A new Figueres Presidency to hand Costa Rica over to the U.N.
The Real Agenda
September 25th, 2012
Reader Views: 846
The first time I heard about sustainable development was during high school and throughout my college years. In 1994, Costa Rica had elected president a member of one of the most influential families in the history of the country. Jose Maria Figueres Olsen, the son of Jose Figueres Ferrer, served himself ‚ÄĒ not the country ‚ÄĒ from 1994 to 1998. During this time I worked as a Journalist for a local television station in the north region of the country, which allowed me to become aware about environmental issues.
Mr. Figueres made it one of his campaign‚Äôs highlights to speak about sustainable development; how Costa Rica was already an example worldwide because of its natural riches, and how it was necessary to implement new and better policies to make sure the country championed environmentally friendly practices which guaranteed conservation.
After planting the seed about sustainable development, Figueres Olsen concluded his tenure while being involved in controversy because of a scandal related to the murder of Jose Joaquin Orozco. The case known as¬†the Chemise Case, had the former Costa Rican president appear as a witness to the case. During four years Figueres managed to obtain international recognition because of his initiative to turn sustainable development into a governing model for Costa Rica. He continued to work on environmental issues in the private sector after disappearing from the Costa Rican political landscape.
Who is this man and what are his ideas?
Mr. Figueres likes to say that his interest about the environment is rooted on his dad‚Äôs teachings about living in harmony with nature. Only he knows whether that is truth or not, but the fact is he has managed to make a career out of his interest for sustainability. After his presidency, Figueres founded the Costa Rican Foundation for Sustainable Development. He then traveled to and lived in Europe, where he got involved in the carbon credit scheme. He met and worked with Nicolas Negroponte and Jeffrey Sachs to found the Digital Nations Consortium, an entity overseen by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Later, he was called by the former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, to head a U.N. group on Information, Communication and Technology, which later landed him the position of Chairman of the¬†United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force (ICT). In 2000, Figueres was appointed Managing Director of the World Economic Forum, the well-known globalist, elitist group where he occupied the position of CEO. After 3 years at the Forum, he resigned due to his involvement in a consultancy scandal with Alcatel.
Immediately after, Figueres got involved with an organization known today as Concordia 21 in Spain. He was also a director of the globalist run World Wild Fund and Chairman of the Carbon War Room, an organization founded by Virgin‚Äôs Richard Branson, a man who promotes the carbon credit hoax, through which individuals like Al Gore sell rights for corporations to pollute the environment as long as they pay royalties to businesses that work in the imaginary carbon emissions market. Companies¬†such as the one headed by Gore¬†emit worthless pieces of paper labeled as licenses that allow large corporate conglomerates to pollute at will.
Jose Maria Figueres departed Costa Rica in 1998, but in a sense he actually never left. Mr. Figueres sat out while the two main political parties voted to amend the Costa Rican Constitution so that former presidents could run for office again. Now, in 2012, and after several rapid visits, he returned a couple of months ago to his native country to present an initiative that he labeled ‚ÄúProyecto Pa√≠s‚ÄĚ where he invited the public to share their ideas about how to transform the country. Figueres‚Äô plan was and still is to make people think he wants everyone involved in the transformation of the country, although the truth is that his plan is already full of preconceived ideas and plans that will be implemented whether Costa Rican people agree or not.
Figueres himself did not present any concrete plans in public, he simply seemed to be serving as a forum creator. When asked about the lack of concrete ideas, Figueres said that his ‚ÄúProyecto Pa√≠s‚ÄĚ was just the beginning of a long process that sought to involve the whole society. This is a very important detail which I will complement later when I explain how Mr. Figueres intends to use his international experience and name to once again run for the presidency in Costa Rica, a decision he has already made public through spokespeople.
After using the presidency as a platform to make a name abroad, Figueres spent the best part of the last decade in Geneva and Zurich, rubbing shoulders with the elite in Europe and also in the United States, learning how to implement United Nations environmental policy so that he could later implant it in Costa Rica.
