Wednesday, November 26th, 2014

Feinstein’s Gun Control Bill Will Trigger The Next American Revolution

Brandon Smith
Alt Market
December 28th, 2012
Reader Views: 4,941

All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party – Mao Tse Tung

After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military – William Burroughs

Revolution?  Yes, it all sounds rather “extreme”, but the cold hard reality of our era is not going to comfort us with diplomacies and niceties, so honestly, why should I have to sugar coat anything?  We live in extreme times and there is no longer room for prancing around the ultimate consequences of that which is taking place in America today.  This country is increasingly sliding towards the edge of internal conflict.  The Liberty Movement and true Constitutionalists see it, subsections of Republicans and Democrats see it, and most of all, the federal government sees it.  In fact, they may even be counting on it.

Over the past two years alone, multiple draconian policies have been enacted through executive order by the Obama Administration which build upon the civil liberty crushing actions of George W. Bush and press far beyond.  The Patriot Acts, the FISA domestic spy bill, the bailouts of corrupt international banks, attempts at CISPA and SOPA, actions like the NDAA authorizing the treatment of U.S. citizens as “enemy combatants” without rights to due process; all paint a picture so clear only a one-celled amoeba (or your average suburban yuppie) would not see it.  You and I, and everyone else for that matter, have been designated potential targets of the state.  Our rights have been made forfeit.

There is no ambiguous or muddled separation between the citizenry and the government anymore.  The separation is absolute.  It is undeniable.  It is vast.  It is only a matter of time and momentum, and eventually there will be unbridled oppression, dissent, and conflict.  All that is required is a trigger, and I believe that trigger has arrived…

Though made to appear “complex”, the gun control debate is actually an incredibly simple issue.  It all boils down to a couple of questions which gun grabbers rarely ask:  How does the 2nd Amendment affect the future?  That is to say, what was the original intent, and should we still value that intent as it applies to tomorrow?  And, what will really happen if it is forcibly removed?  Gun opponents act as though they are unaware of these questions, or maybe they don’t care.  However, it is vital to their safety and the safety of our culture in general that they do finally consider the bigger picture.

We’ve all heard the prefabricated gun control talking points before.  Some of them so old they predate us.  They are numerous and most of them incredibly thin.  The gist of the anti-gun position, though, could be boiled down to these three points…

Common Anti-Gun Arguments

1) The 2nd Amendment is “outdated” and no longer relevant in today’s modern society.

2) We do not want to stop you from “defending yourself”, or interfere with the American tradition of hunting, but people do not need “military assault weapons” for either. 

3) Your claimed freedom to own guns should not supersede my freedom to live without fear of guns.  We exist in a society, and our society requires us to give up certain freedoms so that it can function.

Again, in response to these arguments, I have to ask, what does the 2nd Amendment mean for the future?  What was its original intent?  Gun control advocates would like to ignore the fact that the Constitution specifically protects a broad application of gun ownership, but when they cannot deny the legality of it, they instead turn to more abstract and existential methods of attack.  They try to twist the original intent of the 2nd Amendment to further their goals.  To respond briefly to each of the above fallacies:

1) The right to self defense from ANY threat, whether it be an individual, or a criminal government, does not “outdate”.  It is a universal and eternal freedom.  It is a foundational pillar of natural law.  Even if the 2nd Amendment did not exist, I would still have the inborn right to arm and protect myself and those I love, and the best way to do that is to own firearms.  The men who drafted the Constitution were far more intelligent than any pithy gun grabber today, yet, these socialist errand boys seem to believe that they have “surpassed” the wisdom of the Founders.  The amount of ego required to fuel such an attitude boggles the mind…

Gun violence and violence in general will not end simply by banning firearms.  The very idea that any society can remove all weapons from their sight is naïve to begin with.  Criminals always find a way.  Murder, rape, and mayhem will continue until you confront the root problem, which is the human mind, and the human heart.  Only when these two things are balanced in all people will violence end.  Disarming good men and women has never made a society “safer”.  When the power of defense is removed from the people, someone, somewhere, will seek to abuse their weakness.  The most armed entity of the time invariably becomes the subjugator, and usually this is the government.  Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, Mao’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, etc, all contained disarmed populations.  The guns were gone, and still millions upon millions died.  Modern day Mexico is a perfect example of a disarmed population that is now living in terror because of criminal organizations (which, of course, still have guns).  Disarmament does NOT end gun violence, it only changes the dynamic of who uses that violence, and it makes innocent victims easier to attack.

