|
Saturday, May 25th, 2013 |
|
Home
RSS Feed
Newsletter
Boomark Us
Facebook
Twitter
|
|
American Judges and State Representatives Delphi the Public into Supporting Gun Bans
Susanne Posel
An interesting fact about the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 (CSA) is that the language seems to have been taken from a proposal made by Russia and China in 2011 to regulate the internet under the guise of fighting cybercrime. At the UN, under direction of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the International Code of Conduct for Information Security states that international cooperation must be created to combat cybercrime and political dissension. In this document, the UN would take a more “important role in formulation of international norms, peaceful settlement of international disputes, and improvement of international cooperation in the field of information security, and enhance coordination among relevant international organizations.” In a statement US lawmakers want complete restriction of “online and mail-order sale of ammunition” while claiming that this new law would make our nation “safer for law-abiding Americans who are sick and tired of the ease with which criminals can now anonymously stockpile for mass murder.” The Batman shooting was cited as inspiration for the bill. Obama will evaluate the CSA, while the White House spokespeople will not confirm whether or not he will “support” it. Pat Quinn, Illinois Governor, is now decrying that his state instill a total ban on assault weapons because of the deaths at the Aurora Theater. While purporting to be a supporter of the 2nd Amendment, Quinn claims: “There is no place in the state of Illinois for weapons designed to rapidly fire at human targets at close range.” Yet, Quinn has no problem with soldiers or local law enforcement having access to those weapons. It seems that only the citizens must not be allowed to procure these firearms for self-defense. The amendatory veto power afforded the Governor will allow him to add language that would halt the sale, manufacture, purchase, and possession of “semi-automatic assault weapons and attachments.” The term assault weapon is a catch-all phrase that really is meant to invoke the ideal of scary weapons in the hands of every day citizens. When the mainstream media refers to them, it is pure psy-op designed to coerce the public into giving up their Constitutional right to self-defense. In Delaware, a federal judge has ruled that the Wilmington Housing Authority can prohibit residents from carrying firearms in “common areas” and that this decision is in line with the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. In an amicus-curie brief, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence stated: “Yet again, a court has affirmed that the Second Amendment does not infringe on gun owners’ rights when it comes to common-sense restrictions on the carrying of guns in public spaces.” The original ruling of the US Supreme Court in 2010 said that “state and local governments couldn’t impose blanket bans on gun ownership.” In response the WHA simply banned guns in common areas, thereby imposing the same restriction by using different language to mask their infringement on the 2nd Amendment. And it worked. This time, their word-play was enough to dupe federal courts. Let’s not forget that Eric Holder, US Attorney General, appearing before a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, back in February, said that the Obama administration is focused on reinstating former President Clinton’s “assault weapons” ban. Holder said : “This administration has consistently favored the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we’ve seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico.” False flag attacks like the Batman shooting and governmental cover-ups like Fast and Furious are manufactured so that the disarmament of the American public is the endgame. Their purpose is to facilitate this coerced national “debate” where we are being Delphied into believing that by relinquishing our ability to defend ourselves, we will be free of violence. Nothing could be further from the truth. Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism. Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page . Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
Leave A Comment... |
Break away from the herd and stay up to date with The Daily Sheeple.
           |
v.8
In many countries the entire population has been fooled by this BS. Here it will never be accepted by the several million patriots who remember history, have ammo and weapons stockpiled, hidden, and the courage to use them when the day arrives. It will be a hell of a mess, but ain’t it better to die a man than a slave anyday? Who knows, we might just win.
There is no doubt to winning. They are grossly outnumbered as only 3% of gun owners outnumber all of the worlds armies COMBINED. Do you honestly think any gun owner will just hand over family heirlooms and firearms worth thousands of dollars just because they say they can’t have them anymore? No they will not. And they will run out of collectors long before America will run out of gun owners. We have seen what happens to disarmed people at the hands of their own governments.
I wish it were only a gunfight we were in for. We’d win no doubt. But at the present, the evil ones have more at their disposal than bullets, so we must be smart and adapt countermeasures to their armor, survellience, and aerial capabilities. Not to mention the germ or chemical warfare that can be quite crippling to a population. It’s not unwinnable for us, I suspect that many of us will die though. My kids are worth my life so I will fight.
They can have mine when they pry it from my cold dead hand! While it’s not his quote, I’m not sure of the original author but, Winston Churchill said it best:
“It’s better to die on your feet then to live on your knees.” I have bad knees so I’ll take the first choice…lol.
People need to start organizing and educating themselves. We run the government, they are supposed to work for us, after all, our tax money pays them. Somewhere along the line, both the American people and the government forgot about that. It’s time to start reminding everyone of where they stand. All the citizens need to do is turn off their TVs and stop buying for a few days. That will send a clear message that we’re not taking this BS anymore. But, I’m afraid that will never happen!
“Give me liberty, or give me death!”
Its not the guns you have to worry about they know this. Its the ammo. What good is a gun without ammo. THEY WILL remove ammo from citizens. Or take your ID and write it down when you buy ammo, that is stamped.They do this because its a fact that ballistics do not work!
How vome they can pass bills that have nothing to do with the original bill. Even in grade school we were taught about subject, category etc.
Its a proven fact that ballistics do not work. The entire point of limiting the freedom to buy bullets online is to write down your ID when you purchase ammo that is going to have stamped numbers on the shells. Traceable ammo. Stock up now. I just bought 6K worth.
Remember this, they won’t take guns, they will limit ammo and deprive it from the people. They use the accuse that ammo has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.
Or they will come for your food. Will you give up you guns to feed your families? Stock up now….