While Jose Maria Figueres gained experience on the private sector abroad, his sister Christiana Figueres became the head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This organization is the strongest pusher of United Nations initiatives to curb carbon emissions, impose the Kyoto Protocol on nations, reduce or prevent development in the third world and de-industrialize developed nations; all in the name of saving the Earth from a catastrophe that the organization blames on all humans.
Both Jose Maria Figueres and Christiana Figueres¬†are involved in private ventures¬†that profit from the United Nations led environmental alarmism, that is supported by people like Richard Branson, Al Gore, Ted Turner and organizations such as the World Wild Fund, and philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. All of these people and organizations called for the implementation of policies to drastically reduce the world‚Äôs population. The Figueres siblings have also contributed to the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the¬†Climate Neutral Network,¬†¬†an international initiative of which Costa Rica is a member nation.
Costa Rica already favors U.N. globalist environmental policies, such as the¬†Carbon Neutrality Strategy, which seeks to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2021. UNEP praised Costa Rica‚Äôs carbon cutting scheme as one of the most innovative the organization has seen:
‚Äú[‚Ä¶] a balanced zero or negative national inventory of emissions by sources and absorption by sinks of all anthropogenic activities of the different sectors considered by the IPCC Guidelines on Inventories of Greenhouse Gases. This strategy seeks to have zero impact on the climate.‚ÄĚ
A second Figueres presidency will simply mean an acceleration in the hand over of the Costa Rican territory to the United Nations.
But how will this be accomplished? The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the U.N. organization headed by Christiana Figueres, created a model to tie up all nations and to absorb them as ‚Äúchampions‚ÄĚ of the environment. In a document calledEstablishing National Authorities for the CDM,¬†which was edited by Christiana herself, the organization explains how to infiltrate and conquer nation-states from the inside, while establishing a UN led National Environmental Authority (NA) governed by rules and regulations created by the United Nations.
How will Figueres hand over Costa Rica to the U.N.?
CDM stands for Clean Development Model and the idea is to challenge national organizations; both governmental and NGOs to press societies to create a sort of environmental National Authority (NA) which eventually becomes the manager of everything related to the handling of resources, urban and rural development, population control, national protected territories and so on.
The idea, as the U.N. proposes on its Agenda 21 document, is to keep human populations limited to narrow pieces of land, where they live in tight, compact housing units, while most of the territories remain untouched. See below the future map of the United States as the United Nations intends to turn the country into an off-limits area should Agenda 21 be fully implemented.
As you can see, only a small fraction of the American territory ‚ÄĒ shown in light green ‚ÄĒ is left for humans to live, while most of the continental U.S. is ‚Äúsaved‚ÄĚ for the purposes of ‚Äúsustainable development‚ÄĚ. The same model being applied today in the United States will be enacted everywhere else in the world where governments signed in favor of the Kyoto Protocol, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, the World Heritage Program and where society permits the creation and legitimation of National Authorities such as the one described on the¬†CDM document. It is necessary to emphasize that given the drastic reduction of land where people will be allowed to live, the UN expects two things to happen. One, concentrate populations in highly compact urban centers, where everything is controlled by the government. Two, a significant decrease in the number of people who live on this planet.
Although the complete PDF is filled with revelations as to how the globalists intend to grab national territories from the hands of their rightful owners, most of the juicy details regarding the ways a National Authority works is explained beginning on page 53 and up until page 64 of the guide created specifically for developing countries. Page 53 begins with an explanation about how National Authorities have evolved throughout the years.
Before implanting the NA, the document advises interested parties to conduct an assessment on the conditions available in each country. That assessment, it says, must include the political environment, political stability, ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, institutional rivalries, intersectoral communication, technical knowledge and so on. The U.N. basically requires the interested parties to complete the field work to gauge the level of acceptance or rejection that a NA would have, before implanting its policy framework.
The PDF warns about resistance from ‚Äúclimate skeptics, environmentalists who oppose certain side effects of projects and activists that may feel that there are more urgent social or economic issues to be supported. If these groups can have a negative impact on the NA‚Äôs implementation, the strategy must consider working with them in identifying how national needs can be met through the CDM.‚ÄĚ
This is a typical approach from globalist organizations which intends to make people feel involved in the decision-making process, even though all the relevant decisions have already been made. What Agenda 21 is trying to implement are a series of policies created at global conflagrations to be implemented at the local level. The same model used with the NA‚Äôs is implemented during U.N. environmental gatherings such as the Rio+20 in 2012.