2) Because the legal argument over the “interpretation” of the 2nd Amendment is essentially over, and the Supreme Court has ruled that gun rights do indeed apply to individuals, and not just collective bodies like the National Guard, gun grabbers are now reverting to the argument that we ARE allowed to defend ourselves with firearms, but the kinds of firearms we are able to use can still be limited.  The goal of this argument is to fool gun owners who only possess conventional firearms (hunting rifles) into believing that they will not be personally affected if they support a ban on military style weapons.  These wishy-washy hunting enthusiasts are often referred to as “Elmer Fudds” because of their gullibility.

All gun confiscation programs start by chipping away at the outer barriers of gun ownership.  Like termites slowly chewing away at the wooden skeleton of a home, anti-gun proponents start small and end by destroying the entire edifice.  Anyone who believes Feinstein’s legislation will begin and end with AR-15’s and AK-47’s is living in fantasy land.  That said, the 2nd Amendment was not established for hunting purposes.  Nowhere in the writings of the Founding Fathers do they mention “hunting” as their primary concern.  Instead, gun rights are protected in order to ensure that the citizenry remains dominant over any centralized government that turns to corruption.  We are supposed to police our own political leaders, and without military style arms, this becomes increasingly difficult.

Gun grabbers will argue that our government is not the enemy because it is derived through democratic elections.  They will say that we can change it anytime we like in the voting box.  I would point out that regardless of which party is placed in power through elections, nothing in terms of our direction as a country has been changed, and, that both parties support almost identical policies.  For instance, Obama has come out in favor of nearly identical policy initiatives to Bush, and I can almost guarantee that many Republicans will sign onto the gun control efforts of Democrats despite their supposed pro-gun rhetoric.  When the two party system becomes a one party system, voting becomes irrelevant.

Finally, they will admonish the idea of an armed citizenry keeping the government in check as a “fairy tale”.  They will claim that in the face of modern military might, constitutionalists would be crushed.  For what can an AK-47 do to an F-15?  Apparently, they have never heard of Afghanistan, which has used AK-47’s and 30 year old armaments to repel two technologically advanced armies; the Soviet Union and the U.S.  Of course, the Afghanis did not allow themselves to be disarmed…

3) Here is where we get into the nonsense of intellectual idiocy.  The only real skill which academics seem to have is jumbling piles of logical fallacies together to make a single argument that sounds “rational”, but, in fact, isn’t.  The third debate point is an extremely collectivist one, and collectivist arguments generally exploit the idea that individuals must sacrifice their personal freedoms in order for the group to function.

The truth is, the group does not matter.  The perceived collective concerns and fears of a mass of people are not relevant.  All that matters are the concerns of the singular man or woman, and whether or not those concerns are legitimate.  If a person “fears” guns and gun violence, then that is their private problem, not the problem of our entire society.  We as gun owners should not have to relinquish our rights because others are afraid of what MIGHT happen to them.  We should demand that they control THEIR fear, instead of being allowed to control OUR guns.  Just because a portion of our country shares this individual fear does not make that fear any more credible, or any more our problem.

Do They Know What They Are In For…?

Feinstein’s campaign for gun control is not hers alone; it has been the overall establishment’s work in progress for decades.  I covered the broad based arguments of gun control advocates above because I wanted to illustrate the tangibility of gun ownership.  I want to show you where we stand as constitutionalists, and I can say confidently that our moral and intellectual footing is strong.  To be clear, when defenders of a particular idea are right in their position, they are much more likely to fight and die for that position, and they are much more likely to win.

In the beginning I asked what the 2nd Amendment means for the future of this country.  Not only if it continues, but if it disappears.  If I was a gun control proponent, I would weigh the aftereffects of my actions carefully, because the penalties will likely be dire…

I have heard it argued that Americans are passive.  We didn’t rise up against the last Assault Weapons Ban. We didn’t rise up against the Patriot Act.  We didn’t rise up against TSA molestation.  We didn’t rise up against warrantless wiretapping, the assassination of U.S. citizens, or even the NDAA.  The people who make this point, though, are not looking at the larger issue.  It is one thing for our government to pass legislation; the wider application of that legislation on our streets and at our doorsteps is another matter.

