “less” than before the heatwave.
I thought that I read, yesterday, that the uS never signed the Vienna Treaty. Thus we shouldn’t be subject to it’s terms.
The Secretary of State can NOT overturn the Constitution with her signature and neither can the President. Any treaty takes 2/3 majority in the senate and even then, it can NOT override the Constitution (ref- Reid v. Covert).
“…no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution.”
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Reid_v._Covert
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/1/case.html
Now, this doesn’t stop BHO and his crony’s (FBI, ATF, etc) from carrying out unconstitutional executive orders but then again, the 2nd Amendment was put there to STOP a tyrannical government from trampling the rights enumerated in the Constitution.
Tomorrow’s the big day for the Small Arms Treaty! Don’t let your guard down!
If this passes America is screwed!!!!!
We’re screwed!
Hillary has always cared more about the Global community than she does about America, she is a Marxist and every bad bill that has ever been signed has been signed either by her or Bill Clinton. She is the worst secretary of state there ever was, more death and destruction , make sure you vote for her in 20016 so we can continue on down the road to oblivion.I hope she moves to cameroon instead of the lovely american town of westchester. They are a sad bunch.