According to the CDM document, the steps to create an NA are as follows:
* Define the NA‚Äôs mission and objectives¬†(a process that has been already completed by the U.N. but that is left open-ended so that globalist minions in each country convince their people to accept the idea that country‚Äôs objectives are the same ones sought by the U.N.).
* Obtain official status¬†(this steps seeks to legitimize the NA‚Äôs work at the national level as well as to look for government exceptions, funding from the taxpayers, force nations to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and so on).
* Review and establish national legal framework¬†(as explained in the CDM document, this step intends to make any and all decisions made by the NA binding for the government and all organizations associated with it. In a sense, it is the legal takeover of the country).
*Align program strategies with national sustainable development priorities¬†(during this process, the NA acts as if it is trying to involve the community, but in reality, what it does is present already prepared policies which people then vote on, as supposed to creating their own initiatives).
* Attain broad stakeholder participation¬†(through this step, the NA seeks to get important social and corporate groups involved. The broad stakeholders will be the founders of the NA until it manages to obtain government and international donations from foundations, philanthropic groups and the U.N. itself).
* Obtain financial and non-financial resources¬†(at this point the NA has earned the respect and visibility of the society,¬†as a tool to execute projects that intend to ‚Äúconserve and protect‚ÄĚ natural resources, but that in reality seek to limit the access of the population to those areas, which are later developed for elite members).
* Staff the NA¬†(the organization opens its doors to local shakers and movers, but the management is done from outside the country either by having a UN minion come into the country, or by training local uninformed people who are compartmentalized).
* Establish relationships with the national focal point for climate change and other ministries(the NA takes over the policies of local ministries and their work in construction, development, housing, conservation, and creates rules for the administration of existing national parks and conservation areas already in the hands of the United Nations).
That is, in a nutshell, how the take over happens. If you would like to learn more details, pleaseread the complete document.
The Implementation Process
While reading the CDM document, it is clear that right off the bat, the U.N. and its organizations intend to make countries abide by its own rules. The U.N. provides no chance for locals to bring their own ideas. The process of creating a National Authority limits participant organizations and nations to simply vote on the already existing rules and regulations. On page 75 of the CDM, the guide is very clear about how the evaluation and approval process of projects will be conducted.
‚ÄúThe evaluation and approval process can be designed in four steps: 1) adopt international criteria 2) develop national criteria 3) establish national procedures for the evaluation and approval of projects and 4) establish guidelines for the presentation of projects.‚ÄĚ
Noticeably, everything begins with the adoption of international criteria, from everything else is created.
Those criteria stem from the Kyoto Protocol, which many nation-states signed onto since its inception in 1992. The CDM guide provides three criteria for evaluating and approving projects:
1. Projects must assist Non-Annex I Parties ‚Äúin achieving sustainable development and contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention.‚ÄĚ
2. Projects must result in ‚Äúreal, measurable and long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change.‚ÄĚ
3. Projects must result in ‚Äúreductions in emissions that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the certified project activity.‚ÄĚ
The job of the National Authorities is to capture countries from the inside, given the failure of the United Nations attempts to do it from the outside through their failed international meetings. As explained of pages 75 and 76 of the CDM guide, the projects created through the NA must have ‚ÄúConsistency with UNFCCC decisions‚ÄĚ. For a project to be deemed as compliant, it must provide solutions to the widely debunked global warming and climate change hoaxes that the U.N. have been running since the early 1980s. That is right, the globalists¬† who know warn us about global warming, are the same people who in the 70s and 80s tried to scare the world about ‚Äúglobal cooling‚ÄĚ.
Everything surrounding the National Authority‚Äôs operation deals with initiatives to curb carbon emissions, global warming and development. All projects must comply with so-called national sustainable development objectives, be congruent with national climate policy and/or carbon offset strategies and whether such projects meet eligibility criteria originated from CDM-established activities, technologies, and so on.