Feinstein’s bill is unprecedented in the history of this country, and requires widespread enforcement in every town and hamlet in order to be effective.  The way in which it is designed makes a violent response from the public inevitable.  It reaches far beyond the Assault Weapons Ban of the 1990’s, calling for the creation of a massive database of almost all gun owners in the United States.  This database will require citizens to submit their EXISTING firearms to cataloging, and the owners to be filed and fingerprinted like criminals.

The bill will ban the outright the sale, manufacture, and transfer of at least 120 models of firearms (which have not yet been named).  It will ban the manufacture and sale of most if not all semi-automatic rifles and the bill specifically targets handguns as well.  Large capacity mags and mag fed weapons will essentially disappear from gun stores.  Though, those guns designated as “hunting rifles” will be exempt (for now).

Feinstein has also openly agreed with NY Governor Andrew Cuomo that government buy back programs (forced selling of firearms at a reduced price) and even physical confiscations are on the table:

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/guns/new-york-governor-andrew-cuomo-says-gun-confiscation-could-be-option

http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-feinstein-suggests-national-buyback-of-guns/article/2516648

To put this bluntly, there are approximately 50 million gun owners (according to official estimates) in the United States.  If only 2% of those gun owners refuse to submit to the Feinstein Database, and the feds attempt confiscation, they will have a massive revolution on their hands.

Many Americans, including myself, will not be strolling into the local Fusion Center to register our weapons.  Why?  Because gun registration reeks of fascism!  Some might call this “cliche”, but let’s just examine the guidelines of the Nazi Gun Registration Program of 1938:

- Classified guns for “sporting purposes”

- All citizens who wished to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and have a background check.

- Presumed German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law (meaning officials could have guns, citizens could not).

- Gave Nazis unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not be owned by private persons.

- The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by bureaucrats.

- Juveniles under 18 years could not buy firearms and ammunition. 

You see, we’ve witnessed the Feinstein gun bill before, many times through history.  We know how it ends, so, there is very little incentive for us to go along quietly.

The database itself is truly the crux of it all.  It basically begs to be defied.  When a government has become openly hostile to common people, destructive of their economy, and oppressive of their individual rights, it only follows that gun registration will lead to outright confiscation later down the road or imprisonment for the owner.  Many Americans are simply not going to fall into the same trap that past societies have fallen into.  The eventual refusal of millions of citizens to voluntarily register will lead to a definite federal response.

The Department Of Homeland Security has obviously taken this into account, at least partly, by stockpiling over 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition in the span of a year, most of which are used in weapons distributed by the government for domestic enforcement.  Their projected scenario, I believe, involves limited resistance from people like myself; “gun nuts” and “liberty freaks” who are on the “fringe” of the populous.  At least, that’s what the headlines will say.  In the end, who will care if a few “conspiracy theorists” take a bullet in the quest to end gun violence, right?  But then again…

What I see in America is a much harder stance against gun confiscation than at any time in recent memory, and far less compromising than in the 1990’s.  Gun grabbers are, in my view, walking into a hornets nest.  Most average firearms enthusiast may be less aware of the deeper problems at hand, but they know when they are about to be raped, and will react in kind.  We in the Liberty Movement are often accused of “radicalizing” people against government authority, but I have to say, if that is the case, then the Feds are doing a much better job than we ever could.

Simultaneously, the UN (which most gun owners despise) is helping matters along by using the recent Sandy Hook shooting as a springboard for a reintroduction of their failed international Small Arms Treaty:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/un-arms-treaty-nra_n_2373417.html

“European and other U.N. delegates who support the arms trade treaty told Reuters on condition of anonymity they hoped Newtown would boost support for the convention in the United States, where gun control is an explosive political issue.”

“Newtown has opened the debate within the United States on weapons controls in ways that it has not been opened in the past,” Abramson said, adding that “the conversation within the U.S. will give the (Obama) administration more leeway.”

The UN has always claimed that their small arms treaty would NOT restrict private gun ownership in the U.S., and that it only deals with the international trade of illicit arms.  Yet, they try to use gun control actions in the face of Sandy Hook as a rationale for reopening negotiations?  They can’t have it both ways.  Either they are trying to tie the treaty to domestic gun ownership in the U.S, or they aren’t.  Will our government sign on to an international agreement to restrict private gun ownership on top of Feinstein’s gun grab bill?

