Even Climate Alarmists Reject Planetary Geo-engineering
The Real Agenda
December 5th, 2012
As The Real Agenda reported recently, Geo-engineering is far ahead of being a mere project or vision of the kinds of ways that mad scientists intend to affect global climate. As exposed on our November articleÂ Climate Change spurred by Planetary Geo-engineering, the use of chemicals to change weather patterns, cause floods, droughts and other natural phenomena has been going on since the 1950s. Despite the vast documentation that proves thatÂ Geo-engineering is very real, the main stream media continues to present it as something that may be attempted to save us all from global warming. Heck,Â bets are now being placedÂ on weather events and how disastrous they mayÂ be.
The latest example of media disinformation on Geo-engineering, comes from Alister Doyle, an environmental writer from Reuters, whose article was re-published by Scientific American Magazine. In it, DoyleÂ puts out a list ofÂ examplesÂ ofÂ supposed Geo-engineering techniques which are meant to distract readers about the significance of artificially affecting climate through man-made techniques.Â Doyle presents Geo-engineering as a possible, future tool to stave off the effects of global warming.
SheÂ cites CO2 sequestration, putting gigantic mirrors up on the sky to reflectÂ sunlight and the well-known spraying of chemicals as ways to reduce the effects of anthropogenic warming. But the real news in the article comes from statements from some of the most popular climate alarmists who not only do not support Geo-engineering, but also say its effects on the planet are at the very least questionable.
First in the list is current United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, CristianaÂ Figueres, the sister of former Costa RicanÂ president Jose Maria Figueres Olsen. According to her, âthere are so many proven technologies we know exist that are tried and true that have not been used to their maximumÂ potential.â Figueres is talking about energy efficiency, which has many positive and negative aspects. For example, no one can argue with the benefits of using energy efficiently, but that is far from what the UN and other globalist organizations and NGOs, for example, want to introduce as forms of efficient use of energy. (compact fluorescent ligh bulbs, smart meters, appliances that are remotely controlled by energy companies or government agencies, etc.)
Another climate alarmist who opposes Geo-engineering as a way to âsave usâ from climate doom is RagendraÂ Pachauri, the same guy who is the chairman of the U.N.âs panel of climate scientists. He told Reuters that âgeo-engineering has a lot of unknowns.âÂ He then questioned the science of climate modification: âHow can you go into an area where you donât know anything?â In this case, may be it is PachauriÂ the person who needs to do some reading, because the dire consequences of artificially manipulating the weather have been known for a while now. Pachauri and his team are now looking into Geo-engineering as a tool to carry out weather modification. The group is scheduled to issue a report about Geo-engineering in 2013.
But we need not to wait for their assessment. Uncountable articles and documents have already documented the negative effects that Geo-engineering has on the planet and everything that lives in it. See a short list of articles below:
Climate Change spurred by Planetary Geo-engineering
Government Study: Geo-engineering Too Dangerous
Geo-engineering Could Backfire, Make Climate Change Worse
Why Geo-engineering Doesnât Make Economic Sense
Geo-engineering To Mitigate Global Warming May Cause Other Environmental Harm
The only positive feedback regardingÂ Geo-engineering comes from the mad, power thirsty scientists who seek to advance their careers by imposing a systematic program of global weather modification, even though they claim toÂ ignore the full-scale of the negative consequences that such program will have on all of us. Most pro Geo-engineering articles and alleged studies generally focus on the money aspect of the matter âÂ it is the cheapest way to stave off global warmingÂ â although its effects on the planet, advocates say, are unknown.
Unfortunately, on the main stream cloud of ideas, the other solution to âsave usâ from global warming is reducing emissions, which intrinsically meansÂ taking us all back to the stone age, as United Nations globalists have proposed: To de-industrialize the developed worldÂ while keeping the poor nations poorÂ (@ 7 min 40 sec). In fact, the current emissions reduction scheme is just a way to fund theÂ United Nationsâ global climate executive branchÂ while helping front-men like Al Gore get richer. It is also about allowing big polluter nations such as China, India and large corporationsÂ a license to pollute at willÂ through the payment of carbon offset credits while ignoring what seems to be the real cause of global warming: Geo-engineering itself.
As Joe Romn said, âGeo-engineering isÂ a dangerousÂ course just asÂ chemotherapy and radiation are whenÂ treating a condition curableÂ through diet and exercise.â
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Luis Miranda of The Real Agenda.
Luis R. Miranda is the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda. His 16 years of experience in Journalism include television, radio, print and Internet news. Luis obtained his Journalism degree from Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, where he graduated in Mass Media Communication in 1998. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting from Montclair State University in New Jersey. Among his most distinguished interviews are: Costa Rican President Jose Maria Figueres and James Hansen from NASA Space Goddard Institute.
Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page