As seen on the diagram above, the National Authority provides a prepared evaluation procedure under which the NA itself decides in every step of the way whether a project is approved or not, based on its own conditions. Through its screening process, the NA can mandate the reformulation of the projects or simply discard them if they do not comply with its rules. This process is completely opposite to what a real grassroots environmental organization ‚ÄĒ which is what the NA intends to be ‚ÄĒ would use to approach environmental challenges. In that situation, the communities and their organizations would ultimately decide what projects should be implemented.
Marketing and Propaganda
The work of a National Authority goes beyond being the decider on environmental policy. It is also the marketer of projects which are carefully filtered so that they adhere to U.N.‚Äôs policies. Just as it happens in the decision-making process, the marketing of projects works based on the deeply flawed belief ‚ÄĒ not scientifically proven ‚ÄĒ that human activity is the generator of the largest amounts of greenhouse gases, and that these gases are the cause of climate change and global warming. So according to the CDM guide, for a project to be considered as a valid initiative, it must have it at its core to reduce greenhouse gases.
‚ÄúAt the basic level it is important to understand what all CDM projects have in common: the environmental objective of lowering the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,‚ÄĚ says the document. It goes on to refer people to another flawed instrument to measure a project‚Äôs eligibility. ‚ÄúThe details of any of these methodologies can be found in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) Reference Manual.‚ÄĚ
The success of the propaganda campaign is based on diverting people‚Äôs attention from real environmental problems such as¬†Genetically Modified Organisms,¬†and to concentrate efforts on proven lies. That is why the NA will always refer people to failed policies regarding¬†renewable energy,¬†energy efficiency,¬†emission reductions,¬†transportation, waste management and the most important of all,¬†land use change.¬†On ways to use lands, especially publicly owned lands (government-owned lands) the document suggests the use of pep-talk on hoaxes such as biodiversity protection, soil conservation, watershed maintenance and sustainable forest management.
The Figueres Connection
The Figueres connection between globalist policies and the management of Costa Rica as a nation is very well established. Not only have the Figueres siblings gained experience in the private sector regarding so-called sustainable development, but they have also been trained to bring U.N. propaganda and policies to Costa Rica. The Proyecto Pa√≠s that Jose Mar√≠a Figueres presented a couple of months ago in San Jos√© has at its core the same goals that the United Nations has: to avoid the development of third world countries.
According to Alvaro Ram√≠rez, the Executive Coordinator of the project said it very clearly. The Proyecto Pa√≠s seeks to change the direction of the country from the traditional development-centered process to a ‚Äėsoul-seeking‚Äô adventure. Ram√≠rez regurgitated United Nations talking points about how development and the enjoyment of benefits that wealth have usually provided are bad, and that people need to start thinking about ways to live in harmony with themselves and the environment. He added that Costa Rica is today a nation without goals or purposes and that this is where the plan presented by Figueres intends to help.
Jorge Oller, another Figueres assistant in the Proyecto Pa√≠s initiative, explained that he is in it because as a Costa Rican person, he wants to contribute with the former president‚Äôs idea to ‚Äúturn all this process into a collective dream.‚ÄĚ Not only there is a political and private sector connection between the Figueres family and the U.N., but also an ideological one. ‚ÄúThis new star we are proposing to be the guide for the country is based on four pillars that are included in our document presented yesterday.‚ÄĚ Those pillars: identity and values of the Costa Rican society, inclusion of segregated sectors of the Costa Rican society, innovation, and the fourth pillar is, as you might have guessed already, sustainability.
In case you only know sustainability as a tool to help conserve the environment, which is the hoax the United Nations uses to swindle people into supporting its rules and regulations, please let me explain the part that the U.N. does not want you to know.
The United Nations works through various organizations that fancy themselves as pro environment, pro conservation, pro humanity and pro life. However, the core of these organizations revolve around exactly the opposite. Take for example the UN Population Fund (UNPF), which in numerous occasions¬†called¬†for a global population reduction by use of family planning which is code for depopulation by decreasing fertility among humans. A recent¬†study¬†by this organization claims that as urbanization extends further outside large population centers, the planet‚Äôs biodiversity will suffer dearly due to human activity which will increase the impact of global warming.