To put this in the most basic terms: registration and restriction equals revolution.  Count on it.  It is not a matter of what we “want”, it is a matter of what is necessary.  Without a citizenry armed with weapons of military application, we lose our last deterrent to tyranny, and thus, we lose everything.  When backed into a corner, a victim has two options: he can lie down and die, or, he can fight regardless of the odds.  Sadly, this is where we are in America; fear, servitude, subservience, or civil war.

Let us hope our weapons are never needed –but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government — and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws – Edward Abbey

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Brandon Smith of Alt Market.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.

To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page.

Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide

Get Regular Updates!     Enter Email Address           privacy information  

Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


  • johnd25

    Reverse physiology doesn’t work DailySheeple. Sometimes I think you’re working on the globalist side. They are not counting on it and when it happens. We will win the Globalist will lose. The globalist are preventing it from happening and use reverse physiology to prevent it. FACT

  • agmand

    I have read the Feinstein proposal some 4 times so far.
    As of right now, I just can’t tell how the legislation would have stopped let’s say the Sandy Hook shooter.
    And, no, “lie down and die” is NOT really an option …

  • White Knuckle Driver

    John25: What do you think they purchased billions of rounds for? They are encouraging the insurrection.

  • Steadysteve

    They have picked their targets, we have picked ours.

  • Patriot2013

    Traitor quote by Marcus Tullius Cicero

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through…all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

    For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

  • Nexus789

    People love distorting history. Gun legislation was introduced in Germany in 1928 (Weimar Republic). It was introduced to curb the threat of the brownshirts and the very real threat of armed insurrection. This worked. However, Hitler was ELECTED by the German people and the Nazis only maintained gun control as they wanted to be seen as a ‘responsible’ government. The Nazis came to power via the ballot box and not via the barrel of a gun. Tyranny is this case was won by wining the hearts and minds.

    It won’t be a revolution it will be a population thinning catastrophe.

    People are smoking too much of the wacky stuff. Who is going to organise the so called revolutionaries? How will they communicate? How will they deal with para militaries and a military armed to the teeth with modern weapons, tanks, armoured fighting vehicles, drones, etc.

    In the first hour the Internet and mobile phone services will go down. How will you communicate? This is not a bunch of backwoodsman taking on the Redcoats with similar technologies.

    As for the Afghans they have a totally different social structure based on tribalism and warlords – they already have the networks in place to take on outsiders. This social structure has been in place for hundreds or years and it will also see off the Americans.

    • Patriot2013

      @nexusTROLL – saw you trolling with all you false “facts” all over the web dirtbag. We are ready; are you?

    • White Knuckle Driver

      Read the Nazi Gun Control Bill of 1938 and compare it to the 90s gun bill authored by Chris Dodd.

    • william simpson

      YOU will see how quickly old time commo kicks in WHEN the shtf!

    • SKIP

      Nexus! you need to learn more of WWII history yourself.

  • Patriot2013

    Best article I have read so far about the nwo delusional gun grab dream.

    My choice? Blow them away through the door. I am ready to die, and I promise, some of the enemy shall die with me. I am DEAD serious, as I am sure over 1,000,000 of us are. Better to die a free man, than allow them to execute my family in a fema execution center the jews have built all over America. Paying attention israeli TRAITOR witch, zionstein?

    Give us liberty, or we give them DEATH when they arrive…Just try it – once…

    • vaportrail

      Plus it will be fun just getting revenge on the bastards.

  • H.Nelson

    Nexus789- Why organize? It’s easy to kill an insurrection if there is command and control and leaders running the show. With decentralization and lone wolf operations, all hits will be random. For every act, you might drag in 1, 2 or 3 4 people, but not a whole company of folks. Stand in formation and you will get mowed down. Stand in smaller groups and it becomes an unwinnable game of “wack the mole”. Have enough moles pop up at any given time targeting random objectives, it’ll exhaust their man power.

  • steve25

    This guy is great and done a lot of videos. “For the Greater Good: Outlaw Guns!?” Pt 1 by Nutnfancy , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2ngnikMT1Y&feature=player_embedded

  • Brian Wakefield

    Wolverines!

