Actor Jean-Claude Van Damme: Rockefeller & Rothschild Families Won’t Let Trump or Cruz Win

| |

Our grid depends on this mineral

jeanclaudevd

While actors are just people, we know many are simple closet socialists and communists. However, we have seen several like Kurt Russell and James Woods who have been very vocal in their opposition to the current administration. Now, actor Jean-Claude Van Damme has voiced his opinion that there is no way that Donald Trump will be allowed to be president by families like the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

The Belgian actor appeared on Le Grand Journal and gave his specific thoughts on the US race for the White House. Specifically he addressed both Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and declared, “Well, they are not going to win.”

The Belgian actor appeared on Le Grand Journal and gave his specific thoughts on the US race for the White House. Specifically he addressed both Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and declared, “Well, they are not going to win.”

“You still have the Rockefeller, people like the Rothschild, those big families that dominate continents….these are families that rise in 1827, a family with five sons that expands, it’s above everything we’re talking (about) tonight,” Van Damme added.

Van Damme spoke about those candidates who are controlled by special interests, which is seen in their multi-million dollar funding for their campaign and someone like Donald Trump, who is basically funding his own campaign.

“If I myself have goods and worked all my life, for my family, my friends, for my country, where I pay my taxes, what he wants first in my opinion is to protect his interests, whereas someone who works for free is someone dangerous,” said Van Damme.

“It’s true we have a problem with globalism because the globalists to get out of globalism is to leave the world alone,” the actor added.

While some of the other participants looked at him like he had a tin foil hat, Van Damme told them that he was asked about politics and the he wanted to make it clear that he understood exactly what was going on.

It seems to me that Van Damme does have a little understanding when it comes to how globalism is part of our problem and how it affects our politics in our countries. I say, good for him for bringing it up!

There is no doubt that he put his finger on the pulse of what is actually taking place behind the scenes.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Freedom Outpost of www.FreedomOutpost.com.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • M_Avalon

    Still not convinced that Ted is not a closet Neocon. Kissing the ring of the Bush family and putting Neil Bush on his campaign finance committee didn’t assuage my concerns.

  • Mike

    killary klinton was elected potus last year by the global elite.

  • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

    Why is the flag on his shoulder backwards?

    • I forgot

      If that was a joke it was funny, otherwise, the canton goes in the upper left hand corner as it faces the crowd.

      • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

        Not if it is on the right side. You apparently have never worn a uniform displaying it on the right shoulder or driven an official vehicle displaying it on the right fender.

        • I forgot

          I was in the Marines and the canton always goes in the upper left hand corner.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            On the left shoulder. You must not have ever deployed under UN command, when their flag goes on the left shoulder, and the American flag goes on the right shoulder, with the the canton to the right. Don’t your local police cars have flags on both sides?

          • I forgot

            I don’t care how the Army or the police wear the flag, back when I was in the Marines, the canton was always in the upper left hand corner. The Marine Corps teaches the same, maybe not anymore, but back then…that was the case.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            Did they ever tell you that the Marines were in existence before the united (sic) States of America had a Constitution? The law is the law when the law is considered, not before it was changed. I see Wyoming National Guardsmen all the time with the American flag on their right shoulder. It always is attached with velcro, and it it is always the right side flag, with the stars in the upper right. The velcro is so they can change the posting with a transfer to national service.

          • I forgot

            November 10, 1775. You are telling me nothing about the Corps. What does the Wyoming National Guard have to do with the Marines? Nothing.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            The National Guard is an federal military service. Last time I checked, so were the Marines. The guard and Marines have fought side by side in every unlawful unconstitutional action since WW2, making all of them ignorant traitors.

          • I forgot

            Like yourself?

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            I’ve never taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution nor been in any military organization than my state’s militia. I’ve certainly never committed treason, ignorant or deliberate.You?

          • I forgot

            You remind me of the people who used to spit on us an call us baby killers. Go away.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            Are you saying that you never, ever killed an innocent non-combatant?

          • g.johnon

            wow, I would be way more concerned with being deployed under u.n. command than I would about which way the flag pointed.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            So was Michael New, getting a dishonorable discharge for refusing to deploy in UN blue.

          • g.johnon

            so true. this is what happens to an honorable man these days. if you refuse to break the oath you were made to swear upon enlistment, you are treated as a traitor. whoever is running the show nowadays is a stone-assed shitpig.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            The traitors have been in the majority since the one in the White House arranged for us to be dragged into WW2 by giving the emperor the choice between watching his people starve or attacking Pearl Harbor. It is part of the secret history that no public fool system teacher dare teach.