Scientists working for UNPF¬†suggest¬†that humans would be served better if they lived in largedense and highly controlled and monitored¬†cities. ‚ÄúWe certainly don‚Äôt want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together],‚ÄĚ said their study. Studies conducted by universities state that urbanization¬†will expand out of controland that such expansion must be curbed in order to protect the planet‚Äôs resources from being used by humans. But this calculation and the impact the alleged expansion will have is measured according to the already debunked global warming and climate change alarmism.
Environmental organizations, philanthropic foundations, universities and of course the United Nations, all of which favor Agenda 21 policies as the base for social control, seek to transform current living standards around the planet but not so that everyone lives equally well. In fact, those policies intend to make people equally poor ‚ÄĒ with the exception of the global elite. The globalists themselves call the new¬†transformed cities¬†eco-communities and they will be placed that respect United Nations regulations regarding production of CO2 to the and development.
One of the most noticeable successes of the U.N. has been the way it has infiltrated countries through fake grassroots entities that seem to organically push for conservation. These entities are funded by programs promoted by the hijacked governments or by international environmental organization who receive large donations from globalists. Just last week, Costa Rica announced the funding 11 new conservation projects at a cost of 208 million colones, just over $400,000. The monies taken from taxpayers pockets will work on projects related to biodiversity and climate change. The local mainstream press announced the projects financing as an exchange between the governments of Costa Rica and the United States. According to the reports, the U.S. forgives Costa Rican debt in exchange for investment in environmental projects.
The monies given to these projects are managed by the Costa Rica Por Siempre Association, a supposed non-profit organization that manages public-private initiatives developed by the Costa Rican government.¬†According to its web page, the association works with known globalist organizations such as the Nature Conservancy. In fact let‚Äôs take a look at the goals established by the Costa Rica por Siempre Association as the organization displays them on its website:
1. Costa Rica will at least duplicate the extension of its marine protected areas.
2. The government of Costa Rica will improve the management of protected areas through specifically developed administrative tools, by updating the management plans and also by improving its tax collection system.
3. Costa Rica will identify and label the threats, potential impacts and adapting capacity of ecosystems that are more vulnerable to climate change.
4. External members of the initiative (The Nature Conservancy, Linden Trust for Conservation, Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation, Walton Family Foundation), will create a source ofcontinuous funding¬†to be utilized for the protection of protected areas through a privately managed trust fund. Such trust fund will be used as the government deems it appropriate in a plan that seeks to achieve the goals established by the¬†United Nations Convention of Biological Diversity.
As seen in this example, the ultimate goal this and other environmental associations and organizations have is to help¬†enable a system of globalist domination at the local level.¬†In doing so, the globalist-controlled organizations will seek to use taxpayer funds to rob Costa Rican people of their natural resources which will fall in the hands of the United Nations.
But there is more. The creators of the Clean Development Mechanism actually say the CDM and the National Authorities it promotes are the only way forward. ‚ÄúCOP-7 marked a milestone in the climate change negotiations as Parties to the Protocol sat down to decide on the rules and modalities for the CDM as a global mechanism, and the procedures for individual CDM projects. The CDM executive board continues to move this agenda forward.‚ÄĚ
As in most cases it is in the hands of the Costa Rican people to prevent the handover of their country to the United Nations. Costa Rica must avoid the election of Jose Maria Figueres or anyone else, from any political party, who seeks to steal Costa Rican from the Costa Rican people. They must also reject through voting and effective forms of social opposition the adoption of policies originated in international globalist organizations that intend to control the land and the people of Costa Rica. One good first step would be to abandon the United Nations, which would liberate Costa Rica of the tyrannical compromises that were signed by previous governments including that of Figueres himself.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Luis Miranda of The Real Agenda.
Luis R. Miranda is the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda. His 16 years of experience in Journalism include television, radio, print and Internet news. Luis obtained his Journalism degree from Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, where he graduated in Mass Media Communication in 1998. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting from Montclair State University in New Jersey. Among his most distinguished interviews are: Costa Rican President Jose Maria Figueres and James Hansen from NASA Space Goddard Institute.
Leave A Comment...
The Daily Sheeple Home Page