  • ncjoe

    And when the revolution is over, the losing side will have no guns. If you idiots win, you will disarm those who opposed you out of a sense of vindictiveness and in the name of security. If the other side wins, they will disarm you. In the mean time, how many will die on both sides because of your stupid addiction to firearms? Yes, I own guns, but you morons make me want to get rid of them. Unfortunately, I beleive I will need them to defend myself against fuckheads like you because you are the true oppressors with your self-centeredness and intolerance.

    • Mark

      #1 can you ever make a statment without F$%…
      I think your a TROLL and no I would not disarm them… dead bodies are no threat to my freedom or rights…

    • vaportrail

      If you really want to get rid of those guns, even though I am a self-centered intolerant fuckhead like you describe I will still give you more than a stupid 100 dollar gift card for them if they are decent guns. I enjoy picking up good deals from idiotic, frightened, pussyfied sheep. Also, the “other side” won’t win.

    • Jean

      Actually, Joe, that’s too merciful.
      The disease must be stamped out. Since they were kind enough to show us the way, I’ll burn them all. Hopefully not to death, I want them to curse me for a LONG time…. And serve for decades as an example of what happens when TSHTF. We can put their charred flesh in museums for the children to see: THIS is what happens when you try to kill human nature.

  • Anonymous

    disarm the other side my ass, after it’s done anyone who supported the commies needs to be cleansed from our society

    • Steadysteve

      That is the kind of tactics the other side would use. That type of thing is unAmerican and unChristian. We don’t want to lower ourselves to our enemies’ level. Any of the libtards that are left will probably see the light and arm themselves. The hardcore socialists will be ignored and marginalized and will find it hard as no one will hire them into the new economy and there will be no welfare. Collaborators and former regime puppets will be tried for their crimes. Remember it took 10 years to break the grip of the British and win our liberty the first time. If you are not in for the long haul, don’t come to the party.

      • Jean

        We cannot lower ourselves to their level: They have no level. They need to crane their necks to see the belly of a snake.

        Steve: They respect NO limits, NO laws of conduct. KILL THEM ALL. It is NOT hypocritical, it is ESSENTIAL given that humans have only ONE natural predator: EACH OTHER.

        As for being Christian? That’s where I HAVE to say, “F*ck it.” They aren’t; why should we extend them ANY courtesies? Geneva Conventions: Saboteurs, spies, traitors. Public execution. Done.

        The nature of the war has changed; the nature of the enemy has NOT. We are not stooping to their level, we are eliminating evil. There is NO rule other than WIN AT ALL COSTS. In this case, YES, the ends MUST justify the means. And Innocents WILL get killed. It’s happening in Iraq and Afghanistan NOW. So save the bullshit, let history sort it out; we’ll be dead and gone by then anyway. And if history remembers us as evil bastards, so be it. Won’t be alive to care anyway. But most “Americans” wouldn’t understand regardless, so… Don’t even bother signing your work, just move on. Pray for the good ones. (They may all BE good ones.) If you’re not willing to get your dainty hands dirty, please go elsewhere. Cambodia or China, say.

        That’s just Life.

    • SKIP

      Along with any and all supporters of islam too

  • Cosmo

    It’s all by design. Foment revolution and then clamp down with martial law. All we have are assault rifles and handguns. They have drones, they have bombs and they have technology we haven’t even seen yet; AND they have millions of zombies who would like nothing more than to kill those of us who believe in the Constitution. Welcome to the new world order! Nikita Khruschev was right; the communists defeated us without firing a shot. We did it to ourselves.

    • Patriot2013

      “All we have are assault rifles and handguns.”

      Really? Did you hear about how rifles can easily blow a drone, chopper, and jet out of the sky?

      Their comm infrastructure – toast within a week. All those enemies do have to get out of their tanks sometime. Checkpoints = sniped X 50,000. Boom Boooom Boooooom!

      Did you hear about how 300 + MILLION guns in the hands of over 120,000,000 Patriots, can kinda vaporize the un scum already here?

      Martial law = martial death for hundreds of thousands of traitors, as you and the world will see.

      Ever heard of the Vietcong v. the us military? Hmmmm who won that war?

      The enemy stands not a prayer of survival….

      Think we are fucking around here – disinfo cia TROLL?

      • SKIP

        TANKS and other armored vehicles are ALL vulnerable to having flammable fuels poured on them and then set alight.

