|
Thursday, May 23rd, 2013 |
|
Home
RSS Feed
Newsletter
Boomark Us
Facebook
Twitter
|
|
DHS Prepares for Civil Unrest as Obama Poised to Destroy 2nd Amendment
Susanne Posel
Surveillance drones have a new mission. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) they will be used for “public safety”. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the DHS, told a House Committee meeting on Homeland Security that the more than 30,000 drones that will be deployed into American skies are just arbitrarily watching out for US citizens. Napolitano stated : “With respect to Science and Technology, that directorate, we do have a funded project, I think it’s in California, looking at drones that could be utilized to give us situational awareness in a large public safety [matter] or disaster, such as a forest fire, and how they could give us better information.” Secretly, DHS have been taking bid for contractors who can install “aerial remote sensing” which uses light detection and ranging (LIDAR) that would be part of the unmanned drone missions within domestic US territory. “DHS believes these airborne images are essential for homeland defense missions, such as planning for National Special Security Events (Super Bowls or a national political conventions come to mind); enhancing border, port and airport security; as well as performing critical infrastructure inventories and assessments” and has spent over $50 million to employ contractors, as well as processors for images and dissemination throughout the DHS. Coincidentally, the Federal Protective Service (FPS) has been given the responsibility to protecting federally owned property while preparing for civilian led riots expected in the near future. Part of the preparatory measures was an order of 150 sets of riot gear that was requested to be filled exponentially – within 15 days. The items requested were:
The FPS is anticipating that police or military wearing the gear would encounter “blunt force trauma” to the upper torso, as well as potential beatings with “blunt objects”. To compliment these outfits, are required riot helmets with “tactical face shield” equipped with “liquid seals”. In addition, the US military are ready to assist with local law enforcement “if called upon”. Five hundred military police and dogs will be allocated on civilian matters, as reported by mainstream media (MSM) have included the reallocation of hundreds of military police officers being trained to “assist local authorities” in investigation, crime scene and case building. These same soliders were just stationed in combat areas like Afghantistan. Meanwhile, the TSA have been patrolling trains stations and bus terminals in California. According to one whistleblower : “We’re doing patrols in the parking lot with dogs, we’re even going as far out to the train station because the train station is connected to the airport here and we have guys walking around the train station, walking around the rental cars, we’re inspecting cars coming into the parking garage, I mean we’ve fully expanded – we’re no longer just at the gate and just at the security checkpoint.” The preparations that DHS and FPS are making for civil unrest may be tied to Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty(ATT). This part allows foreign troops (preferably NATO forces) to offer assistance in implementing the ATT. As the ATT does not specify an adherence to the 2nd Amendment, but rather make vague definitions of who can own a gun, what type of gun and for what purpose, the Constitutional rights we take for granted now will be stripped from us once the ATT is signed. To downplay the severity of our American right to bear arms against tyrannical dictators foreign and domestic, President Obama stated at a National Urban League meeting that: “We recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passed on from generation to generation, that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage. I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. That they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.” Richard Schrade, attorney and member of the Libertarian National Committee commented on the 2nd Amendment: “The Second Amendment was to protect the ability of the people to violently overthrow the government. Let’s remember that this country was formed in a violent revolution. Let’s remember that at Lexington and Concord citizen fired on and killed government soldiers sent by the central government to confiscate their weapons and arms…. When viewed in this light, it is apparent that a limitation on automatic weapons would be an infringement on the purposes of the Second Amendment.” Wayne LaPierre, vice president of the NRA, has called out Obama as being part of “conspiracy to ensure re-election by lulling gun owners to sleep. All that first term, lip service to gun owners is just part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment during his second term.” LaPierre states that upon re-election, Obama will be “busy dismantling and destroying our firearms freedom, erase the 2nd Amendment from the Bill of Rights and excise it from the US Constitution.” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism. Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page . Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
Leave A Comment... |
Break away from the herd and stay up to date with The Daily Sheeple.
           |
v.8
Propaganda bullshit, DHS doesn’t have that many Drones. Nor do they have the place for them. Millions of people in a America, and how many miles are in America. I just highly doubt it.
it wasnt even an ak47 that was involved in the shooting,dont you people see that its just getting THERE foot in the door,next is gun registry so they know who has them and where they can come and take them.
this isnt something new,LOOK HOW ADOLF HITLER DISARMEN THE PUBLIC,OBAMA IS JUST READING HISTORY BOOKS HOW OTHERS DISARMED THERE PEOPLE AND IS FOLLOWING IT TO A TEE,
They can have my ammo!! They are grossly misreading the military though, the patriot members wont fire on the people or take our guns, and the rest are pimple-faced collage kids who wish they had never signed up for that collage money… Good luck is all I can say, they will get chewed up and spit out if they try to disarm the people.
The patriot members will not be required or ordered to. But you better KNOW that UN troops will not hesitate to fire on you and keep on firing on you when you have no ammo. They have no ties to this country or to the people here and killing americans will be the order of the day.
Many of those “pimple faced college kids” are battle hardened in Iraq or Afghanistan so they will shoot to defend the side they are on. The question is how many will defect. They swore an oath to defend the Constitution but with the current ( and several past) administrations dismantling or changing it which Constitution will they think they should defend: The one we have traditionally held or this “new” imposter one they are creating as we speak?
David: ditto
No treaty has the authority to over-ride the US Constitution. Any treaty or law that purports being able to do so is itself unconstitutional and therefore null and void.
Keep these five words in mind “VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW”
The way one of the UN treaties (that we have already signed) is worded, if ANY official representative of the US signs any comming treaties, we are bound under international law unless the other member countries agree to let us out. That is in contradiction to our US law but in the eyes of the UN/international community we are bound and THEY will send troops to insure that we comply. So if Obama or Clinton signs that treaty we are internationally bound. And lets face it Congress has been useless lately so don’t expect them to do more than yell and complain. When that treaty is signed we each need to decide which side of the line we will stand on: American come what may or UN members.
Those gun owners who vote for Obummer will deserve what they get when they come for their guns. I just hate it that the rest of us will suffer along with them.