          • g.johnon

            it goes back a lot farther disq. at least to 1865. for sure to 1913 and absolutely 1931. thank Woodrow for opening the gates and letting the barbarians in.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            Your timeline allegations are dizzying.

          • g.johnon

            how unfortunate that this timeline did not ring any bells for you. perhaps a clue, then maybe you might want to ponder the name of this site.

            the clue: http://www.thrivemovement.com/banking-history-timeline-follow-money

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            It rang a lot of bells, but they were so discordant and so competitively referred to that they became irrelevant by presentation.

          • g.johnon

            now that’s a well laid out non-sequitur disq. you can sure put a lot of thought into how to say nothing at all.

      • Reverend Draco

        Army Regulation 670-1, “Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia,” updated most recently September 5, 2003, addresses explicitly the proper and lawful placement of the U.S. flag patch on the Army uniform.

        The regulation states that when authorized for application to the proper uniform the American flag patch is to be worn, right or left shoulder, so that “the star field faces forward, or to the flag’s own right. When worn in this manner, the flag is facing to the observer’s right, and gives the effect of the flag flying in the breeze as the wearer moves forward. The appropriate replica for the right shoulder sleeve is identified as the ‘reverse side flag’.”


        How this was handled prior to September 5, 2003, I haven’t yet been able to find.
        Also, unable yet to find how the other branches handle the issue.

        • I forgot

          Well, what can I say, I was in the Marines over 20 years before that!

          • Reverend Draco

            I have found images from D-Day, paratroopers with the patch on right shoulder displayed in the usual manner, canton to the left.
            Unknown if the images themselves are mirrored.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            I would think that everyone on this group has seen a “revers side flag” decal on a vehicle’s passenger side and probably didn’t give it any further thought than they would following the orders of their commander, even if it was in clear disregard of their oath and/or the Constitution.

          • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

            Back when they were riding horses instead of driving jeeps?

        • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

          If there were true, the same person must have misordered the wrong flag decal for every government vehicle in the nation. Reverse side flag sounds like a justifiable name for a flag decal or patch with the stars in the upper right corner.

  • I forgot

    If Van Damm is against the Rothschild family and their Rockefeller cousinns, then he can’t be all that bad!

    • g.johnon

      since when is the bare shoulder of a Belgian subject to united states military regulations?

      • I forgot

        Who said he was?

        • g.johnon

          whoever said his flag was on backwards. how did you get sucked in to arguing over that?

          • I forgot

            I guess that other guy who hates Marines and to the other part of you question, I don’t know!

  • http://drudgereport.com/ Chris Ritchie

    Oh how his words ring true… The real leaders of the world will not let their work be undone by a US POTUS. I still don’t believe Obama won the second election – it was rigged. Freedom is not free, nor is it safe. Those who want power and control can not allow freedom but must create and false image on what freedom is and sell it to the people. This is the illusion we face!

    • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

      But it would be fine with you if the RNC destroys itself while stopping a candidate that they should have never accepted in the first place if they couldn’t accept his winning by a landslide?

      • http://drudgereport.com/ Chris Ritchie

        The RNC will destroy itself and sometimes you have to let something fall apart so you can rebuild it. Nothing is ever fine with me… It just the way it is. The RNC allowed this monster out of the cage by their lack of caring what what the American people want and are saying. They are their own demise.

        • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

          I am hoping that Trump’s entry into the White House will be the first of a double play. If he keeps his promise to prosecute Hitlary, that could dismantle the Democratic Party after destroying the Republican Party. Political parties are unnecessary if the candidates are worth voting for. If you read around a bit, you’ll discover that the founders of this republic were universally opposed to political parties, but they were out-voted by the king’s agents in the convention.

  • g.johnon

    so curenado, you seem to think that because trump is not some things, that makes him good for the u.s.? if he does, somehow, win the potus election, it will not be long before you are cursing that same god for allowing it to happen. mark my words on that one.

  • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

    It is enough for me that he has said that he would prosecute Hitlary.

    • http://www.shitsenders.com Я0llyJ0g3r

      I’ll believe that if and when I see it and I don’t think I ever will. We have an illusion of choice, that is all.

      • http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/political_reading_room/ disqus_3BrONUAJno

        Somebody might beat him to it, the president not being a court officer.

  • Trusty Spartan

    Your second and third paragraphs are identical. :(