        • Jean

          Tanks are less vulnerable to flammable liquids than they used to be, but can still be turned into ovens, true.
          They are also vulnerable to tread damage. Immobilize it, ignore it. Sticky bombs? Sock + C4 + axle grease. Or use a grenade, should still be enough to take apart a tread.

          Nice if we can roast the tank, take our the BBQ inside, and then use the tank against the enemy… Not sure that’s possible, but… Maybe? What about finding out targeting laser bandwidths and beam frequencies? Maybe we could mimic, mess up missile guidance? Then there are Drones, people can make lego robots (sounds stupid until you put a webcam on it), and you could always put C4 on an RC car…

  • SKIP

    Most WWII history readers will know that Japan did not invade the West coast of America, after Peral harbor, because Yamamoto rightly pointed out that there would be an American with a gun behind every blade of grass.

    • Jean

      Heard also that that’s why there was never a threat of Russian invasion. (IE, the original Red Dawn was sort of spot-on.)

  • David

    Cool!!

  • SKIP

    Has anyone tried to find 7.62X39mm or .223/5.56mm ammo online OR buy an AK or M4 type recently? HELL! even handgun ammo has disappeared from online sellers UNLESS the gubmint has sneakily threatened the online sellers of ammo to stop selling such caliber ammo.

  • michael

    Guerrilla warfare. I encourage everyone to read “the Art of War” by Sun Tzu.

    • Jean

      Read it, has value; still prefer use of heavy weapons, high explosives, and combined arms under air superiority. ;-)

      BTW, fourth-generation warfare? Is first-generation, too. Comanche, for example, or Sioux, or Japanese Shinobi. Basic tactics work well, but anything can happen when TSHTF. Murhpy’s laws of combat: No plan gets past first contact, intact.

      ;-)

      I’d say, find out what are the military installations near you. Which have good munitions? What’s the best way in and out? How can you blend in? What’s the base schedule? How could you steal things, or sneak them out, or bastardize their schedules to string them out? got a rifle with a scope? How good a shot are you? If you take out one sentry a day for a week, at different times, from different angles… How many men will they risk? And of course, after that, disappear, go to another base… Repeat as needed. Include police. They are part of the Executive Branch. Can you use shotgun shells up the tailpipes? Make Pipe bombs? Modify paintball equipment, look up ancient weapons like ballistas, what about high-power crossbows, or old English Longbows? How about using game traps, too? Some are man-killers…

      We don’t need the niceties of combined arms, they just make it easier. We don’t even need rifles, they’re just more efficient. If it’s going to be war, I’m foreseeing brutal, ugly guerilla warfare. I don’t think the entire Armed Forces would go with the regime, but I’d doubt anyone over NCOs will be of the mindset to help… They’re part of the Machine. Won’t join us until the writing’s on the wall.

      All in favor of doing preparatory graffitti?

  • Locus

    This thing should not trigger a grassroots revolution. That is not the way to fight federal tyranny in this case. The 13 colonies did not repel England as a number of isolated individuals hiding in the woods. They fought as a unit.

    It should be done as a series of state secessionist movements, where whole States threaten to secede, and be prepared to carry it out, if the federal government moves to confiscate weapons.

    Whole states have the military power to make a real statement, and (my sincere hope) stand silent and tall and cause the federal government to STAND DOWN on this issue without a single shot fired.

    “The only way to win, is not to play.”

    I believe ALL STATES should hold a public referendum asking, “Would you favor secession if the federal government moves to confiscate personal firearms?” and develop a contingency based on the answer.

    This should have been done already.

    • Levi

      Hell yeah totally agree, it should be fought with the Temporary Secession of States against Federal Tyranny until we can Restore the Republic.

  • Ken

    I say Come on and bring it on NOW. Before they get the 30,000 drones up in the near future. remember anybody can get to anybody. good planning. we will win

  • Ken

    you can do a hellofalot with fertilizer and a few other common things

  • Ken

    glad i stocked up these past 10 years i saw this comming

  • Bimbam

    Why we must fight? (And the simple remedy to cure it.)

    I have a theory and I think it’s true. I have been mulling over what a liberal is and why they do what they do. It may sound sophomoric and trite but I think it has to do with “spoilt-brat” syndrome and I’m not kidding.

