Charges Finally Coming for Hillary? Staffer Who Set up Her Server Just Given Immunity

| |

Screenshot 2016-03-03 at 12.14.34 PM

Every time I leave the house these days, I overhear someone out and about in public discussing how Hillary should be in jail. It’s becoming pretty obvious even to people only mildly paying attention that there’s a criminal “justice” system for most and a separate criminal “just us” system for the elite in this country.

Everyone pretty much everywhere recognizes that Hillary broke the law with her private email server while she was Secretary of State. She mishandled so much classified information there that no one even knows for sure how much, and as a nation, we’ve watched others get punished on a national stage time and again way more for lesser crimes. This hasn’t really been disputed.

The question has always been, will the system somehow find a way to allow Hillary to walk, to get away with it like an elite magical fairy princess, or will she actually have to face charges for her crimes the way the majority of the rest of us would if we had done the same thing (or way, way, way, way less).

Well now the Justice Department has granted immunity to a former State Department staffer named Bryan Pagliano who set up Hillary’s private email server in 2009. After he set it up, Hillary then paid him personally to maintain it for her.

Pagliano had previously invoked his Fifth Amendment rights before a Congressional committee last fall; now he has immunity and will testify.

The Clinton camp released a statement saying Hillary is cooperating and they’re all “pleased” with this new development, again referring to the whole thing as an “inquiry” and not an “investigation”. They’ve also called it a “security review”. Ah, semantics games sure are fun, aren’t they?

A former U.S.  attorney Joseph diGenova said the evidence is so strong that Hillary mishandled classified information in a way that threatened the safety and security of the U.S. that authorities pretty much have no choice but to indict her; however, diGenova says it will be a “Watergate style showdown” if Loretta Lynch overrules the decision to charge Hillary simply because, well, she’s Hillary,  a move which would see a “massive revolt” inside the FBI.

Now every few days a new story comes out claiming official charges are right around the corner for Hillary, but the U.S. attorney has not convened a grand jury and until that happens, no charges. Then again, Hillary is about to clinch the Democratic nomination in one of the fakest election seasons this country has maybe ever had… the system has clearly bent over backwards to ensure she’s the nominee here. Clearly the elite want her or at least have made some kind of special deal with her.

So the question remains.

Do you really think they’re going to charge Hillary for her crimes? And if they don’t, how will the American people react to the fact being blatantly thrown in everyone’s face that there is one set of laws for the American elite and another for everyone else?

Related Reads




Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.

Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa and Aaron also recently launched Revolution of the Method and Informed Dissent. Wake the flock up!

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • I forgot

    It would be silly to think Hilly or Billy should take responsibility.

    • Billy is too busy making beer to care.

    • Mike

      what demonrat has ever taken responsibility for the things they have done?

  • lazWbiPdit

    If the staffer was involved in criminal activities, he would lie again to save face and to protect his bosses if he holds such allegiances.. Swearing to tell the truth on the bible is meaningless if you are a liar. In fact it is a meaningless facade period. You either lie or you don’t.

  • Doc Holliday

    “So the question remains.

    Do you really think they’re going to charge Hillary for her crimes? And if they don’t, how will the American people react to the fact being blatantly thrown in everyone’s face that there is one set of laws for the American elite and another for everyone else?”

    Unfortunately, I think they are going to elect her president. So sad.

  • Smarty

    The American sheepulation will yawn if she’s not indicted, and then go back to TV, Doritos, and beer. They are all mouth breathers at this point. If she is indicted, then you will know they cut a deal with Donald Rump and the torch has been passed to the new team captain…

    • Chef Sp

      Whoa! Did you say Doritos AND beer? Where cun I get me somes?

  • Broos

    The INDYKETMENTS Can’t wait.

  • Dennisito

    My life will not be complete until I learn that cunt is dead.

    • Chef Sp

      Dennisito 2016! Make the comment section great again!

  • seastorm

    Hope he don’t end up with a pillow over his head.

  • ahuxley

    “…how will the American people react to the fact being blatantly thrown in everyone’s face that there is one set of laws for the American elite and another for everyone else?…”

    They will obediently go right back to sleep and accept their subservience to the ruling-class…!


  • archer

    My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news. Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:

    1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

    2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.

    3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.

    4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.

    5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.

    6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.

    7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.

    As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.

    If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.

    If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

    If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government. If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.

    If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.


    Major, US Army (Retired).
    I found this on info wars this morning, if this is true I had no idea how serious this email problem was, also why no in depth investigation by the media, this is being covered up by people in very high places.

    • Infidel51

      Wow. Thanks for the information. Unfortunately she is part of the protected class and our country is being run by people who have no respect for laws unless it serves their purpose. I will be shocked if she is ever prosecuted for anything. Obozo and company don’tcare about anything except advancing the agenda of their owners.

  • mayday911us.

    All you can do is hope but she wiggle her way out of this to.

  • billyjackeng

    Oh please! The “F” in FBI stands for federal. They only investigate crimes committed “against” the federal government not crimes committed “by” the federal government and its cronies. If they functioned otherwise most of DC would already be in prison.