CISA Is Now The Law: How Congress Quietly Passed The Second Patriot Act

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

internet surveillance


* * *

Back in 2014, civil liberties and privacy advocates were up in arms when the government tried to quietly push through the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, or CISA, a law which would allow federal agencies – including the NSA – to share cybersecurity, and really any information with private corporations “notwithstanding any other provision of law.” The most vocal complaint involved CISA’s information-sharing channel, which was ostensibly created for responding quickly to hacks and breaches, and which provided a loophole in privacy laws that enabled intelligence and law enforcement surveillance without a warrant.

Ironically, in its earlier version, CISA had drawn the opposition of tech firms including Apple, Twitter, Reddit, as well as the Business Software Alliance, the Computer and Communications Industry Association and many others including countless politicians and, most amusingly, the White House itself.

In April, a coalition of 55 civil liberties groups and security experts signed onto an open letter opposing it. In July, the Department of Homeland Security itself warned that the bill could overwhelm the agency with data of “dubious value” at the same time as it “sweep[s] away privacy protections.” Most notably, the biggest aggregator of online private content, Facebook, vehemently opposed the legislation however a month ago it was “surprisingly” revealed that Zuckerberg had been quietly on the side of the NSA all along as we reported in “Facebook Caught Secretly Lobbying For Privacy-Destroying “Cyber-Security” Bill.” 

Even Snowden chimed in:

Following the blitz response, the push to pass CISA was tabled following a White House threat to veto similar legislation. Then, quietly, CISA reemerged after the same White House mysteriously flip-flopped, expressed its support for precisely the same bill in August.

And then the masks fell off, when it became obvious that not only are corporations eager to pass CISA despite their previous outcry, but that they have both the White House and Congress in their pocket.

As Wired reminds us, when the Senate passed the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act by a vote of 74 to 21 in October, privacy advocates were again “aghast” that the key portions of the law were left intact which they said make it more amenable to surveillance than actual security, claiming that Congress has quietly stripped out “even more of its remaining privacy protections.”

“They took a bad bill, and they made it worse,” says Robyn Greene, policy counsel for the Open Technology Institute.

But while Congress was preparing a second assault on privacy, it needed a Trojan Horse with which to enact the proposed legislation into law without the public having the ability to reject it.

It found just that by attaching it to the Omnibus $1.1 trillion Spending Bill, which passed the House early this morning, passed the Senate moments ago and will be signed into law by the president in the coming hours.

This is how it happened, again courtesy of Wired:

In a late-night session of Congress, House Speaker Paul Ryan announced a new version of the “omnibus” bill, a massive piece of legislation that deals with much of the federal government’s funding. It now includes a version of CISA as well. Lumping CISA in with the omnibus bill further reduces any chance for debate over its surveillance-friendly provisions, or a White House veto. And the latest version actually chips away even further at the remaining personal information protections that privacy advocates had fought for in the version of the bill that passed the Senate.

It gets: it appears that while CISA was on hiatus, US lawmakers – working under the direction of corporations adnt the NSA – were seeking to weaponize the revised legislation, and as Wired says, the latest version of the bill appended to the omnibus legislation seems to exacerbate the problem of personal information protections.

It creates the ability for the president to set up “portals” for agencies like the FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, so that companies hand information directly to law enforcement and intelligence agencies instead of to the Department of Homeland Security. And it also changes when information shared for cybersecurity reasons can be used for law enforcement investigations. The earlier bill had only allowed that backchannel use of the data for law enforcement in cases of “imminent threats,” while the new bill requires just a “specific threat,” potentially allowing the search of the data for any specific terms regardless of timeliness.

Some, like Senator Ron Wyden, spoke out out against the changes to the bill in a press statement, writing they’d worsened a bill he already opposed as a surveillance bill in the guise of cybersecurity protections.

Senator Richard Burr, who had introduced the earlier version of bill, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

“Americans deserve policies that protect both their security and their liberty,” he wrote. “This bill fails on both counts.”

Why was the CISA included in the omnibus package, which just passed both the House and the Senate? Because any “nay” votes  – or an Obama – would also threaten the entire budget of the federal government. In other words, it was a question of either Americans keeping their privacy or halting the funding of the US government, in effect bankrupting the nation.

And best of all, the rushed bill means there will be no debate.

The bottom line as OTI’s Robyn Green said, “They’ve got this bill that’s kicked around for years and had been too controversial to pass, so they’ve seen an opportunity to push it through without debate. And they’re taking that opportunity.

The punchline: “They’re kind of pulling a Patriot Act.”

And when Obama signs the $1.1 trillion Spending Bill in a few hours, as he will, it will be official: the second Patriot Act will be the law, and with it what little online privacy US citizens may enjoy, will be gone.

Contributed by Zero Hedge

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Zero Hedge of

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • jfvw

    In 1787 as Ben Franklin was leaving the Continental Congress he was asked by a woman: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

    “A Republic if you can keep it.” replied Franklin.

    Is there any doubt that 238 years later it is completely lost to big government and big business.

    • SP_88

      Apparently we couldn’t keep it. Although we shouldn’t be surprised. During the 238 years we have had a steady stream of attacks on our liberty, some done in secret, others right out in the open, and for the most part there was not a lot of outcry if any. Even when some of the biggest assaults on liberty in history occurred there was little opposition from we the people. When things like the incorporation of America in 1871 happened, or the creation of the Fed in 1913, there should have been enough public outcry to stop them in their tracks. People should have taken to the streets and protested, even grabbed their torches and pitchforks if necessary. But there was little or no complaint about it. And if people won’t get up to stop those things or the outrageous things being done nowadays, they won’t bother to stop anything. And that’s sad.
      Perhaps they didn’t understand what was happening or what the consequences would be, but people should be more involved and find out what these people are doing. And nothing should be irreversible. If the government does something and we find out that it’s bad, it should be immediately repealed, no matter what.

  • Guillotine_ready

    It never ceases to amaze me that people on the one hand realize they have a gov that is only interested in taking care of itself and those who pay them off, and on the other hand act shocked when they are treated as a commodity to be controlled and manipulated in any way that benefits the psychopaths in their sold out

    People still walk around every day with two thoughts in mind 1. I live in the best country on earth. Total bullshit and 2. My gov is doing everything it can to increase its own power and screw me over. Very true. These two thoughts cannot exist together and this is why there are so many scripts for psychotropic drugs right now. The stress and frustration rampant in this country is unbelievable and people still have no motivation to put these criminals behind bars. I know we cannot trust the cops to do it, but to hell with the plantation police, we can do it and it will not be that hard to do.

  • SP_88

    I’m surprised that they even bothered to pass any legislation to spy on us. Why bother, they have been spying on us since the technology was available to do so. And when new technology is developed to make spying on us easier, they won’t wait for legislation to start using it. And at this rate, they probably won’t have to, it will already exist. Our rights and privacy were sold out long ago.
    I think it’s obvious by now that most people have just given up. Nobody cares what the government does anymore. Most people don’t even think about it, they just go about their lives completely oblivious to what’s going on around them.

    • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

      This bill was passed to throw it in our face. Despite it being “quietly passed”, they knew that the people who would be most bothered by it would find out about it. Ironically, they used the alternative media to inform us.

  • WeeSee
  • Revolution is the only recourse!

  • Tatiana Covington

    Strange… nothing looks different. You do realize that they just made it up out of nothing at all.

  • James Michael

    Treason of their sworn oaths can never be law….