    They actually want a revolution, they actually want a beating! You see, if you look at most liberals they had life easy, too easy. Everything was handed to them, most hardly worked hard at all. (Not all who lived privileged lives are like that, of course, because some were never given the opportunity to become spoilt brats by truly caring parents).

    If you examine most, if not all liberals, you will see most had vastly privileged lives. They cannot believe how stupid people are to put them in such undeserved positions in life! Thus, the typical adolescent and seemingly atrocious, ungrateful behavior they display for all to see.

    They cannot believe what is so easily lauded on them while the rest of us trudge through life. Honor, riches, come so easy so they develop a certain guilt. A guilt that makes them wonder why they have not been punished like the rest of us.

    So they do the most outrageous things. Things that people like you and me cannot understand the eventual SELF-DESTRUCTIVE behavior they want to give everyone. They actually want you to give them a beating so much that they impose this behavior on the rest of us. The more the merrier.

    I read somewhere once that teenagers said they actually wanted their parents to discipline them when they went awry. Thus the outrageous behavior. The proof of love was needed in the discipline. Remember the story about the bully kid who dared you to knock the block off his shoulder? Well, these spoilt brats are now all grown up daring you to knock their atrocious political agendas off their shoulders now.

    Look at your typical teenager. Is that not a liberal life? Everything is handed to you? No worry about food or shelter? No need to find work? See the similarities between liberal behavior and a teenager?

    Understanding this, you can see liberals were born to be a thorn on the side of society. Their behavior need not rile you anymore if you look at it as “spoilt brat” syndrome, even though they are adults now.

    NOW YOU KNOW THE REMEDY. Remember, they do the atrocious behavior on purpose to goad you into giving them the beating they want and never got in order to preserve THEIR SANITY and knock them down to reality! Poking them so they see this is not a fairy tale to them at all (the good undeserved life.)

    So by beating, I mean we must fight and confront all their nasty agendas. So be mean, be firm, never give in, but most of all give them the secular whacking they need and want not feel no compunction, guilt, or anger about. It does take getting off that couch, however.

    LET’S DO IT! There is a march taking place on November 5, 2013 to ARREST ALL OF CONGRESS, A CERTAIN MR. BARRY SAETORO, AND THE SUPREME COURT. IT IS NOT A PROTEST BUT A SIMPLE CITIZEN ARREST ACTION FOR THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE USURPED THE CONSTITUTION WHICH THEY TOOK AN OATH TO DEFEND AND PRESERVE AND HAVE NOT FULFILLED THAT OBLIGATION OR DUTY AND HAVE COMMITTED TREASON.

    Do not be afraid. They all are liberals with spoil-brat syndrome and actually want to be arrested, want to be clobbered. We must carry through and do our duty lest we all suffer under this common but easily corrected malady and we must show we will not tolerate such atrocious behavior.

    And by not doing nothing we are being complicit in their outrageous behavior and may even show we approve of it! We must not send such a signal. And besides it is OUR right, and an esteemed obligation to remove a government being run by spoilt-brats and is no longer serving the people and is destructive. Anyone seen my belt?

  • http://www.whatreallyhappened.com Anon

    A MUST READ!

    An Open Letter to Members of Congress…

    IS GUN CONTROL A ‘RIGHT’ OF THE GOVERNMENT?
    http://dailyoddsandends.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/is-gun-control-a-right-of-the-government/

  • extinct species

    Was Hitler a brave man ? NO ! he dared to think he could conquer all ! He died trying ! So will these daring , cowards — and their accomplices!
    SECEDE IS THE END ALL ANSWER-it kills the FED. ! TO THEM AND THEIR ACCOMPLICES ; THINK WHAT THEIR LIVES WILL BE LIKE-UNABLE TO SLEEP AT NIGHT IN AMERICA FULLY WORRIED WHAT CITIZEN IS COMING THRU THEIR DOOR. You can forget your life being anything but hell if you choose to support Federal control. The fullness of reality will appear quite different when their “safe haven” America sees them as the enemy asleep. You want to die as a soldier of the traitor Leadership-it can and will be arranged. you get to be the judge ; it is out of anyones control-once the men and women in military positions stumble over their thoughts and accept their duties as the force behind the overthrow of freedom by the feds-your chance to the life and America you thought you wear swearing in oath to defend will end forever. THINK HARD SOLDIER – YOU ARE THE ONES PROTECTING LIBERTY ! BE TRICKED BY THE GOV INTO KILLING YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS AND WHAT OR WHERE WILL YOU HAVE A FOUNDATION TO STAND UPON-TO BUILD A HOME TO RAISE A FAMILY ! STAND FOR YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS AND YOU WILL HAVE A HOME-A NEIGHBORHOOD A FUTURE TO BE PROUD OF. BE THE ONES WRITING THE HISTORY OF HOW AMERICA OVERTHREW THE CRONY-FATCAT GOVERNMENT-ONE WORLD ORDER. IT WAS AS SIMPLE AS FACING THE REAL ENEMY-THE FEW WHO HAVE ALLREADY SHIPPED OUR LIVELYHOODS, OUR ECONOMY.OUR RESOURCES OVERSEAS. THINK HARD MY FRIEND AND NEIGHBOR-WHILE WE STILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY. IMAGINE HOW HELPLESS THE FED IF ALL ITS FORCE-STOOD TALL AGAINST THE OBVIOUS EVIL, THE FEW WEALTHY WANTING TO DESTROY AMERICA AND THEN HAVE THE WORLD. THEIR WILL BE A MOMENT IN YOUR FUTURE TO DECIDE-YOUR CREATOR HAS GIVEN YOU ALONE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DECIDE “GOOD OR EVIL” “WHAT FOOL WOULD BE TRICKED INTO KILLING THE CHILDREN OF wORLD WAR TWO COMBAT VETERANS WHO RISKED THEIR LIVES TO STOP HITLER. I AM 61 AND THE CHILD OF ONE OF THOSE SOLDIERS. HE SPENT OVER 4 YEARS OF HIS LIFE IN THE EUROPEAN THEATRE IN THE 5TH ARMY PUSHING THE GERMANS BACK TO BERLIN . I AM A SINGLE FATHERLESS MAN ; THE RESULT OF THIS GOVERNMENT THAT AUTHORIZED THE MURDER BY ABORTION OF 50,000,000 CHILDREN. AUTHORIZED THE EMASCULATION OF THE MAN AND THE FAMILY GROUP OF POST WW11 AMERICA-AND THEN AUTHORIZED 50,000,000 PLUS ILLEGAL ALIENS TO FLOOD OUR CULTURE , OUR NEIGHBORHOODS . THE GOVERNMENT IN POWER IS THE DIRECT RESULT OF “DIFFERENT PEOPLE VOTING FOR DIFFERENT GOALS THAN WHAT WAS AMERICA, THE GOVERNMENT IS THE RESULT OF UNEXPLAINED, AFTER UNEXPLAINED ASSASINATIONS OF OUR LEADERS OR FUTURE LEADERS. THEY MURDERED OUR LEADERS AND THEN BECAME OUR LEADERS. THEY THEN CONVINCED OUR SOLDIERS TO GO TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND KILL TO REPLACE THOSE COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES LEADERS. NOW THEY ARE BACK HOME AND WILL BE ASKING YOU TO COMMIT THE FINAL ACT. THE ASSASINATION OF AMERICAN CITIZENS. I HOPE YOUR INSTINCTS AND GOD WILL BE WITH YOU AT THAT VERY IMPORTANT DECISION TO COME! THINK ABOUT THE INTEGRITY AND HEART OF A GOVERNMENT THATS CARES NONE TO PUT YOU AND YOUR FAMILY “ON THE SPOT-IN CARRYING SUCH A WORRYSOME DECISION TO COME’ THINK ABOUT THAT SAME HEARTLESS GOVERNMENT HAVING ALLREADY PUT MOST OF ITS CIVILIAN CITIZENS ON THE SPOT WITH A DECISION ALLREADY MADE –THAT OF BECOMING WHAT WAS KNOW AS THE CITIZEN MILITIA PREPARED TO KILL AND DIE FOR FREEDOMS ONCE ENJOYED THAT A FEW IN POWER SAY IS NO LONGER IMPORTANT ! LIVE OR DIE – LIVE IN LIGHT OR LIVE IN DARKNESS. THE SOLDIER HOLDS THE KEY TO FREEDOM OR DARKNESS !

Get Regular Updates!
Get Sheeple news delivered to your inbox. It's totally free and well worth the price!
email address privacy

Copyright 2009 - 2014 The Daily Sheeple. (v.8)

The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader. The Daily Sheeple is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.